Overall Survival Analysis Research Articles

Overall survival in patients with HER2-low breast cancer at a reference hospital in Mexico.

e12578 Background: Breast cancer is the most diagnosed cancer in women. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate in early-stage disease is 97% while in advanced disease is 36%. HER2 is a growth receptor involved in cell survival and proliferation. An overexpression of this protein leads to a more aggressive behavior; however, with targeted therapies, OS has improved. Recently, a new classification has been developed for tumors previously known as HER2-negative: HER2-low; which are those with IHC 1+ or 2+/ISH negative. It is believed that in these types of tumors, the signaling pathways of the HER2-positive subtype are also activated. There are conflicting studies on the prognostic impact of this subgroup. Currently, there is availability of anti-HER2 treatment for patients in advanced stages, as described in the DESTINY-Breast04 study, which changes the treatment paradigm for this pathology. Methods: The aim of this study is to determine overall survival in patients with HER2-low breast cancer. A retrospective, analytical, observational cohort was performed. Patients diagnosed with HER2-negative/low breast cancer, treated at the UMAE Oncology Hospital of the CMN Siglo XXI, from January 2018 to December 2022, were included. OS and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the impact of HER2-low expression on OS and DFS was assessed using log-rank analysis. The prognostic analysis of the complete model was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model. Results: We included 213 patients. The median age was 57 years. Ninety-five patients were HER2-low (44.6%), and 118 were HER2-negative (55.4%). Seventy-six percent had positive hormone receptor (HR) status. Patients with HR+/HER2-negative were 84 (52.2%), and HR+/HER2-low were 77 (47.8%). Among HR-negative status, the majority were HER2-negative (65.4%). When comparing HER2-negative and HER2-low, no statistically significant differences were found, with a 48-month overall survival of 70% for HER2-negative compared to 87.1% for HER2-low (p= 0.5700). OS analysis in the HER2-low group, comparing HR+ vs. HR-, a statistically significant difference at 48 months of 98.31% vs. 49.17% (p <0.0001), respectively, was found. Regarding DFS, a comparison between HR+ against HR-, it was 79.53% vs. 37.14%, respectively (p= 0.0002). The DFS analysis revealed that, among the variables studied, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and HR+ status showed a statistically significant association with time to recurrence. Particularly, the presence of HR positivity was associated with a significant 82.6% reduction in the risk of recurrence. Conclusions: HER2 status alone (negative or low) did not offer a clear distinction in terms of OS or DFS. Nevertheless, it was observed a difference in OS and DFS outcomes favoring the HR-positive group when examining HR status among individuals with HER2-low, though this finding requires validation in a larger population.

Three-year survival data from a phase 2 trial of neoadjuvant short-course radiotherapy followed by chemotherapy and camrelizumab in locally advanced rectal cancer.

e15611 Background: For locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC), short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) or long-course chemoradiotherapy combined with chemotherapy have been the established neoadjuvant treatment, but the optimal therapeutic modality is still under exploration. We previously reported the short-term results of neoadjuvant SCRT followed by chemotherapy and camrelizumab (a PD-1 inhibitor), encouragingly noting pathological complete response (pCR) in 48.1% of LARC patients (Lin Z et al. J Immunother Cancer 2021;9:e003554). Here, we report the further 3-year follow-up results. Methods: Adult patients with histologically confirmed T3-4N0M0 or T1-4N+M0 rectal adenocarcinoma were enrolled. Prior to surgery, eligible patients received 5×5 Gy SCRT, and after one week, they were treated with camrelizumab (200 mg, i.v., on day 1) plus CAPOX chemotherapy (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2, i.v., on day 1 and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2, orally, bid, on days 1-14) in 21-day cycles for 2 cycles. Radical surgery was performed one week after the last neoadjuvant cycle. For this updated analysis, disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) at 3 years are reported. Results: Thirty patients were enrolled and received SCRT, and all of these patients were included in this OS analysis. Among them, 27 patients received camrelizumab plus CAPOX chemotherapy, all of whom underwent surgery and were included in this DFS analysis. Of the 27 patients, 21 patients (77.8%) received at least one cycle of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with CAPOX regimen. With a median follow-up of 40.8 months (IQR 40.3-44.3), disease recurrence or death occurred in six (22.2%) patients. The median DFS and OS were both not reached, with the 3-year DFS and OS rates of 80.2% (95% CI 58.6-91.3) and 93.3% (95% CI 75.9-98.3), respectively. Subgroup analysis showed that patients with pCR, postoperative pathological node-negative status, PD-L1 combined positive score ≥ 1, and negative circumferential resection margin and negative extramural venous invasion by MRI at baseline had a tendency towards improved 3-year DFS and OS compared to those without these characteristics. No new or long-term safety signals were identified. Conclusions: With 3 years of extended follow-up, a favorable survival benefit was observed with neoadjuvant SCRT combined with subsequent CAPOX plus camrelizumab followed by delayed surgery in LARC patients. A randomized phase 3 trial (NCT04928807) is ongoing to confirm these results. Clinical trial information: NCT04231552 .

Association of napsin A-specific T cell clonotypes with durable clinical benefit to immunotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.

8527 Background: Despite the vast amount of T cell receptor (TCR) sequencing data generated from patients undergoing immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), the clinical insights gained from interrogating antigen-specific T cell responses have been limited. Napsin A is a self-antigen normally expressed in lung parenchyma and highly expressed as a cancer antigen in lung adenocarcinoma. A prior study demonstrated enrichment of Napsin A-specific clonotypes within lung tumors and increased frequency of Napsin A-specific CD8+ IFNγ+ cells among patients with response to ICI (Berner et al 2022 Science Immunol). This finding suggests that T cell responses against Napsin A may be relevant to ICI-mediated anti-tumor responses and might offer a mechanistic link between tumor control and immune adverse events involving the lungs. We examined this hypothesis utilizing TCR repertoire data and assessed whether Napsin A-specific clonotypes are more abundant in the blood of patients with durable clinical benefit to ICI compared to patients with progressive disease. Methods: Patients with metastatic NSCLC receiving anti-PD-1 (alone or in combination, 1st-4th line) were enrolled at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center and Stanford University Medical Center (n = 61; histology of adenocarcinoma n = 48, squamous n = 9, NSCLC/other n = 4). Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected for genomic DNA isolation at pre- and post-treatment (range 3 weeks - 3 months, single post-treatment sample per patient). TCRß was sequenced at survey and deep level via the immunoSEQ platform (Adaptive Biotechnologies). Publicly available TCRß sequences specific for Napsin A (n= 42) were obtained from Berner et al. The frequency of Napsin-A specific TCRß sequences were quantified in each patient sample. Patient demographics, durable clinical benefit (DCB) at 6 months (DCB n = 30, progressive disease n = 31), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were captured from chart review. High versus low frequency of Napsin A-specific TCRs were defined as above/below the median for PFS and OS analysis. Results: Napsin A-specific clonotypes were significantly enriched within 3 months after treatment in patients achieving DCB from ICI compared to patients without DCB (p = 0.037 post-treatment, n = 41). Patients with a higher frequency of Napsin A-specific TCRs had a significant improvement in OS compared to patients with a lower frequency of these clonotypes (p = 0.006 pre-treatment; p = 0.016 post-treatment). Conclusions: A higher frequency of Napsin A-specific T cell clonotypes is associated with DCB and improved OS with ICI in patients with NSCLC. T cell immune responses recognizing the tumor antigen Napsin A may play a role in shaping ICI responses, a finding that warrants further investigation in larger datasets.

Differential genomic profiling of the progesterone receptor (PR) negative and estrogen receptor (ER) low metastatic breast cancer subtypes through circulating tumor DNA: A TNBC-like disease subtype?

1039 Background: ER positive/HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is typically regarded as a single entity, although significant clinical differences are often observed, especially in the ER low subgroup (ER<10% regardless of PR status). This study aims to investigate genomic differences among HER2 negative subtypes (i.e., ERlow, PRpos [ER >10%/PRpositve], PRneg [ER >10%/PRnegative], triple negative [TNBC]) through circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) next-generation sequencing (NGS). Methods: The study analyzed a retrospective cohort of 879 patients (pts) with HER2 negative MBC with ctDNA testing using the Guardant360 NGS panel within a large multicenter academic consortium. ER, PR and HER2 status was defined based on the most updated biopsy. Associations across single nucleotide and copy number variations (SNVs and CNVs) and ER/PR status were tested by multinomial logistic regression in terms of Relative Risk Ratio (RRR), adjusting for significant clinical characteristics (i.e., lines of treatment, metastatic sites, histology). Oncogenic pathway was defined based on reference (1). Prognosis was analyzed through Cox regression for overall survival (OS) defined from time of ctDNA collection. Results: Among the 879 analyzed pts, PRpos was the most prevalent subtype (N:420, 48%), followed by PRneg (N:216, 24%), TNBC (N:209, 24%), and ERlow (N:34, 4%). Compared to PRpos, lobular MBC was less common in TNBC (RRR: 0.33, P=0.001), while lung involvement was more frequent in TNBC (RRR: 1.53, P=0.019), and liver involvement in PRneg (RRR: 1.44, P=0.035). In contrast, bone metastases were less common in TNBC and ERlow (RRR: 0.26, P<0.001 and RRR: 0.45, P=0.03, respectively). After multivariable analysis, ERlow and TNBC were associated with a higher incidence of TP53 SNVs (RRR: 5.42, P<0.001 and RRR: 3.08, P=0.007, respectively) and a lower incidence of ESR1 SNVs (RRR: 0.23, P=0.025 and not detected, respectively). TNBC exhibited significantly fewer PIK3CA SNVs (RRR: 0.41, P=0.005) and CCND1 CNVs (RRR: 0.20, P=0.009), along with a higher frequency of CCNE1 CNVs (RRR: 6.47, P<0.001). PRneg had a lower incidence of ESR1 SNVs (RRR: 0.52, P=0.013) and more frequent FGFR1 CNVs (RRR: 2.61, P=0.004). Similar results were observed across oncogenic pathways. Compared to PRpos, OS analysis indicated poorer outcomes across all subgroups (PRneg HR: 1.29 P = 0.035, TNBC HR: 1.96 P<0.001, ERlow HR: 2.32 P<0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights several clinical and molecular similarities between TNBC and ERlow MBC, while suggesting specific endocrine resistance mechanisms in PRneg that are less reliant on ESR1 and more exposed to alternative mechanisms such as FGFR1 amplification. These findings underscore the importance of more precise disease subtyping to inform future drug development trials. 1. Sanchez-Vega F et al, Cell. 2018.

Post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by mechanism of mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) treated with dostarlimab plus chemotherapy in the RUBY trial.

Post hoc analysis of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by mechanism of mismatch repair (MMR) protein loss in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) treated with dostarlimab plus chemotherapy in the RUBY trial.

Association between neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio and efficacy outcomes with avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: post hoc analyses from the JAVELIN Renal 101 trial

ObjectiveWe report post hoc analyses of efficacy with first-line avelumab plus axitinib or sunitinib according to baseline neutrophil-to-eosinophil ratio (NER) in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) from the...

Single-center retrospective analysis of second-line treatment with regorafenib in patients with advanced colorectal cancer among the COVID-19 pandemic.

e15552 Background: Regorafenib targets multiple tyrosine kinases that has been approved for the third-line treatment in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients in China. Here, We retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of regorafenib alone or combined with chemotherapy/immunotherapy in the second-line treatment for those who cannot visit hospital for their chemotherapies because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Individual patient data from Peking University Third Hospital were analyzed retrospectively from January 2020 to September 2023. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: The median age of 31 patients was 65 years, the median PFS was 6 months (1–21 months), and the median OS was 20 months (3–38 months). PFS tended to be prolonged with regorafenib plus capecitabine or immunotherapy in 12 subjects versus regorafenib alone in 19 subjects (8 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.306), with no statistical difference, and so did OS (27 months vs. 15 months, P = 0.899).The analysis of PFS (2.5 months vs. 7 months vs. 4 months, P = 0.164) and OS (13 months vs. 28 months vs. 20 months, p = 0.417) in patients with liver, lung, or abdominal/peritoneal metastases at the initiation of treatment demonstrated poor survival prognosis in patients with liver metastasis. Multivariate analysis showed that regorafenib combined with capecitabine or immunotherapy (wald = 5.766, p = 0.016) and non-liver metastasis (wald = 4.223, p = 0.040) were independent prognostic factors for PFS in the second-line treatment. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) mainly included hand-foot skin reactions (HFSRs), fatigue, hypertension, and proteinuria, due to which 3 subjects discontinued the treatment. The incidence of Grade 3/4 ADRs was 19.3%, 16.9%, 12.9%, and 9.6%, respectively. Conclusions: Regorafenib alone or combined with chemotherapy/immunotherapy is safe and feasible in the second-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer, and therefore further prospective studies can be conducted to explore combination therapies.

An open-label, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial of camrelizumab combined with or without apatinib or capecitabine in the treatment of previously treated advanced pancreatic cancer.

e16324 Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the few cancer types that have essentially no clinical benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy, combined immunotherapy is expected to solve this dilemma. We conducted a randomized open-label, placebo-controlled phase II trial evaluating the efficacy of camrelizumab combined with apatinib or capecitabine in the treatment of patients with previously treated metastatic PDAC (ChiCTR1900024095). Methods: Eligible patients (n = 30) were randomized 1:1:1 to receive camrelizumab (200 mg q2w) combined with apatinib (250mg qd, d1-28, q4w) or capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, bid d1-14, q3w), or placebo plus capecitabine (1000 mg/m2, bid d1-14, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks according to RECISTv1.1. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed 6-month overall survival (OS) rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety. Data cutoff date for the prespecified interim OS and final PFS analysis was Oct 30, 2022. Results: In the primary endpoint analysis, camrelizumab combined treatment showed improved 6-month OS rates, whether in the camrelizumab-apatinib arm (83.3% versus 33.3%, p = 0.1189) or in the camrelizumab-capecitabine arm (100% versus 33.3%, p = 0.0098), compared placebo-capecitabine, respectively. Median PFS was 5.4 months, HR 0.58, [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.21–1.59] in the camrelizumab-apatinib arm , 3.1 months HR 0.98, [95%CI, 0.35–2.77] in the camrelizumab-capecitabine arm , and 2.6 months in the placebo-capecitabine, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 0% and 66.7% in the camrelizumab-apatinib arm, 40% and 50% in the camrelizumab-capecitabine arm, 0% and 44.4% in the placebo-capecitabine, respectively. PR was observed in two patients receiving camrelizumab-capecitabine treatment. The median DoR were 5.3 months in the camrelizumab-apatinib arm, 4.3 months in the camrelizumab-capecitabine arm, and 2.1 months in the placebo-capecitabine arm. Treatment-related adverse event rates were slightly increased in camrelizumab combined arms. Incidences of grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events were comparable between the three groups (20%、 10% vs 0%), with reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (10%) as the most common one in Camrelizumab combinations. Conclusions: Camrelizumab combined treatment showed improved 6-month OS vs conventional capecitabine monotherapy, with a manageable safety profile. These analyses revealed combined immunotherapy could be used as a new option for posterior line treatment in previously treated metastatic PDAC. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900024095.

CASTOR1 phosphorylation as a predictor of survival in male patients with KRAS-mutated lung adenocarcinoma.

e20015 Background: Lung cancer, a leading global cause of cancer-related mortality, necessitates enhanced prognostic markers for improved treatment outcomes. This study focuses on the predictive value of phosphorylated cytosolic arginine sensor for mTORC1 subunit 1 at S14 (pCASTOR1) in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, specifically in males with KRAS mutations. Methods: This retrospective study, approved by University of Pittsburgh IRB, utilized formaline-fixed paraffin embedded primary tissues from two independent cohorts of patients who underwent thoracic surgical procedures at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) from 2002 to 2011. Comprehensive clinical, demographical and pathological information was obtained from UPMC Cancer Registry, with cases lacking incomplete information excluded from analysis. Study endpoints included overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). An antibody targeting pCASTOR1 was employed to analyze LUAD tumor and adjacent non-tumor lung tissues from both cohorts. A pathologist, blinded to patient information and survival outcomes, conducted scoring in 5% increments. Scores were categorized as low or high pCASTOR1 based on second or third quartile. Correlations between pCASTOR1 scores and OS/RFS were examined, stratifying by clinical, pathological, demographic, or genotype data. Univariate OS and RFS analyses were conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test, while multivariate survival significance was assessed via Cox regression analysis. Additionally, unpaired T-tests were utilized to compare pCASTOR1 levels between non-tumor and tumor cells. A significance threshold of p < 0.05 was applied for all analyses. Results: Tumor cells exhibited significantly elevated pCASTOR1 scores compared to non-tumor cells in both cohorts (P < 0.05). High pCASTOR1 scores predicted poor OS (HR = 3.3, P = 0.0008) and RFS (HR = 3.0, P = 0.0035) in male patients with KRAS mutations in Cohort 1. pCASTOR1 remained an independent predictor for OS (HR = 4.1, P = 0.0047) and RFS (HR = 3.5, P = 0.0342) after controlling for other factors. Cohort 2, comprised solely of smokers with incomplete genotype information, validated these findings, with high pCASTOR1 scores correlating with worse OS (HR = 4.8, P = 0.0363). Notably, in early-stage LUAD, elevated pCASTOR1 scores were associated with significantly worse OS (HR = 3.3, P = 0.0176) and RFS (HR = 3.1, P = 0.0277) in male patients with KRAS mutations in Cohort 1, and worse OS (HR = 5.0, P = 0.0069) and RFS (HR = 5.0, P = 0.0069) in Cohort 2, akin to late-stage patients. Conclusions: Elevated pCASTOR1 score serves as a robust biomarker predicting poor OS and RFS in male LUAD patients with KRAS mutations, offering potential clinical utility in optimizing treatment strategies for this subgroup.

High pre-treatment NLR and PLR predict poor prognosis of patients with recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

e18001 Background: The treatment landscape of unresectable recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) has profoundly changed with the introduction of Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). High neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been associated with poor outcome in several tumor types. The aim of the present study was to investigate the role of pre-treatment NLR and PLR in predicting overall survival (OS) of patients treated with ICIs. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 106 consecutive patients with R/M-HNSCC who received ICIs (single-agent or ICIs-based treatment) between January 2018 and June 2023 at the Istituto Oncologico Veneto of Padua. Patients were grouped into platinum-refractory (patients progressed within 6 months from the last platinum dose) and platinum-sensitive. The cut-off values of pre-treatment NLR and PLR were determined based on percentile distribution (75th percentile). OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare survival outcomes. Results: A total of 102 patients were analyzed. Four patients were excluded because of incomplete data. Primary tumor sites were oropharynx (37%), oral cavity (24%), hypopharynx (19%), larynx (15%), nasopharynx (5%) and nasal cavity (1%). 63 patients (62%) with platinum-refractory disease received nivolumab single-agent. All 39 patients (38%) with platinum-sensitive disease were PD-L1 positive (CPS≥1) and received pembrolizumab-based treatment. Median OS was 8.0 months (95% CI 5.8-10.1) in the platinum-refractory cohort and 13.3 months (95% CI 7.3-19.3) in the platinum-sensitive cohort. At the univariate analysis high NLR (≥7) and PLR (≥345) correlated with poor OS in the overall population and in both the platinum-refractory and the platinum-sensitive cohorts (Table1). At the multivariate analysis PLR was an independent predictor of OS. Conclusions: The efficacy results reported in this retrospective series were in line with the literature data. High PLR was an independent predictor of poor outcome regardless of the platinum sensitivity. Prospective studies are needed to better explore the predictive role of easily obtainable blood biomarkers in this poor prognostic population. Univariate analysis for OS [Table: see text]

Longitudinal changes in triceps skinfold thickness and serum albumin during chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic cancer: Gender-based prognostic insights—A prospective cohort study.

e16308 Background: Cachexia, characterized by distinct fat loss and poor nutritional status, is common in patients with pancreatic cancer. This study investigated the association between triceps skinfold thickness(TSF), indicative of body fat, and serum albumin levels, reflecting nutritional status, with overall survival(OS) in patients with pancreatic cancer. Methods: A prospective cohort of 353 patients with pancreatic cancer from April 2018 to June 2021 who received chemotherapy was queried. TSF(mm) and serum albumin(g/dL) were measured at baseline and every three weeks during follow-up. The optimal cutoffs for their six-month changes(six-month value minus initial value) were determined. We performed a landmark analysis of OS six months after the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and assessed the factors influencing OS. Gender-specific survival analysis was conducted, culminating in the construction of nomograms for risk stratification. Results: Two hundred ninety-two patients survived over six months, with a median follow-up of 40.9 months. Changes in TSF, albumin, and protein levels over six months and initial albumin levels were independently associated with OS. Cancer stage, response to chemotherapy, and six-month serum CA 19-9 levels were also independent factors for OS. Gender-stratified analysis revealed gender-specific prognostic factors: TSF changes over six months£ 0 were associated with reduced OS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.84; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–2.95) in men; initial albumin levels£ 3.5g/dl (HR, 5.73; 95% CI, 2.48–13.21) and albumin changes over six months£ -0.7g/dl (HR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.51–6.07) were associated with reduced OS in women. Patients were categorized into low-, medium-, and high-risk groups for each gender based on nomogram scores, and increased risk levels were associated with elevated mortality risk. Conclusions: This was the first prospective cohort study to demonstrate that changes in TSF and albumin levels were associated with OS in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy in a gender-dependent manner.

Analysis of real-world (RW) pomalidomide (pom) dosing patterns in patients (pts) with multiple myeloma (MM) from the Flatiron database.

e19508 Background: Pom is an immunomodulatory drug commonly used in combination with other antimyeloma therapies for the treatment (tx) of pts with MM. However, there is a paucity of data on RW dosing patterns with pom and associated tx outcomes. We report RW pom dosing patterns and effectiveness using RW data to inform potential pom dosing strategies as part of combination tx regimens. Methods: RW pom data in pts with MM were derived from the US Flatiron Health deidentified electronic health record (EHR) database (Jan 2011–Nov 2021). Pom starting dose (1, 2, 3, or 4 mg) and line of therapy (LOT) were identified from EHRs. Tx patterns were captured per LOT; pts could receive >1 pom-containing tx regimen/LOT. Pts receiving pom were followed until Dec 2023 for outcome analysis. Overall survival (OS) and time to next tx (TTNT) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and analyzed by log-rank testing. Results: Of 15,378 pts with MM, 2,034 had an order for pom, of whom 1,344 received pom and 880 had LOT data. The most common initial pom dose was 4 mg (50%), followed by 2 mg (30%), 3 mg (16%), and 1 mg (4%). The most common pom-containing tx regimens were: daratumumab + pom + dexamethasone (d; 29%), pom + d (18%), and carfilzomib + pom + d (14%); 6% of pts received pom monotherapy. Retreatment with pom was infrequent, with 84% of pts receiving only 1 pom-containing LOT. Most pts (n=652, 74%) remained on the initial pom dose received; of these, 367 pts remained on an initial dose of 4 mg. Among pts who changed dose (n=227, 26%), 36% changed from 2 mg and 36% changed from 4 mg. Of pts who received an initial dose of 4 mg and changed dose (n=81), 43%, 51%, and 6% reduced to 3, 2, and 1 mg, respectively. Of pts who received an initial dose of 2 mg and changed dose (n=82), 17% reduced to 1 mg. Among pts who received an initial dose of <4 mg and changed dose, dose escalation was common (67% of pts with a 3 mg initial dose increased to 4 mg; 33% and 50% of pts with a 2 mg initial dose increased to 3 and 4 mg, respectively). Outcome analysis of pts with LOT and available follow-up data suggest that initial pom dose had no impact on OS and TTNT (Table). Log-rank analysis of OS and TTNT between the initial doses of 2 and 4 mg showed no significant difference among all pts ( P=0.32) or in pts who changed dose ( P=0.29). Conclusions: RW analyses show that most pts remain on the initial pom dose received, but some pts changed doses. Pom, most commonly used in combination regimens, can be used across an initial dose range with no impact on efficacy in pts with MM. Optimal pom dosing may vary across pts and combination regimens; pom dosing should be tailored to pt needs per disease and tx factors. [Table: see text]

A phase III trial comparing 5-FU plus cisplatin (CF) versus CF plus docetaxel or radiotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer: 5-year follow-up from JCOG1109.

4082 Background: Triplet chemotherapy with CF plus docetaxel (DCF) improved survival compared to CF as a neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) based on the result from JCOG1109 (jRCTs031180202). Here we report results with 5 years minimum follow-up. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with ESCC of clinical stage IB, II, III (excluding T4) (UICC 7th) from 44 institutions were randomized 1:1:1 to neoadjuvant CF (cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day1 plus 5-FU 800 mg/m2 on days 1-5 Q3W/2 course), DCF (docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 1, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 on day1, plus 5-FU 750 mg/m2 on days 1-5 Q3W/3 course), or CF-RT (cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 plus 5-FU 1000 mg/m2 on days 1-4 Q4W/2 course, radiation 41.4 Gy/23 fr). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Differences in OS was assessed in the ITT using the stratified log-rank test. The data cutoff date for the analysis was July 20, 2023. Results: Of 601 pts 199 CF, 202 DCF, and 200 CF-RT were enrolled from December 5, 2012 to July 20, 2018. Among 601 pts, 88.2% were male, median (range) age was 65 (30-75), clinical stage III (nonT4) pts were 62.6%. Median follow-up time (range) was 5.5 years (y) (0-10.6). Median OS in CF, DCF, and CF-RT arm were 5.8 y, 10.2 y, and 8.2 y, and 5-year OS was 51.9%, 65.1%, and 60.2%, respectively (stratified log-rank test: one-sided p = 0.004 for CF vs. DCF and one-sided p = 0.15 for CF vs. CF-RT). By the stratified Cox regression analysis for OS, hazard ratios (HR) [95% CI] with DCF vs. CF was 0.68 [0.51–0.91] and that with CF-RT vs. CF was 0.86 [0.66–1.13]. The HR for OS in exploratory comparison between DCF vs. CF-RT was 0.78 [0.59-1.05]. Median PFS in CF, DCF, and CF-RT arm were 2.7 y, 9.5 y, and 5.8 y, and 5-year PFS was 42.6%, 55.7%, and 53.5%, respectively. In the CF arm, there were initially 4 treatment-related and 15 other deaths, with 1 additional treatment-related and 2 other deaths over two more years. The DCF arm reported 4 and 10 deaths respectively, with 3 additional deaths from other causes. In the CF-RT arm, there were 4 treatment-related and 27 other deaths, followed by 2 more treatment-related and 4 other deaths in the extended period. Conclusions: After 5 years follow-up, neoadjuvant DCF continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful improvements in OS and PFS compared to CF in patients with locally advanced ESCC. Clinical trial information: jRCTs031180202 .

The population-based effects of the FDA’s approval of durvalumab as consolidative therapy in patients with locally-advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

e20086 Background: In 2018, consolidative durvalumab (D) was FDA-approved in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC) because it increased PFS and was later found to increase overall survival (OS). This analysis will check the real-world effects of this agent prior to and after its approval. Methods: The SEER-17 database was queried from 2015-2020 and assessed for differences in OS/lung cancer specific survival (LCSS) and rates of second cancers (2C). Patients included were those with NSCLC who received chemotherapy and radiation with at least 7 months of follow-up. The population was split into two different groups, those diagnosed before and after D’s approval (2015-2017(BA) and 2018-2020(AA). Multi-variate analyses (MVA) were used to find prognostic factors which were used to adjust OS/LCSS rates for the BA and AA at 12, 24, and 30 months. Variables analyzed included patient characteristics, histopathology, and previous cancers (separated into alcohol, diet, smoking, virus and hormone related). Inverse propensity scores were weighted for OS factors to determine rates of second cancers. Results: Of 12,022 patients, 501 patients developed 2Cs. The OS was significantly better for AA group than the BA group ( p < 0.001, HR = 0.79(0.74, 0.85) with rates at 12, 24, and 30 months of 0.86, 0.68, and 0.62%; and 0.83, 0.62, and 0.55%. Multivariate analyses for OS demonstrated similar prognostic factors in both year groups and were worse with advanced age, male sex, unmarried status, squamous histology, advanced stage and non-Hispanic white race. The LCSS was significantly better in AP than the BA group ( p < 0.001, HR = 0.84 (0.7, 0.89) with rates at 12, 24, and 30 months of groups of 0.82,0.61, and 0.55%; and 0.80,0.56,and 0.48%. The prognostic factors for LCSS were the same in both group and included age, male sex, squamous histology, and advanced stage. The adjusted rates of 2C in 2018-2020 group were trending less than in 2015-2017 (HR = 0.80(0.63-1.03), p =0.07), largely driven by a reduction in smoking-related cancers (HR = 0.74(0.53-1.02, p= 0.07). The 2C rates at 12, 24, and 30 months were 1.0, 2.7, and 3.5% in the 2015-2017 and 0.9, 1.6, and 1.9% in 2018-2020 groups. MVA significant risk factors for 2Cs were age, history of previous cancer, male sex, and squamous histology in the BA group, but no factors were significant for 102 second cancers in the AA group. Conclusions: In the years after durvalumab's approval, there was a significant benefit in terms of overall survival and lung cancer specific survival, but prognostic factors remained similar. In addition to the OS/LCSS benefit, durvalumab's approval was associated with a strong trend for reducing the incidence of second cancers, especially in those with previous smoking related cancers.

The subgroup analysis by age and geriatric assessment in a phase III study comparison of trastuzumab emtansine with trastuzumab, pertuzumab, and docetaxel in older patients with advanced stage HER2-positive breast cancer (JCOG1607 HERB TEA study).

1031 Background: The JCOG1607, HERB TEA Study, is a phase III trial that compared trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) with the HPD regimen (trastuzumab, pertuzumab, docetaxel) in older patients with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. The primary objective was to confirm the non-inferiority of T-DM1 to HPD in overall survival (OS), with a margin of 1.35 for hazard ratio (HR). The trial was terminated early due to futility at the planned first interim analysis. T-DM1 didn't show non-inferiority to HPD in OS (HR 1.263; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.677-2.357). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.3 months for T-DM1 and 15.6 months for HPD (HR 1.373; 95% CI, 0.917-2.056). However, the condition of older patients varies widely, and we conducted a subgroup analysis to investigate the subgroup that could benefit from T-DM1 with fewer side effects as a first-line treatment. Methods: Subgroup analysis for OS and PFS involved 148 patients enrolled in JCOG1607, considering age and PS (<75 years old and PS 0,1 or <75 years old and PS 2 or ≥75 years old), Geriatric 8 (G8) score (≥15 or <15), Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (IADL) score (8 or <8), visceral/brain metastasis presence (with or without), and other factors. Results: Subgroup of <75 and PS 2 was not evaluable. For OS, HR of T-DM1 arm to HPD arm was 0.749 (95% CI: 0.310-1.808) in the group aged <75 years, while 2.867 (95%CI: 1.018-8.069) in the group aged ≥75 years (Table). G8 score and the IADL score did not show significant differences in HR for OS, although low G8 score group and low IADL score group tended to have higher OS in HPD arm than T-DM1 arm: HR of T-DM1 arm to HPD arm of 1.541 (95% CI: 0.755-3.142) in low G8 score group and 2.147 (95% CI: 0.656-7.025) in low IADL score group. For PFS, patients with visceral/brain metastasis had HR of T-DM1 arm to HPD arm of 1.794 (95% CI: 1.092-2.948). No other subgroup showed a significant difference in HR for PFS. Conclusions: No subgroups benefiting from T-DM1 as first-line treatment were identified. HPD remains the standard for advanced HER2-positive breast cancer, regardless of age (even in ≥75 years) G8 score, or IADL. Clinical trial information: UMIN000030783. [Table: see text]

Surgery versus no surgery in platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer: final overall survival analysis of the SOC-1 randomized phase 3 trial.

Surgery for platinum-sensitive, relapsed ovarian cancer (PSROC) is widely practiced but had contradictory survival outcomes in previous studies. In this multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial, women with PSROC, and having had one previous therapy and no platinum-based chemotherapy (platinum-free interval) of 6 months or more, were randomly assigned to either the surgery group (182 patients) or the no-surgery group (control) (175 patients). Patients with resectable diseases were eligible according to the international model (iMODEL), combined with a positron emission tomography-computed tomography imaging. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were coprimary endpoints in hierarchical testing, and a significantly longer progression-free survival with surgery was previously reported. Final analysis of OS was planned at data maturity of 59%. Between 19 July 2012 and 3 June 2019, 357 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 82.5 months. Median OS was 58.1 months with surgery and 52.1 months for control (hazard ratio (HR) 0.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61-1.05, P = 0.11). The predefined threshold for statistical significance was not met, but prespecified sensitivity analysis was performed. Overall, 61 of 175 (35%) patients in control had crossed over to surgery following subsequent relapse, and adjusted HR for death in the surgery group compared with control was 0.76, 95% CI 0.58-0.99. In subgroup analysis of relapse sites by imaging, median survival was not estimable in the surgery group and was 69.5 months in control in patients with <20 sites (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.46-1.03). Patients with a complete resection had the most favorable outcome, with a median OS of 73.0 months. Twenty-four of 182 (13.2%) patients remained relapse free and alive >60 months in the surgery group as compared with five of 175 (2.9%) patients in the control group. In patients with PSROC, surgery did not increase OS in the intention-to-treat population but resulted in a prolongation of survival following adjustment of crossover.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT01611766 .

Outcomes of very young women and adolescent (VYWAA) with breast cancer (BC) in rural and urban Saskatchewan: A population-based cohort study.

1571 Background: BC is uncommon in VYWAA (≤ 35 years) and accounts for about 1.8% of all BC. As BC screening is typically recommended for women aged 50-74 years there is a risk of delayed diagnosis of BC in VYWAA especially those with rural residence. The current study aims to assess outcomes of a cohort of VYWAA with BC in relation to their place of residence in the province of Saskatchewan over a period of 20 years. Methods: In this population-based retrospective cohort study all women ≤ 35 years with histologically documented epithelial BC during 2000-2019 were evaluated. Survival of the entire cohort and its subgroups was estimated using the Kaplan−Meier method, and the survival distribution of different groups was compared by the log rank test. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was performed. Various clinical and demographic variables were examined for their prognostic importance of overall survival (OS) for all stages and disease-free survival (DFS) for early-stage BC. Results: 248 eligible women with a median age of 32 years were identified, 24% were &lt;30 years of age. Of all patients, 51% had node positive disease, 7% had DCIS, 15% stage I, 42% stage II, 22% stage III and 11% had stage IV disease at initial presentation. Among them 42% had hormone receptor +, 28% had HER2 + and 23% had triple negative BC (TNBC).16% developed BC within 1-year of pregnancy. 53% were rural resident and 47% were urban resident. Significant differences were noted between the two groups regarding smoking history (42 vs. 25%), HER2+BC (35% vs. 20%) and mean platelet count (285 vs. 258). Median follow up for all women was 91 months with a total follow up period of 294 months. Median DFS of VYWAA with stage I to III disease has not reached. 10-year estimated DFS of all women was 66%. 10-year DFS for stage I and II was 73% and 75%, respectively, vs. 43% for stage III (p&lt;0.001). Median OS of entire cohort with stage 0-IV BC has not reached. 10-year OS of all VYWAA was 69%. 10 years OS of urban women was 79% compared to 65% for rural resident (p=0.041). 10-year OS of women age &gt;30 years was 74% compared to 62% for age 26-30 years and 55% for age &lt;26 (p=0.35).10 years OS of VYWAA with non-TNBC was 73% compared to 63% for with TNBC (p=0.028). On multivariate analysis for women with early-stage disease, stage III BC, HR, 3.0 (1.80-4.92) and grade III BC were significantly correlated with inferior DFS. On a multivariate analysis for OS of all VYWAA with stage 0 to IV disease, rural residence, HR, 1.75 (1.08-2.81); TNBC, HR, 2.25 (1.34-3.80), and stage IV disease, HR, 8.1 (4.72-13.94) were correlated with inferior OS. Conclusions: Very young women and adolescent with BC have a high incidence of node-positive disease and HER2+ and TNBC subtypes. TNBC and grade III disease were associated with inferior DFS in stage I-III disease whereas stage IV BC, TNBC and rural residence were correlated with inferior survival in women with stage 0-IV disease.

Camrelizumab plus rivoceranib vs sorafenib as first-line therapy for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC): Final overall survival analysis of the phase 3 CARES-310 study.

4110 Background: The phase 3 CARES-310 trial is the first to demonstrate significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefits with immunotherapy plus an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) over standard TKI as first-line treatment for uHCC. In the primary analysis of PFS (data cut-off [DCO], May. 10, 2021) and interim analysis of OS (DCO, Feb. 8, 2022), significant improvements were observed with camrelizumab (C; anti-PD-1 antibody) + rivoceranib (R; VEGFR2-TKI) vs. sorafenib (S). Here, we report updated data at the final analysis (FA), after an additional follow-up of ~16 mo. Methods: In this international, randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, 543 patients with uHCC who had not previously received systemic treatment were randomized 1:1 to receive either C (200 mg, iv, q2w) + R (250 mg, po, qd) or S (400 mg, po, bid). As of Jun.14, 2023, 351 (65%) deaths occurred, and a protocol-specified FA was performed. Results: 272 patients were allocated to C+R and 271 to S. At DCO of FA, median follow-up was 22.1 mo in C+R group and 14.9 mo in S group. After end of study treatment, 36% of patients in C+R group and 42% in S group received subsequent targeted therapy; 17% and 36% received immunotherapy, respectively. Median OS was significantly prolonged with C+R vs . S (23.8 mo [95% CI 20.6-27.2] vs. 15.2 mo [95% CI 13.2-18.5]; hazard ratio (HR) 0.64 [95% CI 0.52-0.79]; 1-sided p &lt;0.0001). OS rate with C+R vs.S was 49.0% vs. 36.2% at 24 mo, and 37.7% vs. 24.8% at 36 mo. OS benefits with C+R was generally consistent across subgroups, regardless of geographical region, race, and aetiology. Benefits in PFS, objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) with C+R were also sustained after prolonged follow-up (Table). Safety data aligned with the interim OS analysis, with no new signals noted. Conclusions: At the protocol-specified FA, C+R continued to show clinically meaningful survival improvement compared with S, with manageable safety. The extended follow-up further confirmed the favorable benefit-to-risk profile of C+R, supporting it as a new first-line treatment option for uHCC. Clinical trial information: NCT03764293 . [Table: see text]

Correlation of therapy-induced neutropenia with survival in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with GSK-3 inhibitor elraglusib (9-ING-41) in combination with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in the 1801 phase 2 study.

e16311 Background: Previously, elraglusib (9-ING-41), an inhibitor of Glycogen Synthase Kinase-3 (GSK-3), was shown to potentiate the anticancer effects of chemotherapeutic drugs in preclinical models of cancer. The combination of elraglusib and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is currently being investigated in a randomized, open-label 1801 phase 2 study as a first-line therapy for patients with metastatic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (mPDAC). Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia is a common dose-limiting toxicity resulting in dose reductions and/or treatment interruptions. Present evidence shows that therapy-induced neutropenia (TIN) grade 3-4 correlates with survival and is a potential marker for improved clinical outcome in elraglusib/GnP-treated patients. Methods: We correlated overall survival (OS) and time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) with TIN grade 3-4 in 72 (GnP arm) and 155 (elraglusib/GnP arm) mPDAC patients previously untreated for advanced disease (1801 Part 3 Arm B study; NCT03678883). TTD was defined as the date of first dose to the date of treatment discontinuation or death. The Kaplan-Meier log-rank test was used for statistical analysis. A p-value &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: The rate of grade 3-4 TIN was 22% (16/72 patients) and 47% (72/155 patients) in the GnP and elraglusib/GnP groups, respectively. Based on 28% of all recorded death events in elraglusib/GnP group and 36% in GnP group, we found that grade 3-4 TIN was significantly associated with improved OS in patients treated with elraglusib/GnP (median OS: 14.4 vs 5.9 months; P &lt; 0.05) but not in patients treated with GnP (median OS: 7.6 vs 7.2 months). In the elraglusib/GnP group, patients with grade 3-4 TIN stayed on treatment significantly longer (median TTD: 7.9 months; P &lt; 0.05) as compared to the patients who did not develop TIN grade 3-4 (median TTD: 1.7 months). Conclusions: Our preliminary results identified grade 3-4 TIN as a potential marker of improved clinical outcome for elraglusib/GnP therapy in previously untreated patients with mPDAC. Recruitment for the 1801 Part 3 Arm B phase 2 trial has been completed. Another interim analysis of OS and its correlation to grade 3-4 TIN will be available by April 2024 and will be included in the final presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT03678883 .

Concurrent enhancer of Zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) over-expression with BRAFV600E mutation predicts a poor outcome in patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH): A pilot study.

e18536 Background: Prior studies demonstrated upregulated EZH2 protein expression and p-ERK1/2 cascade signaling in histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms. BRAFV600E is the most common driver mutation reported in LCH patients (34-64%). In melanoma studies, a signaling pathway with BRAFV600E activating mutation resulted in upregulation of EZH2. The frequency of EZH2 co-expression with BRAFV600E is unknown in LCH. Given the limited durable responses after discontinuation of treatment with BRAF inhibitors in histiocytic disorders, we investigated the prognostic role of EZH2 overexpression and BRAFV600E mutation in LCH. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of 27 consecutive patients (pts) diagnosed with LCH at Moffitt Cancer Center and Tampa General Hospital between 2010-2022. Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining using antibodies against EZH2 (D2C9 clone, Cell Signaling) and BRAFV600E (VE1 clone, Ventana medical systems) were performed. Expression was assessed by an IHC score of stain intensity (0, 1+, 2+ and 3+) multiplied by percent positive cells (H score). H score ≥ 30 was considered as positive. Pyrosequencing was performed to detect BRAFV600E mutations and correlated with VE1 staining results. A positive outcome from either IHC or PCR was deemed indicative of mutation positivity, given the robust presence of mutation representation in melanoma studies through IHC. Results: Entire cohort were grouped for pts who had both EZH2 overexpression and BRAFV600E mutation (EZH2/BRAFV600E) versus those who did not. Out of 27 pts, 25.9% (n=7) had both EZH2/BRAFV600E. EZH2/BRAFV600E group differed from control group by age ( p=0.046). BRAFV600E mutation was identified in 37.03% (10) pts, and 40.7% (11) showed expression of VE1 by IHC study. Discrepancies between PCR and IHC study were observed in 4 pts and potentially attributable to the restricted availability of tissue samples. 63% and 48.1% of pts were positive for EZH2 and BRAFV600E respectively. 6 pts were observed, 8 underwent surgery with or without radiation, 12 received induction chemotherapy, and only 1 received a BRAF inhibitor. After 18.6 months of median follow up, 92.6% pts were alive. Overall response rate (ORR) to the 1st line therapy was 55.6%. In univariate analysis of OS, H score and BRAFV600E mutation trended towards worse OS but were not statistically significant owing to small sample size. However, BRAFV600E mutation and EZH2 over expression demonstrated a poor overall survival (OS) ( p=0.012). Conclusions: Our study indicates that concurrent presence of BRAFV600E mutation and EZH2 overexpression correlates with poor OS in LCH pts. We hypothesize that in a subset of LCH pts combination therapy targeting both EZH2 and BRAFV600E may improve ORR or overcome resistance to BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. However, the results of our pilot study need to be validated on a larger sample set.