A new procedure for the differential analysis of ppb concentrations of Cr(III) and Cr(VI) in natural waters has been developed. In this method, three-liter samples are filtered, acidified to pH 6.0, and divided into three parts. One liter is passed through an anion-exchange resin bed (AG-1X4, 100–200 mesh, Cl − form), one liter is passed through a cation-exchange resin bed (50 WX4, 100–200 mesh, Na + form), and one liter remains untreated. 10 ml of 1.0 M HNO 3 are then added to each of the three aliquots and they are individually reduced in volume by evaporation to 10 ml. Analysis by A.A. employing the method of standard addition follows. By difference, cationic, anionic, and non-ionic Cr concentrations in the sample become available. Cr(III) concentration is probably closely related to (cationic + non-ionic), and Cr(VI) concentration in the original sample corresponds to the anionic portion. Precision is ±20 % or better for total, cationic, and anionic Cr at the 1 ppb level. Precision of the non-ionic analyses is closely linked to these other precisions as the concentration of non-ionic Cr species in the original sample is obtained by the mass balance requirement set up by the other three analyses. Application of this technique to the analysis of natural water samples revealed the predominance of trivalent Cr in uncontaminated waters of the Upper Susquehanna River Basin (1–2 ppb). River water samples taken downstream of Binghamton, N.Y. area sewage outfalls revealed an increase in the mean Cr(VI) content of the river from ∼0.5 ppb to ∼1.6 ppb. The persistence of the Cr(VI) at least as far as 60 km downstream of the outfall area leads to the conclusion that at these levels, little dissolved Cr(VI) is removed from the river as it flows away from a point of contamination. Concentrations of Cr in samples of river sediments also revealed Cr contamination below the outfall area, and Cr contamination extended at least as far as 60 km downstream of the outfall area.
Read full abstract