Anterior Cervical Fusion Research Articles

Comparison of radiological and clinical outcomes of 3D-printed artificial vertebral body with Titanium mesh cage in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion: A meta-analysis.

This meta-analysis aimed to determine whether 3D-printed artificial vertebral body have superior clinical and radiographic outcome than Titanium Mesh Cage(TMC) in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion. A comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure) databases was conducted to find randomized control trials (RCTs) or cohort studies that compared 3D-printed artificial vertebral body with conventional Titanium Mesh Cage (TMC) in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (SL-ACCF). Operation time; intraoperative blood loss; subsidence of vertebral body; preoperative, and final follow-up C2-C7 Cobb angle, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores, and Visual Analog Scale(VAS) scores were collected from eligible studies for meta-analysis. We included 6 cohort studies with 341 patients. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the 3D group has a shorter operation time than the traditional TMC group(p = 0.04) and the TMC group had more severe subsidence(≥3 mm) of vertebral body than the 3D group(p < 0.0001). And the cervical C2-C7 Cobb angle in the 3D group was larger than that in the TMC group at the final follow-up. This meta-analysis demonstrates that 3D-printed artificial vertebral body is superior to traditional TMC in reducing the operation time and maintaining the postoperative vertebral height and restoring sagittal balance to the cervical spine in single-level anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

Comparison of Surgical Outcomes Between Anterior and Posterior Cervical Fusions Stratified by Levels Decompressed.

Retrospective database study. To compare outcomes between 1-, 2-, 3-, and 4- level anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDF) and posterior cervical fusions (PCF) procedures using a national database. Surgical outcomes involving 3- or 4-level ACDF and PCF cases are not well-described. As there are situations where both ACDF and PCF can be employed, it is important to compare the risks and benefits of both procedures. Patients who underwent ACDF or PCF between 2010 and 2020 were identified in PearlDiver using current procedural terminology codes. Surgeries done for infectious, traumatic, or neoplastic etiologies were excluded. 2-year reoperations and 90-day readmissions were queried. Surgical complications and transfusions were compiled using ICD-9/10 billing codes. ACDF and PCF procedures were then matched by age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and a number of levels fused, and the above outcomes were compared. In all, 31,301 PCFs and 110,526 ACDFs were identified. After matching for age, sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index, a total of 30,353 ACDF and PCF procedures were compared. Three-level and 4-level PCFs had higher rates of 90-day postoperative surgical complications compared with ACDF (OR=2.4 and 2.87, respectively; P <0.001). In addition, higher rates of 90-day readmissions were noted in 3-level PCF compared with 3-level ACDF (OR=1.24, P <0.001). Ninety-day postoperative transfusions were higher in both 3- and 4-level PCFs (OR=2.44 and 18.27, respectively; P <0.001). Two-year reoperations rates were higher for 3-level PCF procedures than 3-level ACDF (OR=1.22; P =0.01). Patients who underwent 3-4-level ACDF had lower rates of readmission, blood transfusions, and postoperative complications compared with 3-4-level PCF. This data suggests that in cases of 3-4-level pathology with clinical equipoise regarding approach, ACDF may be associated with less short-term morbidity, however, data on fusion rates and adjacent level disease are needed.

Chemoprophylaxis Timing Is Not Associated With Postoperative Bleeding After Spinal Trauma Surgery

BackgroundLittle is known regarding appropriate timing for chemical venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis initiation in operative traumatic spinal injuries. We hypothesized that the incidence of post-operative bleeding leading to neurological decline or re-operation would not increase in patients who received early VTE prophylaxis (≤2 days post-surgery) as compared to those who received late VTE prophylaxis (≥ 3 days post-surgery). MethodsThis is a retrospective cohort study. Spine trauma patients who underwent spinal surgery, defined as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical spinal fusion, anterior or posterior thoracic/lumbar spinal fusion, or vertebral percutaneous fixation from July 2015 to July 2020 were included. Demographics, pre-injury anti-thrombotics, operative characteristics, pre- and post-operative VTE prophylaxis, and post-operative complications, including spinal bleeding, and VTE were collected. Univariate analysis was performed, comparing baseline characteristics, VTE prophylaxis timing, and complications between the early and late groups. ResultsTwo-hundred-eighty-two patients were included; 189 were in the early group (1.7 ± 0.5 days), and 93 were in the late (4.4 ± 2.1 days) group. The late group received enoxaparin more often than patients in the early group (41.9 % vs. 19 %, p < 0.001). Baseline characteristics, hospital course, and surgical management were similar between the groups. The rate of post-operative complications, including hematoma and VTE was similar between the groups. None of the patients in the early group had post-operative bleeding. ConclusionIn this retrospective cohort study, VTE prophylaxis timing was not associated with clinically significant post-operative spinal bleeding and VTE in trauma patients.

ACDF versus corpectomy in octogenarians with cervical epidural abscess: early complications and outcomes with 2 years of follow-up

PurposeCervical spinal epidural abscess (CSEA) is a rare condition, manifesting as rapid neurological deterioration and leading to early neurological deficits. Its management remains challenging, especially in patients older than 80 years. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical course and determine morbidity and mortality rates after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus corpectomy in octogenarians with ventrally located CSEA at two levels.MethodsIn this single-center retrospective review, we obtained the following from electronic medical records between September 2005 and December 2021: patient demographics, surgical characteristics, complications, hospital clinical course, and 90-day mortality rate. Comorbidities were assessed using the age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index (CCI).ResultsOver 16 years, 15 patients underwent ACDF, and 16 patients underwent corpectomy with plate fixation. Between the two groups, patients who underwent corpectomy had a significantly poorer baseline reserve (9.0 ± 2.6 vs. 10.8 ± 2.7; p = 0.004) and had a longer hospitalization period (16.4 ± 13.1 vs. 10.0 ± 5.3 days; p = 0.004) since corpectomy lasted significantly longer (229.6 ± 74.9 min vs. 123.9 ± 47.5 min; p < 0.001). Higher in-hospital and 90-day mortality and readmission rates were observed in the corpectomy group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Both surgeries significantly improved blood infection parameters and neurological status at discharge. Revision surgery due to pseudoarthrosis was required in two patients after corpectomy.ConclusionsWe showed that both ACDF and corpectomy for ventrally located CSEA can be considered as safe treatment strategies for patients aged 80 years and above. However, the surgical approach should be carefully weighed and discussed with the patients and their relatives.

Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor Increases Pseudarthrosis Rates in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusions.

Retrospective cohort. To determine (1) the effects of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in pseudarthrosis rates after anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and (2) to identify patient-reported outcome measures in patients taking serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Recent literature suggests that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may inhibit fracture healing via downregulation of osteoblast differentiation. Spinal fusion supplementation with osteoblast-rich substances enhances spinal fusion, thus SSRIs may be detrimental. Patients with 1-year postoperative dynamic cervical spine radiographs following ACDF were grouped into serotonin reuptake inhibitor prescriptions (SSRI, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor [SNRI], or tricyclic antidepressant [TCA]) and no prescription (atypical antidepressant or no antidepressant). Pseudarthrosis was defined as ≥1 mm interspinous process motion on dynamic radiographs. Logistic regression models were controlled for confounding to analyze pseudarthrosis rates. Alpha was set at p - values of <0.05. Of the 523 patients who meet the inclusion criteria, 137 (26.2%) were prescribed an SSRI, SNRI, or TCA. Patients with these prescriptions were more likely to have pseudarthrosis (p =0.008) but not a revision surgery due to pseudarthrosis (p =0.219). Additionally, these patients had worse 1-year postoperative mental component summary (MCS)-12 (p =0.015) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) (p =0.006). The multivariate logistic regression analysis identified SSRI/SNRI/TCA use (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-2.99; p =0.018) and construct length (OR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.50-2.44; p <0.001) as pseudarthrosis predictors. A SSRI/SNRI/TCA prescription was a revision surgery predictor due to adjacent segment disease on univariate analysis (OR, 2.51; p =0.035) but not on multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR, 2.24; p =0.10). Patients taking serotonin reuptake-inhibiting antidepressants are at increased risk of worse postoperative outcome scores, including NDI and MCS-12, likely due to their underlying depression. This may contribute to their greater likelihood of having adjacent segment surgery. Additionally, preoperative use of serotonin reuptake inhibitors in patients undergoing an ACDF is a predictor of radiographic pseudarthrosis but not pseudarthrosis revision.

Evaluating the Effect of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease on Postoperative Dysphagia Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery-A Prospective, Multicenter Study.

Prospective cohort study. The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the impact of a preoperative diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease on the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia in a multicenter population. After Institutional Review Board approval, written informed consent was obtained from all participating patients. Patients over 18 years of age who underwent an elective anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for a degenerative condition were prospectively enrolled at two academic centers from the years 2018 to 2020. Patients were separated into two groups: those with and without a preoperative diagnosis of GERD. Continuous variables were assessed using either an independent t-test or Mann Whitney U-test for parametric and non-parametric data. All categorical variables were compared using a chi-square test. A total of 116 patients met study criteria and were subsequently enrolled. Overall rates of postoperative dysphagia increased to 47.3% (n = 53) at 2-weeks but eventually decreased towards the preoperative prevalence of 25.0% at the 24-week mark. Patients with preoperative diagnosis of GERD had lower dysphagia severity scores on a continuous variable analysis in both the DSQ and EAT-10 surveys at 2-week follow-up in addition to the Bazaz survey at 24-week follow-up. Our follow up at 24-weeks was 85.7%. Our study shows that having a preoperative diagnosis of GERD has no significant effect on the incidence of dysphagia following ACDF. Nevertheless, having a preoperative diagnosis of GERD does seem to provide some protective effect on the severity of dysphagia that this patient population develops at multiple intervals over a 24-week postoperative period.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, open-door laminoplasty, or laminectomy with fusion: Which is the better treatment for four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy?

Four-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) is a common disease affecting a large number of people, with the optimal surgical strategy remaining controversial. This study compared the clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and postoperative complications of primarily performed surgical procedures such as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), open-door laminoplasty (LAMP), and laminectomy with fusion (LF) in treating four-level CSM. A total of 116 patients who received ACDF (38 cases), LAMP (45 cases), and LF (33 cases) were followed up for a minimum of 24 months were enrolled in this study and retrospectively analyzed. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system, the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Changes in the curvature of the cervical spine were determined using the cervical curvature index (CCI) and the C2-C7 Cobb angle. Cervical mobility was evaluated using the C2-C7 range of motion (ROM) and active cervical ROM (aROM). Complications were recorded and compared among the three groups. All patients achieved significant improvement in JOA, NDI, and VAS scores at the final follow-up (P < 0.05), whereas no remarkable difference was found among the groups (P > 0.05). In addition, both C2-7 ROM and aROM were significantly reduced in the three groups and LAMP showed the least reduction relatively. As for complications, LAMP showed the lowest overall incidence of postoperative complications, and patients in the ACDF group were more susceptible to dysphagia, pseudoarthrosis than LAMP and LF. Considering improvements in clinical symptoms and neurological function, no remarkable difference was found among the groups. Nevertheless, LAMP had advantages over the other two surgical procedures in terms of preserving cervical mobility and reducing postoperative complications.

The clinical efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with ROI-C device vs. plate-cage in managing traumatic central cord syndrome.

To assess the efficacy and complications of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with ROI-C device vs. conventional anterior plate and cage system (APCS) in managing traumatic central cord syndrome (TCCS). A total of 37 patients diagnosed with TCCS who underwent ACDF with ROI-C implant and APCS were recruited in this retrospective study from June 2012 to February 2020. Radiological parameters and clinical results were recorded and compared through follow-up time. Characteristics of patients and complications were also recorded. All patients tolerated the procedure well. The average follow-up time was 25.00 ± 7.99 months in the ROI-C group, and 21.29 ± 7.41 months in the APCS group. The blood loss and operation time were significantly lower in the ROI-C group than in the APCS group. Radiological parameters and clinical results were all improved postoperatively and maintained at the final follow-up. Fusion was achieved in all patients. ROI-C group had a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia than the APCS group. Only 1 case of ALD was observed at the final follow-up in the APCS group. Both ROI-C device and APCS demonstrated satisfactory clinical effects and safety in managing symptomatic single-level traumatic central cord syndrome with underlying instability. Both techniques could improve and maintain cervical lordosis and disc height. ROI-C device was related to a lower incidence of postoperative dysphagia, shorter operation time, and less blood loss.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to treat cervical instability with vertigo and dizziness: A single center, retrospective, observational study.

The current study attempts to investigate the role of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) in alleviating symptoms in patients with cervical vertigo associated with cervical instability. The patients of cervical instability with vertigo and dizziness who underwent ACDF between January 2011 and December 2019 were followed-up for more than two years. Demographic data (age, sex, follow up period and levels of instable cervical segments) were assessed; Symptoms of vertigo and dizziness before and after surgery were assessed by the 15-item version of the Vertigo Symptom Scale (VSS) and the 25-item Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI). The severity and frequency of other symptoms like neck and occipital pain, gastrointestinal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, tinnitus, palpitations, headache, diplopia and blurring of vision before and after surgery were also assessed. A total of 92 patients underwent ACDF for cervical instability with vertigo and dizziness between January 2011 and December 2019, of which 79 patients were included in the final analysis. The number of instable levels had no correlation with VSS and DHI scores before surgery (p > 0.05), while patients with C3/4 instability suffering a severer vertigo than other levels. Both DHI and VSS scores were significantly reduced after ACDF and this was sustained within two years after surgery (p < 0.001). Although there was no statistical difference in the ratio of patients with vertigo relief, patients with one-level cervical instability demonstrated a more rapid recovery than patients with multi-level cervical instability (p = 0.048). Also, there was improvement in other symptoms such as neck and occipital pain, gastrointestinal discomfort, nausea, vomiting, tinnitus, palpitations, headache and blurring of vision after surgery. Vertigo caused by C3/4 instability was severer than other levels such as C4/5 and C5/6. During 2 years' follow-up the significant relief of vertigo and dizziness was observed after anterior cervical surgery. Other accompanying symptoms except hypomnesia were also extenuated in follow-up period.

The predictive value of Hounsfield units for titanium mesh cage subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion.

To investigate whether bone mineral density (BMD) measured in Hounsfield units (HUs) correlates with titanium mesh cage (TMC) subsidence after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF). A total of 64 patients who underwent one or two levels of ACCF with TMC with a mean follow-up of 19.34 ± 7.86 months were analysed. HU values were measured three times in 3 different planes in the upper and lower vertebrae according to published methods. Subsidence was defined as segmental height loss of more than 3 mm. Pearson correlation analysis was performed. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to obtain optimal thresholds. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was also conducted. Twenty-two patients (34.38%) had evidence of TMC subsidence on follow-up x-ray. The mean HU values in the subsidence group (317.34 ± 32.32, n = 22) were significantly lower than those in the nonsubsidence group (363.07 ± 25.23 n = 42, p < 0.001, t test). At last follow-up, mean disc height loss was 4.80 ± 1.16 mm in the subsidence group and 1.85 ± 1.14 mm in the nonsubsidence group (p < 0.001). There was a negative correlation between HU values and disc height loss (Pearson's coefficient -0.494, p < 0.001). HU values decreased gradually from the C3 vertebra to the C7 vertebra, and the HU values of the C5, C6, and C7 vertebrae in the nonsubsidence group were significantly higher than those in the subsidence group (p < 0.05). Furthermore, there were significant differences between the groups in the segmental angle at the last follow-up and the mean changes in segmental angle (p < 0.05). The area under the ROC curve was 0.859, and the most appropriate threshold of the HU value was 330.5 (sensitivity 100%, specificity 72.7%). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that older age (p = 0.033, OR = 0.879), lower LIV HU value (p < 0.001, OR = 1.053) and a greater segmental angle change (p = 0.002, OR 6.442) were significantly associated with a higher incidence of TMC subsidence after ACCF. There are strong correlations between a lower HU value and TMC subsidence after ACCF. More accurate assessment of bone quality may be obtained if HU measurement can be used as a routine preoperative screening method together with DXA. For patients with HU values <330.5, a more comprehensive and cautious preoperative plan should be implemented to reduce TMC subsidence.

Effectiveness of different surgical methods in the treatment of acute central cord syndrome without fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine.

Acute central cord syndrome (ACCS) without fractures or dislocations is the most common form of incomplete spinal cord injury. To evaluate the effectiveness of different surgical methods in the treatment of acute central cord syndrome without fractures or dislocations of the cervical spine. A total of 164 patients with ACCS without fracture or dislocation of the cervical spine treated in our hospital from May 2012 to October 2019 were recruited and assigned to study group A and study group B according to different treatment modalities, with 82 cases in each group. Study group A underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and study group B was treated with posterior cervical laminectomy. The American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) classification and motor scores of all cases at admission and at discharge were recorded, and the treatment outcomes of the two groups were compared. No significant differences were found in the ASIA classification and ASIA motor scores between the two groups at admission (P> 0.05). One year after surgery, the ASIA motor scores and sensory scores were not statistically significant between the two groups (P> 0.05) but showed significant improvement compared to the preoperative scores (P< 0.05). Both anterior cervical discectomy and fusion and posterior cervical laminectomy can improve the ASIA classification, ASIA motor scores, and sensory scores of ACCS patients without fractures or dislocations of the cervical spine. Therefore, surgical methods should be adopted based on the patients' conditions.

Biomechanical Analysis of Two-Level Novel Cage-Type Implant for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.

One of the standard treatments for spinal diseases is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF is a secure and successful operation that prevents patients to improve their pain and function. The mechanical goal of the ACDF is to prevent motion between adjoining vertebrae by a novel cage-screw implant. The objective of this study is to analyze the biomechanical flexibility in terms of the range of motion (ROM) of two-level ACDF fixation using the finite element method (FEM). A CT scan-based FEM model of the cervical spine (C2-C7) is used and two-level cage is implanted at C4-C6 segments. A 50-N compressive force and 1-Nm moment are applied on C2 vertebrae and C7 is fixed in all directions. The ROM at two-level fixation (C4-C5-C6) is reduced by 55 to 88% compared with intact spine during all physiological movement. The ROM slightly increase (3-9%) at the adjacent segment. The maximum von Mises stress variations are 25-65 MPa during flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotations under given loading. The maximum von Mises stress found in cage and screw is below the yield stress during all physiological movement.

Severe Hypersensitivity Reaction to Dermabond Prineo After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Case Report.

A 68-year-old woman underwent an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy and subsequently developed a severe contact hypersensitivity reaction in response to Dermabond Prineo, beginning 10 days postoperatively. The Dermabond Prineo mesh was removed, and the patient was treated symptomatically with diphenhydramine, systemic steroids, and oral antibiotics, with complete resolution of her symptoms. This is the first reported contact hypersensitivity reaction to Dermabond Prineo in the context of spine surgery. Surgeons should be able to recognize this presentation and treat this appropriately.

Impact of Obesity on Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality.

To investigate the impact of obesity on postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients who underwent anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Project (NSQIP) files from 2006 to 2019 were queried for all patients who underwent an ACDF. Fisher exact tests were used in analyzing univariate differences in preoperative comorbidities and postoperative morbidity and mortality between patients with and without obesity (BMI ?30 kg/ m < sup > 2 < /sup > ). Results with a p value < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Multivariable logistic regression models were used in determining the independent impact of obesity on ACDF postoperative morbidity and mortality. A p value < 0.017 was required for multivariate statistical significance. There were 96,882 patients who underwent an ACDF from 2006 to 2019 found. 53.77% had non-obese BMI. Patients had statistically significant differences in most perioperative comorbidities and postoperative outcomes on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, patients with obesity has decreased adjusted odds of wound infections (aOR=0.7208, CI 0.574-0.9075, p=0.0053), pulmonary events (aOR=0.7939, CI 0.6903-0.9129, p=0.0012), sepsis (aOR=0.5670, CI 0.4359-0.7374, p=2.32E-05), transfusion requirements (aOR=0.5396, CI 0.4498-0.6473, p=3.04E-11), return to operating room (aOR=0.7537, CI 0.6727-0.8447, p=1.17E-06), and length of stay > 10 days (aOR=0.7061, CI 0.6438-0.7744, p=1.49E-13). Obesity is a protective factor toward ACDF postoperative complications. Obesity as a marker of patient selection criteria for ACDF procedures should not be used by spine surgeons.

Efficacy of an allograft cellular bone matrix as an alternative to autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: radiological results & safety.

The predominant surgical procedure employed for patients with symptomatic cervical radiculopathy is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). ACDF typically involves the use of an interbody cage augmented with iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) or local autograft to enhance fusion rate. Substantial complications can arise from autograft use, including donor site morbidity, difficulties with ambulation, and diminished quality of life. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an allograft cellular bone matrix (ACBM) as an osteopromotive bone, in ACDF procedures. This retrospective, single-center, consecutive case series included 73 patients who underwent an ACDF procedure. The surgical procedure involved the placement of an interbody cage supplemented with anterior plate fixation and an ACBM within the interbody spacer. Patient charts were reviewed to gather demographic information, radiographic findings, as well as perioperative and post-operative complications. Radiographic fusion was assessed at 6 and 12 months by a blinded, musculoskeletal-trained radiologist and a board-certified spinal surgeon reviewer. Any discrepancies were settled by a third, senior reviewer. Complete fusion was defined as: evidence of bridging bone across the disc space on CT, angular motion <3 degrees, and translational motion <2 mm on lateral radiographs. Complications were analyzed at 6, 12, and 15+ months post-operatively to assess clinical outcomes and device performance. A total of 73 patients (50 males, 23 females) with an average age of 54.6 (range, 31-77) years underwent an ACDF procedure between C3-T1 with an ACBM. The breakdown of levels operated on was 26%, 32%, 34%, and 8% for one, two, three, and four level procedures, respectively. There were three patients who received spinal injections for pain within the first year post-operatively. There were two patients who required secondary surgery within the first 12 months where supplemental posterior hardware was needed. Notably, there were no instances of cage subsidence, cage migration, cage/graft removal, or reoperation. There were no cases of chronic dysphasia. At 6 months, 45% of patients with available imaging demonstrated complete fusion, while 97.4% of patients with available imaging demonstrated complete fusion at 12 months. At the 12-month follow-up, our study demonstrates a high fusion rate in a real-world population of up to 4 operative levels. There were no bone graft related complications or incidences of cage migration/subsidence. It is noteworthy that the study involved a significant number of multilevel cases (74% of cases). Despite this, our results align with historical fusion rates and provide support for the utilization of ACBMs as a fusion adjunct in ACDF procedures up to 4 levels.

Incidence and severity of dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with zero-profile spacer: prospective study with 3-years follow-up.

Dysphagia after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a regular complication. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for incidence and severity of dysphagia after ACDF with zero-profile spacer. Incidence and severity of dysphagia was evaluated preoperatively and for time of three years after ACDF (regular outpatient check-ups) ‒ prospective study with 3-years follow-up. Severity of dysphagia was assessed subjectively using Bazaz‒Yoo dysphagia score. Influence of selected factors on the incidence and severity of postoperative dysphagia was evaluated. Following statistical methods were used: Fisher's exact test, unpaired Student's t-test, one-way ANOVA and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Level of significance was defined as p ˂ 0.05. Correlations between paired parameters were evaluated according to Spearman's correlation. Our study included 133 patients who underwent one-, two- or three-level ACDF with zero-profile spacer in years 2013‒2018. Myelopathy and GERD had significant impact on incidence and severity of pre-existing dysphagia. Risk factors for incidence of dysphagia after ACDF were number of treated segments, myelopathy, pre-existing dysphagia and surgery of C4/5 segment. Age of patients, duration of surgery and pre-existing dysphagia correlated positively very weakly to weakly with severity of dysphagia after ACDF. Number of treated segments, myelopathy, GERD and surgery of the C4/5 segment were risk factors for greater severity of postoperative dysphagia. Risk factors for incidence and severity of pre-existing dysphagia were myelopathy and GERD. Risk factors for dysphagia incidence after ACDF were number of treated segments, pre-existing dysphagia, myelopathy and surgery of C4/5 segment (Tab. 6, Fig. 1, Ref. 30).

Prediction of 2-year clinical outcome trajectories in patients undergoing anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for spondylotic radiculopathy.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is often described as the gold standard surgical technique for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy. Although outcomes are considered favorable, there is little prognostic evidence to guide patient selection for ACDF. This study aimed to 1) describe the 24-month postoperative trajectories of arm pain, neck pain, and pain-related disability; and 2) identify perioperative prognostic factors that predict trajectories representing poor clinical outcomes. In this retrospective cohort study, patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy who underwent ACDF at 1 of 12 orthopedic or neurological surgery centers were recruited. Potential outcome predictors included demographic, health, clinical, and surgery-related prognostic factors. Surgical outcomes were classified by trajectories of arm pain intensity, neck pain intensity (numeric pain rating scales), and pain-related disability (Neck Disability Index) from before surgery to 24 months postsurgery. Trajectories of postoperative pain and disability were estimated with latent class growth analysis, and prognostic factors associated with poor outcome trajectory were identified with robust Poisson models. The authors included data from 352 patients (mean age 50.9 [SD 9.5] years; 43.8% female). The models estimated that 15.5%-23.5% of patients followed a trajectory consistent with a poor clinical outcome. Lower physical and mental health-related quality of life, moderate to severe risk of depression, and longer surgical wait time and procedure time predicted poor postoperative trajectories for all outcomes. Receiving compensation and smoking additionally predicted a poor neck pain outcome. Regular exercise, physiotherapy, and spinal injections before surgery were associated with a lower risk of poor disability outcome. Patients who used daily opioids, those with worse general health, or those who reported predominant neck pain or a history of depression were at greater risk of poor disability outcome. Patients who undergo ACDF for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy experience heterogeneous postoperative trajectories of pain and disability, with 15.5%-23.5% of patients experiencing poor outcomes. Demographic, health, clinical, and surgery-related prognostic factors can predict ACDF outcomes. This information may further assist surgeons with patient selection and with setting realistic expectations. Future studies are needed to replicate and validate these findings prior to confident clinical implementation.

The Early Effects of Longus Colli Muscle and Anterior Longitudinal Ligament Reconstructions on Swallowing Function after Anterior Cervical Surgery: A Six-Month Follow-Up Study.

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is the gold standard surgery used to treat cervical degenerative disease. Dysphagia and hoarseness are the two most common complications that occur after anterior cervical surgery (ACS). In this study, we aim to evaluate the early effects of longus colli muscle (LCM) and anterior longitudinal ligament (ALL) reconstructions on swallowing function after ACS. We recruited 91 patients (35 males and 56 females; mean age: 49.41 ± 8.60 years [range: 26-72 years]) who have undergone either ACDF or anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion (ACCF) between August 2019 and October 2021. Patients were divided into LCM and ALL suture group (Group A), and LCM and ALL non-suture group (Group B). Assessments of the incidence of dysphagia and the swallowing quality of life (SWAL-QOL) were completed in 2 days, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. Average prevertebral soft tissue thickness (APSTT) were measured on lateral cervical spine radiographs taken with X-rays 2 days, 1 month, 3 months and 6 months after surgery. In the 2-day, 1-week and 1-month postoperative follow-up, the incidence of dysphagia in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (p < 0.05), and the SWAL-QOL scores of group A were significantly higher than those of group B (p < 0.05). In the 3-month and 6-month postoperative follow-up, no significant differences were found between groups A and B in terms of the incidence of dysphagia (p > 0.05). In the 6-month postoperative follow-up, no significant differences were found between the groups in terms of SWAL-QOL scores (p > 0.05). There were no significant differences in APSTT between groups during postoperative follow-up (p > 0.05). The reconstructions of LCM and ALL in ACS can effectively improve short-term postoperative swallowing function.

Anterior cervical discectomy fusion versus posterior decompression and fusion in octogenarians with cervical myelopathy: Clinical outcomes and complications with a 3-year follow-up

IntroductionCervical stenosis and concurrent Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy (CSM) are prevalent in the elderly. Treatment options include Anterior Cervical Discectomy Fusion (ACDF) and Posterior Decompression and Fusion (PDF). Research questionThis study aims to compare clinical outcomes and complications between ACDF and PDF in patients aged 80 and above. Material and methodsData from electronic medical records between 2005 and 2021 at a single institution were analyzed. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to explore risk factors and the relationship between comorbidities and neurological conditions. Results21 patients with ACDF and 26 with PDF were studied over 16 years. PDF patients had more operated levels, higher blood loss, and longer hospital stays, but mortality rates and mJOA improvements were similar in both groups. The presence of comorbidities was a unique risk factor for postoperative complications. Discussion and conclusionACDF and PDF led to neurological improvements in elderly CSM patients. However, the decision of surgical procedure should carefully consider the potential for postoperative complications, particularly in patients with comorbidities.

The effect of cage type on local and total cervical lordosis restoration and global spine alignment in single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion based on EOS® imaging: A comparison between standalone conventional interbody polyether ether ketone cage and integrated cage and plate (Perfect-C®).

There is a small level of evidence regarding the alterations in global spine alignment following the restoration of cervical lordosis using anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Different cage types are available to restore cervical lordosis through ACDF. In this study, we evaluate the impact of two types of these cages on local and global spine alignments. Thirty-two patients with a mean age of 46 ± 10 who underwent ACDF for cervical disc herniation were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided according to their cage type into two groups, 17 patients with standalone conventional polyether ether ketone cages and 15 patients with integrated cage and plate (ICP) (Perfect-C®). Cervical alignment and global spine alignment were evaluated on the pre- and post-operative EOS® images. Three months after the ACDF, total cervical lordosis correction was higher in patients with ICP (P = 0.001), while the local cervical lordosis correction was not significantly different between conventional cages and prefect-C cages (P = 0.067). Lumbar lordosis and pelvic tilt change were significantly higher among patients with Perfect-c cages (P = 0.043). In patients undergoing ACDF, alignment of the global spine changes along with the restoration of the cervical spine. Cage type affects this association, mainly through the compensatory alteration of pelvic tilt.