Asian And Pacific Islander Research Articles

E-cigarette use behaviors of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander youth in the contiguous United States: Insights from the Monitoring the Future Study (2018–2019)

This study examines e-cigarette use behaviors of Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) youth, in relation to other racial/ethnic groups in the United States. Data were obtained from the 2018 and 2019 Monitoring the Future surveys, which include a random, probability-based sample of youth in 8th, 10th, and 12th grades surveyed annually across the contiguous United States. Respondents provided information on race/ethnicity and e-cigarette use (n = 42,980). Measures of e-cigarette use included current (1 + of past 30 days) and regular use (10 + of past 30 days). Chi-square tests were used to determine differences in e-cigarette use by race/ethnicity. Associations between race/ethnicity, other sociodemographic factors, and e-cigarette use were explored using logistic regression analyses. Approximately 5.1% (n = 2,410) of the sample identified as AANHPI. A greater proportion of Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islanders reported current e-cigarette use (NHPI, 28.0%), relative to Asian American (AA, 10.3%), Black (9.5%), Hispanic or Latino (15.0%), American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN, 16.5%), multiracial (22.3%), and non-Hispanic White (25.2%) youth. Regular e-cigarette use was highest among non-Hispanic White (12.3%), followed by multiracial (10.7%), AIAN (7.8%), Hispanic or Latino (5.0%), AA (4.3%), and Black (3.0%) youth. Associations between race/ethnicity and e-cigarette use remained significant, after controlling for other sociodemographic factors. Continued monitoring of e-cigarette use is needed among AANHPI, a historically underrepresented population in tobacco research. Special attention should be paid to NHPI, who reported the highest rates of e-cigarette use.

Examining admission and scheduling for Asian American and pacific islander students' special education

Admission and scheduling for Special Education (SE) are crucial procedures to ensure students with disabilities receive the particular assistance and resources they need to succeed in school. Recent research has questioned these patterns, suggesting that students of colour may be underestimated in programs covered by federal law, even though educational systems in the US need to track the excessive several minority students in SE. Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders (AAPIs) are a population that has historically been underrepresented in special education. They are often left out of these conversations on disproportionality. However, prior research has not looked at the enormous variability in experiences between AAPIs and how the special learning trends can vary between AAPI ethnic groupings. To study the experiences of AAPI students, researchers chose a suburban school area in California. This work is part of a wider district-researcher cooperation aimed at reducing racial inequities in the area's special education services, especially for AAPI students. This research explores further underrepresentation by breaking out participation rates and the timeliness of goods and services for 11 AAPI ethnic groupings over 10 years utilizing longitudinal data on ten cohorts totalling 42,807 kindergarteners from a single school district. The results demonstrate that AAPI students are neglected in special education and obtain services later on than their White peers. Even after taking into consideration student history, degree of acculturation, and fixed influences at school, these patterns persist. The under representation of AAPIs in SE, both overall and across the majority of AAPI ethnic groupings, as discovered in this research, is a warning sign that the system isn't fair to AAPIs. These patterns reflect how AAPI students are becoming marginalized in schools and how difficult it is for them to get treatment for a variety of problems, such as poor academic performance and peer harassment.

Black monstrosity and the rhetoric of whiteness in Disney’s Zombies trilogy

ABSTRACT Drawing from strategic whiteness and guided by racial rhetorical criticism, this article analyzes Disney’s Zombies movie trilogy. Situated within the context of anti-Critical Race Theory policies and the use of children and K-12 education as political pawns, the timely release of Zombies as a postracial narrative motivates this research. Through the positioning of humans, zombies, werewolves, and aliens as fixed symbolic racial groups within the imagined utopian United States town of Seabrook, Zombies presents an ideology of diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) that sustains white power and fluidity. This rhetorical analysis presents three conclusions. First, the imaginary utopian town of Seabrook is a postracial space developed around stereotypical racialized characters and narratives that contribute to the historical marginalization of Indigenous, Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI), and Black people. Second, through the protagonist Zed and the cinematic construction of zombies, the trilogy perpetuates a postracial anti-Blackness via the inscription of a policed and controlled monstrosity onto Black identity. Third, the second protagonist, Addison, engages in the propagation of whiteness via voyeuristic racial tourism and white purity. In total, the children’s mediated narrative upholds white centrality and power obviated by contemporary DEI discourses and representations.

Temporal Changes in Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Utilization of Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion in the United States

Racial and ethnic disparities in the access to left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) have been previously described. However, it remains unclear if there have been any changes in these disparities over the years and if the disparities include other racial and ethnic groups not previously studied. We aimed to determine the temporal evolution of the racial and ethnic disparities in the utilization of LAAO from 2016 to 2019. We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2019. International Classification of Diseases, 10th edition codes were used to identify all adult admissions with atrial fibrillation (AF) and those who underwent LAAO. The sample was divided into Asian American and Pacific Islander, Black, Hispanic, White, and other races/ethnicities. Our primary outcome was the utilization of LAAO in patients admitted with a diagnosis of AF. The Cochran-Armitage test was conducted to evaluate the yearly trend in LAAO utilization stratified by race/ethnicity. Multivariable regression analysis was conducted to assess the association of race/ethnicity with multiple end points. A total of 59,415 patients underwent LAAO. The highest yearly increase in LAAO utilization was seen in White patients (trend: 0.16%, p<0.001). Furthermore, compared with White patients, the yearly increase in LAAO utilization was lower in all other racial/ethnic groups. Black patients had the lowest odds of who underwent LAAO (odds ratio=0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.40 to 0.50, p<0.001). In conclusion, significant gaps exist in the utilization of LAAO between racial and ethnic groups, and they appear to continue worsening from 2016 to 2019.

Bias-Based Bullying and Elevated Depressive Symptoms Among Sexual and Gender–Diverse Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Adolescents

This cross-sectional study analyzes data from 2 statewide school surveys to document the experiences of sexual and gender minoritized Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander students in grades 9 through 12 who reported bullying related to their identity.

A microbial causal mediation analytic tool for health disparity and applications in body mass index

BackgroundEmerging evidence suggests the potential mediating role of microbiome in health disparities. However, no analytic framework can be directly used to analyze microbiome as a mediator between health disparity and clinical outcome, due to the non-manipulable nature of the exposure and the unique structure of microbiome data, including high dimensionality, sparsity, and compositionality.MethodsConsidering the modifiable and quantitative features of the microbiome, we propose a microbial causal mediation model framework, SparseMCMM_HD, to uncover the mediating role of microbiome in health disparities, by depicting a plausible path from a non-manipulable exposure (e.g., ethnicity or region) to the outcome through the microbiome. The proposed SparseMCMM_HD rigorously defines and quantifies the manipulable disparity measure that would be eliminated by equalizing microbiome profiles between comparison and reference groups and innovatively and successfully extends the existing microbial mediation methods, which are originally proposed under potential outcome or counterfactual outcome study design, to address health disparities.ResultsThrough three body mass index (BMI) studies selected from the curatedMetagenomicData 3.4.2 package and the American gut project: China vs. USA, China vs. UK, and Asian or Pacific Islander (API) vs. Caucasian, we exhibit the utility of the proposed SparseMCMM_HD framework for investigating the microbiome’s contributions in health disparities. Specifically, BMI exhibits disparities and microbial community diversities are significantly distinctive between reference and comparison groups in all three applications. By employing SparseMCMM_HD, we illustrate that microbiome plays a crucial role in explaining the disparities in BMI between ethnicities or regions. 20.63%, 33.09%, and 25.71% of the overall disparity in BMI in China-USA, China-UK, and API-Caucasian comparisons, respectively, would be eliminated if the between-group microbiome profiles were equalized; and 15, 18, and 16 species are identified to play the mediating role respectively.ConclusionsThe proposed SparseMCMM_HD is an effective and validated tool to elucidate the mediating role of microbiome in health disparity. Three BMI applications shed light on the utility of microbiome in reducing BMI disparity by manipulating microbial profiles.6ppc1U8Yu1nT7JqzesB9dWVideo

A Person-Centered Analysis of Adolescent Multicultural Socialization Niches and Academic Functioning.

Despite the growing cultural diversity worldwide, there is scarce research on how socialization processes prepare youth to respond to increasing multicultural demands and the degree to which these socialization opportunities inform youth academic functioning. This study used a person-centered approach to identify profiles or niches based on the degree and consistency of multicultural socialization experiences across school, peer, and family settings and to examine the associations between identified niches and markers of academic functioning (i.e., emotional and behavioral academic engagement, academic aspirations and expectations) in a sample of adolescents (N = 717; Mage = 13.73 years). Participants (49.9% girls) were from the U.S. Southwest and represented multiple ethno-racial backgrounds (31.8% Hispanic/Latinx, 31.5% Multiethnic, 25.7% White, 7.3% Black or African American, 1.4% Asian American or Pacific Islander, 1.4% American Indian or Alaska Native, and 1% Arab, Middle Eastern, or North African). Six distinct multicultural socialization niches were identified. Three niches had similar patterns across school-peer-family but ranged in the degree of socialization. The cross-setting similar higher socialization niche (Niche 6) demonstrated greater socialization than the cross-setting similar moderate (Niche 5) and lower socialization (Niche 4) niches, which had moderate and lower socialization, respectively. Three niches demonstrated cross-setting dissimilarity which ranged in the type of cross-setting contrast and the degree of socialization. The cross-setting dissimilar school contrast socialization niche (Niche 3) had greater dissimilarities between socialization opportunities in the school setting compared to the peer and family settings and demonstrated the lowest levels of socialization of all niches. The other two niches, the cross-setting dissimilar peer contrast (Niche 1) and greater peer contrast socialization (Niche 2) niches had larger dissimilarities between socialization opportunities in the peer setting than the school and family settings. In the former, however, the contrast was lower, and socialization ranged between very low to low. In the latter, the contrast was higher and socialization ranged from very low to moderate. Most adolescents were in the cross-setting similar lower socialization niche or in the cross-setting dissimilar niches. Adolescents in the cross-setting similar higher multicultural socialization demonstrated greater emotional and behavioral academic engagement than adolescents in most of the other niches. Adolescents in the cross-setting dissimilar school contrast niches demonstrated lower emotional and behavioral academic engagement and lower academic expectations than adolescents in some of the other niches. The results emphasize the collective role of school, peer, and family multicultural socialization on emotional and behavioral academic engagement.

Inequities in Patient Access to Care Among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander Adults in Medicaid.

Despite decades of advocacy for disaggregated data collection and reporting for Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AA and NHPI) people, significant gaps remain in our ability to understand AA and NHPI individuals' access to care. We assess inequities in access to care measures between non-Hispanic White and AA and NHPI adult Medicaid enrollees. We used the 2014-15 Nationwide Adult Medicaid Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems, the first-and-only nationally representative sample of Medicaid enrollees. Our main outcomes were access to needed care, access to a personal doctor, timely access to a checkup, and timely access to specialty care. Using multivariable linear probability models, we assessed the relationship between racial/ethnic group and our outcomes, both in the aggregate and disaggregated into ten racial/ethnic groups, and adjusted for enrollee-level sociodemographic characteristics, health status, and state-level Medicaid expansion status. In aggregate, AA and NHPI enrollees reported worse access to care than White enrollees on all four metrics (p < 0.001). The magnitude of disparities varied across the ten AA and NHPI ethnic groups. Disparities relative to White enrollees were particularly large in magnitude, roughly 1.5 to 2 times greater, for Chinese, Korean, and Vietnamese enrollees than for the aggregated AA and NHPI group. Despite comparable insurance coverage, there were inequities in multiple access to care metrics between non-Hispanic White and AA and NHPI Medicaid enrollees. Collection of disaggregated health data on AA and NHPI patients reveals important variation in access to care by ethnic group.

Obstetrical health care inequities in a universally insured health care system

Racial and ethnic disparities in health care exist and are rooted in long-standing systemic inequities. These disparities result in significant excess health care expenditures and are due to complex interactions between patients, health care providers and systems, and social and environmental factors. In perinatal care, these inequities also exist, with Black patients being 3 to 4 times more likely to die of childbirth compared with White patients. Similar health care inequities may also exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, stable employment, and social programs that benefit military families. This study aimed to evaluate racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes in the Military Health System. This is a retrospective cohort study of deliveries from 2019 to 2021 in the Military Health System, which provides obstetrical care for approximately 35,000 annual deliveries. The study was conducted using National Perinatal Information Center data on cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, and severe maternal morbidity by race and ethnicity from direct-care military hospitals representing tertiary care medical centers and community hospitals in the United States and abroad. Chi-square analyses and binary logistic regression were used to compare groups. The cohort included 68,918 deliveries. Of these, 32,358 (47%) were White, 9594 (13.9%) Black, 3120 (4.5%) Asian Pacific Islander, 456 (0.7%) American Indian/Alaska Native, 19,543 (28.4%) other, 3976 (5.8%) unknown, 7096 (10.3%) Hispanic, 58,009 (84.2%) non-Hispanic, and 4399 (6.4%) other ethnicity. Rates of cesarean delivery were significantly higher for Black (30%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-1.52), Asian Pacific Islander (27%; odds ratio, 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.35), and other (26%; odds ratio, 1.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.25) compared with White race (23%) (P<.001). Postpartum hemorrhage rates were higher for Black (5.9%; odds ratio, 1.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.24) and Asian Pacific Islander (7.7%; odds ratio, 1.49; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-1.72) compared with White race (5.3%) (P<.001). Severe maternal morbidity was higher for Black (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-1.67), Asian Pacific Islander (2.9%; odds ratio, 1.45; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-1.82), and other (2.8%; odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.21-1.54) compared with White race (2.1%) (P<.001). For severe maternal morbidity excluding blood transfusions, rates were also significantly higher for Black (1%; odds ratio, 1.68; 95% confidence interval, 1.30-2.17) than for White race (0.6%) (P<.002). Hispanic ethnicity was associated with a lower rate of severe maternal morbidity excluding transfusions (0.5%; odds ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.98) compared with non-Hispanic ethnicity (0.7%) (P=.04). Racial disparities in obstetrical outcomes exist in the Military Health System despite universal health care coverage, with significantly higher rates of cesarean delivery and severe maternal morbidity in Black, Asian Pacific Islander, and other races compared with White race. These findings suggest that these disparities are likely related to other factors or social determinants of health rather than availability of health care and insurance coverage. Further work should include investigation into such social determinants of health to address their causes, including systemic and structural barriers.

A Community-Defined Approach to Address Trauma Among Cambodian Immigrants and Refugees.

Asian American and Pacific Islanders are one of the fastest growing and most diverse groups in the United States. Yet, they are often aggregated as a single group, masking within-group differences in rates of disease and demographic characteristics commonly associated with elevated health risk. While more than four decades have passed since the Khmer Rouge genocide, Cambodians continue to experience trauma-related psychiatric disorders, including post-traumatic stress disorder and major depression. Funded by the California Department of Public Health Office of Health Equity, the Community Wellness Program (CWP) aimed to reduce mental health disparities among Cambodians in Long Beach and Santa Ana, California, using community-defined approaches. The 6-month program comprised community outreach, educational workshops, strengths-based case management, and social and spiritual activities. Our study aimed to examine the effects of the CWP on trauma symptoms. Program evaluation followed an incomplete stepped wedge waitlist design with two study arms. A linear mixed models analysis revealed that participants reported fewer trauma symptoms as a result of participation in the CWP and that participants experienced fewer symptoms over time. This is an especially important finding, as trauma can lead to long-term individual health effects and to social and health repercussions on an entire cultural group by way of intergenerational trauma. As the number of refugees and displaced individuals continues to grow, there is an urgent need for programs such as the CWP to prevent the lasting effects of trauma.

Racial disparities in conditional survival of patients with bladder cancer: a population-based study

BackgroundTraditional estimates can only provide static predictions of cancer outcomes and cannot assess the evolving effect of race on patient survival. This study aims to reveal the dynamic survival of patients with bladder cancer and to explore the evolving effect of race on patient prognosis.MethodsUsing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) registry, 99,590 white, 6,036 African American, and 4,685 Asian/Pacific Islander (API) patients with bladder cancer were identified. Conditional cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates, which could reflect the dynamic survival prediction of cancer patients, represented the primary outcomes, and were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier algorithm. The evolving effect of race on patient survival was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression in combination with conditional survival (CS) estimates.ResultsThe 5-year CSS for African American patients who had survived 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 years after definitive therapy improved from the baseline calculation by + 5.8 (84.4%), + 9.5 (87.4%), + 12.8 (90.0%), + 14.4 (91.3%), and + 14.7% (91.5%), respectively. The increasing trend also held for overall white and API patients, and for all patient subsets when CS was calculated according to different levels of sex, age, and disease stage. African Americans, despite having the worst survival at baseline, could have CSS comparable to their white and API counterparts after 4 years of survivorship. In addition, the risk of death for African Americans tended to decrease with increasing survival, and the risk was no longer significantly different from that of whites after 4 years of survival.ConclusionsWhile having the worst initial predicted outcomes, African Americans may eventually achieve comparable survival to white and API patients given several years of survivorship. As patient survival increases, African American race may lose its role as an indicator of poorer prognosis.

Trends in State-Level Maternal Mortality by Racial and Ethnic Group in the United States

Evidence suggests that maternal mortality has been increasing in the US. Comprehensive estimates do not exist. Long-term trends in maternal mortality ratios (MMRs) for all states by racial and ethnic groups were estimated. To quantify trends in MMRs (maternal deaths per 100 000 live births) by state for 5 mutually exclusive racial and ethnic groups using a bayesian extension of the generalized linear model network. Observational study using vital registration and census data from 1999 to 2019 in the US. Pregnant or recently pregnant individuals aged 10 to 54 years were included. MMRs. In 2019, MMRs in most states were higher among American Indian and Alaska Native and Black populations than among Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander; Hispanic; and White populations. Between 1999 and 2019, observed median state MMRs increased from 14.0 (IQR, 5.7-23.9) to 49.2 (IQR, 14.4-88.0) among the American Indian and Alaska Native population, 26.7 (IQR, 18.3-32.9) to 55.4 (IQR, 31.6-74.5) among the Black population, 9.6 (IQR, 5.7-12.6) to 20.9 (IQR, 12.1-32.8) among the Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander population, 9.6 (IQR, 6.9-11.6) to 19.1 (IQR, 11.6-24.9) among the Hispanic population, and 9.4 (IQR, 7.4-11.4) to 26.3 (IQR, 20.3-33.3) among the White population. In each year between 1999 and 2019, the Black population had the highest median state MMR. The American Indian and Alaska Native population had the largest increases in median state MMRs between 1999 and 2019. Since 1999, the median of state MMRs has increased for all racial and ethnic groups in the US and the American Indian and Alaska Native; Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander; and Black populations each observed their highest median state MMRs in 2019. While maternal mortality remains unacceptably high among all racial and ethnic groups in the US, American Indian and Alaska Native and Black individuals are at increased risk, particularly in several states where these inequities had not been previously highlighted. Median state MMRs for the American Indian and Alaska Native and Asian, Native Hawaiian, or Other Pacific Islander populations continue to increase, even after the adoption of a pregnancy checkbox on death certificates. Median state MMR for the Black population remains the highest in the US. Comprehensive mortality surveillance for all states via vital registration identifies states and racial and ethnic groups with the greatest potential to improve maternal mortality. Maternal mortality persists as a source of worsening disparities in many US states and prevention efforts during this study period appear to have had a limited impact in addressing this health crisis.

The development of the Cognitive Assessment for Tagalog Speakers (CATS): A culturally and linguistically tailored test battery for Filipino Americans.

Filipino Americans are one of the largest Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) populations in the United States (US). Previous studies suggest that Filipino Americans have one of the highest incidence rates of Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) among AAPI subgroups. Despite the expected increase in Filipino Americans with ADRD, no studies to-date have validated neuropsychological measures in the United States for speakers of Tagalog, a major language spoken by Filipino Americans. A significant barrier to dementia care and diagnosis is the lack of linguistically and socioculturally appropriate cognitive tasks for Tagalog speakers. To address this need, we developed and piloted the Cognitive Assessment for Tagalog Speakers (CATS), the first neuropsychological battery for the detection of ADRD in Filipino American Tagalog speakers. Based on evidence-based neuropsychological batteries, we adapted and constructed de novo tasks to measure performance across 4 main cognitive domains: visual/verbal memory, visuospatial functioning, speech and language, and frontal/executive functioning. Tasks were developed with a team of bilingual English/Tagalog, bicultural Filipino American/Canadian experts, including a neurologist, speech-language pathologist, linguist, and neuropsychologist. We recruited Tagalog-speaking participants of age 50+ through social media advertisements and recruitment registries for this cross-sectional study. We present the CATS design and protocol. To-date, the CATS battery has been administered to 26 healthy control participants (age 64.5±7.8 years, 18F/8M) at an academic institution in Northern California, United States. The development and administration of the CATS battery demonstrated its feasibility but also highlighted the need to consider the effects of bilingualism, language typology, and cultural factors in result interpretation. The CATS battery provides a mechanism for cognitive assessment of Filipino Americans, a population that has been underrepresented in ADRD research. As we move toward the treatment and cure of ADRD, linguistically and socioculturally appropriate cognitive tests become even more important for equitable care.

Increasing nonalcoholic fatty liver disease–related mortality rates in the United States from 1999 to 2022

Background: We examined trends in NAFLD-related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2022, focusing on sex, racial differences, and specific age groups. Methods: We analyzed age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) for NAFLD-related deaths using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database and assessed differences between sex and racial groups. Results: Between 1999 and 2022, NAFLD-related mortality rose from an age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR) of 0.2 to 1.7 per 100,000, with an average annual percent change (AAPC) of 10.0% (p &lt; 0.001). In all, 85.4% of the cases were reported after 2008. Females (0.2–2 per 100,000, AAPC: 11.7%, p &lt; 0.001) saw a steeper increase than males (0.2–1.3 per 100,000, AAPC: 9.3%, p &lt; 0.001). White individuals’ AAMR rose from 0.2 to 1.9 per 100,000 (AAPC: 10.8%, p &lt; 0.001). Asian or Pacific Islanders (AAPI) increased from 0.2 in 2013 to 0.5 in 2022 (AAPC: 12.13%, p = 0.002), and American Indians or Alaska Natives (AI/AN) from 1 in 2013 to 2.2 in 2022 (AAPC: 7.9%, p = 0.001). African Americans (AA) showed an insignificant change (0.3–0.5 per 100,000, AAPC: 0.7%, p = 0.498). Regarding age, individuals 45–64 saw AAMR rise from 0.3 to 1.2 per 100,000 (AAPC: 6.5%, p &lt; 0.001), and those 65+ from 0.2 to 6 per 100,000 (AAPC: 16.5%, p &lt; 0.001). No change was observed in the 25–44 age group (AAMR: 0.2 per 100,000, AAPC: 0.0%, p = 0.008). Conclusion: We report increased NAFLD-related mortality among both sexes and certain racial groups. The mortality rate increased for older populations, emphasizing the need for targeted public health measures and evidence-based interventions.

Rising alcohol-associated liver disease–related mortality rates in the United States from 1999 to 2022

We examined trends in alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD)–related mortality in the United States from 1999 to 2022, focusing on sex, racial differences, and specific age groups. We analyzed age-adjusted mortality rates for ALD-related deaths using the CDC WONDER database and assessed differences between sex and racial groups. ALD-related mortality rates increased significantly between 1999 and 2022, with a more pronounced increase in females. White, Asian, Pacific Islander (AAPI), and American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) groups showed significant uptrends in ALD-related mortality, while African Americans (AA) experienced a nonsignificant decline. Age-specific trends revealed substantial increases in crude mortality rates across various age groups, with the largest increase observed in the younger age groups of 25–34 years, with an average percent change of 11.12% from 2006 to 2022 (average annual percent change of 7.1% for the study period), and 35–44 years, which showed an average percent change of 17.2% from 2018 to 2022 (average annual percent change of 3.8% for the study period). This study reveals increased ALD-related mortality rates in the United States from 1999 to 2022, with disparities among sex, racial groups, and younger age groups. Continued monitoring and evidence-based interventions are needed to address the growing burden of ALD-related mortality, particularly in the younger population.

How does exposure to masked individuals affect White Americans' attitudes toward Asian American and Pacific Islanders?

AbstractAcross three studies, conducted between Spring 2020 and Spring 2021, we tested whether exposure to an Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI) target person wearing a face mask would increase or decrease White Americans' perceived threat from and positivity toward AAPI individuals. Although results varied by study, a single‐paper meta‐analysis revealed that the masked (compared to unmasked) AAPI target resulted in greater positivity toward AAPIs, due to reduced perceptions of both symbolic threat to group values and realistic threat to group health. Positivity toward AAPIs did not reliably differ after exposure to a masked versus unmasked White target. Implications for interventions that encourage COVID‐safe behaviors and combat anti‐AAPI attitudes are discussed.

1103-P: Prediabetes and Associated Characteristics among Asian/Pacific Islander Adolescents with Obesity

Background: There are limited data regarding modifiable lifestyle behaviors and prediabetes among US Asian/Pacific Islander (API) children. This study characterizes the association of obesogenic behaviors and weight with prediabetes among API adolescents with obesity receiving pediatric care. Methods: We used retrospective data from 3,233 API adolescents aged 13-17 years in a US healthcare system who had well child visits in 2016-2019, provided well-check information on health behaviors, had BMI ≥95th percentile, and HbA1c level (within 1 year). Age, sex, self-reported daily obesogenic behaviors (eating &amp;lt;5 servings of fruits/vegetables, drinking ≥12 oz juice/soda, exercising for &amp;lt;60 minutes, &amp;gt;2 hours screen time), obesity level (Class I,2,3) and neighborhood deprivation index (NDI) were examined. Prediabetes was defined as HbA1c 5.7-6.4%; those with HbA1c ≥6.5% or diabetes diagnosis were excluded. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine the association of these factors and prediabetes. Results: Among 3,233 API adolescents (mean age 14.6 ± 1.4 y; 63.8% male) with obesity, 22.4% had prediabetes (84.4% had HbA1c 5.7-5.9%). Prediabetes did not differ by age or sex but increased with obesity level (20.1%, 25.2%, 33.2% for Class 1, 2, 3 obesity, respectively). In unadjusted analyses, low exercise was marginally associated with prediabetes (p=0.07) but not diet or screen time. In fully adjusted multivariable analyses, obesity severity (OR 1.98 [95% CI 1.47-2.64] for class 3, OR 1.34 [1.10-1.63] for class 2 vs 1), and low exercise (OR 1.20 [1.01-1.44]) were associated with increased odds of prediabetes, whereas other modifiable behaviors were not. Conclusion: About 1 in 5 API adolescents with obesity had prediabetes, associated with obesity severity and low exercise. These findings support efforts that address obesity and promote physical activity in API children to reduce the risk of diabetes. Further studies should examine potential differences by ethnic group. Disclosure C.Chu: None. L.A.Rodriguez: None. M.Chandra: None. L.Greenspan: None. A.M.Bacong: None. J.C.Lo: None. Funding Kaiser Permanente Northern California

422 Healthcare disparities in atopic dermatitis: insights from TARGET-DERM registry

Abstract Atopic dermatitis disproportionately affects diverse patient populations. Furthermore, complex factors may influence the burden of disease and access to treatment amongst different racial and ethnic groups. The aim of this study is to evaluate health disparities and real-world management patterns in distinct populations treated for AD in routine clinical practice. The study included patients with AD (≥age 6) enrolled in TARGET-DERM, an observational, longitudinal study of over 2500 participants across 43 US academic/community centers. Participants were classified in four race/ethnicity categories as reported in enrollment forms and/or patient self-reported: non-Hispanic (NH) White, Black, Asian/Pacific Islander (API) and Hispanic. Patient characteristics analysed included demographics, clinical characteristics, investigator-assessed and patient-reported outcomes, and treatment history. A total of 1928 patients (mean age 34 years; 58% female; 60% enrolled at community-based centers) were included, encompassing 251 NH-Black (13%), 271 NH-API (14%), 288 Hispanic (15%) and 1118 NH-White (58%) participants. Most (71%) had a medical comorbid condition with 30% having ≥3 conditions. Private insurance was highest among NH-APIs (82%) and NH-Whites (70%), Medicaid was highest among Hispanics (46%) and NH-Blacks (27%), and uninsured was highest among NH-Blacks (18%) and NH-Whites (12%). At enrollment, clinical disease severity assessments [vIGA-AD, TBSA and vIGA-ADxTBSA (VxT)] varied by race/ethnicity, also suggesting healthcare disparities. Lowest severity was among NH-Whites (25.9% vIGA-AD clear/almost clear, 26.7% VxT clear/almost clear and median TBSA 5%), followed by Hispanics (21.7%, 18.2% and 7%), NH-Blacks (15.7%, 15.3% and 10%), and NH-APIs (10.7%, 13.8% and 8%). No differences were identified in the distribution of traditional systemic therapies across groups. However, in multivariable analysis (adjusted for age, sex, insurance status, comorbidities, vIGA and treatment status), NH-Blacks and Hispanics were less likely to be treated with advanced systemic therapies than NH-Whites [odds ratio (OR) of 0.67 and 0.70, respectively; P &amp;lt; 0.01]. Similarly, NH-APIs were more likely to have higher vIGA-AD scores than NH-Whites (OR = 1.57; P &amp;lt; 0.01). Non-Hispanic Blacks also had higher vIGA-AD scores than NH-Whites (OR = 1.42; P &amp;lt; 0.05) when controlling for all covariates other than treatment type (P &amp;lt; 0.05), adjustment for which renders the estimated black–white disparity nonsignificant. (OR = 1.32, P = 0.11). Descriptively comparing patient-reported outcome distributions identified no significant differences (P &amp;gt; 0.12). Despite presenting with more severe disease, Blacks and Hispanics have significantly lower odds of using advanced systemic therapy relative to NH-Whites, suggestive of an access disparity leading to disparities in disease control. These disadvantages persist after adjusting for an array of demographic, socioeconomic and medical history characteristics. The results highlight real-world evidence of racial and ethnic disparities among patients with AD.

125-OR: Disparities in Access to Sodium–Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors (SGLT2i)

SGLT2i are shown to improve diabetes control and delay the onset of diabetes-related complications. However, socioeconomic (SES) factors may influence access to SGLT2i. We assessed trends and differences in SGLT2i prescription rates by race, ethnicity, and insurance type at a large academic medical center (AMC). Data were extracted from the electronic health records at a large AMC from January 2014 to December 2021. The study outcome was SGLT2i prescription rates over time. Race and ethnicity were classified as Non-Hispanic White (NHW), NH Black (NHB), Hispanics, and Asian/Pacific Islanders (API), and insurance type as Private, Medicare, and Medicaid. Negative binomial regressions were used to estimate the prescription rates by year. Between 2014-2021, 30,030 type 2 diabetes patients received an SGLT2i prescription, and the prescription rates increased significantly from 0.25% to 11.47%, with the rates increasing fastest in Medicare patients. Privately-insured and Medicare patients were more likely to be prescribed SGLT2i than Medicaid patients (p&amp;lt;0.001). NHB, and Hispanic patients were less likely to be prescribed SGLT2i than NHW and API patients (p&amp;lt;0.001). Although SGLT2i prescription rates increased after FDA approval, substantial variations by race, ethnicity, and insurance type exist. Future studies are needed to explore how SES factors drive observed differences in access to SGLT2i. Disclosure D.S.Zhang: None. A.Rajan: None. S.Islam: None. D.M.Charytan: Advisory Panel; Merck &amp; Co., Inc., CSL Behring, GlaxoSmithKline plc., Consultant; Novo Nordisk, Gilead Sciences, Inc., AstraZeneca, Other Relationship; Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly Alliance, zogenix, medtronic, Research Support; Amgen Inc. A.M.Jacobson: None. J.Divers: None. Funding Doucette Innovation Fund

1242-P: Obesity Disparities in a Multiracial Sample of Asian American and Pacific Islander (API) Adults

Background: Asians have higher diabetes rates than Non-Hispanic white (NHW) people, despite having lower BMI. Studies on Asians often present monoracial groups. We examined obesity rates among mono- and multiracial APIs. Methods: We examined obesity and other factors by self-reported race using case-control data from two integrated healthcare systems with large API populations. Results: Obesity varied by race, ranging from 8.5% (Chinese) to 53.5% (Other Pacific Islander) (Table 1). Obesity was high for multiracial API. Demographic, behavioral, and clinical factors explained some, but not all the differences in obesity rates (Table 2). Conclusion: Multiracial API people had higher obesity rates than monoracial API and NHW people. Robust data on multiracial people are needed to understand health disparities among this group. Disclosure A.M.Bacong: None. S.L.Gibbs: None. T.B.Frankland: Research Support; Pfizer Inc., Stock/Shareholder; AbbVie Inc., Pfizer Inc., CVS Health Corp, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc. J.Li: None. Y.G.Daida: Research Support; GlaxoSmithKline plc. S.P.Fortmann: Research Support; Pfizer Inc. L.Palaniappan: None. Funding National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL126172)