Variations Of Arch Research Articles

CT Angiographic Study of Anatomical Variations of Aortic Arch Branches in Libyan Patients

The aim of this study is to determine the prevalence of the aortic arch branches variations in Libyan patients. The proportion of each type will be determined. Subjects and methods: This retrospective study was carried out on 229 cancer patients referred to the CT Scan Department for enhanced chest CT scanning. The scans showed that 83% of the patients had classical aortic arch branching patterns, and 17% had aortic arch variations. Bovine arch variation was the most common variation seen, reaching 11.4%, in which brachiocephalic and left common carotid arteries arise from the aortic arch in a common trunk. The prevalence of the left vertebral artery type that originates from the aortic arch was 3.9%. The prevalence of the aberrant right subclavian artery type was 2.6%, and of the aberrant right subclavian artery with common carotid trunk type was 1.74%. No relationship was found between gender and aortic arch branches variations. We conclude that aortic arch branching variations exist and hence, attention must be paid during chest surgical operations/radiological interventions to ensure safe procedure outcomes. Also, a CT scan is a good method to study such variations and the associated branching patterns.

Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Double Aortic Arch versus Right Aortic Arch Variant in Vascular Ring Formation – Case Report and Review of the Literature

Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Double Aortic Arch versus Right Aortic Arch Variant in Vascular Ring Formation – Case Report and Review of the Literature

Anatomical Anomaly: Case Report of the Absence of the Right Common Carotid Artery

Purpose: Aortic arch anatomical variations are of surgical importance. Many variations of the aortic arch and associated vessels may be found incidentally or post-mortem. Methods: A 61-year-old presented with symptoms suspicious of a cerebrovascular accident. Results: The patient was found to have the right internal and external carotid arteries emanating from the right subclavian artery in absence of a common carotid artery on computed tomography angiography of the neck. Conclusion: A recent comprehensive review noted 41 published cases of common carotid artery aplasia with the right internal carotid originating from the subclavian artery in only 4 of these cases. The current case represents a rare absence of the right CCA with the right ICA and ECA originating separately from the right subclavian artery.

Branching patterns and anatomical variations of human aortic arch in Indian population

Knowledge of the aortic arch branching pattern is important during supra-aortic angiography, aortic instrumentation, thoracic and neck surgery. The aortic arch (AA) is located in the superior mediastinum. In 65–80% of the cases, the three branches arise from the aortic arch, namely, the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT), the left common carotid artery (LCCA), and the left subclavian artery (LSA). The purpose of this study is to describe different branching patterns of the arch of the aorta in Indian subjects. This observational study is based on dissection performed on Sixty embalmed arches of the aorta in adult Indian cadavers (in manuscript it was written as, 20 dissected heart specimens were collected of still-born fetuses) were exposed and their branches examined during cadaveric dissection in the department of Anatomy. The anatomical variations of the arch of the aorta and its branches, its branches at site of origin, and the distance of each branch from the point of origin to the median plane were measured. The usual three-branched pattern of arch of aorta was found in 44 specimens (73.33%). The common trunk for both brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery was present in 11 specimens (18.33%). In 2 specimens (3.33%), the arch gives four branches. In 1 specimen (1.67%), give three branches. The wide spectrum of variations in the anatomical arrangement of the human aortic arch and its branches offer valuable information to catheterize the aortic arch and its branches for safely performing endovascular surgery. These anatomical and morphologic variations in the arch of the aorta and its branches are significant for diagnostic and surgical procedures in the thorax, head and neck regions.

342 SURGICAL TREATMENT OF ESOPHAGEAL CANCER WITH VARIATIONS OF THE AORTIC ARCH AND ITS BRANCHES

Abstract The variations of the aortic arch and its branches are rare. The surgical treatment of esophageal cancer would be challenged for combination with this anomaly. This study intends to review significant group cases to analyze the influence of this variation on esophagectomy. Methods From 2013 to 2019, 19 patients with aortic arch and brachiocephalic vessels variations underwent esophagectomy, accounting for 0.3% during the same period. The abnormalities were distributed as follows: left-sided aortic arch combined with aberrant right subclavian artery (LAA + ARSA) occurred 13 cases, right-sided aortic arch anomalies with mirror image arch branches (RAA + MIAB) in 1 case, and right-sided aortic arch combined with aberrant left subclavian artery (RAA + ALSA) in 5 case. Of the patients with LAA + ARSA, 11 patients underwent the McKeown esophagectomy, and 2 patients via transhiatal. All patients with RAA underwent left thoracotomy approach.Perioperative outcomes and long-term survival were analyzed. Results The tumors were mostly located in the upper and middle thorax (47.4% and 42.1%). The R0 resection rate was 89.5% (17/19). Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury occurred in 2 patients, anastomotic fistula in 1 patient. Two patients died within 30 days postoperatively. The yield of lymph nodes was 21.8 ± 9.4. The sampling rate of lymph nodes along the recurrent laryngeal nerve was 61.5% in LAA + ARSA group, while 16.7% in RAA group. Recurrence happened in 5 cases (29.4%), including 2 regional relapse. Four patients died after recurrence, with a median time to death of 20 months (range: 10–48 months). Conclusion For aortic arch and brachiocephalic artery variations in esophageal cancer, aberrant right subclavian artery and right-sided aortic arch are the most common types. The surgical strategy is closely related to the aortic arch position. Due to the combined variation of the recurrent laryngeal nerve, the upper mediastinal lymph nodes dissection would be conservative, but with acceptable oncologic results.

Morphometry of the aortic arch and its branches. A computed tomography angiography-based study.

The current study aims to determine the prevalence of variations of the aortic arch using computed tomography angiography (CTA), as well as morphometries and gender correlations. A retrospective, transverse, observational and descriptive study of 220 CTA was performed. The branching pattern, most cranial vertebral level of the aortic arch, area of the proximal, middle and distal segments of the arch, area of each branch, and the path of atypical arteries were recorded. Results were analysed and stratified by gender. The typical aortic arch branching pattern was present in 77.7% without statistical significance between genders. The most common variant was a two-branch pattern with a common trunk and a left subclavian (13.6%), followed by a typical branching pattern with an added left vertebral artery (7.3%). T3 was the most frequent cranial level (32.3%), followed by T2-T3 (26.8%), and T3-T4 (23.2%). The mean areas of the aortic arch were 685.5 ± 183.9, 476.1 ± 124.1, and 445.0 ± 145.1 mm2 for the proximal, middle and distal segments, with statistical difference between men and women in the middle and distal segments. Three paths of atypical arteries were identified: bifurcated vertebral artery (0.5%), aberrant right subclavian artery (0.5%), and left subclavian ostium obstruction (0.5%). Mexican population has one of the highest prevalence of variations in the aortic arch branching pattern. The high probability of finding these should be taken into consideration when assessing patients. A standardised classification method would contemplate future un-reported findings, without causing confusion by the different numbers assigned by each author.

Anatomic Variations of the Aortic Arch in the Omani Population—a Pilot Study

Anatomic Variations of the Aortic Arch in the Omani Population—a Pilot Study

Transposition of Anomalous Left Vertebral to Carotid Artery During the Management of Aortic Disease

The left subclavian artery is frequently revascularized by transposition or bypass when zone 2 thoracic endovascular aortic repair is planned, because decreased rates of spinal cord ischemia (SCI) have been reported with this strategy. An anomalous left vertebral artery (aLVA) originating directly from the aortic arch is the second most common arch variant after the bovine trunk, with a reported incidence of 4% to 8%. In addition, 6% to 10% of vertebral arteries will terminate in a posterior inferior cerebellar artery, increasing the risk of stroke if not revascularized.

Proximal Sealing Length in TEVAR: Dependent on Aortic Arch Type?

The proximal landing zone is of paramount importance in the endovascular treatment of aortic pathologies. Elaborating the ideal proximal landing zone in the thoracic aorta and especially in the aortic arch is difficult for several reasons: 1) biomechanical forces are influenced by anatomical variations of the aortic arch and the proximity to the beating heart; 2) the supra-aortic vessels bring the risk of neurological complications when de-branching or endovascular alternatives are considered to extend the proximal landing zone; 3) the diversity of aortic pathologies including aneurysms, dissections, intramural haematoma, or traumatic ruptures hinders homogeneous cohorts.

Investigating the Association between Aortic Arch Variants and Intracranial Aneurysms.

There is an association between anterior cerebral artery vessel asymmetry and anterior communicating artery aneurysm, presumably based on flow dynamics. The purpose of this study is to investigate the potential relationship between aortic arch branching patterns and incidence of intracranial aneurysm. This study included patients scanned over 1 year at our tertiary care center who underwent high-resolution imaging (computed tomography angiography or digital subtracted angiogram) of the head and neck arteries, aortic arch, and superior mediastinum. Exclusion criteria included patients with suboptimal images. Patient age, gender, aortic arch branching pattern, and the presence, location, and number of aneurysms were documented. Among the 1082 patients analyzed, 250 (23%) patients had a variant aortic arch branching pattern, 22 (8.8%) of whom had aneurysms. There were 104 patients with 126 aneurysms, with majority of patients with normal aortic arch branching pattern (n = 82, 79%). The most common variant was a common origin of the left common carotid artery and brachiocephalic trunk with or without direct origin of the left vertebral artery. Twenty-two patients with aneurysms had an aberrant aortic arch (21%), compared to 232 patients without an aneurysm (24%). Fischer exact test showed no statistically significant difference between the incidence of aneurysm with different aortic arch variant groups (two-tailed p-value = 0.715). To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the association between aortic arch branching patterns and incidence of intracranial aneurysm. No significant association was found between aortic arch branching pattern and the incidence of intracranial aneurysm.

Anatomical organization of aortic arch variation with embryological basis and clinical application

Introduction: The variation in the aortic arch is well known and it has been demonstrated by number of researchers. Changes involved in the development of aortic arch system such as regression, retention or reappearance result in the variation in branching pattern of aortic arch. Variations of the branches of aortic arch are due to alteration of branchial arch arteries during embryonic period. The most common classical branching pattern of the aortic arch in humans comprises of three great vessels, which includes Brachiocephalic trunk, Left Common Carotid artery and Left Subclavian artery. Aim: The study is to determine the embryological basis correlating with clinical application and surgical procedures. Materials and Methods: A study was conducted in 50 formalin fixed cadaveric hearts, during a period of two years. In the routine dissection for 1st MBBS and also museum specimens we encountered 3variations in the branches of arch of aorta. Results: The variations in aortic arch branching pattern were observed in 4 cadaveric hearts (8%). Conclusion: The wide spectrum of variation in the human aortic arch and its branches offer valuable information to catheterize in endovascular surgery for diagnostic and surgical procedures in the thorax, head and neck regions. KEY WORDS: Aortic Arch (AA), Left Common Carotid (LCCA), Left Subclavian (LSA), Brachiocephalic Trunk (BCT), left vertebral artery(LVA).

High-resolution, non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the wrist, hand and digital arteries using optimized implementation of Cartesian quiescent interval slice selective (QISS) at 1.5 T

PurposeNon-contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) techniques are of considerable interest for diagnosing vascular diseases in the upper extremities owing to the possibility of repeated examinations, sufficient coverage of the measurement volume, and because possible side effects of administering iodine- or gadolinium-based contrast agents and radiation exposure can be avoided. The aim of this study was to investigate the feasibility of an optimized electrocardiogram (ECG) triggered Cartesian quiescent interval slice selective (QISS) technique for MRA of hand arteries. Material and methodsBoth hands of 20 healthy volunteers (HVs) were examined using an optimized QISS-MRA pulse sequence at 1.5 Tesla. The wrist and hand arterial trees were divided into 36 segments. Cross-sectional areas (CSA) of all arterial segments were measured. For the technical evaluation of the pulse sequence, the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were computed and six imaging artifacts were graded. Two experienced observers used an ordinal scoring system to assess the image quality of each arterial segment. Interobserver agreement was determined. ResultsThe median CSA was 7.3 mm2 in the ulnar and radial artery, 3.2 mm2 in the four common digital arteries, and 1.5 mm2 in five proper digital arteries. The median SNR and CNR of the third common proper arteries were 45.9 and 20.3, respectively. None of the arterial segments were contaminated by venous enhancement. The image quality of arterial segments for both hands was considered as diagnostic in 87.2% of all 1440 segments. An interobserver agreement of 0.67 for both hands was determined for image quality of arterial segments using a five-grade scoring system. Optimized QISS-MRA allows as the first MRA technique the classification of superficial palmar arch (SPA) and deep palmar arch (DPA) variants. 5 new SPA and 6 new DPA variants could be classified using QISS-MRA in comparison with previous studies using CE computed tomography angiography and using fixed cadaver hands. ConclusionsBy using this optimized 2D Cartesian QISS-MRA protocol, contrast agent-free angiography of the wrist and hand arteries provided a high in-plane spatial resolution and an excellent visualization of small digital arteries.

Anatomical Variations of the Aortic Arch: A Computerized Tomography-Based Study.

IntroductionDespite adequate preparation and meticulous pre-operative assessment, variations of the vascular anatomy of the aortic arch may lead to clinical dilemmas. In the present era, with the easy availability of imaging facilities, various anatomical variations can be found out prior to an interventional procedure. However, there are many countries including India where such facilities may still be not widely available. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of these anatomical variants in patients undergoing Computerised Tomography (CT) chest with contrast.MethodsThis observational study involved patients who underwent CT chest with contrast as part of various clinical indications during a three-year period in a tertiary care centre in South India. Variations of the aortic arch and its branching pattern were studied in 4,000 chest CT images of patients referred to the radiology department. ResultsA total of 4,000 patients underwent CT chest with contrast during the study period. Twenty-seven variations were observed in these patients. They included aberrant right subclavian artery in seven patients, bovine arch in one patient, bovine origin of left vertebral artery from arch in one patient, bronchial artery of anomalous origin from arch in one patient, double aortic arch in one patient, and right-sided aortic arch in 16 patients. ConclusionThe variant anatomy of the aortic arch has tremendous clinical significance, especially from the surgical standpoint. Anatomical variants can also cause difficulty during catheterization while performing endovascular interventions. Given the prevalence demonstrated in our study, imaging may be indicated prior to any procedure involving vascular access in order to prevent unwanted complications.

A systematic classification of the left-sided aortic arch variants based on cadaveric studies' prevalence.

Typical branching pattern of the left-sided aortic arch consists of the brachiocephalic trunk (BCT), the left common carotid artery (LCCA) and the left subclavian artery (LSA). Variant patterns have been associated with a broad spectrum of pathologies. The meticulous knowledge of potential aortic arch variants is of utmost importance to radiologists, interventional cardiologists, vascular and thoracic surgeons. The current systematic review collects all aortic arch branching patterns and their frequency as published by various cadaveric studies, calculates prevalence taking into account the gender and the different people background, as well. All extracted variant patterns are classified into types and subtypes according to the number of emerging (major and minor) branches (1, 2, 3, 4 and 5) and to the prevalence they appear. In cases of similar prevalence, total cases were taken into consideration; otherwise the variants were classified under the title "other rare variants". A systematic online search of PubMed and Google books databases was performed only in cadaveric studies. Twenty studies with typical (78% prevalence) and variable (22%) branching patterns were included. Types 3b, 2b, 4b, 1b and 5b had aprevalence of81%, of13%, of5%, 0% and of0%, respectively. Common variants were the brachiocephalico-carotid trunk (BCCT, 49% prevalence), the aberrant left vertebral artery (LVA, 41%) and the aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA, 8%). LVA of aortic origin was detected in 32%, the bicarotid trunk (biCT) in 5% and the bi-BCT trunk in 3%. Thyroidea ima artery, a minor branch emerging from the aortic arch was found in 2%. Coexisted variants were detected in 4% (ARSA with a distinct RCCA and LCCA origin), in 3% (BCCT with a LVA of aortic origin), in 2% (ARSA with a biCT and a vertebrosubclavian trunk). No significant gender or ethnic differences exist among the 5 branching types. The proposed classification scheme aims to become a valuable and easy to use tool in the hands of all physicians involved in diagnosis and treatment of aortic arch pathology. It could be also useful in anatomical education,as well.

A Cadaveric Study of Superficial Palmar Arch with Surgical Importance

Introduction: Arterial supply of hand is by two arterial anastomotic arches formed by radial and ulnar arteries and their branches. The anastomoses between the branches of radial and ulnar arteries such as palmar carpal and dorsal carpal arches at the wrist and superficial and deep palmar arches in the palm, maintain a rich arterial supply to the wrist and palm. Effective collateral circulation in palm is essential in peripheral arterial diseases such as Raynaud’s disease and in harvesting radial artery or the ulnar artery for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) surgery. Aim: To observe the variations in the formation of superficial palmar arch. Materials and Methods: A descriptive study was performed on 45 formalin fixed upper limbs of both sex in the Department of Anatomy, JSS Medical College, Mysuru, Karnataka, India. The study was conducted during routine dissection of upper limbs for undergraduates as per the Cunningham’s manual for practical anatomy. Few rare variations in the formation of superficial palmar arch and the arterial pattern of hand were noticed. The variations found were classified according to Coleman and Anson classification. Results: Out of 45 limbs, complete arch was found in 36 limbs and incomplete arch in nine limbs. In complete arch type, we found an arterial arcade, bifurcation of ulnar artery and in incomplete arch type, radial-radial anastomosis. Another rare findings of highly tortuous ulnar artery in forearm and in the palm. Conclusion: The findings in the variations of superficial palmar arch are essential in microvascular surgery, forearm fasciocutaneous flap, radial artery and ulnar artery harvesting in coronary artery bypass graft procedure.

Clinical Impact of Rare Aortic Arch Variant

This case report describes the clinical implications of peripheral arterial disease in a patient with a rare variant of the aortic arch branches. The patient was a 68-year old-female with an extensive cardiovascular history including multiple severe peripheral arterial stenoses, systemic and pulmonary hypertension, hyperlipidemia, coronary artery disease, multiple myocardial infarctions, atrial fibrillation, and possible aortic valve disease. The focus of the case report will be how the patient’s anatomical variant played a large role in maintaining cerebral circulation in the presence of significant stenoses of the right vertebral artery, left subclavian artery, and left common carotid artery.

Anatomical Variations in Branching Pattern of Arch of Aorta – A Cadaveric Study in South Indian Population

Background: Knowledge of the branching pattern of arch of aorta is important in avoiding surgical and accidental injuries during aortic instru- mentation, thoracic and neck surgeries. Subjects and Methods: The present study is based on dissections that were performed on 50 properly embalmed human cadaver specimens. The anatomical variations of arch of aorta and its branches, diameter of its branches at site of origin and distance of each branch from the point of origin to median plane were measured. Results: The usual three branched pattern of arch of aorta was found in 36 specimens (72%). The common trunk for both brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery was present in 10 specimens (20%). In 2 specimens (4%), the arch gives four branches, left vertebral artery being additional branch. In 1 specimen (2%), the arch gives three branches namely; common trunk for brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery, left vertebral artery and left subclavian artery. In 1 specimen (2%), the arch gives three branches namely; brachiocephalic trunk, left common carotid artery and common trunk for left vertebral artery and left subclavian artery. Conclusion: The results in this study provide significant information vital for anatomists, cardiovascular surgeons and radiologists.

Feasibility and Safety of Cerebral Embolic Protection Device Insertion in Bovine Aortic Arch Anatomy.

Background: Cerebral embolic protection devices (CEPDs) have emerged as a mechanical barrier to prevent debris from reaching the cerebral vasculature, potentially reducing stroke incidence. Bovine aortic arch (BAA) is the most common arch variant and represents challenge anatomy for CEPD insertion during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods: Cohort study reporting the SentinelTM Cerebral Protection System insertion’s feasibility and safety in 165 adult patients submitted to a transfemoral TAVR procedure from April 2019 to April 2020. Patients were divided into 2 groups: (1) BAA; (2) non-BAA. Results: Median age, EuroScore II, and STS score were 79 years (74–84), 2.9% (1.7–6.2), and 2.2% (1.6–3.2), respectively. BAA was present in 12% of cases. Successful two-filter insertion was 86.6% (89% non-BAA vs. 65% BAA; p = 0.002), and debris was captured in 95% (94% non-BAA vs. 95% BAA; p = 0.594). No procedural or vascular complications associated with Sentinel insertion and no intraprocedural strokes were reported. There were two postprocedural non-disabling strokes, both in non-BAA. Conclusion: This study demonstrated Sentinel insertion feasibility and safety in BAA. No procedural and access complications related to Sentinel deployment were reported. Being aware of the bovine arch prevalence and having the techniques to navigate through it allows operators to successfully use CEPDs in this anatomy.

Anatomy of the axillary arch: from its incidence in human to an embryologic and a phylogenetic explanation of its origins.

Typically, the axillary arch is defined as a fleshy slip running from latissimus dorsi to the anterior aspect of the humerus. Phylogeny seems to give the most relevant and plausible explanation of this anatomical variant as a remnant of the panniculus carnosus. However, authors are not unanimous about its origin. We report herein the incidence of axillary arch in a series of 40 human female dissections and present an embryologic and a comparative study in three domestic mammals. Forty formalin-preserved Caucasian human female cadavers, one rat (Rattus norvegicus), one rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus) and one pig (Sus scrofa domesticus) cadavers were dissected bilaterally. A comparative, analytical and a descriptive studies of serial human embryological sections were carried out. We found an incidence of axillary arch of 2.5% (n = 1 subject of 40) in Humans. We found a panniculus carnosus inserted on the anterior aspect of the humerus only in the rat and the rabbit but not in the pig. The development of the latissimus dorsi takes place between Carnegie stage 16-23, but the embryological study failed to explain the genesis of the axillary arch variation. However, comparative anatomy argues in favour of a panniculus carnosus origin of the axillary arch. With an incidence of 2.5% of cases, the axillary arch is a relatively frequent variant that should be known by clinician and especially surgeons. Moreover, while embryology seems to fail to explain the genesis of this variation, comparative study gives additional arguments which suggest a possible origin from the panniculus carnosus.

Anatomical Considerations for Endovascular Intervention for Extracranial Carotid Disease: A Review of the Literature and Recommended Guidelines.

Patient selection for endovascular intervention in extracranial carotid disease is centered on vascular anatomy. We review anatomical considerations for non-traumatic disease and offer guidelines in patient selection and management. We conducted a systematic literature review without meta-analysis for studies involving anatomical considerations in extracranial carotid intervention for non-traumatic disease. Anatomical considerations discussed included aortic arch variants, degree of vessel stenosis, angulation, tortuosity, and anomalous origins, and atheromatous plaque morphology, composition, and location. Available literature suggests that anatomical risks of morbidity are largely secondary to increased procedural times and difficulties in intervention system delivery. We recommend the prioritization of endovascular techniques on an individual basis in cases where accessible systems and surgeon familiarity provide an acceptable likelihood of rapid access and device deployment.