The marsh frog is a widespread and flexible speciesthat mainly occupies various aquatic biotopes. In theLipetsk oblast, these frogs avoid only closed forestwater bodies and springs, and their habitats in the Cen-tral Russian Upland and the Oka–Don Lowland obvi-ously differ from each other. According to Klimov et al. (1999), the number of these amphibians in the Oka–Don Lowland is greater. The comparison of morpho-logical variation in frogs from these regions shows thatthe pressure of natural selection is greater in the CentralRussian Upland (Vykhodtseva, 1992; Vykhodtseva andKlimov, 1993; Kovylina and Vykhodtseva, 1993; Kli-mov et al. , 1999), and this pressure determines the rela-tionship between the demographic and morphologicalcharacteristics of the amphibian populations.This study was performed at the Galich’ya GoraNature Reserve (Zadonskii raion, Lipetsk oblast) withthe purpose of analyzing the changes in the morpholog-ical parameters of frogs depending on the biotopiccharacteristics of the environment.The material was collected on the bank of the DonRiver within the reserve on August 14–22, 1996. Thecorresponding segment of the river is approximately 3km long. Mount Morozova is located on its left bank.Its northern part is a forested slope descending to thefloodplain. Southward, the floodplain sharply narrows,and the slope becomes steeper and descends almost tothe edge of water. Mount Galich’ya is on the right bank.The floodplain is only in its southernmost part; in otherplaces, the sloping primary bank adjoins the edge ofwater.The banks of the Don River and their plant cover inthese areas are fairly variable. For this reason, the studyarea was arbitrarily divided into several sites with moreor less similar conditions: (1) a flat sandy bank withrare clumps of willow, (2) a steep sandy bank over-grown with willow, (3) a steep sandy bank partiallycovered with willow and riparian grasses, (4) a steppebank partially covered with willow and ripariangrasses, (5) a mainly stony bank covered with a forest,and (6) a steep bank overgrown with thick ripariangrasses and rare clumps of willow (Fig. 1). Sites 1–3were on Mount Morozova, and sites 4–6, on MountGalich’ya.At each site, no less than 30 frogs of different sexand age groups (i.e., female, male, adultus, and sub-adultus) were collected. On the whole, there were 169frogs from five sites (the frogs rarely appeared at site 1).The phenetic description of Rana ridibunda frogswas made according to the studies by Borkin andTikhenko (1976, 1979), Zhukov and Kubantsev (1976),and Peskov (1976). Eight characters were analyzed, sixon the dorsal and two on the ventral side:(1) Dl , the central (dorsomedial) strip (1, absent; 2,from the snout to the anus; 3, from the snout to the pec-toral girdle; 4, from the snout to the pelvic girdle; 5,from the eyes to the anus; 6, from the eyes to the pelvicgirdle; 7, from the nostrils to the anus; and 8, a traceconsisting of several spots).(2) s , the discontinuity of the central strip (1, in thepectoral girdle area; 2, in the hind limb area; and 3, inthe forelimb area and in the middle of the back).(3) z , the sinuousness of the central strip (1, a bendin the front limb area; 2, a bend in the area of the tym-panic membrane and the middle of the back; 3, a bendin the tympanic membrane area; 4, displacement to oneside in the hind limb area; 5, a bend in the eye area; and6, a bend in the hind limb area).
Read full abstract