Aneurysm Sac Research Articles

One-year follow-up after active aortic aneurysm sac treatment with shape memory polymer devices during endovascular aneurysm repair

ObjectiveTo determine the safety and efficacy of treating abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sacs with polyurethane shape memory polymer (SMP) devices during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), using a technique to fully treat the target lumen after endograft placement (aortic flow volume minus the endograft volume). SMP devices self-expand in the sac to form a porous scaffold that supports thrombosis throughout its structure. MethodsTwo identical prospective, multicenter, single-arm studies were conducted in New Zealand and the Netherlands. The study population was adult candidates for elective EVAR of an infrarenal AAA (diameter of ≥55 mm in men and ≥50 mm in women). Key exclusion criteria were an inability to adequately seal a common iliac artery aneurysm, patent sac feeding vessels of >4 mm, and a target lumen volume of <20 mL or >135 mL. Target lumen volumes were estimated by subtracting endograft volumes from preprocedural imaging-based flow lumen volumes. SMP devices were delivered immediately after endograft deployment via a 6F sheath jailed in a bowed position in the sac. The primary efficacy end point was technical success, defined as filling the actual target lumen volume with fully expanded SMP at the completion of the procedure. Secondary efficacy outcome measures during follow-up were the change in sac volume and diameter, rate of type II endoleak and type I or III endoleaks, and the rate of open repair and related reinterventions, with data collection at 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year (to date). Baseline sac volumes and diameters for change in sac size analyses were determined from 30-day imaging studies. Baseline and follow-up volumes were normalized by subtraction of the endograft volume. ResultsOf 34 patients treated with SMP devices and followed per protocol, 33 patients were evaluable at 1 year. Preprocedural aneurysm volume was 181.4 mL (95% confidence interval [CI], 150.7-212.1 mL) and preprocedural aneurysm diameter was 60.8 mm (95% CI, 57.8-63.9 mm). The target lumen volume was 56.3 mL (95% CI, 46.9-65.8 mL). Technical success was 100% and the ratio of SMP fully expanded volume to estimated target lumen volume was 1.4 ± 0.3. Baseline normalized sac volume and diameter were 140.7 mL (95% CI, 126.6-154.9 mL) and 61.0 mm (95% CI, 59.7-62.3 mm). The adjusted mean percentage change in normalized volume at 1 year was −28.8% (95% CI, −35.3 to −22.3%; P < .001). The adjusted mean change in sac diameter at 1 year was −5.9 mm (95% CI, −7.5 to −4.4 mm; P < .001). At 1 year, 81.8% of patients (95% CI, 64.5%-93.0%) achieved a ≥10% decrease in normalized volume and 57.6% of patients (95% CI, 39.2%-74.5%) achieved a ≥5 mm decrease in diameter. No device- or study procedure-related major adverse events occurred through 1 year after the procedure. ConclusionsTreatment of AAA sacs with SMP devices during EVAR resulted in significant sac volume and diameter regression at 1 year with an acceptable safety profile in this prospective study.

Use of EndoAnchors during index endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy.

Standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is sometimes the only treatment option for patients with hostile aortic neck anatomy, but it carries an increased risk of both early and late procedure-related complications. The aim of this study was to report on single-center experience with the Heli-FX EndoAnchors (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) as an adjunctive procedure to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for prevention and perioperative treatment of proximal neck complications in patients with hostile neck anatomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Asingle-centre, retrospective study evaluating 24 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure between November 2018 and August 2021. EndoAnchor implantation was indicated for cases with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy characterised by the presence of at least one of the following parameters: length of 28 mm, angle of >60°, circumferential thrombus/calcification involving ≥50%, and reverse taper. Median follow-up period was 22.5 months (IQR 2-31.5 months) with no aneurysm-related death, rupture, or conversion to open surgical repair during the follow-up. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no type Ia endoleak at the completion angiography. Amean of 7 EndoAnchors was used per patient (range 4-12). There were no EndoAnchor fractures and dislocations or stent graft fabric damage due to anchor implants.Twenty-three patients (95.8%) remained free of type Ia endoleak and migration on follow-up imaging. Aneurysm sac regression was observed in 13 patients (54.1%), while in 8 patients (33.3%) the sac remained stable. Sac enlargement was present in 1 patient (4.2%) due to late type Ia endoleak. Twopatients were lost to the follow-up immediately after the procedure.Between two groups of patients (sac regression versus failure to regress), the larger initial diameter of the proximal neck was the only significant independent factor associated with a lower possibility of sac regression (p= 0,021). The use of EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure in cases with challenging aortic neck anatomy with or without perioperative type Ia endoleak was associated with good midterm results and led to sac regression in most of the patients (Tab. 4, Fig. 3, Ref. 31).

Midterm outcomes of physician-modified endovascular stent grafts for the treatment of complex abdominal aortic aneurysms in Korea: a retrospective study.

Physician-modified endovascular stent grafts (PMEG) are a good treatment option for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), especially in high-risk patients not amenable to open repair, and when commercial fenestrated devices are not available. We report our single-center experience with PMEG for the treatment of complex AAAs. We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent PMEG repair for AAA from November 2016 to September 2020 at our institution. Demographic data, anatomic characteristics, perioperative and postoperative outcomes, major adverse events, and 30-day mortality were analyzed. We identified 12 patients who underwent PMEG for complex AAA. The mean age was 74 years and the mean maximal AAA diameter was 58.1 mm. Indications for treatment included 4 impending or contained ruptures, 2 mycotic aneurysms, and 6 symptomatic cases. The technical success rate was 91.7%. Aneurysm sac regression was observed in 7 patients (58.3%), including 2 cases of complete regression. There was 1 aneurysm-related mortality at 3 months due to mycotic aneurysm. Also, there was 1 postoperative complication case of transient renal failure requiring temporary dialysis. At 1 year, there was 1 branch occlusion from the initial failed cannulation case and 2 type 1A endoleaks, and there was 1 case of open explantation. PMEG showed a low technical failure rate and acceptable midterm stent durability and sac stability, comparable to conventional endovascular aneurysm repair. Despite the small number of cases, there was a tendency for a high sac regression rate, although longer follow-up is needed.

Comparison between Onyx and coil embolization for persistent type 2 endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair.

Type 2 endoleaks (T2EL) are the most common form of endoleaks after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Several studies on the feasibility of embolization using ethylene vinyl alcohol copolymer (Onyx, Medtronic) for T2EL have been reported. The purpose of this study was to compare coil and Onyx embolization for T2EL treatment after EVAR. Between August 2005 and July 2022, 46 patients underwent endovascular embolization for treatment of T2EL (15 Onyx and 31 coils). The primary endpoint was endoleaks resolution or significant aneurysm sac growth of >5 mm in maximal diameter after T2EL embolization. In addition, periprocedural factors, reintervention, sac rupture, and survival analysis were assessed. The follow-up period after embolization was significantly shorter in the Onyx group (11.6 months vs. 34.7 months, P = 0.016), and there was no difference in aneurysm sac growth rate between both groups (20.0% vs. 51.6%; P = 0.472, log-rank test). However, cases with multiple endoleak origins tended to be treated with Onyx (P = 0.002). When applying Onyx, there was no significant difference in results between the transarterial and translumbar approaches. There appears to be no significant difference in the results of Onyx and coil embolization for T2EL treatment, although it is difficult to evaluate effectiveness due to the small number of cases and short follow-up period. However, in cases of multiple origin endoleaks or when the transarterial approach is not feasible, the Onyx by translumbar approach may be a more effective method.

Correlation of Flow Diverter Malapposition at the Aneurysm Neck with Incomplete Aneurysm Occlusion in Patients with Small Intracranial Aneurysms: A Single-Center Experience.

Flow diversion treatment repairs aneurysms by altering the hemodynamics of the aneurysmal sac and providing a scaffold for endothelial cell adhesion. The purpose of this study was to investigate the correlation of flow diverter (FD) malapposition at the aneurysm neck with incomplete occlusion of small intracranial aneurysms (IAs) and investigate other factors that are possibly related to incomplete occlusion. From January 2019 to June 2022, the clinical and imaging data for 153 patients (175 aneurysms) with unruptured small IAs treated with flow diversion were retrospectively analyzed. FD apposition at the aneurysm neck was evaluated by high-resolution conebeam CT (HR-CBCT), and the complete occlusion rate for aneurysms was judged according to the latest follow-up conventional angiography findings (≥6 months). Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to determine factors associated with incomplete aneurysm occlusion. In total, 159 FDs were implanted in 153 patients. HR-CBCT performed after the deployment revealed FD malapposition at the aneurysm neck in 18 cases. According to the latest follow-up angiograms (average: 9.47 ± 3.35 months), the complete aneurysm occlusion rate was 66.9%. The complete occlusion rates for incomplete and complete stent apposition at the neck were 38.9% (7/18) and 70.1% (110/157), respectively. The results of regression analysis showed that an aneurysm sac with branch vessels (OR, 2.937; P = .018), incomplete stent apposition at the aneurysm neck (OR, 3.561; P = .023), and a large aneurysm diameter (OR, 1.533; P = .028) were positive predictors of incomplete aneurysm occlusion. An aneurysm sac with branch vessels, a large aneurysm diameter, and malapposition at the aneurysm neck significantly affect aneurysm repair after FD stent-only treatment for small IAs.

Effectiveness of Intra-operative Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound Assessment to Optimize Type II Endoleak Embolization.

To analyze the effectiveness of type II endoleaks (T2E) embolization using intra-operative contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS). Consecutive patients treated for T2E underwent a standardized protocol with trans-arterial or trans-lumbar access, large volume embolization, onlay fusion, and intra-operative CEUS. Technical success was defined by exclusion of endoleak by CEUS. Twenty-six patients (mean age 81 ± 11years old; 89% male) were treated. The mean aneurysm sac enlargement was 11 ± 8mm from T2E diagnosis. Embolization was performed using Onyx® 18 in all patients with adjunctive coils in 13 patients (50%). After the first embolization, CEUS documented residual T2E in 13 patients (50%). Ten patients (38%) had additional embolization, which successfully eradicated the T2E in seven of them. Technical success was 50% after the first embolization attempt and 77% after additional attempts guided by CEUS (P = 0.080). There was no mortality. Median imaging follow-up was 22months. Among the 20 patients with no residual T2E on completion CEUS, 16 (80%) had sac stabilization and none required additional interventions for T2E. Of the six patients with residual T2Es on CEUS, three had sac stabilization (50%) and one required additional reintervention for T2E. There was one late aortic rupture at 56months. One in two patients treated by T2E embolization had residual endoleak on intra-operative CEUS after a first embolization attempt, decreasing to one in four patients after multiple attempts. A negative completion CEUS following embolization was associated with higher rates of sac stabilization and no need for additional T2E embolization.

Impact of the Lumbar Arteries on Aneurysm Diameter and Type 2 Endoleak after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

Prophylactic embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) during endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is recommended to prevent type 2 endoleak (T2EL). However, the impact of patent lumbar arteries (LAs) on T2ELs and aneurysm diameter has not been elucidated. Fifty-seven consecutive patients who underwent EVAR at our institution between January 2013 and September 2022 and whose IMA had been occluded preoperatively or newly occluded postoperatively were included in the study. Predictive factors for aneurysm sac enlargement, sac shrinkage, and T2EL were investigated. T2ELs occurred in 22.8% of the patients. The 4-year cumulative incidence rates of sac enlargement and shrinkage were 6.7% and 64.6%, respectively. The number of postoperative patent LAs was identified as a risk factor for T2ELs (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.54-12.7, P=0.0065). The number of postoperative patent LAs was found to be a significant predictor of sac enlargement (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] 3.15, 95% CI: 1.43-6.96, P=0.0045) and shrinkage (AHR 0.63, 95% CI: 0.43-0.91, P=0.014). The current study demonstrated that the number of postoperative patent LAs had a significant impact on the development of T2ELs and the change in aneurysm diameter in patients in whom the IMA was occluded after EVAR.

Systematic review of risk factors and outcomes of post-implantation syndrome following endovascular aortic repair

ObjectivePost implantation syndrome (PIS) is an early systemic inflammatory response following endovascular aortic repair (EVAR). The response is variable in patients and the clinical significance of PIS upon outcomes is unknown. This study aims to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, and prognostic implication of PIS. MethodsSystematic literature review and analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines of PubMed, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Eligible English-language studies regarding PIS after infrarenal EVAR were included, after removing duplicates. ResultsAfter screening, 31 studies were included. A total of 2847 patients were reviewed, with mean age of 70.7 years, of which 2012 (90.4%) were male, with a pooled mean follow-up of 26.1 months. PIS was reported in 25.3% of cases, with mean aneurysm diameter of 56.4 cm. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) grafts were utilized in 794 patients (27.9%) with polyester in 1839 (64.6%). White blood cell count, C-reactive protein, interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, and IL-10 levels were all significantly elevated postoperatively. Thirty-day outcomes included type I endoleak rate of 0.8%, type II endoleak rate of 1.7%, reintervention rate of 0.35%, and mortality rate of 0.25%. Subgroup pooled analysis of patients with PIS (n = 309) vs No-PIS (n = 691) revealed that polyester (n = 642), rather than PTFE (n = 234) grafts, were associated with a higher rate of PIS (94.8% vs 3.7%; P = .0001), White blood cell count was higher in the PIS group both preoperatively (7.61 vs 6.76 × 109/L; P = .04) and postoperatively (15.0 vs 9.8 × 109/L; P = .0007) and IL-6 levels were higher in the PIS group postoperatively (98.6 vs 25.2 pg/mL; P = .02). Aneurysm diameter and amount of chronic or new thrombus within the aneurysm sac was not identified as a risk factor for PIS. Pooled outcomes of patients with PIS vs No-PIS demonstrated a significantly higher rate of 30-day mortality (0.6% vs 0%; P = .03) and major adverse cardiac events (5.8% vs 0.43%; P < .0001) without any differences seen in reintervention or 30-day type I or type II endoleaks. ConclusionsThis systematic review suggests that polyester grafts are strongly associated with PIS compared with PTFE. Interestingly, this report is suggestive of an association between 30-day mortality and major adverse cardiac events and PIS. Given these clinical sequelae, consideration for use of PTFE over polyester grafts to reduce the incidence of PIS may be a simple step to improve overall outcome. Further, exploration of the relationship between inflammatory mediators associated with PIS and mortality and cardiac complications may engender deeper understanding of risks, leading to eventual mitigation of harm for patients experiencing PIS.

Use of physician-modified inverted limb in conjunction with Zenith fenestrated stent graft to rescue failed previous endovascular and open repair

ObjectiveTo evaluate outcomes and performance of inverted limbs (ILs) when used in conjunction with Zenith fenestrated stent grafts (Zfens) to treat patients with short distance between the lowest renal artery (RA) and aortic or graft bifurcation (A/GB). MethodsThis study was a multicenter, retrospective review of prospectively maintained database of patients with complex aortic aneurysms, failed endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), or open surgical repair (OSR) with short distance between LRA and A/GB treated using a combination of Zfen and an IL between 2013 and 2023. Endpoints included technical success, aneurysm sac regression, long-term device integrity, and target vessel patency. We defined technical success as implantation of the device with no endoleak, conversion to an aorto-uni-iliac or OSR. ResultsDuring this time, 52 patients underwent endovascular rescue of failed repair. Twenty (38.5%) of them required relining of the failed repairs using IL due to lowest RA to A/GB length restrictions. Two patients had undergone rescue with a fenestrated cuff alone but developed type III endoleaks. One patient with no previous implant had a short distance between the lowest RA and aortic bifurcation to accommodate the bifurcated distal device, and two patients had failed OSR or anastomotic pseudoaneurysms. The majority (94%) were men with a mean age of 76.8 ± 6.1 years. The mean aortic neck diameter and aneurysm size were 32 ± 4 cm and 7.2 ± 1.3 cm, respectively. The median time laps between initial repair and failure was 36 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24-54 months). Sixteen patients (80%) were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists class III, whereas four were class IV. Seventy-eight vessels were targeted and successfully incorporated. Technical success was 100%, and median estimated blood loss was 100 mL (IQR, 100-200 mL). Mean fluoroscopy time and dose were 61 ± 18 minutes and 2754 ± 1062 mGy, respectively. Average hospital length of stay was 2.75 ± 2.15 days. Postoperative complication occurred in one patient who required lower extremity fasciotomy for compartment syndrome. At a median follow-up of 50 months (IQR, 18-58 months), there were no device migration, components separation, aneurysmal related mortality, and type I or type III endoleak. Aneurysm sac regression (95%) or stabilization (5%) was observed in all patients, including in four patients (25%) with type II endoleak. ConclusionsThe use of IL in conjunction with Zfen to treat patients with short distance between the lowest RA and A/GB is safe, effective, and has excellent long-term results. The technique expands the indication of Zfen, especially in patients with failed previous EVAR.

Single Component Polymers, Polymer Blends, and Polymer Composites for Interventional Endovascular Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Intracranial aneurysm is the abnormal focal dilation in brain arteries. When untreated, it can enlarge to rupture points and account for subarachnoid hemorrhage cases. Intracranial aneurysms can be treated by blocking the flow of blood to the aneurysm sac with clipping of the aneurysm neck or endovascular embolization with embolics to promote the formation of the thrombus. Coils or an embolic device are inserted endovascularly into the aneurysm via a micro-catheter to fill the aneurysm. Many embolization materials have been developed. An embolization coil made of soft and thin platinum wire called the "Guglielmi detachable coil" (GDC) enables safer treatment for brain aneurysms. However, patients may experience aneurysm recurrence because of incomplete coil filling or compaction over time. Unsatisfactory recanalization rates and incomplete occlusion are the drawbacks of endovascular embolization. So, the fabrication of new medical devices with less invasive surgical techniques is mandatory to enhance the long-term therapeutic performance of existing endovascular procedures. For this aim, the current article reviews polymeric materials including blends and composites employed for embolization of intracranial aneurysms. Polymeric materials used in embolic agents, their advantages and challenges, results of the strategies used to overcome treatment, and results of clinical experiences are summarized and discussed.

Three-Year Safety and Efficacy of the INCRAFT Endograft for Treatment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: Results of the INSIGHT Study.

Preliminary results of the INSIGHT study showed that the low-profile INCRAFT Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) Stent-Graft System was safe and effective in the endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). This study aimed to assess the durability and the midterm effectiveness of EVAR using the INCRAFT System in the framework of a multicenter, prospective, open-label, post-approval study. Between 2015 and 2016, 150 subjects from 23 European centers treated with the INCRAFT System for an infrarenal AAA were included. Clinical and radiologic data were prospectively collected and analyzed using protocol-specified, monitored follow-up clinic visits at 1, 6, and 12 months post-implantation and annually after that. The clinical success at 3 years was determined. Freedom from overall and aneurysm-related mortality, type I endoleak, secondary interventions, and aneurysm sac enlargement through 3 years were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for late outcomes. An independent clinical events committee reviewed all events. The CT (computed tomography) scans through 1 year were reviewed by an independent core laboratory. The primary clinical success rate at 3 years was 84.0% (126/150). There were no aneurysm-related deaths, endograft migration, or aneurysm-related ruptures through 3 years. Stent fracture was detected in 2 subjects (1.3%) without clinical sequelae. Over 3 years, freedom from overall mortality was 89.4%, freedom from secondary interventions was 80%, and freedom from aneurysm sac enlargement was 96.5%. The 3-year freedom from type IA and IB endoleaks was 93.3% and 98.6%, respectively. In a multicenter real-world study setting, the use of a low-profile INCRAFT device for AAA is associated with sustained clinical success and low rates of reinterventions through 3 years. Low-profile endografts have broadened the spectrum of patients with anatomic suitability for endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). However, questions remain regarding the durability of the repair. The INSIGHT study evaluated the use of the INCRAFT System in routine real-world clinical practice, including patients with complex anatomies. The treatment was safe and effective. The results showed sustained clinical success over 3 years, with no aneurysm-related deaths or ruptures, and a high rate of intervention-free survival at 3 years. Despite the low-profile design of the endograft, the midterm results demonstrate the durability of AAA repair using the INCRAFT System.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02477111.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Anticoagulation on Outcomes After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair.

Our objective was to investigate whether patients who receive anticoagulation therapy have different outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) from those who do not. We conducted a systematic review of studies that compared outcomes of EVAR in patients who were on therapeutic anticoagulation vs those who were not. We developed and reported the review in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines with a registered protocol (CRD42022375894). The Ovid interface was used to search Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) up to November 2022. The quality of studies was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) (maximum score=9), and the evidence was appraised with the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) was the effect estimate in time-to-event meta-analyses, calculated using the inverse-variance statistical method and random-effects models. Sixteen studies qualified for inclusion reporting a total of 35 739 individuals. Anticoagulated patients had a statistically significantly higher hazard of death (HR=1.93, 95% CI=1.03-3.63), endoleak (HR=2.13, 95% CI=1.55-2.93), reintervention (HR=1.79, 95% CI=1.27-2.52), and aneurysm sac expansion (HR=2.72, 95% CI=1.57-4.72) than patients not receiving anticoagulation therapy. The median score on the NOS was 7 (range=4-9). The certainty of evidence was very low for mortality and reintervention and low for endoleak and sac expansion. Anticoagulation is a poor prognostic factor after standard EVAR and should be considered in decision-making, consent processes, and surveillance strategies. The number of individuals who take anticoagulation treatment has been rapidly increasing over the recent years. We aimed to investigate the effect of such treatment on outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). Anticoagulated patients were found to have increased mortality, endoleak, and reintervention rates after EVAR compared to their non-anticoagulated counterparts. Anticoagulation therapy has a prognostic role in EVAR and should be considered in decision making and EVAR surveillance. Anticoagulated patients need to be informed of the higher failure rates of EVAR, and intensified surveillance strategies may need to be implemented in this patient cohort.

Transarterial Embolization of Simple Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformations: Long-Term Outcomes of 0.018-Inch Coils versus Vascular Plugs

PurposeTo compare the safety, effectiveness, and persistence rates of 0.018-inch coils with those of Amplatzer vascular plugs (AVPs; Abbott Vascular, Abbott Park, Illinois) for the treatment of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVMs) in response to a growing concern that 0.018-inch coil embolization would increase the long-term persistence rate. Materials and MethodsThis is a retrospective, single-center study of a database (2002–2020) of 633 PAVM embolizations. Complex PAVMs and those not embolized with 0.018-inch coils or plugs were excluded. PAVM embolization material was classified into 4 groups: (a) 0.018-inch nonfibered coils (NFCs), (b) 0.018-inch fibered coils (FCs), (c) NFCs and FCs, or (d) plugs. Persistence was defined as flow through the PAVM on digital subtraction angiography (DSA) or as <30% diameter reduction of the aneurysmal sac on unenhanced computed tomography (CT). Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to assess PAVM’s persistence-free survival. ResultsA total of 312 PAVM embolizations with NFCs (43 PAVMs), FCs (127 PAVMs), NFCs and FCs (12 PAVMs), or plugs (130 PAVMs) in 109 patients (28% men; mean age = 49 years) were included. All PAVM embolizations were technically successful without any major adverse events. PAVM persistence-free survival rates at 10 years’ follow-up were 40.8% versus 44.7% in the NFC and FC groups (P = .22) and 47.3% versus 81.0% in the 0.018-inch coil (NFC or FC) and plug groups (P < .0001), respectively. There were 0.43 (79/182) and 0.08 (10/130) re-embolization procedures per PAVM in the 0.018-inch coil and plug groups, respectively (P < .001). ConclusionsPAVM embolization with 0.018-inch coils was safe, but persistence rate with PAVM embolization was significantly higher than that with plugs, with no significant differences between FCs and NFCs.

Reducing aneurysm sac growth and secondary interventions following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair by preemptive coil embolization of the inferior mesenteric artery and lumbar arteries

ObjectiveType II endoleak (EL-2) is the most common complication following endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR), leading to continued sac growth and potential rupture. In this study, we examined the association between patency of the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) and lumbar arteries (LAs) with respect to sac growth. The effect of preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LAs on the need for secondary interventions for sac growth post-EVAR was also evaluated. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was performed on consecutive patients who underwent EVAR for non-ruptured, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) from January 2012 to December 2020. A select group of patients underwent preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Patients with any types I, III, or IV endoleaks were excluded. Patency of the IMA and LA on preoperative computed tomography angiogram (CTA) was evaluated on TeraRecon workstation. All secondary interventions to treat EL-2 were recorded. Sac growth was defined as centerline axial diameter increase of ≥5 mm on follow-up CTA. ResultsA total of 300 patients (mean age, 74 ± 8.5 years; 83.7% male) underwent EVAR. Ninety-nine patients had preemptive embolization of the IMA and/or LA. Mean follow-up of the cohort was 59.3 ± 30.5 months. Thirty-six patients (12%) demonstrated sac growth on follow-up; 12 of these (33.3%) had preemptive embolization. The median time until detection of sac growth was 28.8 months (interquartile range, 15.2-46.5 months), with a mean growth of 10.1 ± 6.4 mm. Sac growth was significantly associated with presence of EL-2: 27 of 36 (75%) with EL-2 vs 9 of 36 (25%) without EL-2 (P < .001). Patients with sac growth had a higher mean total number (2.6 ± 1.5) of patent lower LAs (L3, L4) compared with those without (2.0 ± 1.4; P = .03). Patency of L1, L2, and L3 LAs were not associated with sac growth. However, patency of at least one L4 LA was significantly associated with sac growth (14.8% vs 7.7%; P = .04). The highest incidence of sac growth (17.6%) was seen when both IMA and L4 LA were patent; significantly different from the lowest incidence (5.3%) when both were occluded preoperatively (P = .018). Preemptive coiling of the IMA and/or LA significantly reduced the need for post-EVAR secondary intervention for sac growth. Freedom from post-EVAR secondary intervention was achieved in 92 of 99 (92.9%) pre-EVAR coiled patients vs 163 of 201 (81.5%) patients who did not undergo pre-EVAR coiling (P = .009). ConclusionsPreemptive coil embolization of the IMA and LAs, especially L4 LA, reduces the need for secondary interventions for sac growth, potentially improving the long-term durability of EVAR.

Aneurysm Sac Dynamics and its Prognostic Significance Following Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

This study aimed to assess aneurysm sac dynamics and its prognostic significance following fenestrated and branched endovascular aneurysm repair (F/BEVAR). Patients undergoing F/BEVAR for degenerative complex aortic aneurysm from 2008 to 2020 at two large vascular centres with two imaging examinations (30 day and one year) were included. Patients were categorised as regression and non-regression, determined by the proportional volume change (> 5%) at one year compared with 30 days. All cause mortality and freedom from graft related events were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods. Factors associated with non-regression at one year and aneurysm sac volume over time were examined for FEVAR and BEVAR independently using multivariable logistic regression and linear mixed effects modelling. One hundred and sixty-five patients were included: 122 FEVAR, of whom 34% did not regress at one year imaging (20% stable, 14% expansion); and 43 BEVAR, of whom 53% failed to regress (26% stable, 28% expansion). Following F/BEVAR, after risk adjusted analysis, non-regression was associated with higher risk of all cause mortality within five years (hazard ratio [HR] 2.56, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.09 - 5.37; p= .032) and higher risk of graft related events within five years (HR 2.44, 95% CI 1.10 - 5.26; p= .029). Following multivariable logistic regression, previous aortic repair (odds ratio [OR] 2.56, 95% CI 1.11 - 5.96; p= .029) and larger baseline aneurysm diameter (OR/mm 1.04, 95% CI 1.00 - 1.09; p= .037) were associated with non-regression at one year, whereas smoking history was inversely associated with non-regression (OR 0.21, 95% CI 0.04 - 0.96; p= .045). Overall following FEVAR, aneurysm sac volume decreased significantly up to two years (baseline vs. two year, 267 [95% CI 250 - 285] cm3vs. 223 [95% CI 197 - 248] cm3), remaining unchanged thereafter. Overall following BEVAR, aneurysm sac volume remained stable over time. Like infrarenal EVAR, non-regression at one year imaging is associated with higher five year all cause mortality and graft related events risks after F/BEVAR. Following FEVAR for juxtarenal aortic aneurysm, aneurysm sacs generally displayed regression (66% at one year), whereas after BEVAR for thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm, aneurysm sacs displayed a concerning proportion of growth at one year (28%), potentially suggesting a persistent risk of rupture and consequently requiring intensified surveillance following BEVAR. Future studies will have to elucidate how to improve sac regression following complex EVAR, and whether the high expansion risk after BEVAR is due to advanced disease extent.

Image Guidance Techniques and Treatment Approach Optimization in the Management of Type-II Endoleak After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

Over the past three decades EVAR emerged as the primary approach for abdominal aortic aneurysm management, however the occurrence of endoleak following endograft implantation imposes a high toll on patients and hospitals alike. The early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of endoleaks is associated with better outcomes, which calls for more advanced imaging and a standardized approach for endoleak diagnosis and management following EVAR. Although conventional strategy with non-targeted deployment of coils and embolic material in the aneurysm sac is considered to be the standard approach in many hospitals, it may not prove to be a viable option, given that it affects any further follow-up imaging in the event of sub-optimal therapy and consequent recurrence. Currently various imaging and image guidance tools are available to address this clinical challenge, utilizing a targeted approach to warrant optimal individualized, patient-tailored treatment for each case. We summarize our tertiary aortic referral center experience and describe strategies for optimal selection of various treatment approaches for Type-II Endoleak specifically. Including endovascular, percutaneous and laparoscopic approaches.

Time Dependent Correlation Between Sac Behaviour and Re-intervention after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair

This study aimed to investigate the correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and time to re-intervention after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). A retrospective observational cohort study of patients who underwent EVAR at a single centre between January 2008 and November 2011 and who were followed up for a mean of 6.6 ± 2.9 years was conducted. Based on sac appearances on pre-operative imaging and imaging at the end of follow up, patients were stratified into two groups: (1) sac regression; and (2) no sac regression. The no sac regression group was further subdivided into stable sac group and sac expansion group. Sac regression and expansion throughout follow up were defined as a decrease or increase in the abdominal aortic aneurysm sac diameter of ≥ 5 mm compared with the pre-operative size. A Cox proportional hazards model using multiple failure per subject data was used to identify sac behaviour as a predictor of re-intervention free time. Patients with sac regression had a higher probability of freedom from re-intervention compared with those with a stable or expanding aneurysm sac (94%, 57%, and 16% at 12 years, respectively; log rank, p<.001). Mean time to re-intervention was 11.3 years for the sac regression group, 8.8 years for the stable sac group, and 5.0 years for the sac expansion group (p < .001). In the stable sac group, the risk of re-intervention increased sharply six years after EVAR, whereas in the sac expansion group a sharp rise in re-intervention was noted 3.5 years after EVAR, reaching a plateau after year 6. A time dependent correlation between aneurysm sac behaviour and re-intervention was found. Such findings have implications for surveillance strategies.

Treatment of true superficial femoral artery aneurysms: the 15-year experience of a single centre.

True superficial femoral artery aneurysms (SFAAs) are rare and traditionally treated by open repair. However, the endovascular approach excluding the aneurysm sac with a covered stent may be an alternative. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of the open and endovascular repair of SFAAs. This is a retrospective, observational, monocentric study. The main endpoints were: technical success, limb salvage and primary patency rate, and hospitalisation time. We identified 49 SFAAs in 40 patients; the mean age was 73.3±10.1 years, the mean diameter of SFAAs was 5.41±3.64cm, and 61.2% were symptomatic for ischaemic or compression-related signs. The indication for open repair was given mainly for complex SFAAs involving the distal third of the superficial femoral artery and with an ipsilateral popliteal aneurysm. Among the 36 open-repair patients, 33 underwent ligation and revascularisation via bypass or graft interposition, and 3 patients underwent simple ligation without revascularisation. The endovascular approach was adopted mainly for aneurysms located in the medial third of the SFAA, which underwent covered stenting in 12 patients and coil embolisation in 1 patient. The technical success was 100% in all cases. There were no statistical differences in terms of primary patency and limb salvage rate between groups at two and four years. The mean hospitalisation time was 10±4 and 3±1 days after open and endovascular treatment, respectively. The endovascular approach may be a valid alternative for isolating SFAAs offering good results and shorter hospitalisation. Open repair remains a valid approach, particularly in complex aneurysms.

GİRİŞ HIZ PROFİLİ VE GİRİŞ UZUNLUĞUNUN ABDOMİNAL AORT ANEVRİZMASI HEMODİNAMİĞİ SİMÜLASYONLARINA ETKİSİ

In computational Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (AAA) hemodynamics studies, along with adjusting the problem geometry, mesh, transport, turbulence and rheology models; setting up boundary conditions (BC) is also a very important step which affect the reliability and accuracy of the hemodynamic assessment. The transient effects of physiological flow are well described by the Womersley profile, though its application might be difficult due to the complex nature of functions involved. Conversely, in literature, studies utilizing Plug or Parabolic profiles as inlet boundary conditions generally requires large entrance lengths to obtain the exact characteristics of the Womersley profile. In the current study, the differences arising between those boundary conditions, Womersley, Parabolic and Plug, with different entrance lengths, L_(ent )=D,3D and 11D, are examined by comparing the results with a Base condition, which is a solution obtained with ensured fully-developed flow before entering the aneurysm sac at two physiological flow conditions with mean Reynolds numbers, 〖Re〗_m=340 and 1160. The results reveal that with increasing mean flow rate, applying the complex Womersley equation might not be necessary. For the inlet flow waveform with 〖Re〗_m=1160, the Parabolic profile can be used instead of the Womersley profile by supplying an entrance length L_(ent )= 3D. On the other hand, the Plug profile requires an entrance length at least L_(ent )= 11D to replicate the Base condition for waveform with 〖Re〗_m=340.

Case Series on Double-Barrel Stenting for the Renal Arteries Associated With Fenestrated Repair (FEVAR) of Complex Anatomy Aortic Aneurysms.

The double-barrel stenting (DBS) is a technique in which 2 parallel stents are simultaneously deployed through the same reinforced fenestration, into 2 adjacent target vessels. Prior reports describe the application of this technique for the treatment of superior mesenteric artery dissection with aneurysmal degeneration, coronary artery bifurcations, aortic arch branches, and intracranial aneurysms. The DBS technique is particularly useful in the context of fenestrated repair (FEVAR) of complex anatomy aortic aneurysms when the origin of visceral arteries branch off the aorta very close to each other or present early branches. We herein describe a case series including 7 patients who underwent a FEVAR procedure for thoracoabdominal and juxtarenal aortic aneurysms in which the presence of accessory renal arteries (ARA) or early renal branches was the reason for the application of this technique. Technical success was 100% and all stents were patent in the last follow-up CT scan (follow-up range: 1.8-62.8 months). There was only 1 small endoleak from indetermined source potentially related to the DBS, but the aneurysm sac decreased in size during follow-up and no secondary intervention was needed. Therefore, the DBS technique is a viable option for the incorporation of ARA or early renal branches to a fenestrated repair of aortic aneurysms with complex anatomy.