Answer Set Programming Programs Research Articles

Intrinsic Prioritization in Answer Set Programming Based on an Adapted Notion of Tolerance

Answer set programming (ASP) is a declarative programming language suited to solve complex combinatorial search problems. Prioritized ASP is the subdiscipline of ASP which aims at prioritizing the models (answer sets) of ASP programs. Common approaches to prioritized ASP require an additional input, sometimes expressed as special literals within the ASP program, that guides the prioritization of the answer sets. In this paper, to the best of our knowledge, we propose the first approach that is able to prioritize answer sets solely based on the original ASP program. For this, we adapt the notion of tolerance from conditional reasoning according to System Z and establish tolerance partitions of ASP programs which can be used for prioritization.

Unit Testing in ASP Revisited: Language and Test-Driven Development Environment

Abstract Unit testing frameworks are nowadays considered a best practice, included in almost all modern software development processes, to achieve rapid development of correct specifications. Knowledge representation and reasoning paradigms such as Answer Set Programming (ASP), that have been used in industry-level applications, are not an exception. Indeed, the first unit testing specification language for ASP was proposed in 2011 as a feature of the ASPIDE development environment. Later, a more portable unit testing language was included in the LANA annotation language. In this paper we revisit both languages and tools for unit testing in ASP. We propose a new unit test specification language that allows one to inline tests within ASP programs, and we identify the computational complexity of the tasks associated with checking the various program-correctness assertions. Test-case specifications are transparent to the traditional evaluation, but can be interpreted by a specific testing tool. Thus, we present a novel environment supporting test-driven development of ASP programs.

A Unified View on Forgetting and Strong Equivalence Notions in Answer Set Programming

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a prominent rule-based language for knowledge representation and reasoning with roots in logic programming and non-monotonic reasoning. The aim to capture the essence of removing (ir)relevant details in ASP programs led to the investigation of different notions, from strong persistence (SP) forgetting, to faithful abstractions, and, recently, strong simplifications, where the latter two can be seen as relaxed and strengthened notions of forgetting, respectively. Although it was observed that these notions are related, especially given that they have characterizations through the semantics for strong equivalence, it remained unclear whether they can be brought together. In this work, we bridge this gap by introducing a novel relativized equivalence notion, which is a relaxation of the recent simplification notion, that is able to capture all related notions from the literature. We provide the necessary and sufficient conditions for relativized simplifiability, which shows that the challenging part is for when the context programs do not contain all the atoms to remove. We then introduce an operator that combines projection and a relaxation of SP-forgetting to obtain the relativized simplifications. We furthermore provide complexity results that complete the overall picture.

Syntactic ASP forgetting with forks

Answer Set Programming (ASP) constitutes nowadays one of the most successful paradigms for practical Knowledge Representation and declarative problem solving. The formal analysis of ASP programs is essential for a rigorous treatment of specifications, the correct construction of solvers and the extension with other representational features. In this paper, we present a syntactic transformation, called the unfolding operator, that allows forgetting an atom in a logic program (under ASP semantics). The main advantage of unfolding is that, unlike other syntactic operators, it is always applicable and guarantees strong persistence, that is, the result preserves the same stable models with respect to any context where the forgotten atom does not occur. The price for its completeness is that the result is an expression that may contain the fork operator. Yet, we illustrate how, in some cases, the application of fork properties may allow us to reduce the fork to a logic program.

An Efficient Solver for ASP(Q)

AbstractAnswer Set Programming with Quantifiers ASP(Q) extends Answer Set Programming (ASP) to allow for declarative and modular modeling of problems from the entire polynomial hierarchy. The first implementation of ASP(Q), called QASP, was based on a translation to Quantified Boolean Formulae (QBF) with the aim of exploiting the well-developed and mature QBF-solving technology. However, the implementation of the QBF encoding employed in qasp is very general and might produce formulas that are hard to evaluate for existing QBF solvers because of the large number of symbols and subclauses. In this paper, we present a new implementation that builds on the ideas of QASP and features both a more efficient encoding procedure and new optimized encodings of ASP(Q) programs in QBF. The new encodings produce smaller formulas (in terms of the number of quantifiers, variables, and clauses) and result in a more efficient evaluation process. An algorithm selection strategy automatically combines several QBF-solving back-ends to further increase performance. An experimental analysis, conducted on known benchmarks, shows that the new system outperforms QASP.

Inconsistent Cores for ASP: The Perks and Perils of Non-monotonicity

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a prominent modeling and solving framework. An inconsistent core (IC) of an ASP program is an inconsistent subset of rules. In the case of inconsistent programs, a smallest or subset-minimal IC contains crucial rules for the inconsistency. In this work, we study fnding minimal ICs of ASP programs and key fragments from a complexity-theoretic perspective. Interestingly, due to ASP’s non-monotonic behavior, also consistent programs admit ICs. It turns out that there is an entire landscape of problems involving ICs with a diverse range of complexities up to the fourth level of the Polynomial Hierarchy. Deciding the existence of an IC is, already for tight programs, on the second level of the Polynomial Hierarchy. Furthermore, we give encodings for IC-related problems on the fragment of tight programs and illustrate feasibility on small instance sets.

Learning to Break Symmetries for Efficient Optimization in Answer Set Programming

The ability to efficiently solve hard combinatorial optimization problems is a key prerequisite to various applications of declarative programming paradigms. Symmetries in solution candidates pose a significant challenge to modern optimization algorithms since the enumeration of such candidates might substantially reduce their performance. This paper proposes a novel approach using Inductive Logic Programming (ILP) to lift symmetry-breaking constraints for optimization problems modeled in Answer Set Programming (ASP). Given an ASP encoding with optimization statements and a set of small representative instances, our method augments ground ASP programs with auxiliary normal rules enabling the identification of symmetries using existing tools, like SBASS. Then, the obtained symmetries are lifted to first-order constraints with ILP. We prove the correctness of our method and evaluate it on real-world optimization problems from the domain of automated configuration. Our experiments show significant improvements of optimization performance due to the learned first-order constraints.

ASP and subset minimality: Enumeration, cautious reasoning and MUSes

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a well-known logic-based formalism that has been used to model and solve a variety of AI problems. For several years, ASP implementations primarily focused on the main computational task: the computation of one answer set of a (logic) program. Nonetheless, several AI problems, that can be conveniently modelled in ASP, require to enumerate solutions characterized by an optimality property that can be expressed in terms of subset-minimality with respect to some objective atoms. In this context, solutions are often either (i) answer sets that are subset-minimal w.r.t. the objective atoms or (ii) atoms that are contained in all subset-minimal answer sets, or (iii) sets of atoms that enforce the absence of answer sets on the ASP program at hand — such sets are referred to as minimal unsatisfiable subsets (MUSes). In all the above-mentioned cases, the corresponding computational task is currently not supported by plain state-of-the-art ASP solvers. In this paper, we study formally these tasks and fill the gap in current implementations by proposing several algorithms to enumerate MUSes and subset-minimal answer sets, as well as perform cautious reasoning on subset-minimal answer sets. We implement our algorithms on top of wasp and perform an experimental analysis on several hard benchmarks showing the good performance of our implementation.

Tools and Methodologies for Verifying Answer Set Programs

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a powerful declarative programming paradigm commonly used for solving challenging search and optimization problems. The modeling languages of ASP are supported by sophisticated solving algorithms (solvers) that make the solution search efficient while enabling the programmer to model the problem at a high level of abstraction. As an approach to Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, ASP benefits from its simplicity, conciseness and rigorously defined semantics. These characteristics make ASP a straightforward way to develop formally verifiable programs. In the context of artificial intelligence (AI), the clarity of ASP programs lends itself to the construction of explainable, trustworthy AI. In support of these goals, my research is concerned with extending the theory and tools supporting the verification of ASP progams.

Analyzing Semantics of Aggregate Answer Set Programming Using Approximation Fixpoint Theory

AbstractAggregates provide a concise way to express complex knowledge. The problem of selecting an appropriate formalization of aggregates for answer set programming (ASP) remains unsettled. This paper revisits it from the viewpoint of Approximation Fixpoint Theory (AFT). We introduce an AFT formalization equivalent with the Gelfond–Lifschitz reduct for basic ASP programs and we extend it to handle aggregates. We analyze how existing approaches relate to our framework. We hope this work sheds some new light on the issue of a proper formalization of aggregates.

Compilation of Aggregates in ASP Systems

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a well-known declarative AI formalism for knowledge representation and reasoning. State-of-the-art ASP implementations employ the ground&solve approach, and they were successfully applied to industrial and academic problems. Nonetheless there are classes of ASP programs whose evaluation is not efficient (sometimes not feasible) due to the combinatorial blow-up of the program produced by the grounding step. Recent researches suggest that compilation-based techniques can mitigate the grounding bottleneck problem. However, no compilation-based technique has been developed for ASP programs that contain aggregates, which are one of the most relevant and commonly-employed constructs of ASP. In this paper, we propose a compilation-based approach for ASP programs with aggregates. We implement it on top of a state-of-the-art ASP system, and evaluate the performance on publicly-available benchmarks. Experiments show our approach is effective on ground-intensive ASP programs.

ApproxASP – a Scalable Approximate Answer Set Counter

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a framework in artificial intelligence and knowledge representation for declarative modeling and problem solving. Modern ASP solvers focus on the computation or enumeration of answer sets. However, a variety of probabilistic applications in reasoning or logic programming require counting answer sets. While counting can be done by enumeration, simple enumeration becomes immediately infeasible if the number of solutions is high. On the other hand, approaches to exact counting are of high worst-case complexity. In fact, in propositional model counting, exact counting becomes impractical. In this work, we present a scalable approach to approximate counting for answer set programming. Our approach is based on systematically adding XOR constraints to ASP programs, which divide the search space. We prove that adding random XOR constraints partitions the answer sets of an ASP program. In practice, we use a Gaussian elimination-based approach by lifting ideas from SAT to ASP and integrating it into a state of the art ASP solver, which we call ApproxASP. Finally, our experimental evaluation shows the scalability of our approach over the existing ASP systems.

Rushing and Strolling among Answer Sets – Navigation Made Easy

Answer set programming (ASP) is a popular declarative programming paradigm with a wide range of applications in artificial intelligence. Oftentimes, when modeling an AI problem with ASP, and in particular when we are interested beyond simple search for optimal solutions, an actual solution, differences between solutions, or number of solutions of the ASP program matter. For example, when a user aims to identify a specific answer set according to her needs, or requires the total number of diverging solutions to comprehend probabilistic applications such as reasoning in medical domains. Then, there are only certain problem specific and handcrafted encoding techniques available to navigate the solution space of ASP programs, which is oftentimes not enough. In this paper, we propose a formal and general framework for interactive navigation toward desired subsets of answer sets analogous to faceted browsing. Our approach enables the user to explore the solution space by consciously zooming in or out of sub-spaces of solutions at a certain configurable pace. We illustrate that weighted faceted navigation is computationally hard. Finally, we provide an implementation of our approach that demonstrates the feasibility of our framework for incomprehensible solution spaces.

ValAsp: A Tool for Data Validation in Answer Set Programming

AbstractThe development of complex software requires tools promoting fail-fast approaches, so that bugs and unexpected behavior can be quickly identified and fixed. Tools for data validation may save the day of computer programmers. In fact, processing invalid data is a waste of resources at best, and a drama at worst if the problem remains unnoticed and wrong results are used for business. Answer Set Programming (ASP) is not an exception, but the quest for better and better performance resulted in systems that essentially do not validate data. Even under the simplistic assumption that input/output data are eventually validated by external tools, invalid data may appear in other portions of the program, and go undetected until some other module of the designed software suddenly breaks. This paper formalizes the problem of data validation for ASP programs, introduces a language to specify data validation, and presents valasp, a tool to inject data validation in ordinary programs. The proposed approach promotes fail-fast techniques at coding time without imposing any lag on the deployed system if data are pretended to be valid. Validation can be specified in terms of statements using YAML, ASP and Python. Additionally, the proposed approach opens the possibility to use ASP for validating data of imperative programming languages.

Rushing and Strolling among Answer Sets - Navigation Made Easy

Answer set programming (ASP) is a popular declarative programming paradigm with a wide range of applications in artificial intelligence. Oftentimes, when modeling an AI problem with ASP, and in particular when we are interested beyond simple search for optimal solutions, an actual solution, differences between solutions, or number of solutions of the ASP program matter. For example, when a user aims to identify a specific answer set according to her needs, or requires the total number of diverging solutions to comprehend probabilistic applications such as reasoning in medical domains. Then, there are only certain problem specific and handcrafted encoding techniques available to navigate the solution space of ASP programs, which is oftentimes not enough. In this paper, we propose a formal and general framework for interactive navigation towards desired subsets of answer sets analogous to faceted browsing. Our approach enables the user to explore the solution space by consciously zooming in or out of sub-spaces of solutions at a certain configurable pace. We illustrate that weighted faceted navigation is computationally hard. Finally, we provide an implementation of our approach that demonstrates the feasibility of our framework for incomprehensible solution spaces.

Graph Based Answer Set Programming Solver Systems

Answer set programming (ASP) is a popular nonmonotonic-logic based paradigm for knowledge representation and solving combinatorial problems. Computing the answer set of an ASP program is NP-hard in general, and researchers have been investing significant effort to speed it up. The majority of current ASP solvers employ SAT solver-like technology to find these answer sets. As a result, justification for why a literal is in the answer set is hard to produce. There are dependency graph based approaches to find answer sets, but due to the representational limitations of dependency graphs, such approaches are limited. This paper proposes a novel dependency graph-based approach for finding answer sets in which conjunction of goals is explicitly represented as a node which allows arbitrary answer set programs to be uniformly represented. Our representation preserves causal relationships allowing for justification for each literal in the answer set to be elegantly found. In this paper, we explore two different approaches based on the graph representation: bottom-up and top-down. The bottom-up approach finds models by assigning truth values along with the topological order, while the top-down approach generates models starting from the constraints.

Compilation of Aggregates in ASP

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a well-known problem-solving formalism in computational logic. Nowadays, ASP is used in many real world scenarios thanks to ASP solvers. Standard evaluation of ASP programs suffers from an intrinsic limitation, knows as Grounding Bottleneck, due to the grounding of some rules that could fit all the available memory. As a result, there exist instances of real world problems that are untractable using the standard Ground and Solve approach. In order to tackle this problem, different strategies have been proposed. Among them we focus on a recent approach based on compilation of problematic constraints as propagators, which revealed to be very promising but is currently limited to constraints without aggregates. Since aggregates are widely used in ASP, in this paper we extend such an approach also to constraints containing aggregates. Good results, that proof the effectiveness of the proposed approach, have been reached.

Abstraction for non-ground answer set programs

Abstraction is an important technique utilized by humans in model building and problem solving, in order to figure out key elements and relevant details of a world of interest. This naturally has led to investigations of using abstraction in AI and Computer Science to simplify problems, especially in the design of intelligent agents and automated problem solving. By omitting details, scenarios are reduced to ones that are easier to deal with and to understand, where further details are added back only when they matter. Despite the fact that abstraction is a powerful technique, it has not been considered much in the context of nonmonotonic knowledge representation and reasoning, and specifically not in Answer Set Programming (ASP), apart from some related simplification methods. In this work, we introduce a notion for abstracting from the domain of an ASP program such that the domain size shrinks while the set of answer sets (i.e., models) of the program is over-approximated. To achieve the latter, the program is transformed into an abstract program over the abstract domain while preserving the structure of the rules. We show in elaboration how this can be also achieved for single or multiple sub-domains (sorts) of a domain, and in case of structured domains like grid environments in which structure should be preserved. Furthermore, we introduce an abstraction-&-refinement methodology that makes it possible to start with an initial abstraction and to achieve automatically an abstraction with an associated abstract answer set that matches an answer set of the original program, provided that the program is satisfiable. Experiments based on prototypical implementations reveal the potential of the approach for problem analysis, by its ability to focus on the parts of the program that cause unsatisfiability and by achieving concrete abstract answer sets that merely reflect relevant details. This makes domain abstraction an interesting topic of research whose further use in important areas like Explainable AI remains to be explored.

Lpopt: A Rule Optimization Tool for Answer Set Programming

State-of-the-art answer set programming (ASP) solvers rely on a program called a grounder to convert non-ground programs containing variables into variable-free, propositional programs. The size of this grounding depends heavily on the size of the non-ground rules, and thus, reducing the size of such rules is a promising approach to improve solving performance. To this end, in this paper we announce lpopt, a tool that decomposes large logic programming rules into smaller rules that are easier to handle for current solvers. The tool is specifically tailored to handle the standard syntax of the ASP language (ASP-Core) and makes it easier for users to write efficient and intuitive ASP programs, which would otherwise often require significant handtuning by expert ASP engineers. It is based on an idea proposed by Morak and Woltran (2012) that we extend significantly in order to handle the full ASP syntax, including complex constructs like aggregates, weak constraints, and arithmetic expressions. We present the algorithm, the theoretical foundations on how to treat these constructs, as well as an experimental evaluation showing the viability of our approach.

Towards an Answer Set Programming Methodology for Constructing Programs Following a Semi-Automatic Approach – Extended and Revised version

Answer Set Programming (ASP) is a successful rule-based formalism for modeling and solving knowledge-intense combinatorial (optimization) problems. Despite its success in both academic and industry, open challenges like automatic source code optimization, and software engineering remains. This is because a problem encoded into an ASP might not have the desired solving performance compared to an equivalent representation. Motivated by these two challenges, this paper has three main contributions. First, we propose a developing process towards a methodology to implement ASP programs, being faithful to existing methods. Second, we present ASP encodings that serve as the basis from the developing process. Third, we demonstrate the use of ASP to reverse the standard solving process. That is, knowing answer sets in advance, and desired strong equivalent properties, “we” exhaustively reconstruct ASP programs if they exist. This paper was originally motivated by the search of propositional formulas (if they exist) that represent the semantics of a new aggregate operator. Particularly, a parity aggregate. This aggregate comes as an improvement from the already existing parity (xor) constraints from xorro, where lacks expressiveness, even though these constraints fit perfectly for reasoning modes like sampling or model counting. To this end, this extended version covers the fundaments from parity constraints as well as the xorro system. Hence, we delve a little more in the examples and the proposed methodology over parity constraints. Finally, we discuss our results by showing the only representation available, that satisfies different properties from the classical logic xor operator, which is also consistent with the semantics of parity constraints from xorro.