Since DeFrancis et al.1 first described needle biopsy of the parietal pleura in 1955, this aid to diagnosis of causes of pleural effusion has received much interest. According to previous reports, needle biopsy has been diagnostic in about one-half of the cases in which it has been used. However, it should be realized that some of these cases were selected and that needle biopsy of the parietal pleura may not be this efficacious if used in all cases. If the diagnosis appears obvious on the basis of other clinical evidence, then pleural biopsy is not recommended. If there is some question as to the cause of the pleural effusion, then Donohoe's2 approach is advisable: “At the time of the initial thoracentesis, aspira tion biopsy should be performed. If a specific cause is determined, no further diagnostic studies would be needed and appropriate treatment may be instituted. If such a specimen is either inadequate or inconclu sive, either a repeat aspiration biopsy is in order or surgical biopsy through a small intercostal approach should be undertaken. A frozen section should be obtained and if a specific cause is demonstrable, the incision may be closed. If the result is not diagnostic, then the surgeon should extend the incision and full exploration with appropriate biopsy and/or resection can be carried out, followed subsequently with appropri ate treatment.†The Vim-Silverman needle has generally been used as originally de scribed by DeFrancis.1 Following this procedure, thoracentesis must be done next. Either procedure, particularly the latter, may be complicated by pneumothorax due to puncturing or lacerating the lung. In order to combine pleural biopsy and thoracentesis and also to lessen the risk of pneumothorax, we have devised a new instrument. It has features some what similar to those previously described by Cope,3 but it is more similar to that reported by Abrams.4 The purpose of this article is to describe this instrument and its use, report our results in using it and compare the apparent efficacy of this instrument to others. We are not attempting to prove the merits of pleural needle biopsy, for we feel this has been done. Description of Instrument The instrument consists of two parts—the “sheath†and the “needle†and is shown in Fig. 1. The outer “sheath,†A, has a hook-like cutting notch on one end and a collar with three grooves on the other end. The needle, B, has a boss protruding from its hub which fits in the grooves of the collar of the sheath. The sheath has a diameter of a size 13 needle and the needle, B, fits within this snugly enough to be airtight.