AbstractLand surface model (LSM) predictions of soil moisture and transpiration under water‐limited conditions suffer from biases due to a lack of mechanistic process description of vegetation water uptake. Here, I derive a “big root” approach from the porous pipe equation for root water uptake and compare its predictions of soil moistures during the 2010 summer drought at the Wind River Crane site to two previously used Ohm's law analog plant hydraulic models. Due to a fuller representation of pressure gradients and flows within a complex root system architecture, the new formulation achieves somewhat improved fit and significantly lower bias compared to the Ohm's law analog models. A key advantage of the improved physical representation is the increased robustness of fits and predictions, making it less liable to overfitting. This new mechanistic model advances our understanding of vegetation water limitation at site scale with potential to improve LSM predictions of soil moisture, temperature and surface heat, water, and carbon fluxes.