Background: The Pooled Cohort Equation (PCE) estimates 10-y atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk among adults aged 40-79 years without CVD. Recent studies applied the PCE to mixed primary (1°) and secondary (2°) prevention populations to predict risk of future CVD events. However, the PCE is not validated in 2° prevention populations. We studied the impact of prior CVD on PCE performance in a 2° prevention population of the SPRINT trial. Methods: SPRINT randomized 9,361 adults with hypertension and ≥1 CVD risk factor or prior ASCVD to standard or intensive BP control. Excluding those age >79 years (n=1,158) or missing PCE covariates (n=52), we calculated 10-year ASCVD risk at baseline using the PCE. We assessed PCE discrimination with the C-statistic among all SPRINT participants and among 1° and 2° prevention subgroups. We estimated the hazard ratio (HR) for incident ASCVD events comparing the 2° to the 1° prevention group, controlling for baseline PCE-predicted 10-y risk. Results: Of the 8,151 included participants, 6,874 (84%) and 1,277 (16%) were in the 1° and 2° prevention groups, respectively. Mean (SD) age was 66 (8) years, 35% were female, 34% were black. Median (IQR) baseline predicted 10-year ASCVD risk in the 1° prevention group was lower than the 2° prevention group (P<0.001; Table ). In the 3.3 years of follow-up, ASCVD events occurred more frequently in the 2° prevention group than the 1° prevention group (P<0.001). The C-statistic was 0.618 (95% CI 0.589, 0.646) in the entire analytic population, and was non-significantly higher among the 1° prevention subgroup. Comparing the 2° to 1° prevention population, HR for incident ASCVD events was 2.6 (95% CI 2.1, 3.3) when controlling for baseline PCE-estimated 10-y risk. Conclusions: Adults with prior ASCVD events have a nearly 3-fold higher risk of subsequent events. This study demonstrates that the PCE underestimates risk of recurrent events in 2° prevention populations and use in mixed populations should be avoided.
Read full abstract