To determine if manually measured global longitudinal strain (MM-GLS) can be a reliable alternative to speckle tracking global longitudinal strain (ST-GLS). We undertook an analysis of Princess Alexandra Hospital’s echocardiography database and looked at all patients who underwent a transthoracic echocardiogram, both inpatient and outpatient, in the monthly of June 2020. Both ST-GLS and MM-GLS were calculated and compared using Pearson’s correlation coefficient. Descriptive statistics were analysed using Student’s T test. In the month of June 2020, there were 154 patients who underwent an echocardiogram at Princess Alexandra Hospital. 64% of them were males and the mean age was 61.7+/-14.75 years. The average LVEF was 51.32+/-11.3% and the average ST-GLS calculated was 16.72+/-3.75. Pearson’s coefficient between MM-GLS and ST-GLS was 0.982 (p<0.001). In the event that ST-GLS is unavailable or cannot be accurately assessed, MM-GLS can be a reliable alternative.
Read full abstract