Aspects Of Patient Care Research Articles

EEVALUATION AND QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS OF OPERATING ROOM PERSONAL KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDE, AND PRACTICE OF STERILE TECHNIQUES IN KHYBER TEACHING HOSPITAL PESHAWAR

The pivotal aspect of patient care within the operating room is the operating room personnel. Therefore, assessing their knowledge, attitudes, and practices concerning sterile techniques in the operating theatre is crucial, as infections pose a significant risk to post-operative patient morbidity and mortality. Wound infections are the second most prevalent type of hospital-acquired nosocomial infection in the United States. Recognizing that inadequate infection control and sterile technique practices in the operating room can contribute to wound infections, it is imperative to establish infection control principles and adhere to sterile technique standards. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of operating room personnel with respect to sterile techniques at Khyber Teaching Hospital (KTH) in Peshawar. A cross-sectional descriptive study approach was employed to assess the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of operating room personnel in the operating theaters of KTH. One hundred and eighty operating room personnel from the selected hospitals were chosen from the population using a non-probability convenient sampling method. The self-administered questionnaires were used to gauge their understanding of, attitude toward, and adherence to sterile techniques. The study's findings revealed that most respondents (74%) were male, 44.2% fell within the age range of 25-30 years, and most (74.6%) had less than 10 years of experience. Many respondents exhibited good knowledge, a positive attitude, and solid practices regarding sterile techniques. In conclusion, the study found that operating room personnel displayed good knowledge, a positive attitude, and sound practices about sterile techniques. Furthermore, the study established a direct relationship between knowledge, attitude, and practice. As a result, it is recommended that operating room personnel should participate in additional workshops or seminars on sterile techniques to stay updated on new developments in this field.

Reconsidering the use of urine drug testing in reproductive settings

The urine drug test is ubiquitous within reproductive healthcare settings. Although the test can have evidence-based use for a patient and clinician, in practice, it is often applied in ways that are driven by bias and stigma, do not correctly inform decisions about clinical aspects of patient care, and cause devastating ripple effects through social and legal systems. This paper proposes a framework of guiding questions to prompt reflection on (1) the question the clinical team is trying to answer, (2) whether a urine drug test answers the question at hand, (3) how testing benefits compare with the associated risks, (4) a more effective tool for clinical decision-making if the urine drug test does not meet the standards for use, and (5) individual and institutional biases affecting decision-making. We demonstrate the use of this framework using 3 common uses of the urine drug test within abortion care and labor and delivery settings.

Decreasing Lens Irradiation on Brain Imaging: A Multi-CT Scanner Quality Improvement Project.

Cataracts, a leading global cause of blindness, are associated with ionising radiation exposure. This audit aimed to enhance lens exclusion during non-contrast head computed tomography (CT) scans at Newham University Hospital (NUH) using two CT scanners. A retrospective audit of non-contrast head CT scans at NUH excluded scans for trauma and imaging of orbital structures. A one-week audit in April 2023 assessed lens exclusion, compared to the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) standards. A total of 101 consecutive scans were analysed and 63 (62%) scans were included in the final study. Thirty-eight percent of the scans were excluded according to the exclusion criteria of head, neckand facial traumas, orbital infectionsand papilledema. Results were presented, followed by a three-month radiographer re-education period, emphasizing gantry tilt and patient positioning. A reaudit in August 2023 evaluated outcomes. For the reaudit, 183 consecutive scans were analysed, with 131 (72%) scans included in the final studyand 52 (28%) scans excluded according to the same exclusion criteria as the first audit. Lens exclusion in non-contrast head CT scans improved significantly from 0/63 (0%) compliance to 19/131 (14.50%) (p=0005) compliance with the standards. Variability in radiographer practices, 'near misses' and time constraints were identified as challenges. Staff turnover impacted compliance. This audit has shed light on a critical aspect of patient care in the field of radiology. This research underscores the importance of rigorous and standardised protocols in radiological procedures, particularly when it comes to protecting the lens of the eye. By enhancing lens exclusion during non-contrast head CT scans, we have taken a significant step in mitigating the risk associated with ionising radiation exposure. Although substantial improvements were made, achieving the RCR audit standard remained elusive. Ongoing re-education, reauditsand a multidisciplinary approach are necessary to optimise radiographer adherence and reduce ionising radiation exposure to the lens during head CT scans.This quality improvement project proves thatcontinued emphasis on gantry tilt and patient positioning in radiographer education and training can make a significant difference in patient safety.As we move forward, let us remember that even small improvements can make a big difference in safeguarding the health and well-being of patients.

Transitions curriculum impact on students and care.

Transitions of patient care from the inpatient to outpatient setting is a high-risk time often resulting in medical errors and adverse events. Transitions of care programmes have been demonstrated to reduce negative outcomes. Several professional societies have highlighted care transitions as a central pillar of patient care and therefore a crucial aspect of health professional education; however, little data exist on medical student education in this area. The Transitions of Care Curriculum was developed and delivered to all Harvard Medical School Core I Internal Medicine Clerkship students at Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA between January 2017 and March 2019, where 12-14 students participated each quarter and included didactic teaching followed by experiential learning. Student data were collected via postclerkship survey. Patient data were collected via chart review. Student self-reported comfort level with transitions in care skills and medical errors were analysed. All student measures related to comfort with transitions in care skills demonstrated statistically significant improvement after curriculum participation(p < 0.001). Of the patients with a completed postdischarge note, students identified ≥1 postdischarge related issue in 33 of 70 patients, with multiple issues identified in many of these patients. Seventy-six total issues were identified. The Transitions of Care Curriculum demonstrated promising student and patient outcomes, suggesting that students can successfully learn and advance clinical skills while having a positive impact on a highly needed and important aspect of patient care by reducing postdischarge errors and adverse events.

Integrating clinical psychology into a liaison psychiatry for older people service: A reflection

This reflective piece explores the integration of clinical psychology into an older adult liaison psychiatry service within Cardiff and Vale University Health Board. A scoping exercise was conducted by a clinical psychologist and an assistant psychologist to assess whether there was a role for clinical psychology and to define its functions within the service. Referrals to clinical psychology during the scoping exercise comprised requests for additional support in complex cases, team reflection, and specific psychological interventions. The scoping exercise revealed the need for a clinical psychologist to be embedded within the liaison psychiatry service, with their role encompassing various aspects of patient care, consultation, training, and service development. The psychologist should be experienced working in a medical setting and be able to prioritise their workload. There was also a defined role for an assistant psychologist. The article offers reflections on challenges faced by staff within the service, and how the integration of psychology offered valuable contributions to patient care, team dynamics, and system-wide improvements. This reflection emphasises the importance of clinical psychologists working in older adult liaison psychiatry services.

Nutritional support for patients with malignant tumors

Nutritional support is an integral aspect of caring for patients burdened with advanced onсological disease. Following the development of palliative medicine, it draws a growing body of attention from medical community suggesting the expansion of practical use indications. Nowadays rational nutritional support is defined as a combined approach including wide implementation of supplementary nutrition along with physical activity, drug therapy and psychological consulting.It is usually carefully designed with a help of nutritionist, administered individually and prioritises the initial use of physiological non-invasive forms of nutrition.Artificial nutrition also appears to have benefit when used for patients at the end of life, but requires the critical consideration of indications and contraindications to minimise possible impairment of quality or even duration of life.

Application and Challenges of Machine Learning in Healthcare

Abstract: The integration of machine learning (ML) techniques into healthcare has emerged as a transformative force, revolutionizing various aspects of patient care, disease management, and healthcare operations. This research paper explores the manifold applications and accompanying challenges associated with the utilization of ML in healthcare. Machine learning finds extensive application in healthcare, encompassing early disease detection, personalized treatment plans, drug discovery, medical image analysis, and patient risk stratification. It plays a pivotal role in clinical decision support, enhancing diagnostic accuracy and treatment effectiveness. Furthermore, ML-based telemedicine and remote monitoring solutions have expanded healthcare accessibility, particularly in remote or underserved areas. Despite its remarkable potential, the adoption of ML in healthcare is not without challenges. Data privacy and security concerns are paramount, as sensitive patient information is processed. Data quality, interoperability issues, and ethical considerations related to algorithm bias and transparency demand vigilant attention. Regulatory hurdles and resistance to change among healthcare professionals add complexity to the integration process. Ethical considerations emerge prominently as healthcare providers increasingly rely on ML-driven insights. This paper discusses the ethical dimensions surrounding patient data privacy, informed consent, and the need for transparent and unbiased algorithms. Looking ahead, the research identifies future trends and opportunities in the intersection of ML and healthcare. As technology evolves, AI ethics and responsible AI principles will play a pivotal role in shaping the ethical framework of healthcare. Real-world case studies underscore the significant impact of ML in healthcare and provide valuable insights into success factors and challenges faced in various healthcare contexts. In conclusion, machine learning holds great promise in revolutionizing healthcare, but its implementation necessitates addressing complex challenges, especially ethical concerns. This paper serves as a comprehensive overview of the state of ML in healthcare, offering recommendations for stakeholders and a vision for an ethically-driven, technology-empowered future in healthcare

Increased time to surgery and worse perioperative outcome in benign brain tumor patients with COVID-19

BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions to healthcare systems around the world, due to both high resource utilization and concern for disease spread. Delays in non-emergent surgeries have also affected chronic disease management, including that of benign brain tumors such as meningiomas and pituitary adenomas. To evaluate the effect of COVID-19 infection on benign brain tumor resection rates and subsequent perioperative and inpatient outcomes, this study utilized the 2020 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) to investigate rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, and mortality among benign brain tumor patients with and without COVID-19. MethodsPatient data from April 2020 to December 2020 was extracted from the NIS. Confirmed COVID-19 diagnosis was identified using the ICD-10 diagnosis code U07.1. Patients with benign neoplasms of the cerebral meninges, cranial nerves, pituitary gland, craniopharyngeal duct, and brain were included in the study. Patient socio-demographics, hospital characteristics, and clinical comorbidities were obtained. Outcome variables included rates of surgical resection, time to surgery, in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge disposition. ResultsThe study analysis consisted of 13,053 patients with benign intracranial neoplasms who met inclusion criteria; 597 (4.6%) patients were COVID-19 positive. Patients with COVID-19 were more likely to be older and male than COVID-19 negative patients. Patients with COVID-19 had increased overall likelihood of mortality (OR 2.36, 95% CI 1.72–3.25, p < 0.0001). Even when controlling for sociodemographic/hospital factors and comorbidities, COVID-19 positive patients had a significantly longer time to surgery (8.7 days vs. 0.9 days, p < 0.0001) than COVID negative patients, and were associated with a decreased likelihood of undergoing surgery on index admission overall (OR 0.17, 95% CI 0.10–0.29, p < 0.0001). ConclusionsAs expected, COVID-19 infection was associated with worse inpatient outcomes in effectively all measured categories, including longer time to surgery, decreased likelihood of receiving surgery on index admission, and increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality. These findings emphasize the effect that COVID-19 has on other aspects of patient care and highlight the importance of appropriate avenues of care for patients who are COVID-19 positive. Although the COVID-19 pandemic is no longer a public health emergency, understanding the pandemic's impact on outcome for these patients is essential in efficient triage and optimizing treatment for these patients in the future. Further study is needed to elucidate causal relationships on the outcomes of benign brain tumor patients.

Validation of traditional Chinese version of Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care Questionnaire in Taiwanese patients.

Holistic health care considers all aspects of patient care, namely the physical, psychological, spiritual, and social aspects. To assess which patient needs are unmet, a screening questionnaire covering the four aforementioned aspects is required. Therefore, the Sheffield Profile for Assessment and Referral for Care (SPARC), a multidimensional, self-reported questionnaire designed to screen patients regardless of diagnosis, was developed. This study developed a translated and validated traditional Chinese version of the SPARC for patients in Taiwan. The original English version of the SPARC was translated into a traditional Chinese version (SPARC-T) through forward-backward translation. Semistructured debriefing interviews were conducted with participants to evaluate the SPARC-T. The reliability and validity of the SPARC-T were assessed through Cronbach's alpha coefficients and a correlation analysis conducted using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. Fifty-three patients were enrolled from our hospital: 22 had cancer but the majority had nonmalignant chronic conditions. About internal consistency, the Cronbach's alpha values for all domains of the SPARC-T were favorable. A correlation analysis of the SPARC-T and FACT-G revealed significant correlations for the domains of physical symptoms, independence and activity, family and social issues, sleep, and treatment issues; no significant correlation was identified for the "psychological issues" domain. This study revealed that the SPARC-T is an effective tool for screening Mandarin-speaking patients. Thus, it can be used in hospitals to holistically screen and identify the needs of patients to ensure they can receive appropriate professional support and holistic health care.

Closed-Loop Pharmacologic Control of Blood Pressure: A Review of Existing Systems.

Blood pressure management is a critical aspect of patient care, particularly in surgical and critical care settings. Closed-loop systems, which utilize real-time data and feedback to adjust treatment interventions, have gained attention for their potential to enhance blood pressure control. This review explores the application of closed-loop systems in blood pressure management. We discuss various closed-loop approaches, including their mechanisms, benefits, and limitations. By harnessing real-time patient data and feedback, closed-loop systems can tailor interventions dynamically, thus enhancing blood pressure regulation. Additionally, we examine the integration of advanced monitoring technologies and artificial intelligence algorithms in closed-loop systems. The review highlights recent studies and their findings, emphasizing the evolving landscape of closed-loop blood pressure management across different clinical scenarios. From the perioperative period to critical care settings, closed-loop systems hold the potential to optimize patient outcomes by precisely adjusting vasopressor administration in response to continuous blood pressure fluctuations. By providing insights into the current state of closed-loop systems for blood pressure control, this review offers a comprehensive overview of their potential contributions to improved patient outcomes and future directions for research and implementation.

Psychosocial Well-Being and Quality of Life in Uveitis: A Review

ABSTRACT Purpose As a potentially sight-threatening disease with ocular, systemic, and treatment-related complications, uveitis diminishes quality of life (QOL) and affects psychosocial well-being. This review summarizes the existing tools for evaluating psychosocial well-being and/or QOL in patients with uveitis, explores the biological and non-biological factors affecting psychosocial well-being and/or QOL, and proposes future directions for incorporating these tools into clinical practice. Methods A systematic search of the MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane databases from inception to June 8, 2022 was conducted, screening for articles focused on psychosocial well-being and/or QOL in patients with uveitis. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were performed. Results In uveitis research, the most frequently studied patient-reported outcome measures were vision-related QOL (e.g. Visual Function Questionnaire [VFQ-25]) and health-related QOL (e.g. Short Form Survey [SF-36]), followed by mental health indicators including depression and anxiety. Instruments have also been developed specific to the pediatric population (e.g. Effects of Youngsters’ Eyesight on Quality of Life [EYE-Q]). Generally, studies report worse psychosocial outcomes and QOL in patients with uveitis compared to the general population. Contributory factors include both clinical (e.g. visual impairment, ocular comorbidities) and patient-related (e.g. older age, female sex) factors. Conclusion Given the heterogeneity of instruments used, it is worth considering standardization across large uveitis studies and trials. Beyond research, given the biopsychosocial effects on patients with uveitis, there are benefits to incorporating QOL and psychosocial assessments into clinical practice. Simplification of questionnaires into abridged forms, focusing on the most clinically relevant aspects of patient care, may be considered.

The impact of social deprivation on patient satisfaction in physical medicine and rehabilitation outpatient interventional spine and musculoskeletal medicine using the press Ganey® outpatient medical practice survey

IntroductionMultiple factors (patient age, wait time, depression, etc.) have been associated with lower patient satisfaction as assessed by the Press Ganey® Outpatient Medical Practice Survey (PGOMPS). Social deprivation has been shown to impact multiple aspects of patient care but its impact on patient satisfaction in Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) is limited. ObjectiveWe hypothesized that increased social deprivation would independently predict lower patient satisfaction, as measured by the PGOMPS. DesignRetrospective large cohort study. SettingSingle tertiary academic institution. PatientsAdult patients seen by PM&R physicians practicing outpatient interventional spine and musculoskeletal medicine who completed PGOMPS between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2019. InterventionsIndependent variables include: Social deprivation as measured by 2015 Area Deprivation Index (ADI), wait time, patient age, and sex. Main outcome measurePatient satisfaction was defined as receiving a perfect PGOMPS Total Score. ResultsA totla of 64,875 patients (mean age 52.7 ± 21.8 years, 41.4% male, mean ADI 29.9 ± 18.8) were included. Univariate analysis showed a decreased odds of achieving satisfaction for each decile increase in ADI (odds ratio 0.965; 95% confidence interval 0.957–0.973; p < 0.001). The most socially deprived quartile was significantly less likely to report satisfaction on PGOMPS compared to the least deprived quartile (91.1 vs 93.2; p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that the odds of achieving satisfaction was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.980 to 0.997; p = 0.009) for the Total Score, independent of age, wait time, and patient sex for each decile increase in ADI. ConclusionsIn this cohort, increased social deprivation independently predicted patient dissatisfaction in PM&R.

Protecting the Autonomy of Patients with Severe Mental Illness Through Psychiatric Advance Directive Peer-Facilitation

Protecting the Autonomy of Patients with Severe Mental Illness Through Psychiatric Advance Directive Peer-Facilitation

Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm.

As the demand for quality healthcare increases, healthcare systems worldwide are grappling with time constraints and excessive workloads, which can compromise the quality of patient care. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool in clinical medicine, revolutionizing various aspects of patient care and medical research. The integration of AI in clinical medicine has not only improved diagnostic accuracy and treatment outcomes, but also contributed to more efficient healthcare delivery, reduced costs, and facilitated better patient experiences. This review article provides an extensive overview of AI applications in history taking, clinical examination, imaging, therapeutics, prognosis and research. Furthermore, it highlights the critical role AI has played in transforming healthcare in developing nations.

Multidisciplinary Teamwork Perceptions When Mobilizing Ventilated Neurosurgery Patients.

BACKGROUND: Multidisciplinary teamwork is essential in delivering holistic care to critically ill populations, including ventilated neurosurgery patients. Although it is considered a safe and feasible aspect of patient care, mobilization is often missed in this population because of negative healthcare provider perceptions regarding barriers and patient safety. Nurse-led teamwork has been suggested to overcome these barriers and to achieve earlier mobilization for patients, as well as positive provider perceptions, which may affect the culture and frequency of mobilization on neurointensive care units. Quantitative studies analyzing multidisciplinary teamwork perceptions to mobilize ventilated neurosurgery patients with or without a nurse-led protocol have not been previously conducted. Analyzing such perceptions may provide insight to team-related barriers related to missed mobility. This pilot quasi-experimental study aimed to determine whether the use of a nurse-led mobility protocol affects teamwork perceptions when mobilizing ventilated neurosurgery patients. METHODS: A sample of multidisciplinary teams, composed of nurses, patient care technicians, and respiratory therapists, mobilized ventilated neurosurgery patients according to either standard of care (for the control group) or a nurse-led mobility protocol (for the interventional group). Teamwork perceptions were measured via the reliable and valid Nursing Teamwork Survey tool. RESULTS: Linear mixed model analyses revealed that multidisciplinary teams in the nurse-led mobility protocol group had significantly higher levels of overall perceived teamwork than those in the control group, t3 = -3.296, P = .038. Such differences were also noted for teamwork variables of team leadership and mutual trust. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led mobility protocols should be considered to increase teamwork when performing multidisciplinary teamwork-based mobility for ventilated neurosurgery patients. Future studies should continue to evaluate teamwork perceptions after nurse-led mobility.

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on source plasma donations.

While the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted many aspects of healthcare, including routine blood donations, the impact of COVID-19 on the donation of source plasma critical to many aspects of patient care, including apheresis procedures, has been more difficult to define. As production of plasma-derived medicinal products (PDMPs) can take up to a year, shortages in source plasma donations may not be immediately appreciated. Given current shortages in PDMPs, in particular albumin, we examined the impact of COVID-19 on source plasma donations. Our data demonstrate that source plasma donations were disproportionately impacted by COVID-19 and that these shortages remained until the latter half of 2022. Given the time delay in PDMP manufacturing, these results suggest that while source plasma donation levels are returning to pre-pandemic levels, shortages in PDMPs may not be quickly overcome. These results also highlight the unique vulnerabilities in plasma sourcing that may continue to manifest as PDMP shortages for years to come.

Examining the Growing Demand for Surgical Care in Rural Communities and Novel Approaches to Achieving a Sustainable Surgical Workforce: A Narrative Review.

Surgery continues to be an increasingly vital component of public health and aspect of patient care in rural communities. An anticipated shortage of surgeons within the next decade in the United States prompts a growing concern for increasing the delivery of essential surgical care to these populations. When considering the existing barriers to surgical healthcare in rural communities, there is a sense of urgency to identify innovative approaches that will promote a sustainable surgeon workforce.A narrative review was conducted to investigate the current state of access to essential surgical care in rural communities. Qualitative and quantitative data were collected to better understand the key issues in rural healthcare and to provide statistical data related to the status of the surgical workforce. With the anticipated shortage of surgeons in both rural and urban areas, this review highlights the importance of enacting immediate measures to address the concern. This review has accomplished the initial objectives of gaining a better understanding of the current state of access to surgical care in rural communities and utilizing this knowledge to provide recommendations to readily attain a sustainable number of rural surgeons. With each approach addressing ways to address the contributory issues to the surgeon shortage, this review reveals a new avenue of integrating valuable aspects from each approach, rather than relying on a single approach. In particular, enhancing the overall pipeline of medical training to attending status may prove to be more beneficial for achieving this goal. Ultimately, this may be accomplished by introducing additional rural surgical mentorship opportunities for medical students, developing a rural surgery fellowship, and incorporating a market-based response that will correspond to attractive incentives that help to retain a sustainable number of surgeons working in rural areas.

Compliance With Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy Tube Insertion Guidelines and Associated Complications in a Tertiary Care Setting: A Clinical Audit.

Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion is a widely utilized enteral access technique offering long-term nutritional support for patients unable to tolerate oral intake. While the PEG tube provides numerous advantages, adherence to evidence-based guidelines is crucial to minimize complications. This study aims to evaluate adherence to PEG tube insertion guidelines and analyze associated complication rates in a tertiary care setting. A retrospective clinical audit was conducted at Quaid-e-Azam International Hospital, Islamabad. Data were collected over three years from patients undergoing PEG tube insertion by a single consultant gastrointestinal surgeon. Adherence to guidelines was evaluated using a 10-item checklist developed based on European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Complication rates and patient characteristics were analyzed. The study included 70 participants (mean age = 72.21 ± 13.17). The PEG tube insertion rate was 100%. The mean checklist score was 8.34 ± 1.2. Laboratory investigations were performed for 98.6% of patients. 91.4% of patients had a life expectancy exceeding 30 days. 60% of patients received an anticoagulation hold. Prophylactic antibiotics were administered to 90% of patients. Psychological counseling and dietician consultation were offered to 38.6% and 64.2% of patients, respectively. Caregivers received specialized training in 98.5% of cases. 12.8% of patients experienced early complications post-procedure, and 14.2% experienced late complications. PEG tube removal occurred in 27% of patients, with only one patient experiencing complications after removal. Adherence to PEG tube insertion guidelines was observed in various aspects of patient care, resulting in a low incidence of complications. Comprehensive auditing and guideline adherence are essential to ensure optimal patient safety and procedural outcomes.

International medical graduates' experiences with caring for cross-cultural patient populations: Qualitative study in Alberta.

To explore experiences of international medical graduate (IMG) FPs in providing cross-cultural patient care and to identify rewards and challenges they experienced when caring for patients of cultural backgrounds different from their own. Descriptive qualitative study. Family medicine primary care practices in Alberta. Eighteen IMG FPs practising in the metropolitan areas of Edmonton or Calgary in Alberta as of May 2013. Individual face-to-face or telephone interviews were conducted using a semistructured interview guide. Seventeen interviews occurred between July and August 2013 and 1 took place in August 2014. All interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcribed data were subject to thematic analysis. International medical graduates identified several rewarding aspects of caring for patients with cultural backgrounds different from their own, including learning about different cultures, perceiving that appointments are more succinct, and advocating for patients whom they perceive to be at a disadvantage. Family physicians also identified several challenges associated with caring for patients of different cultural backgrounds, including encountering language barriers, perceiving that visits take longer, and experiencing patients' lack of acceptance of FPs with cultural backgrounds different from their own. Cultural differences between FPs and patients can enhance or undermine doctor-patient relationships. The results of this study speak to the need for cultural competency training for FPs practising in culturally diverse settings.

Engaging Premedical Students in Medical Education Research: Benefits of Clinical Skills Observation Studies.

Observations requiring evaluation and critical thinking can be powerful learning experiences. Video-recorded standardized patient encounters are underused resources for evaluation and research. The authors engaged premedical students in medical education research reviewing standardized patient encounters. This study aims to explore participant perceptions of the research experience and how they gained clinical skills. This mixed-method study was completed between 2019 and 2022. Premedical participants coded medical students' clinical skills in video-recorded standardized patient encounters. Each participant also completed their own new patient history in a standardized patient encounter at both the beginning and end of their research project. Participants then completed an end-of-program debrief to discuss their experiences coding the clinical skills encounters. The authors coded communication skills implemented in the pre/postencounters and completed a thematic analysis of the debrief transcripts. All 21 participants demonstrated significant clinical skills gain after their research project, which included spending more time with the patient (pre-M=5 minutes, post-M=19 minutes, t=13.2, P<.001) and asking more questions (pre-M=13, post-M=40, t=9.3, P<.001). Prior clinical experience did not influence pre- or postoutcomes, but the number of videos coded was associated with asking more questions in the postencounter. Participants described learning actively and reflected that their clinical skills research project gave them greater insight into patient-care aspects of medical school and how medical students learn. These data demonstrate that observational studies in which premedical students evaluate standardized patient encounters gave the students context to medical education while enabling them to develop and transfer their own clinical skills. Studies observing standardized patient encounters provide rich insight into clinical skills development, and this work generates both research outcomes and actionable program evaluation data for medical educators. Purposefully engaging premedical students in such experiential learning opportunities benefits the students and helps cultivate early medical education pathways for these learners.