Abstract Introduction Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCMP) is a condition characterized by hypertrophy of the myocardium, which can be classified into types based on the location of the hypertrophy. Among these, the most common type is the group with septal hypertrophy. However, prognosis and clinical features according to the type are not well known. Method This study was conducted on 137 patients with HCMP from March 2016 to August 2023. Their echocardiographic findings and demographic features were retrospectively collected, and Single photon emission computed tomography(SPECT) and clinical outcomes were also analyzed. The types of HCMP were classified based on Helmy's classification: basal septal hypertrophy alone (Type I), hypertrophy of the septum and adjacent segments sparing the apex (Type II), apical hypertrophy with hypertrophy of other segments (Type III), and apical hypertrophy alone (Type IV). Additionally, the clinical outcomes, including mortality and cardiovascular hospitalization rates, were analyzed by dividing them into Type I and other types (II~IV). Results The prevalence of type I, II, III, and IV was 23.3% (n = 32), 0% (n = 0), 30.6% (n = 42) and 46% (n = 63). The patients were divided into two groups as septal HCMP (Group I) and non septal HCMP (Group II), with more patients in Group II (n=105, 76.6%) than in Group I (n=35, 23.3%). Mean age, systolic blood pressure, heart rate and body mass index were similar between two groups. In the subgroup analysis of echocardiographic parameter, left ventricular mass (LVM) and relative wall thickness (RWT) were significantly lower in Type IV compared to the other types. In contrast, there was no significant difference between Type I and Type III. In the strain analysis, the global strain values of Type III were significantly lower. (Type I vs. Type III vs. Type IV; -14.7 ± 3.7 vs. -11.1 ± 3.0 vs. -14.2 ± 4.0; p<0.01). Analysis of LV perfusion scores using SPECT showed that cardiac perfusion during stress compared to rest was significantly more impaired in Type III than Type I (p=0.03). In terms of clinical outcomes, mortality was higher in the order of Type I, III, and IV. However, there was no significant difference between Type I and Type III compared to Type IV. Regarding hospitalization, there were no significant differences between the types. Conclusion Patients with non-septal type HCMP accounted for a significant proportion of all HCMP cases. Non-septal types showed differences in echocardiographic parameters and perfusion compared to the septal type. Although the septal type is known to have a worse prognosis, this study did not find a significant difference in hospitalization rates. Further research is warranted.
Read full abstract