Epstein-Barr Virus in Myasthenia Gravis Thymus: A Matter of Debate Barbara Serafini, PhD, Paola Cavalcante, PhD, Pia Bernasconi, PhD, Francesca Aloisi, PhD, and Renato Mantegazza, MD In this issue, 2 papers report absence/very low levels of EpsteinBarr virus (EBV) in early-onset myasthenia gravis (EOMG) thymuses. In contrast, we recently showed active EBV infection in all myasthenic thymuses analyzed. These discrepancies are unlikely due to sampling from patients with different clinical features as all or most patients tested had EOMG. The possible effect of treatment is difficult to discuss as the patients analyzed by Kakalacheva and colleagues apparently did not require immunosuppression (or any other treatment) before thymectomy, even if performed up to 3 years after onset; they therefore probably represent selected patients characterized by a mild phenotype. As neither description of treatment, nor clear indication of the patients’ status is given in the report by Meyer and colleagues, where the cohort is apparently quite inhomogeneous, we cannot comment adequately on this study. Rather, the discrepancies could be explained by differences in tissue processing (we analyzed not only paraffin samples as did the 2 other groups, but also fixed frozen and snap frozen samples) and use of different procedures and tools. Both studies have used in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry as well as automated immunostaining systems optimized for viral detection in EBV-associated tumors, but which may not be sensitive enough to detect EBV in nonmalignant pathological conditions. Thus, Meyer and colleagues report that only rare cells expressing BZLF1 are generally present in tonsil from infectious mononucleosis patients. In contrast, using a similarly processed tissue (kindly provided by Prof. G. Niedobitek) and the same monoclonal antibody (BZ-1, kind gift of Prof. J. Middeldorp) but different antigen-unmasking and detection procedures, we found numerous BZLF1þ cells outside tonsillar B-cell follicles (Fig), suggesting that our immunohistochemical protocol has greater sensitivity, allowing detection of BZLF1þ cells in myasthenic thymus (Fig). In accordance with our findings, Kakalacheva and colleagues see rare cells expressing EBV nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2), which indicates highly dysregulated EBV infection. The finding of very low to undetectable levels of EBV DNA in MG thymuses analyzed by Kakalacheva and colleagues suggests that their real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may be less sensitive than the PCR method we used. To solve these issues, a correct approach would be exchanging optimally processed thymic samples and finding an agreement on the best procedures to analyze EBV infection in thymus. Finally, the finding by Kakalacheva and colleagues that EBV-specific T-cell and B-cell responses are unchanged in patients with MG compared to controls should be interpreted with caution given the small number of samples analyzed. To clarify this issue, larger, longitudinal serological studies and analyses of CD8 T-cell responses to specific EBV lytic antigens using pentamer technology should be performed.
Read full abstract