Abstract

The problem of developing the ways of recognition of the qualified silence of the legislator has been studied. It has been stated that the “qualified silence of the legislator” is underdeveloped category of law, especially regarding the ways of recognizing such specific legislative silence within the norms of law. This problem has become more urgent due to the revival of case law in Ukraine on the application of the analogy of law and the analogy of legislation. While applying these techniques, overcoming the gaps of civil law, the courts often identify the relevant gaps of the legislation with the qualified silence of the legislator, which is a major shortcoming. Solution of this problem will allow the courts to better identify the qualified silence of the legislator in the law norms.
 One of the methodological approaches in solving the problem of recognition of the legislator’s qualified silence and the gaps of the legislation is the extension of the relevant research tools. In contrast to the legal position existing in the legal doctrine, the author of the article has critically assessed the ability of systematic interpretation of the law norms to be a self-sufficient method of revealing the legislator’s qualified silence. In order to recognize the true qualified silence of the legislator, the author has offered to concentrate on explaining the legal policy that may be manifested in one or other cases of the legislator’s silent expression of will. At the same time, systematic, historical or doctrinal interpretation of legislation is of relative importance to the need for clarifying legal policy.
 From the point of view of determining the degree of scientific novelty, the suggested approach has the nature of further development of doctrinal provisions. The author has noted on the necessity of further elaboration of the studied problems, in particular, in determining the location of each of the ways of recognizing the qualified silence of the legislator within the system of methods of interpretation of legal norms.

Highlights

  • Критично оцінено спроможність системного тлумачення норм права як самодостатнього методу виявлення кваліфікованого мовчання законодавця

  • тобто цілеспрямованим і пов'язаним із необхідністю адекватного реагування на нього правозастосовними органами

  • але гостро постала саме у зв'язку із застосуванням норм нового цивільного законодавства

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Критично оцінено спроможність системного тлумачення норм права як самодостатнього методу виявлення кваліфікованого мовчання законодавця. З метою розпізнання дійсного кваліфікованого мовчання законодавця запропоновано концентруватися на з’ясуванні правової політики, яка може виявлятися в тих чи інших випадках мовчазного виявлення волі законодавцем. Ключові слова: кваліфіковане мовчання законодавця, методи тлумачення норм законодавства, способи виявлення кваліфікованого мовчання законодавця. Словосполученням «кваліфіковане мовчання законодавця» позначаються випадки відсутності в нормативно-правових актах позитивного впорядкування певного виду соціальних відносин2.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.