anti-OKT3 Antibodies Research Articles

Effectiveness of a Second Course of OKT3 Monoclonal Anti-T Cell Antibody for Treatment of Renal Allograft Rejection

A second course of OKT3 monoclonal anti-T cell antibody was given to 21 recipients of kidney transplants. Rejections reversed in 43% of patients in whom 95% of rejections had reversed with their initial OKT3 course. Reversal was highly dependent upon the timing of rejection, anti-OKT3 antibody production, and T cell CD3 modulation. Rejections treated greater than 90 days after transplantation were resistant to OKT3 reversal. High-titer anti-OKT3 antibodies prevented OKT3 reversal of rejection, and effective CD3 (the cell surface target of OKT3) modulation was necessary for successful OKT3 reversal of rejection. Reexposure to OKT3 further stimulated anti-OKT3 antibody production and broadened the specificity of the antibodies produced. OKT3 can effectively and safely be used a second time for treatment of early T cell-mediated renal allograft rejections if high-titer anti-OKT3 antibodies have not been made.

INFLUENCE OF LOW-DOSE CYCLOSPORINE ON THE OUTCOME OF TREATMENT WITH OKT3 FOR ACUTE RENAL ALLOGRAFT REJECTION

The outcomes of 51 consecutive patients who received OKT3 for acute renal allograft rejection were analyzed. Thirty patients (group 1), previously maintained on cyclosporine, continued to receive 50% of their maintenance dose of CsA during OKT3; 21 patients (group 2) either never received CsA or temporarily discontinued CsA during OKT3. All patients received low doses of azathioprine and prednisone during OKT3. Rejection was reversed by OKT3 in 90% of patients in group 1 and in 62% of patients in group 2. Continuation of CsA during OKT3 did not increase the incidence of serious infections following OKT3. Serum creatinine concentrations in groups 1 and 2 were comparable before, during, and after therapy with OKT3 suggesting that low doses of CsA do not induce graft dysfunction during therapy with the monoclonal antibody. In a subset of 22 prospectively studied patients, anti-OKT3 antibodies developed in 2 of 13 patients (15%) who continued low-dose CsA during OKT3 and in 6 of 9 patients (67%) in whom CsA was temporarily discontinued during OKT3. We conclude that administration of low doses of CsA during therapy with OKT3 may reduce the formation of anti-OKT3 antibodies without compromising reversal of rejection by the monoclonal antibody and without increasing the short-term risk of infection or graft dysfunction.

SUCCESSFUL RETREATMENT OF ALLOGRAFT REJECTION WITH OKT3

OKT3 is a murine monoclonal antibody to the CD3 antigen of human T lymphocytes. The production of human antimurine antibodies after treatment with OKT3 has been perceived as a major limitation to its extended use and reuse. Treatment of 142 patients with 168 courses of OKT3 resulted in the development of antimouse antibody in 28% of the patients. Twenty-six patients (16 kidney, 6 liver, 3 heart, 1 pancreas) have been retreated with 27 courses of OKT3. Eighteen patients had no antimurine antibodies present, and the rejection reversal rate was 83% (15/18). Six patients had a low-titer antimurine antibody present, and rejection reversal occurred in 5 (83%). Rejection was not reversed in 2 patients with a high-titer antibody. Development of antimurine antibody was more frequent in renal transplant recipients (33%) than in hepatic (12%) or cardiac transplant recipients (18%). We believe that this reflects the fact that concomitant immunosuppressive therapy is more likely to be reduced during OKT3 therapy in renal transplant recipients than in hepatic or cardiac transplant recipients. Retreatment of patients with no anti-OKT3 antibody resulted in depletion of CD3+ cells from the peripheral blood, but it took longer than in patients being treated with OKT3 for the first time. Similarly, serum OKT3 levels rose more slowly in retreated patients compared to first treatment. In retreating patients with a low-titer antimurine antibody, it often was necessary to increase the dose of OKT3 in order to achieve adequate serum OKT3 levels and to deplete CD3+ cells. De novo antimurine antibody developed in 4 of the 18 (22%) antibody-negative patients who were retreated. In conclusion, retreatment with OKT3 should not be considered unless the antibody status of the patient is known. Development of low-titer antibodies does not preclude successful retreatment with OKT3; however, alternate antirejection therapy should be used in patients with high-titer antimurine responses.

RANDOMIZED PROSPECTIVE TRIAL OF OKT3 FOR EARLY PROPHYLAXIS OF REJECTION AFTER LIVER TRANSPLANTATION

A group of 52 liver transplant patients was prospectively randomized to receive prophylactic immunosuppressive therapy consisting of either Orthoclone OKT3 for 14 days, azathioprine, and steroids (25 patients); or cyclosporine, azathioprine, and steroids (27 patients). The groups were similarly matched for age, diagnosis, and Child's classification. The patients were studied to determine the effect of these two regimens on the incidence of rejection, infection, renal dysfunction, and mortality. Seven rejection episodes, as determined by clinical and histological criteria, occurred in seven of 25 patients (28%) receiving OKT3 compared with 18 episodes in 27 patients (67%) receiving cyclosporine during the first 14 days after transplantation (P less than 0.02). In 20% of the OKT3 patients, CD3+ levels of greater than 10% developed during therapy, and 16% of the patients developed anti-OKT3 antibodies during OKT3 treatment. Five patients were retreated with OKT3 for steroid-resistant acute rejection episodes; all had resolution of the rejection episode. Infectious complications were similar in each group. Renal function, as measured by serum creatinine, was significantly better with OKT3 than with cyclosporine (P less than 0.003) at 14 days. We conclude that prophylactic OKT3 is effective in reducing the number of early rejection episodes after liver transplantation; after 14 days the incidence of rejection is similar; reuse of OKT3 has been successful in liver transplant patients; infectious complications are similar between OKT3 and cyclosporine; and OKT3 preserves renal function better than cyclosporine and is thus indicated in patients with compromised preoperative renal function.

Effectiveness of a second course of OKT3 monoclonal anti-T cell antibody for treatment of renal allograft rejection.

A second course of OKT3 monoclonal anti-T cell antibody was given to 21 recipients of kidney transplants. Rejections reversed in 43% of patients in whom 95% of rejections had reversed with their initial OKT3 course. Reversal was highly dependent upon the timing of rejection, anti-OKT3 antibody production, and T cell CD3 modulation. Rejections treated greater than 90 days after transplantation were resistant to OKT3 reversal. High-titer anti-OKT3 antibodies prevented OKT3 reversal of rejection, and effective CD3 (the cell surface target of OKT3) modulation was necessary for successful OKT3 reversal of rejection. Reexposure to OKT3 further stimulated anti-OKT3 antibody production and broadened the specificity of the antibodies produced. OKT3 can effectively and safely be used a second time for treatment of early T cell-mediated renal allograft rejections if high-titer anti-OKT3 antibodies have not been made.

Complications and Monitoring of OKT3 Therapy

Complications of OKT3 therapy were studied in 122 treatment episodes in renal allograft recipients (83 for rejection treatment, 39 for immunosuppression induction). A febrile first-dose reaction to OKT3 was common; no severe pulmonary complications were encountered. Other toxicities of OKT3 therapy were observed later in the treatment course. Most severe were the occurrence of aseptic meningitis in four patients (3%), and seizures in eight (6%). Seizures occurred only when OKT3 was given to patients with nonfunctioning grafts due to acute tubular necrosis. Infections were the only significant late adverse sequelae of OKT3 therapy and occurred more frequently after multiple exposures to the drug (53%) than after a single exposure (22%). IgG antibodies to OKT3 developed after 45% of exposures to the drug in the 74 patients in whom appearance of anti-OKT3 antibodies was monitored. In two patients (3%), anti-OKT3 antibodies were detected before the end of the OKT3 treatment course, neutralizing the immunosuppressive property of the drug. In five patients (7%), strong anti-OKT3 antibody responses were present at the time of subsequent rejection, which precluded reuse of the drug. In 17 other cases, no or only a weak anti-OKT3 response was detectable at the time of rejection following initial OKT3 exposure. Retreatment with OKT3 was successful in reversing rejection in 15 cases (88%). No untoward sequelae were noted after reexposure to OKT3, except the high incidence of subsequent infections.

Early Use of OKT3 Monoclonal Antibody in Renal Transplantation to Prevent Rejection

OKT3 monoclonal anti-T cell antibody was used during the first 2 weeks following cadaveric renal transplantation to prevent rejection. When compared with a control group receiving triple immunosuppression with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone, the OKT3, azathioprine, and prednisone group had significantly fewer acute rejections during the first month (6% v 50%; P less than 0.01), and the mean time of onset of the first rejection was significantly delayed (day 47 v day 8; P less than 0.01) in the OKT3 prophylaxis group. OKT3 was administered intraoperatively safely and without complications on the day of transplantation. The well-reported first dose reaction to OKT3 was similar in these patients when compared with patients receiving OKT3 for treatment of rejection. Anti-OKT3 antibody development occurred in half of the patients receiving OKT3, and did not prevent the subsequent use of OKT3 in these patients, whose rejections following OKT3 prophylaxis were steroid reversible. There were no deaths among the patients receiving prophylactic OKT3, and during a 15-month follow-up, only three of 34 kidneys were lost for any reason. In addition to its use for primary and steroid-resistant rejection, OKT3 may be useful early after transplantation to prevent rejection.

Inhibition of lymphocyte responsiveness by a glial tumor cell-derived suppressive factor.

The results of this study demonstrate the presence of suppressive factor(s) in the tissue culture supernatants of cloned and freshly explanted malignant glioma cells. Culture supernatants obtained from these glial cell lines were demonstrated to have potent suppressive activity as evidenced by their ability to inhibit the proliferative response of normal human peripheral blood lymphocytes induced by phytohemagglutinin and anti-OKT3 monoclonal antibodies. The results further demonstrate the existence of a dose-response relationship between these supernatants and inhibition of mitogen-induced lymphocyte activation. Maximum production of suppressive activity by glial tumor cells was dependent on: 1) the number of tumor cells seeded in culture, 2) whether fetal calf serum was present, and 3) the duration of culture. The production of the suppressive factor(s) was not inhibited by the addition of inhibitors of prostaglandin E synthesis. Experiments designed to determine at what time during lymphocyte activation the suppressive factor was most effective demonstrated that the culture supernatants must be added during the first 24 hours of culture to exhibit inhibitory properties. Finally, proliferation of both the T-helper and T-suppressor/cytotoxic subsets was equally well inhibited by the glial tumor cell culture supernatants.

OKT3 monoclonal antibody plasma levels during therapy and the subsequent development of host antibodies to OKT3.

OKT3 levels and the presence of human antibodies to OKT3 were determined in the plasma of 66 patients receiving OKT3 monoclonal antibody (5 mg i.v. daily) for the treatment of acute renal allograft rejection. Plasma 24-hr trough levels of OKT3 rose over the first three days and then remained in a steady state over the remainder of the 14-day period of OKT3 therapy, with a mean level of 902 +/- 71 ng/ml (mean + SEM). On termination of OKT3 therapy plasma levels of OKT3 dropped to very low levels after 3 days. Host antibodies, usually of low titer, developed in a number of patients, usually 2-3 weeks after the start of OKT3 therapy. 37/43 patients (86%) who received OKT3 alone developed IgG anti-OKT3 antibodies; 9/23 patients (39%) who received Cytoxan in addition to OKT3 developed IgG anti-OKT3 antibodies, a significantly lower (P = 0.0002) incidence. The present regimens permitted maintenance of adequate levels of circulating OKT3 for 2 weeks, a sufficient time to reverse acute renal allograft rejection in most patients.

Restriction of the human in vivo immune response against the mouse monoclonal antibody OKT3.

The murine monoclonal antibody OKT3 (IgG2a) was administered prophylactically to 17 renal allograft recipients (5 mg/day, i.v.), either alone or in association with corticosteroids (0.25 mg/kg/day) and azathioprine (3 mg/kg/day). In all patients the kinetics of the IgM and IgG anti-OKT3 response was monitored by means of immunofluorescence and ELISA. All patients treated with OKT3 alone showed a rapid and strong sensitization that completely neutralized the therapeutic effectiveness of the monoclonal antibody. The anti-OKT3 sensitization was manifested by accelerated OKT3 clearance and abrupt reappearance of circulating OKT3+ cells before the end of treatment. This immune response was significantly delayed and reduced in its incidence and intensity in patients receiving low dose corticosteroids and azathioprine in association to OKT3; mainly IgM anti-OKT3 antibodies that did not accelerate OKT3 clearance were then observed. The fine specificity of the antibodies produced was studied, using patients whole sera and various mouse IgG2a-affinity chromatography-purified serum fractions. The results obtained showed that the anti-OKT3 response was remarkably restricted to two main categories of antibodies: a) anti-idiotypic antibodies that inhibited OKT3 binding to T cells and abrogated its therapeutic activity and b) anti-mouse IgG2a (anti-isotypic) antibodies that did not neutralize OKT3 immunosuppressive activity. These results suggest that OKT3-immunized patients might still be sensitive to the immunosuppressive effect of other anti-T cell monoclonals that do not share the OKT3 idiotype and possibly isotype.

Function of T cells from elderly humans: Reductions of membrane events and proliferative responses mediated via T3 determinants and diminished elaboration of soluble T-cell factors for B-cell growth

The abilities of T cells from young and elderly humans to cap membrane T3 determinants, proliferate in response to anti-OKT3 antibody, and elaborate soluble factors required for the growth of B-cell colonies were investigated. The results showed that T cells from ~50 to 80% of elderly subjects had reductions in ligand-induced T3-mediated membrane events and proliferative responses in addition to decreased elaboration of soluble B-cell growth factors. Thus, these previously unrecognized abnormalities in T cells might contribute to the decline of immunocompetence observed among some elderly humans.

Unique features of human and monkey xenosensitization against anti-T cell murine monoclonals

OKT3 monoclonal anti-T cell antibody was used during the first 2 weeks following cadaveric renal transplantation to prevent rejection. When compared with a control group receiving triple immunosuppression with cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone, the OKT3, azathioprine, and prednisone group had significantly fewer acute rejections during the first month (6% v 50%; P < 0.01), and the mean time of onset of the first rejection was significantly delayed (day 47 v day 8; P < 0.01) in the OKT3 prophylaxis group. OKT3 was administered intraoperatively safely and without complications on the day of transplantation. The well-reported first dose reaction to OKT3 was similar in these patients when compared with patients receiving OKT3 for treatment of rejection. Anti-OKT3 antibody development occurred in half of the patients receiving OKT3, and did not prevent the subsequent use of OKT3 in these patients, whose rejections following OKT3 prophylaxis were steroid reversible. There were no deaths among the patients receiving prophylactic OKT3, and during a 15-month follow-up, only three of 34 kidneys were lost for any reason. In addition to its use for primary and steroid-resistant rejection, OKT3 may be useful early after transplantation to prevent rejection.

Simultaneous multiple labelling of cells using mixtures of different antibody-latex conjugates and immuno-scanning electron microscopy (immuno-SEM)

Allograft rejection remains the single largest impediment to success in the field of transplantation. While OKT3 therapy has proven to be a significant advancement, many grafts are still lost. Late treatment, subtherapeutic OKT3 levels, anti-OKT3 antibodies, and OKT3-induced class II antigen expression are possible explanations. To determine the mechanism of OKT3 resistant rejection we propagated and characterized infiltrating T cells from the biopsy of a liver transplant patient who was rejecting while on prophylactic OKT3. The T lymphocytes demonstrated allospecific proliferation and interleukin 2 (IL2) production and showed a high degree of cytolysis of donor splenocytes. CD3 ∈ monoclonal antibodies (Mab) in concentrations up to 100 μg/ml did not inhibit lysis. In contrast, T lymphocytes derived from rejecting allografts of patients receiving cyclosporine and prednisone were readily inhibited from killing by CD3 ∈ Mab at doses of 1 μg/ml. Furthermore, allospecific proliferation and IL2 production were not inhibited in the OKT3-treated patient by the addition of CD3 ∈ Mab. Incomplete modulation of the CD3-TCR complex was noted after a 72-hr incubation with CD3 ∈ Mab. The T cells did demonstrate other intact CD3-mediated functions such as a rise in intracellular calcium and CD3-dependent cytotoxicity. These results should alert clinicians that CD3 resistant cytotoxic T cells can emerge during OKT3 therapy and may cause rejection. Immunotherapy that targets additional cell surface structures may be of benefit.

Unusually restricted anti-isotype human immune response to OKT3 monoclonal antibody.

The unusual anti-mouse immunoglobulin (Ig) sensitization of a renal allograft recipient who was treated prophylactically with the anti-T cell monoclonal antibody OKT3 (IgG2a) is reported. Whereas in most patients, the injection of OKT3 (5 mg/day, i.v. for 13 days) induces the rapid appearance of neutralizing anti-OKT3 antibodies, the patient reported here did not show the signs of conventional anti-OKT3 sensitization. High levels of circulating OKT3 persisted and no OKT3+ lymphocytes reappeared during the whole treatment period. Moreover, no IgG or IgM anti-OKT3 antibodies were detected at any time, using a specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. However, an atypical anti-isotype response was evidenced in this subject whose Ig were shown by indirect fluorescence to bind to normal T cells coated with OKT3 or with other anti-T cell murine monoclonal antibodies carrying the IgG2a isotype (no reactivity was observed with IgG1 or IgG2b molecules). The patient's Ig did not bind to normal T cells coated with F(ab')2 fragments of OKT3 and did not inhibit the binding of OKT3 to its target antigen indicating that they reacted with the Fc fragment of the OKT3 molecule. Additionally, and probably explained by this unusual anti-OKT3 response, the patient's Ig were shown to inhibit the phytohemagglutinin-induced proliferation of normal lymphocytes, to bind under selected in vitro conditions to normal T cells and lastly to enhance the antigenic modulation induced in vitro by OKT3 on its membrane receptor.