AbstractCorrosion behaviour of four coating systems, which are commonly used in aircraft components; namely cadmium‐coated and subsequently chromate‐treated steel AISI 4340, aluminium‐coated steel AISI 4340, anodised aluminium alloy 7075‐T6 and chromate‐treated aluminium alloy 7075‐T6, were investigated in six commercial acetate‐ and formate‐based de‐icing chemicals. The results show that the aluminium‐coated steel specimens experience least corrosion among the four coating systems; no corrosion is detected in potassium acetate‐based de‐icing chemicals (Safeway KA HOT, Safegrip and Safegrip+), although some corrosion is observed in the other three chemicals (Safeway SD, Safeway SF and Meltium). In contrast, the coatings in the other three coating systems are damaged in all six de‐icing chemicals. The thickness of the coating does not necessarily predict how well the coating will protect the substrate; the thickest coating, several tens of micrometres, is apparent on the cadmium‐ and chromate‐coated steel specimens, while only a few micrometres thin aluminium coating on the steel substrate is the only coating system that can survive the corrosion tests in some of the de‐icing chemicals. Comparison of the results from the two test methods used in this research, polarisation measurements and chemical exposure tests, shows that, for each coating system, the extent of corrosion, as evaluated on the basis of weight changes calculated from corrosion current density values and those experienced during chemical exposure tests, is different: the weight changes that materialise during exposure tests are, at least, from one to two orders of magnitude higher than those predicted by calculations. In this paper, these observations are discussed and explanations for them are presented.
Read full abstract