Local anesthetics are used to facilitate analgesia through their inhibition of sensory nerve conduction. As sodium channel blockers, local anesthetics inhibit the propagation of action potentials along nerve axons participating in the transmission of pain signals through the peripheral and central nervous systems. Aside from sodium channel inhibition, it is now becoming clear that local anesthetics have actions on other important cellular components. In this issue of the Journal, Sung et al. explore the mechanisms of ropivacaine-induced vasoconstriction through the modulation of arachidonic acid metabolism and production of vasoactive leukotrienes. Their article raises the interesting possibility that existing drug therapies in patients can affect the pharmacokinetics of co-administered local anesthetics. Ropivacaine is a relatively new, long acting aminoamide local anesthetic that is structurally similar to bupivacaine. However, ropivacaine has relatively low central nervous system (CNS) toxicity and cardiotoxicity compared to bupivicaine. The pharmacokinetic properties of these two local anesthetics are similar with respect to their pKa values and protein binding properties. However, ropivacaine has a smaller volume of distribution, higher plasma clearance and is less lipid soluble than bupivacaine. Because of its lower lipid solubility and epidural/neural fat absorption, ropivacaine used for epidural and peripheral nerve blockade has a reduced duration of action compared to bupivacaine. The shorter duration of action is due to a greater plasma resorption resulting in a lower elimination half-life (t1/2) and higher maximal concentration in the plasma (Cmax). 6–9 In contrast, local wound infiltration of ropivacaine results in a longer duration of action compared to bupivacaine, which has been attributed to a direct vasoconstrictive effect of ropivacaine on surrounding vessels. In 2005, Yu et al. demonstrated the direct vasoconstrictive effect of ropivacaine on de-endothelialized rat aortic vasculature which Sung et al. reaffirm in this issue. Sung et al. demonstrated that clinically relevant concentrations of S-ropivacaine (Naropin) at between 10 lM to 1 mM caused vasoconstriction of de-endothelialized rat aorta. These concentrations, though much above central neurotoxic and cardiotoxic thresholds, would be found in proximity of nerves during peripheral, neuraxial, or local injections of ropivacaine. The direct vasomotor actions of ropivacaine have been studied in different vascular structures including capillaries, femoral veins, umbilical arteries, femoral arteries, and the aorta. Some of these studies showed no effect of ropivacaine on impairment of vasorelaxation while others observed its direct vasoconstrictive effects. The vasoconstrictive properties of ropivacaine are not unique, and are shared by several other amide local anesthetics such as lidocaine and bupivacaine. Unfortunately, the preparations used by both Sung et al. and Yu et al. were de-endothelialized, thereby, eliminating the effect of nitric oxideand some KATP channel-induced vasorelaxation mechanisms that D. T. Joo, MD, PhD (&) Department of Anesthesia, Program in Neurosciences and Mental Health, Research Institute, Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Ave., Rm. 5013D, Toronto, ON M5G 1X8, Canada e-mail: daisy_joo@yahoo.com