Aortic Arch Aneurysm Research Articles

Hybrid Thoracic Endovascular Repair of a Large, Saccular Aortic Arch Aneurysm with Coil Embolization of the Left Subclavian Artery in a 31 Year Old Filipino Female with Takayasu Arteritis and Multiple Intracranial Aneurysms: A First in the Philippines

BACKGROUND: Takayasu Arteritis (TA) is a rare, primary large-vessel vasculitis frequently leading to stenosis and less commonly, aneurysm formation. Saccular aneurysms of the aortic arch in patients with TA are fatal, have rarely been reported and represent a significant technical challenge due to the difficult anatomical location and need for protection of the cerebral circulation. Concomitant intracerebral aneurysms in patients with TA are extremely uncommon and have mostly been documented in very few case reports in literature. CASE DISCUSSION: We present a case of a 31 year-old Filipino female with recurrent chest and neck pain radiating to the upper back. Computed tomographic (CT) angiography demonstrated a large saccular aortic arch aneurysm without branch stenosis. CTA of the cerebral circulation likewise demonstrated multiple, saccular, intra-cerebral aneurysms. She underwent hybrid thoracic arch repair with supra-aortic debranching via mini-sternotomy and proximal ligation of the left common carotid artery and staged endovascular aortic arch replacement with coil embolization of the ostial-to-proximal left subclavian artery segment. Post-operative aortogram showed optimal repair with thrombosed aneurysmal sac, optimal graft position, no endoleaks and preservation of cerebral circulation. Patient improved symptomatically post-procedure and remained symptom-free during follow-up after six months. Careful review of local literature suggests that this is the first Philippine TA case with a saccular aortic arch aneurysm successfully managed in this manner. CONCLUSION: Saccular aortic arch aneurysms in patients with Takayasu are unusual and presence of concomitant multiple cerebral saccular aneurysms have rarely been reported in literature. This case highlighted that hybrid endovascular arch repair in patients with TA is feasible, minimally invasive and effective. KEYWORDS: Takayasu arteritis, aortic arch aneurysm, cerebral aneurysm, hybrid endovascular arch repair, aortic de-branching

Endovascular Repair of Aortic Arch Zones 0 to 2 Using Physician-Modified Endografts: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to collect all the available evidence concerning technical success and early and mid-term clinical outcomes of physician-modified endografts (PMEGs) for the treatment of aortic arch pathologies in zones 0 to 2. Material and methods: We performed a systematic review to identify all the eligible studies that reported outcomes to the PMEGs for aortic arch pathologies in zones 0 to 2 and then conducted a qualitative synthesis and meta-analysis of the results. The main outcomes were technical success, mortality, stroke rate, bridging stents’ complications, and reintervention rate. We estimated pooled proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Results: A total of 134 study titles were identified by the initial search strategy, of which 14 (zone 0 n=6; zone 1 n=1; zones 1 t o2: n=7) were considered eligible for inclusion in the meta-analysis. A total of 777 patients (80% male; 62±6 years) were identified among the eligible studies. The pooled technical success for the PMEG in zone 0 was 96.6% (95% CI=93.9%-98.2%), whereas in zones 1 to 2 was 95.9% (95% CI=92.9%-97.6%). The pooled 30-day mortality was 4.6% (95% CI=2.0%-10%) and 4.3% (95% CI=2.2%-8.2%) for zones 0 and 1 to 2, respectively, whereas the prevalence of late mortality was 8.2% (95% CI=4.7%-14%) and 3.4% (95% CI=1.9%-6%). The pooled stoke rate was 3.7% (95% CI=2.1%-6.4%) in zone 0 and 2.7% (95% CI=1.4%-5%) in zones 1 to 2. The early reintervention rate was 3.5% (95% CI=1.5%-8.0%) and 4.2% (95% CI=2.4%-7.2%) for zones 0 and 1 to 2, respectively, whereas during the mean follow-up of 26 months was 8.5% (95% CI=3.0%-21%) and 1.9% (95% CI=0.8%-4.3%). The pooled bridging’s stent instability was 3.9% (95% CI=1.1%-12.9%) in zone 0 and 3.2% (95% CI=1.8%-5.8%) in zones 1 to 2. Conclusions: Endovascular repair of aortic arch pathologies using PMEGs seems to present a satisfactory level of technical success and a low mortality rate. To attain clearer conclusions, further research employing randomized controlled trials, longer-term follow-up, and consistent reporting of results is warranted. Clinical Impact This systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies analyzed the short- and mid-term outcomes of aortic arch aneurysm and/or dissection using physician-modified endografts. It separately examined the outcomes from zones 0 and 1-2 of the aortic arch. Fourteen studies (n=777 patients) were included. Overall technical success rates were 96.6% for zone 0 and 95.9% for zone 1-2. Regarding early mortality and stroke rates, no significant differences were observed, while late mortality was higher in patients in zone 0. The late reintervention rate favored patients treated with PMEGs in zone 1-2. The physician-modified technique appears to be an excellent and rapidly available alternative for the treatment of aortic arch diseases.

Changes in stent-graft orientation after frozen elephant trunk treatment in aortic arch aneurysm

Changes in stent-graft orientation after frozen elephant trunk treatment in aortic arch aneurysm

Outcomes of hand-made versus commercial stent grafts in frozen elephant trunk.

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique is effective for treating extended aortic arch aneurysms. This study compares hand-made and factory-made devices in this context. A retrospective case-control study was conducted on 68 patients who underwent FET for distal aortic arch aneurysm at our institution. We used two different types of devices: hand-made stent graft in group Z (17 cases, 25.0%) and a commercialized stent graft in group J (51 cases, 75.0%). The study compared demographic characteristics and the outcomes between the two groups. In-hospital mortality was equivalent in both groups (5.9%). Spinal cord injury rates were 5.9% in group Z and 3.9% in group J. Group Z had a higher rate of aortic events (55.9% vs 96.9%, p < 0.001) and more frequent stent migration. The number of cases with aneurysm diameter shrinkage was lower in group Z. The landing zone angle at insertion influenced aneurysm changes, being 17.6 degrees in shrink cases and 26.7 degrees in unchanged or enlarged cases (p = 0.045). FROZENIX device notably reduced incidences of postoperative complications compared to hand-made prostheses. Factors such as insertion angle and stent size, rather than changes in the landing zone angle, appeared to influence aneurysm shrinkage. The use of FROZENIX in TARFET procedures has shown benefits in reducing complications and improving long-term prognosis, taking into account the landing zone angle.

Clinical impact of proximal fixation augmentation using the Najuta thoracic fenestrated stent graft during endovascular treatment for distal aortic arch aneurysm

ObjectivePrevention of late type 1a endoleaks is the main concern in thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR) for thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA). Since 2017, we have performed zone 0 TEVAR with proximal fixation augmentation using a Najuta thoracic fenestrated stent graft in addition to zone 2 TEVAR for distal arch aneurysms. We report the early-midterm outcomes of TEVAR performed using this strategy. MethodsThis single-center retrospective study enrolled 386 cases of TEVAR for thoracic aortic disease between January 2013 and December 2020. Patients with TAA treated by TEVAR landing at zone 2 was referred to as the Standard group (S group), whereas those treated by TEVAR landing at zone 0 using a Najuta fenestrated stent graft in addition to zone 2 TEVAR was referred to as the Augmentation group (A group). We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes between the two groups. The primary endpoint was secondary intervention for postoperative type1a endoleaks. Secondary endpoints were technical success, aneurysm-related death (ARD), and major adverse events (MAEs) including stroke, paraplegia, endoleaks, and secondary interventions. ResultsWe performed TEVAR in 41 and 30 cases in the S and A groups, respectively. The mean aneurysm sizes in the S and A group were 54.5 and 57.3 mm (p=0.23), and the proximal neck lengths were 16.8 and 17.4 mm (p = 0.65), respectively. The anatomical characteristics appeared to be similar in both groups. The technical success rate in both groups was 100%. Three cases in the S group had MAEs, including two stroke and one brachial artery pseudoaneurysm; whereas, 2 cases had MAEs in the A group, including one stroke and one paraplegia. There was no 30-day mortality or retrograde type A dissection in both groups. The mean observation periods in the S and A groups were 46 (1–123) and 35 (1–73) months, respectively. At 36 and 60 months post-procedure, the freedom from ARD was 97.6% and 97.6% in the S group, 100.0% and 100.0% in the A group (p=0.39); and the freedom from re-intervention for type1a endoleaks was 79.2% and 65.2% in the S group, 100.0% and 100.0% in the A group (p = 0.0087 < 0.05). A statistically significant reduction in re-intervention for type1a endoleaks was observed in the A group. ConclusionsProximal fixation augmentation using the Najuta fenestrated stent graft during TEVAR for distal arch aneurysm is effective in preventing the postoperative late type 1a endoleaks.

The jailed coiling technique: An endovascular solution for saccular aneurysms with suboptimal fixation sites.

To evaluate the midterm results of patients with saccular aneurysms treated with the jailed coiling technique. A retrospective review of 17 patients treated with the jailed coiling technique over a 7 year period, between 2018 and 2024 at our institution. Treatment entails placing an endograft across the neck of the saccular aneurysm followed by coiling of the aneurysm through an extraluminal catheter. Debranching procedures of the aortic arch were performed when necessary in order to create a sealing zone of >5mm. Data collected included demographics, anatomical features of the lesions and sealing zones, indication for intervention, method of treatment and technical success, sac expansion, and reinterventions. 17 patients (median age 69, 14 males) were treated for saccular aneurysms with short, suboptimal sealing zones (aortic arch 13, distal thoracic aorta 2, celiac trunk 1, brachiocephalic artery 1). Among the aortic arch aneurysms, six required preoperative debranching procedures of the aortic arch in order to create a short landing zone of 5mm, making them eligible for the procedure. Technical success was obtained in all patients. One perioperative mortality occurred. Mean follow-up among those treated for arch aneurysms was 32 months (range 1-71 months). One patient who was treated for an aortic arch aneurysm had a persistent endoleak. No sac enlargement was observed. None of the patients required interventions and none experienced aneurysm related mortality. The jailed coiling technique is a safe and effective method to treat saccular arterial aneurysms with suboptimal, short sealing zones. It can be utilized for saccular aneurysms located within the aortic arch and for aneurysms located in other locations where coiling or stent grafting is not an option. The procedure can be performed with minimal morbidity with a high percentage of success. Long term durability of the repair needs to be determined.

Ruptured Huge Complex Aortic Arch Aneurysm Associated With Aortic Coarctation.

Ruptured Huge Complex Aortic Arch Aneurysm Associated With Aortic Coarctation.

Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repairs: The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database Analysis

BackgroundContemporary national outcomes of open and endovascular aortic repair for descending thoracic aortic aneurysms (DTAAs) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs) are unclear. This study evaluated this issue by using The Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD). MethodsFrom July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2022, study investigators identified 3522 adults who underwent planned DTAA repair (open, 328; endovascular, 1895) or TAAA repair (open, 870; endovascular, 429), after excluding ascending aorta or aortic arch aneurysms (zone 0, 1, or 2), interventions with a proximal extent in zone 0 or zone 1, juxtarenal or infrarenal aortic interventions, hybrid procedures, aortic trauma, and aortic infection. ResultsMost DTAA interventions (85.2%) were endovascular repairs, whereas most TAAA interventions were open repairs (66.9%). For DTAA interventions, the operative mortality, permanent stroke rate, and rate of spinal cord injury were 4.2%, 3.8%, and 2.4% for endovascular repairs and 9.2%, 8.5%, and 4.6% for open repairs, respectively (all P < .05). For TAAA interventions, the operative mortality, permanent stroke rate, and rate of spinal cord injury were 6.5%, 2.1%, and 3.0% for endovascular repairs and 11.7%, 6.0%, and 12.2% for open repairs, respectively (all P < .05). Increasing annual open TAAA repair volume was associated with lower odds of experiencing the composite of operative mortality, permanent stroke, or spinal cord injury. ConclusionsOn the basis of STS ACSD data, endovascular repair was the predominant approach for treating DTAA, whereas most patients undergoing TAAA interventions had an open surgical repair. Outcome differences between open and endovascular approaches may be related to patient selection. Increasing center experience with open TAAA repair is associated with improved outcomes.

Reverse cannulation method as a strategy for aortic aneurysm surgery: A computational fluid dynamics study on minimizing neurological risks

ObjectivesTo evaluate the blood flow velocity and wall shear stress in total arch replacement with a “shaggy” aorta, using computational fluid dynamics, and determine the optimal cannulation method. MethodsA patient-specific aortic arch aneurysm model was constructed by using computed tomography scans. Three cannulas were assessed, as follows: dispersive with a steep angle, dispersive with a gentle angle, and the endo-hole type. The cannula tips were oriented toward the aortic arch (standard direction) and aortic root (reversed direction), with an ideal angle (base orientation: 0°), tip orientations rotated 20° clockwise and counterclockwise from the base orientation. The variables of interest included the blood flow velocity, streamlines, wall shear stress, and flow distribution. ResultsThe standard direction resulted in variable accelerated flow and wall shear stress locations based on cannula tip orientation, leading to unstable cerebral branch flow. Minor deviation in the cannula tip angle and cannula type led to significant alterations in flow distribution. Conversely, in the reverse direction for all cannulas, no accelerated blood flow was observed in the proximal aortic arch or cerebral vessel ostia even with angular adjustments, helping maintain a stable cerebral branch flow. Minimal variation in blood flow distribution was observed across all cannula types and angles. ConclusionsOur simulations indicate that, irrespective of the cannula type or orientation, directing the cannula tip toward the aortic root (reversed direction) prevents accelerated blood flow in critical areas, suggesting its potential as an optimal approach for aortic arch surgery in “shaggy” aorta cases.

Rehabilitation report of 2 cases of spinal cord ischemic injury after intra-aortic repair.

Spinal cord ischemia injury is a serious complication after intra-aortic surgery, with a low incidence but high disability rate. However, patients often do not receive comprehensive treatment in the early stages of the disease. Therefore, active neurological intervention is needed to protect and prevent spinal cord ischemia during and after surgery. In this paper, rehabilitation program and imaging data of 2 cases with spinal cord ischemic injury are presented and discussed regarding causes, prevention and acute treatment with this disease, which could be referred by clinicians. Case report 1: A 69-year-old male patient underwent aortic arch aneurysm and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (coated stent) was performed under general anesthesia. Complete paralysis of both lower limbs, constipation, and urinary retention occurred after surgery and was subsequently referred to our rehabilitation department. Case report 2: A man aged 41 years experienced sudden chest pain with no dizziness or headache. Weakness of both lower limbs gradually appeared over 30 minutes with subsequent loss of consciousness. He was diagnosed with aortic dissection and underwent aortic stent implantation. Inpatient rehabilitation began systematically 3 months after discharge. The 2 patients were diagnosed with paraplegia and spinal cord ischemic injury. The patients received strength and transfer training, sensory input, health mission, and activities of daily living. Patient 1 returned home without assistive devices and patient 2 returned home with wheelchair. Perioperative spinal cord protection is directly related to postoperative quality of life. Once the symptoms of spinal cord ischemic injury occur, cerebrospinal fluid drainage should be performed as soon as possible to increase mean arterial pressure. At the same time, methylprednisolone, ganglioside, anticoagulation, vasodilator drugs, and symptomatic supportive treatments are required. Intercostal artery and subclavian artery are reconstructed if necessary. Symptom stability flags referral to commence rehabilitation. Repetitive functional training is necessary to help patients return to the family and society as soon as possible.

Utility of transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach and its modification in vascular surgery: a case series study of surgeries related to subclavian artery

BackgroundThe operative field in subclavian vessel surgery is limited by thoracic inlet and outlet structures. Although endovascular therapy for the subclavian artery could be an option, open repair management is occasionally required in cases of large aneurysms, infectious vasculopathy, and trauma. The transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach, commonly used in thoracic surgery area to resect superior sulcus tumors, is a simple and safe procedure providing an excellent view of the operative field. Herein, we present three cases that underwent open repair of the subclavian artery using the transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach, and we also highlight the utility of the technique along with the procedural details.Case presentationCase 1: A 54-year-old man presented with a true aneurysm of the proximal portion of the right subclavian artery. The aneurysm measured 50 × 80 mm and compressed the right lung and trachea. We performed an aneurysm resection and a right subclavian artery reconstruction via the transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach under cardiopulmonary bypass support.Case 2: A 72-year-old man who presented with an abscess that formed around the left subclavian artery due to an unremoved guidewire during thoracic endovascular aortic repair for an aortic arch aneurysm in another hospital. After the antibiotics administration, debridement and axillary-axillary bypass were performed, and the guidewire was removed via a transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach with a use of cardiopulmonary bypass.Case 3: A 60-year-old man presented with misplacement of an indwelling dialysis catheter inserted for acute renal failure and hyperkalemia. The catheter was placed through the right neck, but had penetrated the right internal jugular vein and was misplaced from the right subclavian artery into the proximal aortic arch. Emergently, we removed the catheter using the transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach.ConclusionsThe transmanubrial osteomuscular sparing approach to the subclavian artery provides an excellent view and a wide surgical field, even in different pathological situations. This is a simple, safe, and highly useful procedure and could be the standard approach for subclavian artery surgeries.

Prevalence of carotid artery stenosis and intra-cranial lesions in patients with aortic arch aneurysm and its association with intraoperative regional cerebral oxygen saturation and postoperative neurological outcomes.

Although aortic aneurysm is associated with vascular aging and atherosclerosis, carotid and intracranial vascular disease prevalence in patients with aortic arch aneurysm remains unclear. Similarly, the effect of carotid and intracranial lesions on postoperative outcomes is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of carotid artery stenosis and intracranial lesions in patients with aortic arch aneurysm and its association with intraoperative regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2) and postoperative neurological outcomes, including delirium and cerebral infarction. This retrospective observational study included 133 patients with true aortic arch aneurysm who underwent preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We evaluated the prevalence of carotid and intracranial arterial lesions. Symptomatic cerebral infarction and delirium, defined by the confusion assessment method for the intensive care unit, were evaluated for their association with preoperative cerebrovascular lesions. Additionally, changes in regional saturation of the cerebral tissue at different surgical phases were evaluated for patients with and without cerebrovascular lesions. Fifteen (11.3%) patients experienced symptomatic cerebral infarction, and 64 (48.1%) had postoperative delirium. Preoperative MRI showed old infarction, microbleeds, significant carotid artery stenosis, and intracranial lesions in 21.1%, 14.3%, 10.5%, and 7.5% of the patients, respectively. White matter hyperintensities with Fazekas scale 2 were observed in 40.6% of the patients, while Fazekas scale 3 were observed in 18.8% of the patients. Preoperative MRI findings and postoperative neurological outcomes were not significantly different. Seventy-six patients underwent rScO2 monitoring intraoperatively. Changes in rScO2 in patients with and without carotid/cerebrovascular lesions were not significantly different. However, rScO2 was significantly lower in patients who developed cerebral infarction. Significant carotid artery stenosis and intracranial lesions were observed in 10.5% and 7.5% of the patients, respectively. Although preoperative MRI findings and changes in rScO2 or postoperative outcomes showed no significant association, patients with postoperative cerebral infarction showed significantly lower rScO2 intraoperatively.

Comparison between Zone 2 and Zone 3 distal anastomoses for aortic arch replacement in terms of invasiveness.

Zone 2 anastomosis with total cervical branch reconstruction for acute type A aortic dissection and aortic arch aneurysms became possible after stent-graft introduction. This may be an easier procedure and reduce the risk of recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the outcomes between Zone 2 and Zone 3 distal anastomoses. After evaluating the patient data in our institute between April 2016 and April 2022, the patients in whom distal anastomosis was performed at Zone 2 with a stent-graft were defined as the Zone 2 group (n = 70). The patients in whom distal anastomosis was performed at Zone 3 were defined as the Zone 3 group (n = 24). The incidence of new-onset recurrent nerve palsy was one patient (1.4%) in the Zone 2 group and six patients (25.0%) in the Zone 3 group (p < 0.001). The lower body perfusion arrest time was 44.3 ± 9.1min in the Zone 2 group and 52.9 ± 12.8min in the Zone 3 group (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality and morbidities. Multivariable analysis showed that only age was an independent predictor of overall mortality. Performing distal anastomosis at Zone 2 with a frozen elephant trunk or stent-graft reduced the lower body perfusion arrest time and possibly prevented recurrent nerve palsy.

Endovascular Arch Repair of Anastomotic Aneurysm and Pseudoaneurysm in Patients after Open Repair of the Ascending Aorta and Aortic Arch: A Case Series

Abstract Background Endovascular techniques have provided new options in the treatment of arch pathologies. Multiple studies have reported good results after endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysms and it has developed to be a considerable approach, especially in patients who are unfit for open surgery. In treatment of progressing distal pathologies after open ascending aorta and/or aortic arch replacement, the endovascular arch repair has shown promising results. Aims Aim of study was to investigate the outcomes of endovascular arch repair (b-TEVAR) with a custom-made double or triple branched arch endograft in patients with distal anastomotic aneurysms after open repair of the ascending aorta or proximal arch replacement. Methods Retrospective analysis was conducted of all consecutive patients with anastomotic aneurysms after open surgical repair involving the ascending aorta and/or aortic arch treated with b-TEVAR. All patients were treated with a custom-made double or triple inner-branched arch endograft. Study endpoints were technical success, 30-day and follow up mortality/ morbidity and re-interventions. Results Between 2018 and 2022, ten patients were treated with custom-made double or triple branched TEVAR due to anastomotic aneurysms after open ascending aorta and/or proximal aortic arch replacement. Eight patients received a triple and two a double arch branched endograft. Eight cases were performed electively and two urgently for contained rupture. Technical success was achieved in nine cases (90%). All elective patients survived. Two patients treated due to contained ruptures expired. Within 30 postoperative days, one transient ischemic attack occurred. No early endograft-related re-interventions were necessary. Median follow-up was 20 months. One patient died two months after discharge due to sepsis caused by pneumonia. No further deaths or endograft-related re-interventions were observed. Conclusion Endovascular aortic arch repair with double or triple inner-branched arch endograft for anastomotic aneurysms after open ascending and/or proximal arch replacement is technically feasible and a promising alternative in a patient cohort unfit for surgery.

Interrupted Aortic Arch and Aortic Root Aneurysm and Dissection.

Interrupted Aortic Arch and Aortic Root Aneurysm and Dissection.

Conservative treatment of retrograde aortic dissection after hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysm.

Conservative treatment of retrograde aortic dissection after hybrid repair of aortic arch aneurysm.

Successful endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysm in a pediatric patient

Successful endovascular treatment of aortic arch aneurysm in a pediatric patient

Physician Modified Fenestrated Endografts for Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair in Zone 0

This multicentre study aimed to assess the early and midterm outcomes of physician modified fenestrated endografts (PMEGs) for endovascular aortic arch repair in zone 0. Between 2018 and 2022, a retrospective study was conducted in three centres of consecutive patients undergoing endovascular aortic arch repair in zone 0 with PMEGs. Endpoints included technical success, 30 day mortality rate, major adverse events, secondary interventions, stent stability, target vessel patency, and overall survival. A total of 54 patients (mean age 63 years; 45 males) with aortic arch pathology were included, comprising aortic dissections (n= 32; 59%) and aortic arch aneurysms (n= 22; 41%). Technical success was 98%. One patient died from stroke within 30 days. Major adverse events included stroke (n= 4; 7%), retrograde type A dissection (RTAD) (n= 3; 6%), and acute kidney injury (n= 2; 4%). During a median follow up of 12 months, there were two deaths (4%) of unknown cause at one month and 1.5 months, and no aortic related death. Type Ia, type Ic, and type IIIc endoleaks were observed in two (4%), three (6%), and two (4%) patients, respectively. No vessel stenosis was observed. Re-intervention was required in 10 patients (19%). Estimates of overall survival, freedom from secondary intervention, and freedom from target vessel instability at one year were 94.2% (standard error [SE] 3.3%), 81.8% (SE 6.0%), and 92.0% (SE 4.5%), respectively. This study has demonstrated the efficacy of PMEGs for zone 0 endovascular aortic arch repair, with acceptable technical success and mortality rates. Stroke, RTAD, and re-intervention rates remain a concern for endovascular therapy. A larger population and long term outcomes are required to assess the safety and durability of this technique as a beneficial choice for endovascular aortic arch repair in specialised centres.

Prospective randomized pilot trial comparing prophylactic and therapeutic cerebrospinal fluid drainage during complex endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair

BackgroundEndovascular techniques have transformed the management of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). However, spinal cord ischemia (SCI) remains a prevalent and devastating complication. Prophylactic drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) is among the proposed strategies for prevention of SCI. Although prophylactic CSF drainage is widely used and conceptually attractive, prophylactic CSF drains have not been demonstrated to definitively prevent the occurrence nor mitigate the severity of SCI in endovascular TAAA repair. Whether or not outcomes of prophylactic drains are superior to therapeutic drains remains unknown. This pilot study was performed to determine the feasibility of a randomized clinical trial designed to investigate the role of prophylactic vs therapeutic CSF drains in the prevention of SCI in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair using branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic repair (FBEVAR). MethodsThis was a prospective multicenter randomized pilot clinical trial conducted at The University of Alabama at Birmingham and The University of Massachusetts. Twenty patients were enrolled and randomized to either the prophylactic drainage or therapeutic drainage groups, prior to undergoing FBEVAR for extensive TAAAs and arch aortic aneurysms. This was a pilot feasibility study that was not powered to detect statistical differences in clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was feasibility of randomization and compliance with a shared lumbar drain protocol. Secondary outcomes included rate of drain complications and SCI. ResultsTwenty patients were enrolled and successfully randomized, without any crossovers, to either the control cohort (n = 10), without prophylactic drains, or the experimental cohort (n = 10), with prophylactic drains. There were no differences in age, comorbidities, or history of prior aortic surgery across the cohorts. All patients were treated with FBEVAR. Aneurysm classifications were as follows: Extent I (10%), Extent II (50%), Extent III (35%), and Extent IV (5%). The average length of aortic coverage was 207 ± 21.6 mm. The length of aortic coverage did not vary across cohorts, nor did procedural times or blood loss volume. Compliance with the SCI prevention protocol was 100% across both groups. Within the prophylactic drain cohort, one patient experienced an adverse event related to lumbar drain placement, manifested as an epidural hematoma requiring laminectomy, without neurologic deficit (n = 1/10; 10%). There was one SCI event (n = 1/20; 5%), which occurred in the prophylactic drain cohort on postoperative day 9 following an episode of hypotension related to a gastrointestinal bleed. ConclusionsThe role of prophylactic CSF drains for the prevention of SCI following endovascular TAAA repair is a topic of ongoing research, with many current practices based on expert opinion and experience, rather than rigorous scientific data. This study demonstrates the feasibility of a multicenter randomized clinical trial to evaluate the role of prophylactic vs therapeutic CSF drains in the prevention of SCI in patients undergoing endovascular TAAA repair.

Branched and fenestrated endovascular aortic arch repair in patients with native proximal aortic landing zone

ObjectiveFenestrated and branched thoracic endovascular repair (f/bTEVAR) have been successfully applied in patients with diverse aortic arch pathologies. The aim of this study is to present the early and mid-term outcomes of patients with native proximal aortic landing (NPAL) managed with f/bTEVAR. MethodsA single-center retrospective analysis of patients with NPAL, managed with f/bTEVAR, between September 1, 2011, and June 30, 2022, was conducted. All patients were treated with custom-made devices (Cook Medical) with landing within Ishimaru zones 0 to 2. Primary outcomes were technical success, mortality, stroke, and retrograde type A dissection at 30 days. Follow-up outcomes were considered secondary. ResultsA total of 126 patients were included (69.8% males; mean age, 70.8 ± 4.2 years; 18.3% urgent). The main indications (60.4%) for repair were aortic arch (29.4%) and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (31.0%). Seventy-two patients (57.1%) were managed with fTEVAR. Proximal landing in zone 0 and 1 was chosen in 97.6%. Technical success was 94.4%, and 30-day mortality was 11.9%. Strokes were diagnosed in 13.5% of patients and major strokes were identified in 7.9% cases. Retrograde type A dissection rate was 3.9%. The multivariate analysis confirmed landing in Ishimaru zone 0 as an independently related factor for stroke (P = .005), whereas stroke (P < .001), pericardial effusion (P < .001), and acute kidney injury (P < .001) were independently related to 30-day mortality. Mean follow-up was 17.5 ± 9.3 months. The estimated survival rate and the freedom from reintervention rate were 72.6% (standard error, 4.4%) and 46.4% (standard error, 6.0%) at 24-month follow-up, respectively. ConclusionsStroke rate after endovascular arch repair was alarming among patients with NPAL. Proximal landing to zone 0 was related to higher risk of stroke. Reinterventions were common within the 24-month follow-up.