Aortic Attenuation Research Articles

Optimized versus conventional trigger threshold for pancreatic phase image acquisition using dual-energy CT at 40-keV: a randomized controlled trial.

To evaluate the impact of optimized trigger threshold on 40-keV pancreatic phase images acquired with a dual-energy CT (DECT) protocol. A cohort of 69 consecutive participants (median age, 72 years) undergoing a pancreatic protocol DECT examination between September to December 2021 were prospectively randomized into two protocols: conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU (Group A, n = 34) and optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU (Group B, n = 35). Pancreatic phase image acquisition was performed with fixed delay of 20s from the trigger threshold. Two radiologists assessed the 40-keV pancreatic phase images for scan timing adequacy using a binary scale (adequate or inadequate). The proportions of these classifications were compared in the two groups using the Fisher's test. The median times to achieve the aortic attenuation of 30 HU and 100 HU were 16.3s and 22.3s in Group A, respectively, and was 17.8s for 30 HU in Group B. The median time difference from 30 HU to 100 HU was 4.5s in Group A. The scan timing adequacies of pancreatic phase images were classified as adequate (50.0% and 74.3%) or inadequate (50.0% and 25.7%) in Group A and Group B (P = 0.049). An optimized trigger threshold of 30 HU allows consistent acquisition of adequate pancreatic phase images compared to the conventional trigger threshold of 100 HU for pancreatic protocol DECT at 40-keV which might lead to improved pancreatic lesion conspicuity.

Optimization of window settings for coronary arteries assessment using spectral CT-derived virtual monoenergetic imaging

PurposeTo determine the optimal window setting for virtual monoenergetic images (VMI) reconstructed from dual-layer spectral coronary computed tomography angiography (DE-CCTA) datasets.Material and methods50 patients (30 males; mean age 61.1 ± 12.4 years who underwent DE-CCTA from May 2021 to June 2022 for suspected coronary artery disease, were retrospectively included. Image quality assessment was performed on conventional images and VMI reconstructions at 70 and 40 keV. Objective image quality was assessed using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Two independent observers manually identified the best window settings (B-W/L) for VMI 70 and VMI 40 visualization. B-W/L were then normalized with aortic attenuation using linear regression analysis to obtain the optimized W/L (O-W/L) settings. Additionally, subjective image quality was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale, and vessel diameters were measured to examine any potential impact of different W/L settings.ResultsVMI 40 demonstrated higher CNR values compared to conventional and VMI 70. B-W/L settings identified were 1180/280 HU for VMI 70 and 3290/900 HU for VMI 40. Subsequent linear regression analysis yielded O-W/L settings of 1155/270 HU for VMI 70 and 3230/880 HU for VMI 40. VMI 40 O-W/L received the highest scores for each parameter compared to conventional (all p < 0.0027). Using O-W/L settings for VMI 70 and VMI 40 did not result in significant differences in vessel measurements compared to conventional images.ConclusionOptimization of VMI requires adjustments in W/L settings. Our results recommend W/L settings of 1155/270 HU for VMI 70 and 3230/880 HU for VMI 40.

Effect of patient characteristics on aortic attenuation in iodinated contrast-enhanced Abdominopelvic CT: A retrospective study

IntroductionContrast Enhanced Computed Tomography (CECT) abdomen and pelvis is a common imaging procedure. Hospitals typically follow fixed protocols of contrast volume administration for triple-phase CECT abdomen and pelvis scans and have found that patients are either underdosed or overdosed with respect to their body habitus. The aim of the study was to correlate different patient characteristics such as Total body weight (TBW), Lean Body Mass (LBM), Body Mass Index (BMI), Body Surface Area (BSA) and Blood Volume (BV) with aortic enhancement in the arterial and portal venous phases for CECT Abdomen and pelvis. MethodsA total of 106 patients who underwent triple-phase CECT abdomen & pelvis were retrospectively studied. A circular region-of-interest (ROI) of 100 mm2 was positioned on descending aorta for unenhanced, arterial, and portal venous phases to measure the aortic enhancement in Hounsfield's units. Measure of contrast attenuation (ΔH) was calculated from the difference of CT values on unenhanced images and contrast images. Correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relation of patient body characteristics with aortic enhancement. ResultsCorrelation analysis revealed that BMI exhibited the least correlation when compared to the other characteristics in both arterial (r = −0.3; p = 0.002) and portovenous phases (r = −0.35; p < 0.001) whereas TBW, LBW, BSA and BV reported moderate inverse correlations. BV was found to be the strongest of all characteristics under linear regression. ConclusionThe study supports the use of protocols that adjust contrast volume to either TBW, LBW, BSA, or BV for CT abdomen and pelvis scan. Implication of practiceThe right body parameter ensures optimal contrast enhancement, improving the visualization of anatomical structures and helps in adapting tailored contrast injection protocols.

Reference distributions of aortic calcification and association with Framingham risk score

Evidence supporting aortic calcification as a leverageable cardiovascular risk factor is rapidly growing. Given aortic calcification’s potential as a clinical correlate, we assessed granular vertebral-indexed calcification measurements of the abdominal aorta in a well curated reference population. We evaluated the relationship of aortic calcification measurements with Framingham risk scores. After exclusion, 4073 participants from the Reference Analytic Morphomic Population with varying vertebral levels were included. The percent of the aortic wall calcified was used to assess calcification burden at the L1–L4 levels. Descriptive statistics of participants, sex-specific vertebral indexed calcification measurements, relational plots, and relevant associations are reported. Mean aortic attenuation was higher in female than male participants. Overall, mean aortic calcium was higher with reference to inferior abdominal aortic measurements and demonstrated significant differences across all abdominal levels [L3 Area (mm^2): Females 6.34 (sd 16.60), Males 6.23 (sd 17.21); L3 Volume (mm^3): Females 178.90 (sd 474.19), Males 195.80 (sd 547.36); Wall Calcification (%): Females (L4) 6.97 (sd 16.03), Males (L3) 5.46 (13.80)]. Participants with elevated calcification had significantly higher Framingham risk scores compared to participants with normal calcification scores. Opportunistically measuring aortic calcification may inform further cardiovascular risk assessment and enhance cardiovascular event surveillance efforts.

Exploring Intra-arterial Contrast Administration for Intraoperative Imaging Using a Swine Model.

Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging with endovascular delivery of intra-arterial (IA) contrast could potentially provide higher attenuation with lower contrast volumes than intravenous (IV) administration. We aimed to compare IA and IV contrast use for organ-specific CT abdominal imaging. Five anesthetized swine had external jugular and brachial artery access with ascending aortic pigtail placement. An IV protocol was 100mL at 5mL/sec over 20 sec vs 50mL of IA contrast at 5mL/sec over 10 sec. Region-of-interest markers were applied to anatomical regions to measure attenuation (HU) over time. IA and IV contrast protocols achieved adequate aortic opacification (IA, 455 ± 289 vs IV, 450 ± 114 HU). The IA contrast aortic attenuation curve reached peak attenuation compared with IV contrast (IA, 8 vs 23 sec; P < .001). Time to peak attenuation was similar between IA and IV contrast in the portal vein (IA, 38 vs IV, 42 sec, P = .25). IA administration achieved a superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in less time compared with IV (R2 = .94; P < .001). IA contrast achieved adequate opacification with less bolus broadening and a superior CNR compared with IV contrast while using a smaller contrast volume for directed organ-directed imaging.

Variation in aorta attenuation in contrast-enhanced CT and its implications for calcification thresholds.

CT contrast media improves vessel visualization but can also confound calcification measurements. We evaluated variance in aorta attenuation from varied contrast-enhancement scans, and quantified expected plaque detection errors when thresholding for calcification. We measured aorta attenuation (AoHU) in central vessel regions from 10K abdominal CT scans and report AoHU relationships to contrast phase (non-contrast, arterial, venous, delayed), demographic variables (age, sex, weight), body location, and scan slice thickness. We also report expected plaque segmentation false-negative errors (plaque pixels misidentified as non-plaque pixels) and false-positive errors (vessel pixels falsely identified as plaque), comparing a uniform thresholding approach and a dynamic approach based on local mean/SD aorta attenuation. Females had higher AoHU than males in contrast-enhanced scans by 65/22/20 HU for arterial/venous/delayed phases (p &lt; 0.001) but not in non-contrast scans (p &gt; 0.05). Weight was negatively correlated with AoHU by 2.3HU/10kg but other predictors explained only small portions of intra-cohort variance (R2 &lt; 0.1 in contrast-enhanced scans). Average AoHU differed by contrast phase, but considerable overlap was seen between distributions. Increasing uniform plaque thresholds from 130HU to 200HU/300HU/400HU produces respective false-negative plaque content losses of 35%/60%/75% from all scans with corresponding false-positive errors in arterial-phase scans of 95%/60%/15%. Dynamic segmentation at 3SD above mean AoHU reduces false-positive errors to 0.13% and false-negative errors to 8%, 25%, and 70% in delayed, venous, and arterial scans, respectively. CT contrast produces heterogeneous aortic enhancements not readily determined by demographic or scan protocol factors. Uniform CT thresholds for calcified plaques incur high rates of pixel classification errors in contrast-enhanced scans which can be minimized using dynamic thresholds based on local aorta attenuation. Care should be taken to address these errors and sex-based biases in baseline attenuation when designing automatic calcification detection algorithms intended for broad use in contrast-enhanced CTs.

Quantification of aortic valve calcification in contrast enhanced computer tomography

Abstract Introduction Aortic valve calcification (AVC) is linked to higher gradients and worse prognosis in aortic valve stenosis. Current guidelines recommend calcium scoring of the aortic valve as additional factor for decision making in low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis. Calcium Scoring is performed by native computed tomography (CT). For planning of interventional valve replacement (TAVR) a second scan with contrast agent (CECT) is needed at the cost of additional radiation exposure and work up time. The aim of this study is to assess and validate an estimate conversion factor of aortic valve quantification by using CECT without native imaging. Methods The Agatston score was measured on native CT in 45 patients and used as a reference. In contrast enhanced CT, mean aortic attenuation values in Hounsfield units (HU) were determined by placement of a region of interest in the ascending aorta with a standard deviation of 4xHU for calcification threshold. AVC was segmented semi-automatically. A conversion formula was created by plotting of native Agatston score versus aortic valve calcification segmented on contrast enhanced CT and linear regression. Validation of calculated conversion formula was established by Intra-class coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman analysis. Results The linear regression model yielded an Agatston score conversion formula of 691 + 1.83 × AVCCECT. Validation of the formula in a validation cohort (n=20) showed high agreement (r2=0.802, ICC 0.915 (CI 95%: 0.786–0.966) p&amp;lt;0.001, p=0.055). Conclusion Approximation by our calculated conversion factor from contrast enhanced CT has shown excellent reliability to determine aortic valve calcification. Further studies are needed to extend this finding to larger cohorts and diverse clinical environments. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Utilization of Intra-arterial Contrast for Abdominal Computed Tomography in a Swine Model

Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging with endovascular catheter delivery of intra-arterial (IA) contrast could potentially provide higher signal attenuation in directed anatomic locations with lower contrast volumes. We compared image quality and attenuation timing of IA vs intravenous (IV) contrast protocols for abdominal imaging. Five anesthetized swine had internal jugular access and ascending aortic pigtails placed percutaneously via the brachial artery. The IV contrast protocol utilized 100 mL of iodinated contrast at 5 mL/sec over 20/sec. The IA protocol delivered 50 mL at 5 mL/sec over 10/sec. A 16-slice CT scanner with a 10 mm detector acquired static serial images at 1 image/sec for 45 seconds. Region-of-interest markers were used to select the aorta and portal vein to capture the arterial and portal venous phases of contrast administration via Hounsfield Units (HU) per second. Attenuation curves were plotted against time and assessed using a Pearson correlation. Adequate attenuation was defined as >100 HU a priori, and image quality was assessed using contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Both contrast protocols achieved adequate image attenuation with an aortic peak of 665 ± 226 (Mean HU ± standard deviation) for IA and 414 ± 141 for IV. IA contrast achieved faster peak aortic attenuation compared with IV contrast (8 vs 20 seconds; P < .001] (Figure 1). Portal values (attenuation and time to peak) were similar for IA vs IV (146 ± 46 vs 169 ± 39; 34 vs 42 seconds; P < .05) (Figure 2). IA administration achieved a superior CNR in less time compared with IV (10 vs 23 seconds; P < .001). All curves were modeled using non-linear least squares regression and achieved an R2 >0.94; P < .001. IA contrast achieves adequate opacification and a superior CNR compared with IV contrast, while using a smaller volume for organ directed imaging. It is likely that the contrast volume can be reduced further without impacting image quality. Although further work is required to optimize IA contrast CT and abdominal imaging, the incorporation of intraoperative CT with IA contrast could radically change imaging protocols in a variety of clinical settings.Fig 2Averaged Hounsfield units (HUs) over 45 seconds comparing intra-arterial (IA) vs intravenous (IV) contrast attenuation of the portal vein.View Large Image Figure ViewerDownload Hi-res image Download (PPT)

Abstract 289: Utilization Of Intra-Arterial Contrast For Computed Tomography Aortography In A Swine Model

Background: Intraoperative computed tomography (CT) imaging with endovascular catheter delivery of intra-arterial (IA) contrast could potentially provide higher signal attenuation in directed anatomic locations with lower contrast volumes. We compared image quality and attenuation timing of IA versus IV contrast protocols for abdominal imaging. Methods: Five anesthetized swine had internal jugular access and ascending aortic pigtails placed percutaneously via the brachial artery. The IV contrast protocol utilized 100 mL of iodinated contrast at 5 mL/sec over 20/sec. The IA protocol delivered 50 mL at 5 mL/sec over 10/sec. A 16-slice CT scanner with a 10 mm detector acquired static serial images at 1 image/second for 45 secs. Region-of-interest markers were used to select the aorta and portal vein to capture arterial and venous attenuation via Hounsfield Units (HU) per second. Attenuation curves were assessed using a Pearson’s correlation. Adequate attenuation was defined as &gt;100 HU a priori and image quality assessed using Contrast-to-Noise Ratio (CNR). Results: Both contrast protocols achieved adequate image attenuation with an aortic peak of 665 ± 226 (Mean HU ± SD) for IA and 414 ± 141 for IV. IA contrast achieved faster peak aortic attenuation compared to IV contrast [8 vs 20 sec; p&lt;0.001] (Fig 1). Portal values (attenuation and time to peak) were similar for IA vs IV: [146 ± 46 vs 169 ± 39; 34 vs 42 sec; p&lt;0.05]. IA administration achieved a superior CNR in less time compared to IV [10 vs 23 sec; p&lt;0.001]. All curves were modeled using non-linear least squares regression and achieved an R 2 &gt;0.94; p&lt;0.001. Conclusion: IA contrast achieves adequate opacification and a superior CNR compared to IV contrast, while using a smaller volume for intraoperative directed imaging. The incorporation of intraoperative CT with IA contrast could radically change imaging protocols for endovascular aortic repair.

Ladder-Like Low Iodine Delivery Rate Injection Protocols Based on BMI at 70 KV by Automated Tube Voltage Selection in Coronary CTA.

Objective To evaluate the feasibility of reducing the injection velocity and volume of contrast agent according to BMI, and the effect of body weight (BW), body surface area（BSA）, body mass index（BMI），and blood volume (BV) on aortic contrast enhancement when the voltage of third-generation dual-source CT is selected at 70 KV. Methods A total of 280 patients selected at 70 KV were randomly divided into an experimental group and a control group. Each group was divided into 7 subgroups according to BMI ≤20, 20–21, 21-22, 22-23, 23-24, 24-25, and 25–26. The experimental group uses 2.3/2.4/2.5/2.6/2.7/2.8/2.9 ml/s injection speed with 350 mgI/ml contrast agents according to the subgroups; injection time was fixed at 10 s. In the control group, the fixed injection flow rate was 3.5 ml/s, time was 12 s with a total of 42 ml. Subjects in both groups were inspected to adaptive prospective ECG-gating sequence scanning, and subjective and objective image quality of the two groups were compared using Student's t-test. BMI, BSA, and BV were calculated from the patient's body weight and height. We assess the relationship between aortic attenuation and BW, BMI, BV, and BSA using regression analysis or correlation analysis. Results Significant differences exist in vascular enhancement between the two groups; SNR and CNR of objective image quality in the experimental group were lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). Both groups had the same subjective image scores (P > 0.05). The number of vessels in the optimal enhancement range counts more in the experimental group than in the control group (χ2 value = 334.25, P ＜ 0.05). In the control group, a weak to medium correlation was seen between vascular enhancement and BMI (r = −0.20), BW (r = −0.42), BSA (r = −0.46), and BV (r = −0.48) (P ＜ 0.05 for all). Conclusions Compared to BW, BSA, and BV, a weaker negative correlation exists between vascular enhancement and BMI when ATVS selects 70 KV. However, as a much easier way to operate, the stepped low flow and low-contrast agent injection based on BMI was feasible, and the image quality was more homogenized than that of the control group.

Dual-Layer Spectral CTA for TAVI Planning Using a Split-Phase Protocol and Low-keV Virtual Monoenergetic Images: Improved Image Quality in Comparison with Single-Phase Conventional CTA.

Adaptation of computed tomography protocols for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) planning is required when a first-generation dual-layer spectral CT scanner (DLCT) is used. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the objective image quality of aortic CT angiography (CTA) for TAVI planning using a split-phase technique with reconstruction of 40 keV virtual monoenergetic images (40 keV-VMI) obtained with a DLCT scanner. CT angiography obtained with a single-phase protocol of a conventional single-detector CT (SLCT) was used for comparison. 75 CTA scans from DLCT were retrospectively compared to 75 CTA scans from SLCT. For DLCT, spiral CTA without ECG-synchronization was performed immediately after a retrospectively ECG-gated acquisition covering the heart and aortic arch. For SLCT, spiral CTA with retrospective ECG-gating was performed to capture the heart and the access route simultaneously in one scan. Objective image quality was compared at different levels of the arterial access route. 40 keV virtual monoenergetic images of DLCT showed a significantly higher mean vessel attenuation, SNR, and CNR at all levels of the arterial access route. With 40 keV-VMI of DLCT, the overall mean aortic attenuation of all six measured regions was 589.6 ± 243 HU compared to 492.7 ± 209 HU of SLCT (p < 0.01). A similar trend could be observed for SNR (23.6 ± 18 vs. 18.6 ± 9; p < 0.01) and CNR (21.1 ± 18 vs. 16.4 ± 8; p < 0.01). No deterioration was observed for vascular noise (27.8 ± 9 HU vs. 28.1 ± 8 HU; p = 0.599). Using a DLCT scanner with a split-phase protocol and 40 keV-VMI for TAVI planning, higher objective image quality can be obtained compared to a single-phase protocol of a conventional CT scanner. · Adaption of TAVI planning CT protocols may be required when using a first-generation dual-layer CT scanner.. · Reconstruction of virtual monoenergetic images at 40 keV improves image quality.. · With a split-phase protocol, the radiation dose is lower compared to a single-phase ECG-gated CT acquisition.. · Mangold D, Salatzki J, Riffel J et al. Dual-Layer Spectral CTA for TAVI Planning Using a Split-Phase Protocol and Low-keV Virtual Monoenergetic Images: Improved Image Quality in Comparison with Single-Phase Conventional CTA. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; 194: 652 - 659.

Optimising CT-chest protocols and the added value of venous-phase contrast timing; Observational case-control.

To optimize CT chest protocol by comparing venous contrast timing with arterial timing for contrast opacification in vessels, qualitative image quality and radiologists' satisfaction and diagnostic confidence in assessing for potential nodal, pleural and pulmonary disease in general oncology outpatients. Matched case-control study performed following CT protocol update. 92 patients with a range of primary malignancies with 2 CT chests in a 2-year period, one with an arterial phase protocol and the second in the 60 second venous phase, were included. Contrast attenuation in aorta, pulmonary artery and liver were measured. Subjective measurements assessed perivenous artefact, confidence in nodal pleural and pulmonary assessment and presence of pulmonary emboli. Statistical analysis was performed using paired and unpaired t-tests. Venous-phase CT demonstrated more consistent enhancement of the vessels, with higher attenuation of the nodes, pulmonary and pleural lesions. There was a significant reduction in perivenous beam hardening artefact on venous-phase CT (P < 0.001). Diagnostic confidence was significantly higher for nodal assessment and pleural abnormality visibility (P < 0.001) and pleural assessment (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in pulmonary mass visibility. There was adequate enhancement to diagnose significant pulmonary emboli (PE) with 4 incidental PEs detected on the venous phase, extending to segmental vessels. Venous-phase CT chest performs better than arterial-phase on all fronts, without compromising assessment of incidental pulmonary emboli. When intravenous contrast is indicated in a routine chest CT (excluding a CT-angiogram), the default timing should be a venous or 60s phase.

Impact of intravenous access site on attenuation for thoracic computed tomographic angiography: A time-matched, nested, case-control study.

The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the choice of intravenous access (IVA) site affects aortic attenuation during thoracic computed tomographic angiography (T-CTA) and any associated risks with intravenous device placement. All T-CTA exams performed between 1/1/2013 and 8/14/2015 were retrospectively reviewed to identify those performed with contrast media injection via alternative (i.e. non-antecubital) IVA (n = 1769). Using time matching, antecubital IVA exams (n = 1769) were selected as controls. For each exam, attenuation was measured in the ascending aorta. Patient and technical data was subsequently collected from all 3538 patients included in this study. Multiple linear regression was used to determine if IVA site affected attenuation. Lastly, data related to extravasations for the entire T-CTA cohort were collected and compared. Hand/wrist, arm, and central venous access device IVA were all equivalent to antecubital IVA in terms of attenuation (P = 0.579, P = 0.599, and P = 0.522 respectively). Forearm and intraosseous IVA had significantly higher attenuation (P = 0.010 and P = 0.002, respectively) than antecubital IVA. Right-sided IVA was associated with a small attenuation increase of 11 Hounsfield Units (P < 0.001) compared to left-sided IVA. In terms of extravasation, antecubital IVA was equivalent to hand/wrist, forearm, and upper arm IVA (P = 0.778, P = 0.060, and P = 0.090 respectively). Satisfactory aortic attenuation achieved with non-antecubital IVA is equivalent to attenuation achieved with antecubital IVA for T-CTA imaging. The risk of contrast media extravasation in peripheral IVA devices was relatively low, however, appropriate IVA site selection should be considered an important factor for successful administration of contrast media for future imaging studies. This prevents undue harm to patients through preventable device failures when using a peripheral IV device in areas of high flexion/range of movements undergoing pressure injection for contrast media.

Extravasation Volume at Computed Tomography Angiography Correlates With Bleeding Rate and Prognosis in Patients With Overt Gastrointestinal Bleeding.

Despite the identification of active extravasation on computed tomography angiography (CTA) in patients with overt gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), a large proportion do not have active bleeding or require hemostatic therapy at endoscopy, catheter angiography, or surgery. The objective of our proof-of-concept study was to improve triage of patients with GIB by correlating extravasation volume of first-pass CTA with bleeding rate and clinical outcomes. All patients who presented with overt GIB and active extravasation on CTA from January 2014 to July 2019 were reviewed in this retrospective, institutional review board-approved and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study. Extravasation volume was assessed using 3-dimensional software and correlated with hemostatic therapy (primary endpoint) and with intraprocedural bleeding, blood transfusions, and mortality as secondary endpoints using logistic regression models (P < 0.0125 indicating statistical significance). Odds ratios were used to determine the effect size of a threshold extravasation volume. Quantitative data (extravasation volume, aorta attenuation, extravasation attenuation and time) were input into a mathematical model to calculate bleeding rate. Fifty consecutive patients including 6 (12%) upper, 18 (36%) small bowel, and 26 (52%) lower GIB met inclusion criteria. Forty-two underwent catheter angiography, endoscopy, or surgery; 16 had intraprocedural active bleeding, and 24 required hemostatic therapy. Higher extravasation volumes correlated with hemostatic therapy (P = 0.007), intraprocedural active bleeding (P = 0.003), and massive transfusion (P = 0.0001), but not mortality (P = 0.936). Using a threshold volume of 0.80 mL or greater, the odds ratio of hemostatic therapy was 8.1 (95% confidence interval, 2.1-26), active bleeding was 11.8 (2.6-45), and massive transfusion was 18 (2.3-65). With mathematical modeling, extravasation volume had a direct and linear relationship with bleeding rate, and the lowest calculated detectable bleeding rate with CTA was less than 0.1 mL/min. Larger extravasation volumes correlate with higher bleeding rates and may identify patients who require hemostatic therapy, have intraprocedural bleeding, and require blood transfusions. Current CTAs can detect bleeding rates less than 0.1 mL/min.

Impact of pericoronary inflammation assessed by coronary computed tomography angiography on the progression of aortic valve calcification

Abstract Background Aortic valve calcification (AVC) has been known as an independent predictor for adverse cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality. Previous studies demonstrated that AVC was associated with aortic valve inflammation and atherosclerosis. However, the relationship between the progression of AVC and pericoronary inflammation remains undetermined. Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pericoronary inflammation on the progression of AVC. Methods A total of 107 patients with suspected or known chronic coronary syndromes who underwent clinically indicated serial 320-slice coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) at Tsuchiura Kyodo General Hospital from January 2011 to June 2019 were retrospectively studied. Pericoronary inflammation was assessed by pericoronary adipose tissue attenuation (PCATA) defined as the mean CT attenuation value of PCATA (−190 to −30 Hounsfield units [HU]) on proximal 40 mm segments of coronary arteries. AVC was quantified by Agatston score on CTA. The mean aortic attenuation (HU Aorta) and the standard deviation (SD) in the region of interest at the level of the sinotubular junction was measured. AVC was defined as the threshold for calcium detection (mean HU Aorta + 2SD). AVC index was calculated as follows: (follow-up/baseline) AVC divided by follow-up period. AVC progression was defined as newly-developed AVC at follow-up or an increased AVC index during follow-up. All patients were divided into two groups according to the presence or absence of AVC progression, and clinical characteristics and CT findings were compared between these two groups. Results AVC progression was observed in 26 patients (24.3%) between 2 serial CT examinations (median, 34 months). There was no significant difference in age, gender and the prevalence of other cardiovascular risk factors between the 2 groups. Patients in AVC progression group were associated with higher prevalence of elevated PCATA-LAD, higher LV mass index at baseline and the initial AVC presence. Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis revealed that the optimal cut off value of PCATA-LAD for predicting AVC progression was −68.26 HU (area under the curve 0.605; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.465–0.745). Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that baseline PCATA-LAD ≥−68.26 HU (odds ratio [OR], 3.12; 95% CI, 1.04–9.35, p=0.042) and the presence of baseline positive AVC (OR, 6.84; 95% CI, 2.34–20.0, p=0.0004) were independent predictors of AVC progression. Conclusions The increased pericoronary inflammation and the presence of AVC may help identify patients with high risk for future AVC progression. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: None

Comparison of four contrast medium delivery protocols in low-iodine and low-radiation dose CT angiography of the aorta

To evaluate contrast medium delivery protocols for the optimal enhancement profile of the aorta with both a reduced dose of radiation and contrast medium, called double-low computed tomography (CT) angiography (DLCTA). DLCTA was performed with 70 kVp and 200 mg iodine/kg in 205 patients following four protocols, namely slow rate (n=52), short duration (n=52), low concentration (n=50), and combined method (n=51), in comparison with a conventional group (120 kVp, 400 mg iodine/kg, n=51). The quantitative measurement of aortic attenuation, homogeneity, and subjective scores were evaluated. Overall, in the four DLCTA groups, the radiation dose was reduced by 62%, and the iodine dose was reduced by 50%. Among the four DLCTA groups, the signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) of the thoracic aorta were similar, but a significant difference was noted in the abdominal aorta. The short-duration group had the highest peak enhancement, least homogeneity, and worst subjective scores. Good contrast enhancement and good homogeneity were significantly more frequent in the slow-rate (86.6% and 90.4%, respectively) and low-concentration groups (78% and 96.0%, respectively). Subjective scores exhibited a trend of higher scores in the low-concentration group and lower scores in the slow-rate group (p=0.071). DLCTA with 70 kVp and 200 mg iodine/kg is feasible for whole-aortic CT angiography. The low-concentration protocol is recommended owing to its most consistent optimal aortic enhancement profile. Alternatively, the slow-rate protocol can be considered for patients with limited venous access.

Estimation of Fractional Extracellular Space at CT for Predicting Chemotherapy Response and Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between primary pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma fractional extracellular space (fECS) estimated from pretreatment CT and tumor response to chemotherapy and patient outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS. A database search identified the records of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treated with systemic therapies who had undergone pretreatment CT that included both unenhanced and equilibrium phase images. An ROI was placed on the primary tumor and aorta, and the tumor fECS was calculated as follows: (tumor attenuation in the equilibrium phase - tumor attenuation in the unenhanced phase) / (aortic attenuation in the equilibrium phase - aortic attenuation in the unenhanced phase) × (1 - hematocrit). Response to therapy was assessed in subsequent CT examinations according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Relevant clinical variables, including carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, chemotherapy regimen, and survival were recorded. Multivariate analyses were performed to determine the predictors of treatment response and patient survival. RESULTS. The median primary tumor fECS was 0.41 (range, 0.02-0.69). When dichotomized to high (> 0.41) versus low fECS (≤ 0.41) values, a larger proportion of patients with high tumor fECS values achieved disease control after chemotherapy than did those with low tumor fECS values: full cohort, 27 of 30 versus 19 of 30 (p = 0.030); cohort with locally advanced disease, 23 of 24 versus 10 of 15 (p = 0.024). The mean progression-free survival among patients with high primary tumor fECS values was significantly longer than that among those with low fECS values (191 versus 115 days, p = < 0.0001). Primary tumor fECS was an independent predictor of progression-free survival (p = 0.003) in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION. High primary tumor fECS value estimated from staging CT was associated with chemotherapy response and progression-free survival of patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

CT Angiography Findings of Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations in Children and Young Adults With Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia.

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the CT angiography (CTA) findings of pulmonary arteriovenous malformation (PAVMs) in patients with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia and to correlate these findings with those of graded contrast-enhanced transthoracic echocardiography (CE-TTE). MATERIALS AND METHODS. A retrospective review was conducted of PAVMs visualized at CTA of patients with abnormal CE-TTE findings (3-point scale). Location, distribution, size, number, volume, grade, and relative attenuation (attenuation of PAVM divided by attenuation of aorta) of PAVMs were recorded. PAVMs were graded as follows on conventional and maximum-intensity-projection (MIP) images: 0, nodule, unlikely PAVM; 1, ground-glass opacity (GGO); 2, GGO with increased vascular network; 3, GGO or nodule with single vessel; 4, GGO or nodule with two or more vessels; 5, GGO or nodule with afferent and larger efferent vessels; 6, mature arteriovenous malformation. Correlation between PAVM grade and relative attenuation and between CTA variables and CE-TTE grades was assessed. RESULTS. Forty patients (median age, 14.9 years; range, 0.6-27.9 years) had 117 PAVMs at CTA: 107 peripheral, eight central, and two both peripheral and central. None of the PAVMs was diffuse. Median size and volume were 0.4 cm (range, 0.1-4.4 cm) and 0.031 mL (range, 0.0009-10.019 mL). At CTA, seven PAVMs were grade 1, five grade 2, 28 grade 3, 62 grade 4, two grade 5, and 13 grade 6. MIP images showed 39 of 117 PAVMs were higher grade. Statistically significant correlation was found between relative attenuation and PAVM grade (p < 0.001, r = 0.58) in 40 patients and between all CTA variables and CE-TTE (p < 0.05, strongest correlation with highest grades [p < 0.0001, r = 0.81]) in 32 patients. CONCLUSION. In children and young adults with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia, grade 4 PAVMs were most common. Higher-grade PAVMs more often have right-to-left shunts.

Contrast medium injection protocols for coronary CT angiography: should contrast medium volumes be tailored to body weight or body surface area?

To compare the uniformity and image quality between contrast media injection protocols adjusted for patient body weight (BW) versus body surface area (BSA) during coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (CCTA). Consecutive patients (n=489) with suspected coronary artery disease were randomised prospectively to one of two CCTA protocols. In the BW protocol (n=245), patients received individualised iodine delivery rates (≤50 kg: 1 g/s; 51-60 kg: 1.2 g/s; 61-70 kg: 1.4 g/s; 71-80 kg: 1.6 g/s; 81-90 kg: 1.8 g/s; 91-100 kg: 2 g/s; >100 kg: 2.2 g/s). In the BSA protocol (n=244), patients received 9,600 mg iodine/m2 of contrast medium over 12 seconds. Attenuation and image noise were measured. Signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio were calculated. Image quality was scored. Attenuation was assessed for correlation with BW and BSA using linear regression. There were no statistically significant differences in mean arterial attenuation (396.8±47.6 versus 395.8±42.2 HU, p=0.804; 95% confidence interval: -7 to 9), image noise (25.2±5.8 versus 25.5±5.4 HU; p=0.549), signal-to-noise ratio (16.7±4.4 versus 16.6±3.6; p=0.902), contrast-to-noise ratio (25.1±5.8 versus 25.8±7.4; p=0.258) or image quality scores (4.1±0.9 versus 4±0.9; p=0.770) between the BW and BSA protocols. There was no correlation between BW and aortic attenuation or between BSA and aortic attenuation (p=0.324 and 0.932, respectively). The average contrast media attenuation and image quality was comparable between BW-adjusted protocol and BSA-adjusted protocol.

Prospective Comparison of 70-kVp Single-Energy CT versus Dual-Energy CT: Which is More Suitable for CT Angiography with Low Contrast Media Dosage?

To compare the objective and subjective image qualities between single-energy computed tomography (CT) at 70 kVp and virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI) of dual-source dual-energy CT for CT angiography with 180 mgI/kg. Total 63 patients scanned with 180 mgI/kg were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (32 patients) underwent CT angiography at 70-kVp, and Group B (31 patients) underwent dual-energy CT. VMI sets were generated at 10-keV increments between 40 and 100 keV. We calculated aortic attenuation, contrast-to-noise-ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise-ratio, figure of merit of CNR, and effective dose for each protocol. Three radiologists scored overall image quality and various arteries' visibility using a four-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative comparisons between 70 kVp and VMI with the highest CNR were performed with the two-tailed t test or Kruskal-Wallis test. The 40-keV images offered the highest CNR among VMIs. Aortic attenuation at 70 kVp was significantly lower than that at 40 keV (p < 0.001). However, the signal-to-noise-ratio, CNR, and figure of merit of CNR were significantly higher at 70 kVp than those at 40-keV (p < 0.001, p < 0.05, and p < 0.05, respectively). The effective dose of each group was almost equal. The qualitative visibility scores for various arteries, except the ascending and upper-abdominal aorta, were also better at 70 kVp than those at 40 keV. Aortic attenuation at 70 kVp with 180 mg I/kg was lower than that of VMI at 40 keV, and the objective and subjective image qualities were higher at 70 kVp than those at 40 keV.