Aortic Dissection Patients Research Articles

The role of peripheral blood eosinophil counts in acute Stanford type A aortic dissection patients.

BackgroundAcute Stanford-A aortic dissection (AAAD) is a devastating cardiovascular condition with high mortality, therefore identifying risk prognosis factors is vital for the risk stratification of patients with AAAD. Here, we investigated peripheral blood eosinophil (EOS) counts in patients with AAAD and their possible biological implications.MethodsWe performed a single center retrospective cohort study. From 2011 to 2021, a total of 1,190 patients underwent AAAD surgery. Patients were categorized first by death and then admission EOS counts (0.00 × 109/L or >0.00 × 109/L). Demographics, laboratory data, and outcomes were analyzed using standard statistical analyses. Ascending aorta specimens were used for western blotting and histological assessments.ResultsDeath group patients had lower EOS counts than the non-death group (P = 0.008). When patients were stratified using mean blood EOS counts: 681 patients had low (0.00 × 109/L) and 499 had high (>0.00 × 109/L) counts. Patients with low EOS counts at admission were more likely to have a higher mortality risk (P = 0.017) and longer treatment in the intensive care unit (ICU) days (P = 0.033) than patients with normal EOS counts. Also, the five blood coagulation items between both groups showed significantly different (P < 0.001). Hematoxylin & eosin-stained cross-sections of the ascending aorta false lumen showed that EOSs were readily observed in thrombi in the false lumen of the aorta.ConclusionsPeripheral blood EOS counts may be involved in thrombosis and could be an effective and efficient indicator for the diagnosis, evaluation, and prognosis monitoring of patients with AAAD.

Activation of AMP-activated protein kinase ablated the formation of aortic dissection by suppressing vascular inflammation and phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells

BackgroundAortic dissection (AD) is a fatal vascular disease in absence of effective pharmaceutical therapy. Adenosine monophosphate-activated protein kinase α (AMPKα) plays a critical role in various cardiovascular diseases. Whether AMPKα is involved in the pathogenesis of aortic dissection remains unknown. We aimed to determine whether activation of AMPKα prevents the formation of AD. Methods and resultsReduced expression of phosphorylated AMPKα (Thr172) and exacerbated phenotypic switching were observed in human aortic tissues from aortic dissection patients compared with those in tissues from controls. In vivo, the formation of aortic dissection in ApoE-/- mice was successfully induced by continuous infusion of angiotensin II (AngII) for two weeks, characterized by the activation of vascular inflammation, infiltration of macrophages and phenotypic switching of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs). rAAV2-mediated overexpression of constitutively active AMPKα (CA-AMPKα) enhanced the expression of phosphorylated AMPKα (Thr172) and attenuated AngII-induced occurrence of aortic dissection by suppressing the infiltration of macrophages, activation of vascular inflammation and phenotypic switching of VSMCs. The pathogenesis above was conversely exacerbated by rAAV2-mediated overexpression of dominant negative AMPKα2 (DN-AMPKα). In vitro, we demonstrated that the administration of an AMPK agonist (AICAR) or transfection of CA-AMPKα induced the activation of AMPKα and then ameliorated AngII-induced phenotypic switching in the VSMCs and inflammation in the bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). This could be reversed by the addition of AMPK inhibitor compound C or transfection of DN-AMPKα. ConclusionImpaired activation of AMPKα may increase the susceptibility to aortic dissection. Our findings verified the protective effects of AMPKα on the formation of aortic dissection and may provide evidence for clinical prevention or treatment.

Outcome comparison between LSA complete reconstruction and partial coverage with endovascular technique for patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection

Objectives: To compare the short-term outcomes of branched stentgrafts for left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization or partial LSA coverage without reconstruction in the treatment of type B aortic dissection with proximal tear close to LSA. Methods: A total of 125 type B aortic dissection patients were treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in Xinqiao Hospital of the Army Medical University from January 2019 to March 2021. Their medical records were reviewed and the outcomes were followed up. According to the different treatment methodologies, the patients were divided into complete LSA coverage with reconstruction group (n=25) and partial LSA coverage without reconstruction group (n=100). The data of baseline characteristics, clinical outcomes, and incidence of postoperative in-hospital adverse events were collected and compared between the two groups. The adverse events during one-year follow-up were also compared between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and log-rank test were used to compare the cumulative survival rates between groups. Results: Compared with partial LSA coverage group, distance of proximal tear to LSA((8.69±2.32)mm vs. (13.77±1.71) mm) was shorter, in-hospital expenses[175 400(166 000-189 900) yuan vs. 143 700 (138 100-151 800) yuan] was higher, average length of stent [200.00 mm vs. 150.00 (150.00-150.00) mm] and operation time [155.00 (140.00-170.00) min vs. 95.00 (80.00-100.00) min] were longer, and volumes of contrast agent [300.00 (200.00-300.00) ml vs. 200.00 (200.00-300.00) ml] (P<0.05) were higher for patients in the complete LSA coverage with reconstruction group. The incidence of post-operative fever was significantly higher in complete LSA coverage with revascularization group than that in partial LSA partial coverage with reconstruction group (56% vs. 25%, P=0.003). There was no significant difference in the incidences of all-cause death, stroke, endoleak, paraplegia, and LSA branch vessel occlusion between the two groups during follow-up. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the cumulative survival rates between the two groups (log-rank test: P=0.572 5). Conclusion: The TEVAR with complete LSA revascularization or partial LSA coverage without reconstruction for type B aortic dissection close to LSA are safe and effective with high success rates. There is no significant difference between these two techniques in short-term outcomes.

Impact of unintentional coronary angiography on outcomes of emergency surgery in acute type A aortic dissection: a retrospective study

BackgroundThis study investigated the impact of coronary angiography on outcomes of emergency operation in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients who were initially misdiagnosed as an acute coronary syndrome.MethodsFrom October 2016 to April 2019, 129 patients underwent emergency operation for ATAAD in our institution, including 21 patients (16.3%, coronary angiography group) who received preoperative coronary angiography without knowledge of the ATAAD, and the rest 108 did not (Non-coronary angiography group). Preoperative clinical characteristics, 30-day mortality and postoperative complications were compared. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to confirm the independent prognostic factors for short-term and long-term outcomes.ResultsPatients undergoing coronary angiography had higher prevalence of preoperative hypotension or shock (61.9% vs 35.2%, P = 0.022), ischemic changes on electrocardiogram (66.7% vs 37.0%, P = 0.012), platelet inhibition (ADP-induced inhibition 92.0% vs 46.0%, P = 0.001), and coronary involvement (66.7% vs 30.6%, P = 0.002). 30-day mortality was 4.8% versus 9.3% (P = 0.84). Coronary angiography group had more intraoperative bleeding (1900 ml vs 1500 ml, P = 0.013) and chest-tube drainage on the first postoperative day (1040 ml vs 595 ml, P = 0.028). However, preoperative coronary angiography was not independent risk factors for 30-day mortality (OR 0.171, 95%CI 0.013–2.174, P = 0.173) and overall survival (HR 0.407; 95%CI 0.080–2.057; P = 0.277).ConclusionPatients undergoing coronary angiography carried a higher risk of preoperative hemodynamic instability, myocardial ischemia, and perioperative bleeding. However, unintentional coronary angiography did not have a significant impact on short-term and long-term outcomes of emergency surgery in ATAAD.

The diagnostic and prognostic value of D-dimer in different types of aortic dissection

ObjectiveTo evaluate the serum D-dimer level and its diagnostic and prognostic predictive value in patients with different types of aortic dissection.MethodsEighty-four aortic dissection patients who were diagnosed clinically in our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were selected for the study. All patients were divided into Stanford type A (39 cases) and Stanford type B (45 cases) groups. The serum D-dimer level was detected at 1 h, 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission to the hospital, and its expression level with different types of aortic dissection was analyzed. The relationship between D-dimer and the prognosis of patients was also analyzed.ResultsThe serum D-dimer levels of patients in group A were significantly higher than those in group B at 6 h, 12 h, 24 h, and 72 h after admission, and the differences were statistically significant. In group A, 16 patients died, and 23 patients survived, while in group B, 18 patients died, and 27 patients survived. The serum D-dimer level of the dead and surviving patients in group A was significantly higher than that of group B, and the serum D-dimer level of dead patients in groups A and B was significantly higher than that of surviving patients. For diagnostic value, the AUC was 0.89, sensitivity was 76.92%, specificity was 90.00% in group A, and the AUC was 0.82, sensitivity was 71.11%, and specificity was 85.00% in group B. For the prognostic predicted value, the AUC was 0.74 in group A, while the AUC was 0.69 in group B.ConclusionsD-dimer has different serum levels in different types of aortic dissection patients, with higher levels in Stanford A. Serum D-dimer levels may be used as a better biomarker to diagnose the two types of aortic dissection and play an important role in patient prognostic prediction, especially Stanford type A.

Endovascular treatment of aortic dissections in patients presenting a syndrome of Marfan or a related disease: Results of a comparative study

Aortic dissection in patients with a Marfan’s syndrome and related diseases is a serious pathology for which thoracic endovascular treatment with stentgrafts (TEVAR) is still debated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of TEVAR for aortic dissection in patients with Marfan’s syndrome and related diseases by comparison with a young population without disease of the connective tissue.

Serum cystatin C is a potential predictor of short-term mortality and acute kidney injury in acute aortic dissection patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundSerum cystatin C concentration is associated with cardiovascular disease. However, the relationship between cystatin C and acute aortic dissection (AAD) remains unclear. In the current study, we aim to evaluate the predictive value of cystatin C in the occurrence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and the prognosis of AAD patients.MethodsThe patients with AAD admitted to our hospital from November 2019 through January 2022 were consecutively included in the retrospective cohort study. A complete blood cell count, serum biochemistry tests, including cystatin C and creatinine, in-hospital mortality and the incidence of AKI were recorded. All the patients were categorized into four groups according to the quartile of their serum cystatin C levels. Multivariate logistic and Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine the independent risk factors for the incidence of AKI and the prognosis of AAD patients, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to evaluate differences in survival. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the predictive value of cystatin C for short-term mortality and the incidence of AKI in AAD patients.ResultsA total of 357 patients were included in this study. The results showed that the higher the concentration of cystatin C, the higher the level of serum creatinine and the higher the incidence of AKI. Mortality was significantly higher in the group with serum cystatin C levels >1.18 mg/L. Type A AAD, white blood cell count >10×109/L, platelet count <100×109/L, and serum cystatin C concentration >1.18 mg/L [adjusted hazards ratio (HR) =2.405, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.029–4.063, P=0.041] were independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Cystatin C levels >1.18 mg/L remained an independent predictor of AKI in AAD after adjusting for the confounding [odds ratio (OR) 76.489, 95% CI, 25.586–228.660]. The areas under the ROC curves of cystatin C in predicting the mortality and incidence of AKI in AAD patients were 0.655 (95% CI, 0.551–0.760) and 0.807 (95% CI, 0.758–0.856), respectively.ConclusionsIn sum, serum cystatin C concentration is a potential predictor of short-term mortality and the incidence of AKI in AAD patients.

Surgical outcomes associated with sleep apnea syndrome in Stanford A aortic dissection patients

BackgroundPatients suffering from aortic dissection (AD) often experience sleep apnea syndrome (SAS), which aggravates their respiratory function and aortic false lumen expansion.MethodsWe analyzed the peri-operative data of Stanford A AD patients, with or without SAS, between January 2017 and June 2019. Subjects were separated into SAS positive (SAS+) and SAS negative (SAS−) cohorts, based on the Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) and the Oxygen Desaturation Index (ODI). We next analyzed variables between the SAS+ and SAS− groups.Results155, out of 198 AAD patients, were enlisted for this study. SAS+ patients exhibited higher rates of pneumonia (p < 0.001), heart failure (HF, p = 0.038), acute kidney injury (AKI, p = 0.001), ventilation time (p = 0.009), and hospitalization duration (p < 0.001). According to subsequent follow-ups, the unstented aorta false lumen dilatation (FLD) rate increased markedly, with increasing degree of SAS (p < 0.001, according to AHI and ODI). The SAS+ patients exhibited worse cumulative survival rate (p = 0.025). The significant risk factors (RF) for poor survival were: severe (p = 0.002) or moderate SAS (p = 0.008), prolonged ventilation time (p = 0.018), AKI (p = 0.015), HF New York Heart Association (NYHA) IV (p = 0.005) or III (p = 0.015), pneumonia (p = 0.005), Marfan syndrome (p = 0.010), systolic blood pressure (BP) upon arrival (p = 0.009), and BMI ≥ 30 (p = 0.004).ConclusionsSAS+ Stanford A AD patients primarily exhibited higher rates of complications and low survival rates in the mid-time follow-up. Hence, the RFs associated with poor survival must be monitored carefully in SAS patients. Moreover, the FLD rate is related to the degree of SAS, thus treating SAS may mitigate FLD.

A nomogram for reduced cardiac function in postoperative acute type A aortic dissection patients with acute kidney injury undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy.

BackgroundThis study aimed to develop a nomogram to predict reduced cardiac function for acute kidney injury (AKI) patients who received continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) after acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) surgery.MethodsThis study was a retrospective analysis. ATAAD patients with preoperative normal ejection fraction (EF) and postoperative AKI with CRRT admitted between January 2014 and November 2021 were included. The reduced cardiac function was defined as EF <50%. The data were analyzed by the univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A diagnostic model was established by a nomogram, and its discriminative performance was validated by the received operating characteristic (ROC) curve and concordance (C) statistic. The calibration of the diagnostic model was tested by calibration curves and the HosmerLemeshow test. The clinical utility was evaluated by the decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultIn total, 208 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 98 patients with reduced cardiac function. The logistic regression analyses showed age ≥60 years old, history of coronary atherosclerotic disease, preoperative pericardial tamponade, and cardiopulmonary bypass time were risk factors for reduced cardiac function, which were further employed in the nomogram. As results, nomogram revealed a high predictive power (C statistic = 0.723, 0.654–0.792; the bootstrap-corrected concordance C statistic = 0.711, the area under the ROC curve = 0.723). The calibration curves showed good consistency between the predicted and the actual probabilities (calibration curve: Brier points = 0.208, Emax = 0.103, Eavg = 0.021; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = 0.476). DCA showed that the nomogram could augment net benefits and exhibited a wide range of threshold probabilities in the prediction of EF reduction.ConclusionThis nomogram is an effective diagnostic model for predicting the reduced cardiac function in postoperative ATAAD patients with AKI undergoing CRRT and can be used to protect postoperative renal functions and facilitate patient-specific care after ATAAD surgery.

The Role of Multiple Re-Entry Tears in Type B Aortic Dissection Progression: A Longitudinal Study Using a Controlled Swine Model

Purpose: False lumen (FL) expansion often occurs in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) and has been associated with the presence of re-entry tears. This longitudinal study aims to elucidate the role of re-entry tears in the progression of TBAD using a controlled swine model, by assessing aortic hemodynamics through combined imaging and computational modeling. Materials and Methods: A TBAD swine model with a primary entry tear at 7 cm distal to the left subclavian artery was created in a previous study. In the current study, reintervention was carried out in this swine model to induce 2 additional re-entry tears of approximately 5 mm in diameter. Computed tomography (CT) and 4-dimensional (4D) flow magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were taken at multiple follow-ups before and after reintervention. Changes in aortic volume were measured on CT scans, and hemodynamic parameters were evaluated based on dynamic data acquired with 4D-flow MRI and computational fluid dynamics simulations incorporating all available in vivo data. Results: Morphological analysis showed FL growth of 20% following the initial TBAD—growth stabilized after the creation of additional tears and eventually FL volume reduced by 6%. Increasing the number of re-entry tears from 1 to 2 caused flow redistribution, with the percentage of true lumen (TL) flow increasing from 56% to 78%; altered local velocities; reduced wall shear stress surrounding the tears; and led to a reduction in FL pressure and pressure difference between the 2 lumina. Conclusion: This study combined extensive in vivo imaging data with sophisticated computational methods to show that additional re-entry tears can alter dissection hemodynamics through redistribution of flow between the TL and FL. This helps to reduce FL pressure, which could potentially stabilize aortic growth and lead to reversal of FL expansion. This work provides a starting point for further study into the use of fenestration in controlling undesirable FL expansion. Clinical Impact Aortic growth and false lumen (FL) patency are associated with the presence of re-entry tears in type B aortic dissection (TBAD) patients. Guidelines on how to treat re-entry tears are lacking, especially with regards to the control and prevention of FL expansion. Through a combined imagining and computational hemodynamics study of a controlled swine model, we found that increasing the number of re-entry tears reduced FL pressure and cross lumen pressure difference, potentially stabilising aortic growth and leading to FL reduction. Our findings provide a starting point for further study into the use of fenestration in controlling undesirable FL expansion.

D-dimer for screening of aortic dissection in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction

BackgroundAcute aortic dissection (AAD) with concurrent ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is relatively rare and sometimes overlooked. As D-dimer testing has been reported to have high sensitivity to diagnose AAD in a clinical scale, Aortic Dissection Detection Risk Score (ADD-RS), a point-of-care D-dimer analyzer capable of measuring in 10 min would be useful to deny AAD with concurrent STEMI. However, an optimal cut-off value of D-dimer in such population remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to elucidate the optimal D-dimer threshold in patients clinically diagnosed with STEMI. MethodsThis retrospective cohort study was conducted at two tertiary care centers between 2014 and 2019. Patients clinically diagnosed with STEMI who underwent serum D-dimer measurement on hospital arrival were included. The primary outcome was the diagnosis of AAD. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for D-dimer values to diagnose AAD was evaluated, particularly in patients with low to moderate risks of AAD (1 of ADD-RS). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated with several cut-off values. ResultsA total of 322 patients were included, and 28 were diagnosed with AAD. The AUROC for D-dimer to diagnose AAD was 0.970 (95% confidence interval: 0.948–0.993) in 262 patients with 1 of ADD-RS. If D-dimer ≥750 ng/mL was used as a cut-off value, sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV were 100%, 86.4%, 37.7%, and 100%, respectively. AAD could be denied in 209 (79.8%) patients using the cut-off value (D-dimer <750 ng/mL). ConclusionsSerum D-dimer ≥750 ng/mL exhibited high sensitivity and NPV to diagnose AAD with concurrent STEMI, while the ADD-RS originally utilized ≥500 ng/mL as a cut-off for any suspected AAD. A point-of-care D-dimer measurement with the new cut-off would be useful to rule-out AAD among patients with STEMI.

Previous Cardiac Surgery in Acute Type A Dissection: Not a Contraindication, But Proceed With Caution

Type A Aortic Dissection Repair in Patients With Prior Cardiac SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic SurgeryPreviewEmergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissection in patients with previous cardiac surgery is controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the association between previous cardiac surgery and outcomes after surgery for acute type A aortic dissection, to appreciate whether emergency surgery can be offered with acceptable risks. Full-Text PDF

Intraoperative Fenestration of Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) and Total Arch Replacement for Aortic Dissection in Aberrant Subclavian Artery.

Total arch replacement (TAR) and the frozen elephant trunk (FET) routinely are performed to treat aortic dissection. When aortic dissection combines with the aberrant right subclavian artery (aRSA), routine TAR+FET will occlude the ostium of aRSA. But there is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical strategy to revascularize the aRSA. We seek an uncomplicated and less time-intensive way to reconstruct the aRSA. From July 2020 to April 2022, six patients with aortic dissection and aRSA underwent TAR+FET and intraoperative fenestration on the descending trunk. The mean age of the patients was 51.7 (SD 16.2; range 30.0-72.0). TAR+FET was performed via a median sternotomy and under cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest (HCA). A fenestra of descending trunk was made intraoperative. There was no operative death in hospital and follow up. The average aortic cross-clamp time, SACP time, and lower body circulatory arrest time was 138.8 (SD 22.5; range 103.0-156.0) min and 28.3 (SD 3.9; range 25.0-35.0) min. Bleeding, neurological deficit, visceral ischemia, injury to the spinal cord, or organ dysfunction was not observed. Follow-up CTA showed the blood flow of aRSA was patent in all patients. TAR+FET and intraoperative fenestration on the descending trunk is an efficacious approach. It also reduces the difficulty of reconstruction the aRSA in aortic dissection patients.

Obesity Increases In-Hospital Mortality of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Patients Undergoing Open Surgical Repair: A Retrospective Study in the Chinese Population.

ObjectiveThe prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide, and the role of the obesity paradox in cardiovascular surgery remains controversial. In this study, we redefined obesity according to the Chinese criteria and examined the relationship between obesity and in-hospital mortality in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (AAD) undergoing open surgical repair.Materials and MethodsA total of 289 patients with AAD (between 2014 and 2016) were divided into the non-obese group and obese group for correlation analysis, general information, demographic factors, blood biochemistry, surgical details, and complications, which were used as covariates. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method, and any differences in survival were evaluated with a stratified log-rank test. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression and logistic regression were used to evaluate the effect and interaction of obesity on surgical mortality.ResultsAll the 289 patients had a mean age of 48.64 (IQR 44.00–55.00) and 74.39% were men. Of the 289 patients, 228 were non-obese (78.89%) and 61 were obese (21.11%). Patients with obesity were younger and more prone to unstable blood pressure [systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP)], preoperative hypoxemia and delirium, prolonged operative time, and surgical wound deep infection (p < 0.05). In the fully adjusted model, we observed an increased risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with obesity after fine-tuning other covariates including age and sex (HR = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.03 to 6.80; p = 0.042). The interaction suggested that obesity was more likely to cause death in elderly patients (age ≥ 60), although it was more common in younger patients (test for interaction, p = 0.012).ConclusionObesity, interacting with age, increases the risk of in-hospital mortality in patients with AAD undergoing open surgical repair. Although more verification is needed, we believe these findings provide further evidence for the treatment of AAD.

Volumetric Measurements Improve the Accuracy of Aortic Remodeling Prediction in Aortic Dissection.

Accessing aortic remodeling status through regular follow-ups is essential for acute type A aortic dissection patients undergone surgical treatment. Aortic remodeling status was usually determined using diameter or area measurements of the true and false lumen in specific anatomical slices of medical images. However, these indicators only represent partial information about the aorta and can hardly characterize the overall aorta situation. In this study, we included two types of morphology features collected from computed tomography angiography images to predict the aortic remodeling. One type is the volumetric measurements of the true and false lumen, which provide a better overall description of the aorta, and the other type is the volumetric measurements of the thrombus in false lumen and the patent false lumen, which present more detailed information of the dissection. Through progressively incorporating these measurements into the construction of the remodeling prediction model, we investigated the importance of the features that describe the overall situation and that characterize aortic internal details in remodeling prediction, especially the effect of quantitative thrombosis features. The results showed that with the inclusion of the two types of volume features, the prediction accuracy of the model increased, which proves that volumetric measurements of aortic dissection, especially the volume of thrombus, are of significant value in aortic remodeling prediction, and should be paid more attention on in clinical practice and research areas. Clinical Relevance-Demonstrating the importance of volumetric measurements of true and false lumen thrombus in false lumen and patent false lumen in the prediction of aortic remodeling.

Massive Bleeding After Surgical Repair in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Patients: Risk Factors, Outcomes, and the Predicting Model.

BackgroundMassive bleeding throughout aortic repair in acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) patients is a common but severe condition that can cause multiple serious clinical problems. Here, we report our findings regarding risk factors, short-term outcomes, and predicting model for massive bleeding in ATAAD patients who underwent emergent aortic repair.MethodsA universal definition of perioperative bleeding (UDPB) class 3 and 4 were used to define massive bleeding and comprehensively evaluate patients. A total of 402 consecutive patients were enrolled in this retrospective study during 2019. Surgical strategies used to perform aortic arch procedures included total arch and hemiarch replacements. In each criterion, patients with massive bleeding were compared with remaining patients. Multivariable regression analyses were used to identify independent risk factors for massive bleeding. Logistic regression was used to build the model, and the model was evaluated with its discrimination and calibration.ResultsIndependent risk factors for massive bleeding included male sex (OR = 6.493, P < 0.001), elder patients (OR = 1.029, P = 0.05), low body mass index (BMI) (OR = 0.879, P = 0.003), emergent surgery (OR = 3.112, P = 0.016), prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time (OR = 1.012, P = 0.002), lower hemoglobin levels (OR = 0.976, P = 0.002), increased D-dimer levels (OR = 1.000, P = 0.037), increased fibrin degradation products (OR = 1.019, P = 0.008), hemiarch replacement (OR = 5.045, P = 0.037), total arch replacement (OR = 14.405, P = 0.004). The early-stage mortality was higher in massive bleeding group (15.9 vs. 3.9%, P = 0.001). The predicting model showed a well discrimination (AUC = 0.817) and calibration (χ2 = 5.281, P = 0.727 > 0.05).ConclusionMassive bleeding in ATAAD patients who underwent emergent aortic repair is highly associated with gender, emergent surgery, increased D-dimer levels, longer CPB time, anemia, and use of a complex surgical strategy. Since massive bleeding may lead to worse outcomes, surgeons should choose suitable surgical strategies in patients who are at a high risk of massive bleeding.

The Preventive Effect of Dexmedetomidine Against Delirium in Patients with Aortic Dissection: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background: Dexmedetomidine (DEX) is often used to reduce the incidence of delirium in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. However, it was found in our clinical practice that the incidence of delirium in some patients with aortic dissection (AD) remained high even after using DEX. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether the protective effects of DEX against delirium were different between Stanford type A and B AD patients during ICU stay. Methods: Data of patients with Stanford type A or B AD who were treated in the ICU of our hospital between 2015 and 2018 retrospectively were reviewed. They were divided into four groups: A1 group (Stanford type A AD patients using DEX), A2 group (Stanford type A AD patients without using DEX), B1 group (Stanford type B AD patients using DEX), and B2 group (Stanford type B AD patients without using DEX). Patients in A1 and B1 groups received intravenous administration of DEX within 1 h admission to the ICU and after surgery or stent implantation at a loading dose of 1 µg/kg, followed by continuous infusion of 0.2–0.7 µg/(kg·h) for &gt;24 h. The mortality rate, delirium incidence, length of ICU stay, and drug administration were compared between the four groups. Results: After intravenous administration of DEX, the delirium incidence in B1 group was reduced significantly compared with that in B2 group (2.8% vs. 17.8%, P = 0.04), while there was no significant difference between A1 and A2 group (20.8% vs. 24.3%, P = 0.7). However, DEX administration significantly reduced the use of anti-hypertensive drugs (P = 0.04) and morphine (P = 0.02) in Stanford type A AD patients. Conclusion: The use of DEX reduced the incidence of delirium in Stanford type B AD patients during ICU stay, therefore reducing the risk of medical accidents and risk of rupture of the aortic dissecting aneurysm. The preventive effect of DEX against delirium in Stanford type A AD patients was not obvious, and whether increasing the dosage of DEX could enhance the therapeutic efficacy in this group of patients needs to be further observed in future studies.

Endovascular treatment of type B aortic dissection in patients with end-stage renal disease.

This study aimed to evaluate the postoperative and intermediate outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). We retrospectively reviewed patients with type B aortic dissection (TBAD) undergoing TEVAR at our single center from January 2010 to December 2020. Patients with pre-existing ESRD were enrolled as the study group. One hundred consecutive patients from September 2013 to March 2015 without ESRD were included as the control group. The primary and secondary outcomes were adverse events and survival, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival and freedom from adverse events were calculated and analyzed using the log-rank univariate test. Multivariable analysis was used to isolate the effects of ESRD. A total of 39 patients with ESRD and TBAD underwent TEVAR during the study period. The median follow-up time of patients with and without ESRD was 45 and 46months, respectively. There was significant difference between the survival at 4years of patients with and without ESRD (72.8% vs 94.9%; p = 0.011). Meanwhile, the incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in patients with ESRD (p = 0.026). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that ESRD (OR, 2.46; p = 0.049) and peripheral artery disease (OR, 4.11; p = 0.002) were the predictors of adverse events. The rates of adverse events and survival expectancy were poor in patients with ESRD and TBAD.

Clinical Features of Aortic Dissection in the Emergency Department: A Single-center Experience from South China.

ObjectivesOur goal in this study was to determine 1) whether there are any differences in clinical characteristics between Chinese and Western patients with aortic dissection (AD), and 2) the mortality rate of AD patients in the emergency department (ED) and identify the risk predictors for death.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed patients who were diagnosed with AD and admitted to our ED between September 1, 2017–August 31, 2020. Data on age, gender, clinical manifestation, medical history, routine blood tests, liver and kidney function, coagulation, myocardial enzymology, and mortality were collected.ResultsWe enrolled 535 AD patients (422 men and 113 women) with a mean age of 54.7±14.1 years. Type A AD constituted 40% of the total number of AD cases, while type B AD constituted 60%. The proportion of those who were females, 10–92 years, with type A AD, and hypertension in the Chinese population was lower than that in the Western population (P <0.05 for all). Type A AD patients had a higher proportion of acute AD clinical manifestations than did patients with type B AD (P = 0.0084, P <0.05). The mortality rate of type A AD patients (10.75%) was higher than that of type B AD patients (1.87%) (P <0.0001) in the ED. Higher values of white blood cells, neutrophils, high-density lipoprotein, activated partial thromboplastin time, and D-dimer level with worsened hepatic and renal function were found in the deceased group, and multivariate logistic regression revealed that blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels (P = 0.0031, P <0.05) were significantly associated with death.ConclusionIn South China, patients with AD had a mean age of 54.7 years, with 78.88% prevalence in males and 66.92% hypertension rate. Type A AD accounted for 40% of all AD cases, and 10.70% of patients with type A AD died in the ED. Elevated BUN levels may be a risk predictor for death in patients with type A AD.

Assessment of Optimization of Computed Tomography Angiography Protocols for Follow-Up Type B Aortic Dissection Patients by Using a 3D-Printed Model

Aim: This study aimed to investigate the optimal computed tomography angiography (CTA) scanning protocols in patients with aortic dissection following thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Materials &amp; methods: A patient-specific aortic dissection model was CT scanned at different tube voltages (80, 100 and 120 kVp) and pitch values (1.2, 1.5, 2.0 and 2.5). Six radiologists and ten radiological technologists were invited to assess images in terms of both image quality and diagnostic value. Results &amp; conclusion: The protocol of 80 kVp with 2.0 pitch resulted in highest subjective scores with lowest dose value compared with other protocols. This study concludes that low tube voltage with high pitch (CTA) using 3D-printed model produces adequate image quality while reducing radiation dose.