αN Helix Research Articles

Mapping the conformational landscape of the stimulatory heterotrimeric G protein.

Heterotrimeric G proteins serve as membrane-associated signaling hubs, in concert with their cognate G-protein-coupled receptors. Fluorine nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was employed to monitor the conformational equilibria of the human stimulatory G-protein α subunit (Gsα) alone, in the intact Gsαβ1γ2 heterotrimer or in complex with membrane-embedded human adenosine A2A receptor (A2AR). The results reveal a concerted equilibrium that is strongly affected by nucleotide and interactions with the βγ subunit, the lipid bilayer and A2AR. The α1 helix of Gsα exhibits significant intermediate timescale dynamics. The α4β6 loop and α5 helix undergo membrane/receptor interactions and order-disorder transitions respectively, associated with G-protein activation. The αN helix adopts a key functional state that serves as an allosteric conduit between the βγ subunit and receptor, while a significant fraction of the ensemble remains tethered to the membrane and receptor upon activation.

Structure of IMPORTIN-4 bound to the H3–H4–ASF1 histone–histone chaperone complex

IMPORTIN-4, the primary nuclear import receptor of core histones H3 and H4, binds the H3-H4 dimer and histone chaperone ASF1 prior to nuclear import. However, how H3-H3-ASF1 is recognized for transport cannot be explained by available crystal structures of IMPORTIN-4-histone tail peptide complexes. Our 3.5-Å IMPORTIN-4-H3-H4-ASF1 cryoelectron microscopy structure reveals the full nuclear import complex and shows a binding mode different from suggested by previous structures. The N-terminal half of IMPORTIN-4 clamps the globular H3-H4 domain and H3 αN helix, while its C-terminal half binds the H3 N-terminal tail weakly; tail contribution to binding energy is negligible. ASF1 binds H3-H4 without contacting IMPORTIN-4. Together, ASF1 and IMPORTIN-4 shield nucleosomal H3-H4 surfaces to chaperone and import it into the nucleus where RanGTP binds IMPORTIN-4, causing large conformational changes to release H3-H4-ASF1. This work explains how full-length H3-H4 binds IMPORTIN-4 in the cytoplasm and how it is released in the nucleus.

A Coil-to-Helix Transition Serves as a Binding Motif for hSNF5 and BAF155 Interaction.

Human SNF5 and BAF155 constitute the core subunit of multi-protein SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complexes that are required for ATP-dependent nucleosome mobility and transcriptional control. Human SNF5 (hSNF5) utilizes its repeat 1 (RPT1) domain to associate with the SWIRM domain of BAF155. Here, we employed X-ray crystallography, nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy, and various biophysical methods in order to investigate the detailed binding mechanism between hSNF5 and BAF155. Multi-angle light scattering data clearly indicate that hSNF5171–258 and BAF155SWIRM are both monomeric in solution and they form a heterodimer. NMR data and crystal structure of the hSNF5171–258/BAF155SWIRM complex further reveal a unique binding interface, which involves a coil-to-helix transition upon protein binding. The newly formed αN helix of hSNF5171–258 interacts with the β2–α1 loop of hSNF5 via hydrogen bonds and it also displays a hydrophobic interaction with BAF155SWIRM. Therefore, the N-terminal region of hSNF5171–258 plays an important role in tumorigenesis and our data will provide a structural clue for the pathogenesis of Rhabdoid tumors and malignant melanomas that originate from mutations in the N-terminal loop region of hSNF5.

A variety of changes, including CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletions, in CENH3 lead to haploid induction on outcrossing.

SummaryCreating true‐breeding lines is a critical step in plant breeding. Novel, completely homozygous true‐breeding lines can be generated by doubled haploid technology in single generation. Haploid induction through modification of the centromere‐specific histone 3 variant (CENH3), including chimeric proteins, expression of non‐native CENH3 and single amino acid substitutions, has been shown to induce, on outcrossing to wild type, haploid progeny possessing only the genome of the wild‐type parent, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Here, we report the characterization of 31 additional EMS‐inducible amino acid substitutions in CENH3 for their ability to complement a knockout in the endogenous CENH3 gene and induce haploid progeny when pollinated by the wild type. We also tested the effect of double amino acid changes, which might be generated through a second round of EMS mutagenesis. Finally, we report on the effects of CRISPR/Cas9‐mediated in‐frame deletions in the αN helix of the CENH3 histone fold domain. Remarkably, we found that complete deletion of the αN helix, which is conserved throughout angiosperms, results in plants which exhibit normal growth and fertility while acting as excellent haploid inducers when pollinated by wild‐type pollen. Both of these technologies, CRISPR mutagenesis and EMS mutagenesis, represent non‐transgenic approaches to the generation of haploid inducers.

CENP‐C unwraps the human CENP‐A nucleosome through the H2A C‐terminal tail

Centromeres are defined epigenetically by nucleosomes containing the histone H3 variant CENP‐A, upon which the constitutive centromere‐associated network of proteins (CCAN) is built. CENP‐C is considered to be a central organizer of the CCAN. We provide new molecular insights into the structure of human CENP‐A nucleosomes, in isolation and in complex with the CENP‐C central region (CENP‐CCR), the main CENP‐A binding module of human CENP‐C. We establish that the short αN helix of CENP‐A promotes DNA flexibility at the nucleosome ends, independently of the sequence it wraps. Furthermore, we show that, in vitro, two regions of human CENP‐C (CENP‐CCR and CENP‐Cmotif) both bind exclusively to the CENP‐A nucleosome. We find CENP‐CCR to bind with high affinity due to an extended hydrophobic area made up of CENP‐AV532 and CENP‐AV533. Importantly, we identify two key conformational changes within the CENP‐A nucleosome upon CENP‐C binding. First, the loose DNA wrapping of CENP‐A nucleosomes is further exacerbated, through destabilization of the H2A C‐terminal tail. Second, CENP‐CCR rigidifies the N‐terminal tail of H4 in the conformation favoring H4K20 monomethylation, essential for a functional centromere.

Crystal Structure of the C‐terminal Guanine Exchange Factor Module of Trio Reveals its Oncogenic Potential

The C‐terminal guanine exchange factor module of Trio (TrioC) serves as a link between the heterotrimeric G proteins Gαq/11 and the small G‐protein RhoA, joining Gαq/11‐coupled GPCRs to downstream events of cell motility and gene transcription. This ancient signal transduction axis has been identified as crucial to the rise and spread of the fatal malignancy uveal melanoma. Previous studies have shown that TrioC is likely regulated via an autoinhibitory constraint that is released upon binding of Gαq/11. However, the structural determinants of this autoinhibition remain unclear. We have determined the crystal structure of TrioC in its basal state, revealing high‐resolution detail of autoinhibition mediated by the Pleckstrin Homology (PH) domain. We show that truncation of the PH domain activates the module in vitro, showcasing the importance of the αN helix found at the DH/PH junction. We then show using two orthogonal biochemical assays that the disruption of the autoinhibited conformation by point mutations destabilizes and activates the module. Finally, we show that mutations in αN found in cancer patients hyperactivate TrioC. These point mutations likely increase mitogenic signaling through the RhoA axis and may thus represent the first known cancer drivers identified in Trio, operating in an analogous, yet Gαq/11 independent manner. We are in the process of confirming this hypothesis using cell‐based assays.Support or Funding InformationRackham Graduate Student Research Grant, University of Michigan Horace H. Rackham Graduate SchoolPharmacological Sciences Training Program Fellow, 5T32GM007767–38This abstract is from the Experimental Biology 2018 Meeting. There is no full text article associated with this abstract published in The FASEB Journal.

Variations on a nucleosome theme: The structural basis of centromere function.

The centromere is a specialized chromosomal structure that dictates kinetochore assembly and, thus, is essential for accurate chromosome segregation. Centromere identity is determined epigenetically by the presence of a centromere-specific histone H3 variant, CENP-A, that replaces canonical H3 in centromeric chromatin. Here, we discuss recent work by Roulland et al. that identifies structural elements of the nucleosome as essential determinants of centromere function. In particular, CENP-A nucleosomes have flexible DNA ends due to the short αN helix of CENP-A. The higher flexibility of the DNA ends of centromeric nucleosomes impairs binding of linker histones H1, while it facilitates binding of other essential centromeric proteins, such as CENP-C, and is required for mitotic fidelity. This work extends previous observations indicating that the differential structural properties of CENP-A nucleosomes are on the basis of its contribution to centromere identity and function. Here, we discuss the implications of this work and the questions arising from it.

Determination of the Solution Structure of Isolated Histone H2A-H2B Heterodimer by using CS-Rosetta

CS-Rosetta is a program for protein structure determination from NMR experimental parameters and is able to determine solution structures of proteins only from the chemical shift values. However, to determine structures only from the chemical shift values, the target protein have to be a monomer, less than about 120 residues, and smaller flexible region. Histone H2A-H2B heterodimer, which is contained in histone octamer, is out of this limitation. In the present study, we applied CS-Rosetta to determine the solution structure of isolated histone H2A-H2B heterodimer only from chemical shift values. As the results, our solution structures are in good agreement with the chemical shifts values and the chemical shift indices observed from the NMR experiments. In the solution structures, H2A and H2B each contain a histone fold, comprising four α-helices and two β-strands, together with the long disordered N- and C-terminal H2A tails and the long N-terminal H2B tail. The N-terminal αN helix, C-terminal β3 strand, and 310 helix of H2A observed in the H2A-H2B nucleosome structure are disordered in isolated H2A-H2B. In addition, the H2A α1 and H2B αC helices are not well fixed in the heterodimer, and the H2A and H2B tails are not completely random coils, which are consistent with the results of NMR experiments.

Solution structure of the isolated histone H2A-H2B heterodimer

During chromatin-regulated processes, the histone H2A-H2B heterodimer functions dynamically in and out of the nucleosome. Although detailed crystal structures of nucleosomes have been established, that of the isolated full-length H2A-H2B heterodimer has remained elusive. Here, we have determined the solution structure of human H2A-H2B by NMR coupled with CS-Rosetta. H2A and H2B each contain a histone fold, comprising four α-helices and two β-strands (α1–β1–α2–β2–α3–αC), together with the long disordered N- and C-terminal H2A tails and the long N-terminal H2B tail. The N-terminal αN helix, C-terminal β3 strand, and 310 helix of H2A observed in the H2A-H2B nucleosome structure are disordered in isolated H2A-H2B. In addition, the H2A α1 and H2B αC helices are not well fixed in the heterodimer, and the H2A and H2B tails are not completely random coils. Comparison of hydrogen-deuterium exchange, fast hydrogen exchange, and {1H}-15N hetero-nuclear NOE data with the CS-Rosetta structure indicates that there is some conformation in the H2A 310 helical and H2B Lys11 regions, while the repression domain of H2B (residues 27–34) exhibits an extended string-like structure. This first structure of the isolated H2A-H2B heterodimer provides insight into its dynamic functions in chromatin.

Integrated molecular mechanism directing nucleosome reorganization by human FACT.

Facilitates chromatin transcription (FACT) plays essential roles in chromatin remodeling during DNA transcription, replication, and repair. Our structural and biochemical studies of human FACT-histone interactions present precise views of nucleosome reorganization, conducted by the FACT-SPT16 (suppressor of Ty 16) Mid domain and its adjacent acidic AID segment. AID accesses the H2B N-terminal basic region exposed by partial unwrapping of the nucleosomal DNA, thereby triggering the invasion of FACT into the nucleosome. The crystal structure of the Mid domain complexed with an H3-H4 tetramer exhibits two separate contact sites; the Mid domain forms a novel intermolecular β structure with H4. At the other site, the Mid-H2A steric collision on the H2A-docking surface of the H3-H4 tetramer within the nucleosome induces H2A-H2B displacement. This integrated mechanism results in disrupting the H3 αN helix, which is essential for retaining the nucleosomal DNA ends, and hence facilitates DNA stripping from histone.

Two arginine residues suppress the flexibility of nucleosomal DNA in the canonical nucleosome core.

The dynamics of nucleosomes containing either canonical H3 or its centromere-specific variant CENP-A were investigated using molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations showed that the histone cores were structurally stable during simulation periods of 100 ns and 50 ns, while DNA was highly flexible at the entry and exit regions and partially dissociated from the histone core. In particular, approximately 20–25 bp of DNA at the entry and exit regions of the CENP-A nucleosome exhibited larger fluctuations than DNA at the entry and exit regions of the H3 nucleosome. Our detailed analysis clarified that this difference in dynamics was attributable to a difference in two basic amino acids in the αN helix; two arginine (Arg) residues in H3 were substituted by lysine (Lys) residues at the corresponding sites in CENP-A. The difference in the ability to form hydrogen bonds with DNA of these two residues regulated the flexibility of nucleosomal DNA at the entry and exit regions. Our exonuclease III assay consistently revealed that replacement of these two Arg residues in the H3 nucleosome by Lys enhanced endonuclease susceptibility, suggesting that the DNA ends of the CENP-A nucleosome are more flexible than those of the H3 nucleosome. This difference in the dynamics between the two types of nucleosomes may be important for forming higher order structures in different phases.

Free Energy Profiles for Nucleosomal DNA Unwrapping

Eukaryotic genome is compactly stored into a tiny nucleus of cell in a form of protein-DNA complex. This protein-DNA complex is called as nucleosome which is composed of a histone octamer formed by two copies each of the four core histones H3, H4, H2A and H2B and about 150bp of DNA wrapping almost twice around the octamer. This compact form, however, has to be unwrapped in transcription, DNA duplication and DNA repair processes. To study the detailed molecular mechanism, we calculated free energy profiles for unwrapping nucleosomal DNA on H3-containg and CENP-A containing nucleosomes with adaptively biased MD and umbrella sampling. We estimated from the profiles that a cost for unwrapping the outer DNA is 0.1 to 0.4 kcal/mol/1bp, consistent with a value experimentally obtained. Compared with H3 nucleosome, the profile showed that CENP-A nucleosome was the most stable in a conformation where 15bp from each of ends were unwrapped. The detail analysis indicated that this is attributable to the difference in ability of forming hydrogen bond of αN helix of H3 and CENP-A. We unwrapped DNA further from the histone core up to 38bp from DNA ends. Relative distance matrix analysis showed that the distance between H2A-H2B and H3-H4 increased in a process of 0 to 17bp unwrapping. This distance decreased during a process of 17bp to 25bp unwrapping, indicating that the conformational relaxation occurred in the histone core.

Single Cell Analysis of RNA-mediated Histone H3.3 Recruitment to a Cytomegalovirus Promoter-regulated Transcription Site

Unlike the core histones, which are incorporated into nucleosomes concomitant with DNA replication, histone H3.3 is synthesized throughout the cell cycle and utilized for replication-independent (RI) chromatin assembly. The RI incorporation of H3.3 into nucleosomes is highly conserved and occurs at both euchromatin and heterochromatin. However, neither the mechanism of H3.3 recruitment nor its essential function is well understood. Several different chaperones regulate H3.3 assembly at distinct sites. The H3.3 chaperone, Daxx, and the chromatin-remodeling factor, ATRX, are required for H3.3 incorporation and heterochromatic silencing at telomeres, pericentromeres, and the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter. By evaluating H3.3 dynamics at a CMV promoter-regulated transcription site in a genetic background in which RI chromatin assembly is blocked, we have been able to decipher the regulatory events upstream of RI nucleosomal deposition. We find that at the activated transcription site, H3.3 accumulates with sense and antisense RNA, suggesting that it is recruited through an RNA-mediated mechanism. Sense and antisense transcription also increases after H3.3 knockdown, suggesting that the RNA signal is amplified when chromatin assembly is blocked and attenuated by nucleosomal deposition. Additionally, we find that H3.3 is still recruited after Daxx knockdown, supporting a chaperone-independent recruitment mechanism. Sequences in the H3.3 N-terminal tail and αN helix mediate both its recruitment to RNA at the activated transcription site and its interaction with double-stranded RNA in vitro. Interestingly, the H3.3 gain-of-function pediatric glioblastoma mutations, G34R and K27M, differentially affect H3.3 affinity in these assays, suggesting that disruption of an RNA-mediated regulatory event could drive malignant transformation.

The Carboxy-Terminal αN Helix of the Archaeal XerA Tyrosine Recombinase Is a Molecular Switch to Control Site-Specific Recombination

Tyrosine recombinases are conserved in the three kingdoms of life. Here we present the first crystal structure of a full-length archaeal tyrosine recombinase, XerA from Pyrococcus abyssi, at 3.0 Å resolution. In the absence of DNA substrate XerA crystallizes as a dimer where each monomer displays a tertiary structure similar to that of DNA-bound Tyr-recombinases. Active sites are assembled in the absence of dif except for the catalytic Tyr, which is extruded and located equidistant from each active site within the dimer. Using XerA active site mutants we demonstrate that XerA follows the classical cis-cleavage reaction, suggesting rearrangements of the C-terminal domain upon DNA binding.Surprisingly, XerA C-terminal αN helices dock in cis in a groove that, in bacterial tyrosine recombinases, accommodates in trans αN helices of neighbour monomers in the Holliday junction intermediates. Deletion of the XerA C-terminal αN helix does not impair cleavage of suicide substrates but prevents recombination catalysis. We propose that the enzymatic cycle of XerA involves the switch of the αN helix from cis to trans packing, leading to (i) repositioning of the catalytic Tyr in the active site in cis and (ii) dimer stabilisation via αN contacts in trans between monomers.

Characterization of Chromoshadow Domain-mediated Binding of Heterochromatin Protein 1α (HP1α) to Histone H3

The chromoshadow domain (CSD) of heterochromatin protein 1 (HP1) was recently shown to contribute to chromatin binding and transcriptional regulation through interaction with histone H3. Here, we demonstrate the structural basis of this interaction for the CSD of HP1α. This mode of H3 binding is dependent on dimerization of the CSD and recognition of a PxVxL-like motif, as for other CSD partners. NMR chemical shift mapping showed that the H3 residues that mediate the CSD interaction occur in and adjacent to the αN helix just within the nucleosome core. Access to the binding region would require some degree of unwrapping of the DNA near the nucleosomal DNA entry/exit site.

Structural basis for recognition of H3K56-acetylated histone H3–H4 by the chaperone Rtt106

Dynamic variations in the structure of chromatin influence virtually all DNA-related processes in eukaryotes and are controlled in part by post-translational modifications of histones. One such modification, the acetylation of lysine 56 (H3K56ac) in the amino-terminal α-helix (αN) of histone H3, has been implicated in the regulation of nucleosome assembly during DNA replication and repair, and nucleosome disassembly during gene transcription. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the histone chaperone Rtt106 contributes to the deposition of newly synthesized H3K56ac-carrying H3-H4 complex on replicating DNA, but it is unclear how Rtt106 binds H3-H4 and specifically recognizes H3K56ac as there is no apparent acetylated lysine reader domain in Rtt106. Here, we show that two domains of Rtt106 are involved in a combinatorial recognition of H3-H4. An N-terminal domain homodimerizes and interacts with H3-H4 independently of acetylation while a double pleckstrin-homology (PH) domain binds the K56-containing region of H3. Affinity is markedly enhanced upon acetylation of K56, an effect that is probably due to increased conformational entropy of the αN helix of H3. Our data support a mode of interaction where the N-terminal homodimeric domain of Rtt106 intercalates between the two H3-H4 components of the (H3-H4)(2) tetramer while two double PH domains in the Rtt106 dimer interact with each of the two H3K56ac sites in (H3-H4)(2). We show that the Rtt106-(H3-H4)(2) interaction is important for gene silencing and the DNA damage response.

Crystal structure of the human centromeric nucleosome containing CENP-A

In eukaryotes, accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis and meiosis is coordinated by kinetochores, which are unique chromosomal sites for microtubule attachment. Centromeres specify the kinetochore formation sites on individual chromosomes, and are epigenetically marked by the assembly of nucleosomes containing the centromere-specific histone H3 variant, CENP-A. Although the underlying mechanism is unclear, centromere inheritance is probably dictated by the architecture of the centromeric nucleosome. Here we report the crystal structure of the human centromeric nucleosome containing CENP-A and its cognate α-satellite DNA derivative (147 base pairs). In the human CENP-A nucleosome, the DNA is wrapped around the histone octamer, consisting of two each of histones H2A, H2B, H4 and CENP-A, in a left-handed orientation. However, unlike the canonical H3 nucleosome, only the central 121 base pairs of the DNA are visible. The thirteen base pairs from both ends of the DNA are invisible in the crystal structure, and the αN helix of CENP-A is shorter than that of H3, which is known to be important for the orientation of the DNA ends in the canonical H3 nucleosome. A structural comparison of the CENP-A and H3 nucleosomes revealed that CENP-A contains two extra amino acid residues (Arg 80 and Gly 81) in the loop 1 region, which is completely exposed to the solvent. Mutations of the CENP-A loop 1 residues reduced CENP-A retention at the centromeres in human cells. Therefore, the CENP-A loop 1 may function in stabilizing the centromeric chromatin containing CENP-A, possibly by providing a binding site for trans-acting factors. The structure provides the first atomic-resolution picture of the centromere-specific nucleosome.

Probing the (H3-H4)2 histone tetramer structure using pulsed EPR spectroscopy combined with site-directed spin labelling.

The (H3-H4)2 histone tetramer forms the central core of nucleosomes and, as such, plays a prominent role in assembly, disassembly and positioning of nucleosomes. Despite its fundamental role in chromatin, the tetramer has received little structural investigation. Here, through the use of pulsed electron-electron double resonance spectroscopy coupled with site-directed spin labelling, we survey the structure of the tetramer in solution. We find that tetramer is structurally more heterogeneous on its own than when sequestered in the octamer or nucleosome. In particular, while the central region including the H3-H3′ interface retains a structure similar to that observed in nucleosomes, other regions such as the H3 αN helix display increased structural heterogeneity. Flexibility of the H3 αN helix in the free tetramer also illustrates the potential for post-translational modifications to alter the structure of this region and mediate interactions with histone chaperones. The approach described here promises to prove a powerful system for investigating the structure of additional assemblies of histones with other important factors in chromatin assembly/fluidity.

Analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae histone H3 mutants reveals the role of the αN helix in nucleosome function

To understand the role of histone H3 sub-domains in chromatin function, 35 histone H3 tandem alanine mutants were generated and tested for their viability and sensitivity to DNA damaging agents. Among 13 non-viable H3 mutants, 6 were mapped around the αN helix and preceding tail region. Mutants with individual alanine substitutions in this region were viable but developed multiple sensitivities to DNA damaging agents. The only viable triple mutant, REI49-50A, in the αN helix region could not grow when combined with histone chaperone mutations, such as asf1Δ, cac1Δ, or hir1Δ, suggesting that this particular region is important when the histone assembly/disassembly pathway is compromised. In addition, further analysis showed that T45, E50, or F54 of the αN helix genetically interacted with a histone chaperone (Asf1) and transcription elongation factors (Paf1 and Hpr1). These results suggest a specific role of the H3 αN helix in histone dynamics mediated by histone chaperones, which might be important during transcription elongation.

Histone Tails and the H3 αN Helix Regulate Nucleosome Mobility and Stability

Nucleosomes fulfill the apparently conflicting roles of compacting DNA within eukaryotic genomes while permitting access to regulatory factors. Central to this is their ability to stably associate with DNA while retaining the ability to undergo rearrangements that increase access to the underlying DNA. Here, we have studied different aspects of nucleosome dynamics including nucleosome sliding, histone dimer exchange, and DNA wrapping within nucleosomes. We find that alterations to histone proteins, especially the histone tails and vicinity of the histone H3 alphaN helix, can affect these processes differently, suggesting that they are mechanistically distinct. This raises the possibility that modifications to histone proteins may provide a means of fine-tuning specific aspects of the dynamic properties of nucleosomes to the context in which they are located.