Correspondence: David E Vance Center for Nursing Research, School of Nursing, 1701 University Boulevard, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294-1210, USA Tel +1 20 59347589 Fax +1 20 5996 7183 Email devance@uab.edu Over the past 20 years, I have written and published over 150 book chapters and journal articles, with others and alone. Despite such collaborative efforts in generating articles, writing itself is a solitary act, requiring a great deal of concentration, knowledge, and dedication, along with a keen eye for detail. And it is that solitary approach that I would like to address. Since writing is such a solitary exercise, why do we write in groups? Clearly, fantastic advantages (eg, insights in conceptualization, help with interpretation and analysis of data, valuable feedback in revising the article) as well as dismal disadvantages (eg, personality clashes, extra time needed) exist for doing so. In fact, viewing scientific writing as a continuum ranging from a single/solo author to a team of multiple coauthors, a few of the pros and cons can be observed along both ends of this framework as is outlined in Figure 1; these include authorship determination, amount of workload, coordination of others, production speed, and quality checks. Starting at the solo author end of this continuum, let me begin by saying, I prefer to work on articles alone, at least initially as I’m developing the ideas, pulling the reference materials together, developing the outline, and putting pen to paper. Although I handle most of the workload when I draft the article, one reason I prefer writing alone is because when I complete a draft of the article there is no doubt that I am the first author because most of the article reflects my original thoughts and insights. Another reason I prefer to write alone is that I can be as creative and unorthodox in my reasoning as I like; likewise, I can focus on the topics that appeal to me. From a “going for promotion” perspective, I also like writing alone because I am in control of how fast the article will be written; if it does not get done, I have no one to blame but myself. But if I am writing with others, many times the production of the article is delayed as I wait on my coauthors to finish their substantial contributions which in some instances can linger for months (or in rare cases years). Yet there are several disadvantages to writing alone, such as lacking a specific skill set or knowledge base needed to improve the article. Also, let us not discount the value of balancing one’s point of view with the professional perspective of someone from another discipline; such intellectual feedback certainly can contribute to the enhancement of the article. Given these compelling reasons, I try to balance the advantages and disadvantages of both sides of the solo – team writing continuum by adopting a middle path. Once the article is drafted, I frequently invite colleagues with expertise in certain areas, to substantially contribute to the conception and interpretation of the findings of the Dovepress
Read full abstract