Introduction: Many changes occurred in the UK National Health Service (NHS) during the COVID-19 pandemic-some positive and some negative. We were interested in how the pandemic drove integration of health care in small community hospitals in the UK.
 Method: Appreciative inquiry was used to understand staff perspectives of how community hospitals responded. A total of 20 organisations participated, representing 168 (34%) of community hospitals in the UK. Qualitative interviews were conducted, with a total of 85 staff members, using an online video platform. Community representation was featured through the membership of our project board and advisory group which includes Hospital Leagues of Friends. 30 case studies were developed from these interviews.
 Results: From our case studies we examine 4 types of integrated care: Multi-Disciplinary Team Working, Community Hospital and Primary Care, Community Hospital and Acute Care, Community Hospital and Local Community. In the interviews staff gave accounts of improved collaborations and partnerships across the local health and care system, and the consequent impact on patients, families, staff and the community. Many staff said that in many cases teamworking and partnerships were already established, so the trust was there to build on even closer joint working.
 Case studies demonstrating enhanced integration of health care at the micro, meso and macro level are described. Examples of micro changes were small but significant local improvements which impacted positively on the patient experience. Examples of meso changes were those that were across a community hospital or hospitals, with partnerships and joint working supporting improved services. We focus particularly on the macro level, where system-wide changes were implemented to embed innovations and integrated working. 
 We pay particular reference to factors that are known to be associated with successful integration as shown in a recently published systematic review, namely: organisational culture, workforce management, inter-organisational collaboration, leadership ability of staff, economic factors and political factors.
 Discussion: We discuss the learning from the case studies that in order to make the most of our community hospitals we need to be: making decisions locally, benefiting from excellent leadership, recognising community hospitals as community assets and looking after our staff. In particular locally devolved decision-making appropriate to local context was viewed as a critical success factor in swiftly making changes and improvements for the benefit of patients and families, and also for staff. Where this was supported by strong leadership, staff reported successful quality improvements. We continue to work with staff in online discussion groups in our Community Hospital Q Community Special Interest Group to build on this learning and share widely across the community hospital network.
 Conclusion: This study shows how the pandemic accelerated integrated care between staff, services and systems, and the improved recognition of the vital role of community hospitals as community services in the local health and care system.
 
 
Read full abstract