Despite advances in treatment during the past two decades, long-term prognosis of heart failure (HF) still is poor in patients at advanced stages. Antiadrenergic therapy has demonstrated consistent morbidity and mortality benefits, which often are linked to its ability to facilitate reversal in cardiac remodeling. Although a direct association between heart rate (HR) and cardiovascular (CV) outcomes in patients with HF has been observed [1, 2], there is debate regarding the importance of HR reduction as a contributor to the beneficial effects of antiadrenergic therapy [3–6]. A recent meta-analysis found a significant association between the degrees of HR reduction and the impact of antiadrenergic therapy in survival of patients with HF, whereas the dose of antiadrenergic therapy achieved was not correlated [7]. However, in the real world, β-blocker uptitration in response to persistently elevated HR can be associated with increased risk of adverse reactions [8, 9], and such limitations of antiadrenergic therapy have prompted the interest of looking into alternative treatment strategies to lower HR. Ivabradine is a selective inhibitor of the pacemaker I “funny” (If) channel, which is responsible for the autonomic capacity of the sinoatrial node. If channels are upregulated in atrial tissue of patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter and they also are present in ventricular myocytes of patients with HF [10]. Ivabradine works by reducing its diastolic depolarization slope, thereby decreasing HR via direct sinus node inhibition without direct effects on myocardial contractility and intracardiac conduction. In the BEAUTIFUL (Morbidity–Mortality Evaluation of the If Inhibitor Ivabradine in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease and Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction) study, patients with high baseline HR had an increase in serious CV events including death (34%), hospital admission secondary to congestive HF (53%), acute myocardial infarction (46%), or revascularization procedure (38%) [11]. In a subset of patients with baseline HR of 70 bpm and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40%, ivabradine was associated with a 36% decrease in hospital admissions secondary to fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction and a 30% decrease in coronary revascularization [11].
Read full abstract