Dear Editor, It is increasingly important for cataract and refractive surgery to achieve an emmetropic, astigmatic result. The efficacy of the many techniques that are available to achieve this is dependent upon the accurate identification of corneal meridia, to ensure the correct placement of corneal incisions or toric intraocular lenses. In cataract surgery, the incision can be astigmatically active, with a recent paper demonstrating a mean surgically induced astigmatism (SIA) of 0.66 dioptres in patients undergoing biaxial microincisional cataract surgery with enlargement of one wound to 2.8 mm [1]. Surgically induced astigmatism can be used to the surgeon’s advantage to reduce small cylinder errors with on-axis incisions [2]. This is facilitated by the pre-operative marking of a known meridian on the cornea. For our technique, we placed one drop of 1 % tetracaine hydrochloride (Minims, Bausch & Lomb, France) into the inferior fornix of the operative eye. The patient was then seated upright and instructed to look straight ahead (primary position) to avoid torsion brought on by postural change [3, 4]. The ophthalmic surgeon (MG), standing in front of the patient, then used the tip of a bevelled 25-gauge needle to mark the limbal epithelium with a radial vertical line at the most inferior point of the limbus. This line coincides with the 90° corneal meridian (Fig. 1a). Following routine peribulbar anaesthesia and sterile preparation of the eye, the 90° mark on a Mendez ring (Geuder, Germany) was aligned with the epithelial mark on the limbus whilst viewing through the operating microscope (Fig. 1b/c). The ring was then centred on the cornea. To ensure centration, the ring was placed to expose equal strips of conjunctiva on the vertical meridian above and below the limbus and similarly on the horizontal meridian, nasal and temporal to the limbus (Fig. 1d). The appropriate corneal meridian could then be chosen. The location of the main incision and paracentesis were measured at day 1 review using a slit lamp (Haag–Streit, Germany), with 10° graticules marked on the platform indicating the rotation of the slit beam about the z-axis. The positions of the main wound and paracentesis were recorded in the case notes, and compared with the targeted axes noted in the operation record. The technique was analysed for 41 patients who underwent phacoemulsification surgery by a single surgeon (MG) in the one centre. There were 24 right eyes (58.5 %) and 17 left eyes (41.5 %) operated upon. The majority (33, 80.5 %) of the main incisions were created at either 0 or 180°, and more than 78 % (32/41) of the paracenteses fell between 115 and 125°. Eighty-five percent (35/41) of the main wound incision sites were exactly aligned with their target site. Six main wounds (15 %) were misaligned by between 5° and 10°. No main wound incisions were misaligned by more than 10°. Misalignment was anti-clockwise from the intended site in all misaligned cases. Only four paracenteses (9.8 %) were 5 or more degrees away from the per-operatively recorded site. Each of these errors was made in favour of a more counter-clockwise position. There were two paracenteses that were on their per-operatively recorded merdia despite their associated main wounds being distant from their intended meridia. The authors have full control of all primary data, and agree to allow Graefe’s Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology to review the data upon request. S. R. Durkin (*) :M. Goggin Department of Ophthalmology, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville Rd, Woodville South, South Australia, Australia e-mail: shane.durkin@adelaide.edu.au
Read full abstract