With an interest on atomization in turbulent flows, and modeling alternatives to classic atomization models and Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS), the present work derives and tests two droplet-size distributions parametrized by local information about the flow. One distribution is heuristic and another one is based on the linear-eddy model. Predictions from these distributions are tested with numerical simulations in which the unresolved droplet-mass production is closed by assuming that turbulence is the rate controlling mechanism and by using a correction step. Moreover, the testing considers a round jet with a Reynolds number of 5000 from which DNS data is available. Overall, it is found that the present atomization model provides an enhancement of accuracy of the droplet-mass production and droplet-diameter distribution in comparison with using no model. Furthermore, the predicted droplet-diameter distribution is more accurate than that using a previous assumption of taking droplet diameters equal to local Taylor microscales. These results are obtained with simulations whose cost is orders of magnitude less than DNS.
Read full abstract