Abstract Background Left ventricular (LV) contraction in left bundle branch block (LBBB) is characterized by early septal contraction and delayed contraction of the lateral wall, but the process may differ depending on myocardial contractility in addition to the degree of conduction block. Purpose This study aimed to evaluate LV contraction in patients with LBBB by analysis of longitudinal strain (LS) and to compare it between patients with preserved LV ejection fraction (pEF: EF>50%) and reduced LV EF (rEF: EF<40%). Methods We studied 87 patients with LBBB. Fifty had pEF (EF 59±7%) with a mean QRS duration of 144±12ms, and 38 had rEF (EF: 29±4%) with a mean QRS duration of 147±12ms (p=0.32 vs. pEF). We also studied 43 patients without conduction block (Narrow-QRS; pEF, n=23; rEF, n=20). Patients with a heart rate less than 60 or greater than 80 beats/min during echocardiography or with a history of myocardial infarction were excluded. Three standard apical images were recorded, and the LS of one heartbeat starting at the beginning of the QRS was evaluated in 18 LV segments. When the strain waveform showed a negative peak during the pre-ejection period, it was identified as early systolic contraction (ESC), and the first negative peak that appeared after aortic valve opening (AVO) was identified as late systolic contraction (LSC). The time from the beginning of QRS to the peak of the LSC (Q-Peak) and the strain value at the end of the QRS were measured in each segment. Results In patients with LBBB, the septum contracted early, and ESC was seen mainly in the early contracted area. The lateral wall contraction was delayed, and the difference between the maximum and minimum Q-Peak was greater than the Narrow-QRS in the same EF category. Patients with rEF and LBBB had a larger number of segments with ESC and a smaller minimum Q-Peak than those with pEF. The difference between the maximum and minimum Q-Peak was greater for patients with rEF than for patients with pEF. Conclusions Although patients with LBBB had significant dyssynchrony due to conduction block even those with pEF, LV contractile properties were altered in patients with rEF and associated with further increased dyssynchrony.