Today, we are going through a period when people from different countries, cities and institutions unprecedentedly resemble each other. Resemblance emerges as a magnifying phenomenon in every aspect of life. For instance, from East to West, from North to South, urbanization homogenizes in the mould of a West-centred context of culture and urban people resemble each other in socio-economic and socio-cultural aspects. In other words, cities have their own identities depending on man. Man reflects his perception of the universe and his sustaining belief of metaphysics on the cities he constructs. The aesthetic qualities of the structures of cities are the realization of this perception. A city is a living materialization of the spirit of a society, its perception of life and religion. Thus, a city is never constructed irrespective of the spiritual worlds, cultural perceptions or edifices of its dwellers. In brief, a city reflects the edifice of its dwellers as the dwellers reflect their worldviews in cities.Classical, ancient structures of cities are greatly varied in aesthetic regard, and they all reflect different worldviews through the cities I have visited extending from Europe to Far Asia. Nevertheless, today we witness that these cities are abandoned, turned into historical heritage sites as people flood into the metropolis. We also unfortunately witness that all metropolis extending from America to Europe, or from the Middle East to the Far East show a uniformed structure.Likewise, the deeds and imagery aspirations of Oriental and Occidental people also resemble. In such an atmosphere, the local cultures rooted in history become accessories and lose their historical significance and metaphysical aspects in the edifice of the society because classic architecture is a product of rich cultures, while modern cities are the design of a of engineering. As modern architecture is a perception of secular Western edifice, its cities are constructed in a similar uniformed structural identity. This destroys cultural richness of different civilizations and enriches the orchestrators of modern architecture.The reform packages offered by Western countries for the sake of modernization eradicate the differences between ancient cultures, traditions and human experiences in a socio-cultural sense and standardize the world. In this regard, Ali Bulac (2011) warns that:Structures following the model of modern Western urbanization and the structures which emerge as a result of projects or urban transformation are exact similitude. Twin cities are emerging everywhere in the world. On one side lies the diverse ancient cities of various civilizations and cultures, continuously being abandoned and derelict, and on the other are the modern, Western models of urbanization based on vertical and drawn up structure.This monotypic structuralization is undoubtedly the greatest achievement of the West. The conquest, unachievable through battles, has been accomplished through cultural assimilation. What is touted as integration with the world or global citizenship is indeed succumbing to Western codes of civilization. In the age of modernization, our minds are obscured by such slogans which condemn its opponents because of their promoted positive connotations. Homogenization within the boundaries of ontological edifices and their representations in life pose a paradox in the modern age when multiculturalism is widely discussed. In this regard, this study aims to analyze Prophet Muhammad 's (s.a.w.) warning Who so imitates other people becomes one of them , its layers of meaning and its relationship with image and resemblence.The Framework of Meaning Laid out by the HadithFirst, it should be stated that according to ulum al-hadith (hadith sciences) the hadith Who so imitates other people becomes one of them (Abu Dawud n.d. 4: 44, hadith no. 4031) is acceptable to be practised. …