You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Advanced III1 Apr 2012949 INFLUENCE ADJUVANT VS. SALVAGE RADIOTHERAPY ON CONTINENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY Joanne Nyarangi-Dix, Johannes Steimer, Hildegard Jakobi, Sascha Pahernik, Boris Hadaschik, and Markus Hohenfellner Joanne Nyarangi-DixJoanne Nyarangi-Dix Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author , Johannes SteimerJohannes Steimer Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author , Hildegard JakobiHildegard Jakobi Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author , Sascha PahernikSascha Pahernik Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author , Boris HadaschikBoris Hadaschik Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author , and Markus HohenfellnerMarkus Hohenfellner Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.1047AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Adjuvant radiotherapy (ART) in high risk and salvage radiation therapy (SRT) in case of biochemical recurrence are common settings for EBRT after radical prostatectomy (RP). We primarily evaluated the effect of both approaches on continence. METHODS Upon authorization by our institutional review board we identified 309 men from the Heidelberg prospective tumour data bank. ART was defined as RT < 4 months and SRT as RT > 4 months after RP. We retrieved data on pre-, postoperative patient and tumour characteristics as well as postoperative therapies like RT from our institutional prospective tumour data bank. A telephone survey for evaluation of continence was done using the ICIQ-SF-Questionnaire. Study subjects were also further questioned e.g. on whether present continence was similar, better or worse than the situation prior to RT. Analysis was made with the IBM-SPSS software and Pearson Chi-square, Students′ t-test and Fischer′s exact tests. RESULTS 128 received ART and the other 181 SRT. Mean age of all patients at the time of RT was 65.4 (sd 6.2) yrs. Statistically significant differences in the distribution between the 2 groups were found in age at RT, preoperative prostate volume, post-RT-PSA, progression free survival , lymph node status, Gleason score and surgical margins. The difference in the distribution of applied radiation dose, age at RP, technique of RP, preoperative PSA-Value, length of RT, cancer specific survival, pre-RT-continence was not statistically significant. Form and overall grade continence before and after ART and SRT was also not statistically significant. In a sub-analysis, only 2% of the patients, all from the ART group, indicated an improvement of continence in the period after RT; this was statistically, significant. The other 98% reported unchanged or worsened continence. There was no significant difference in this distribution between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS According to our literature review of the past 10 years, this is the first study specifically analysing the effect of ART vs. SRT on continence. The time of RT seems to have no significant influence on continence after RP. At the same time, maintenance of the natural course of post-prostatectomy continence including spontaneous improvement seems possible. Should this thesis be confirmed in prospective studies, early ART and intraoperative RT-regimes can be safely evaluated with the goal of improving survival of high risk prostate cancer without compromising continence. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e386 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Joanne Nyarangi-Dix Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author Johannes Steimer Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author Hildegard Jakobi Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author Sascha Pahernik Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author Boris Hadaschik Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author Markus Hohenfellner Heidelberg, Germany More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract