American Philosophical Quarterly Research Articles

Intentionality and Causal Analysis

3Pp. 27-30 of the paperback edition. 4 I have argued for this interpretation on several occasions. See on the Mathematical Method, The Monist vol. 51 (1967), pp. 352-375 (reprinted in Kant Studies To-Day, ed. by Lewis White Beck, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1969, pp. 117-140); my papers in Deskription, Analytizitdt und Existenz, ed. by Paul Weingarter, Pustet, Salzburg and Munich, 1966; On Notion of Intuition (Anschauung), in The First Critique: Reflections on Critique of Pure Reason, ed. by Terence Penelhun and J. J. MacIntosh, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, Calif., 1969, pp. 38-53; Kantian Intuitions, Inquiry (1971, forthcoming); Kant's 'New of Thought' and his Theory of Mathematics, Ajatus vol. 27 (1965), pp. 37-47; Kantin oppi matematiikasta (in Finnish), Ajatus vol. 22 (1959), pp. 5-85. 5 See, e.g., T. E. Wilkerson, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 20 (1970), pp. 200-212, especially p. 200. 6 Moltke Gram, Nous vol. 5 (1971), pp. 15-26. Unspecified references in the sequel are to this paper. 7Most explicitly in Language-Games, and Transcendental forthcoming in the Proceedings of the New York University Metaphysics Colloquium for 1970-71. See also Language-Games for Quantifiers, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph Series, vol. 2: Studies in Logical Theory, Blackwell's, Oxford, 1968, pp. 46-72, and on the Mathematical Method (above note 4). 8See on the Mathematical Method (note 4 above), and Information, Deduction, and A Priori, Nouis vol. 4 (1970), pp. 135-152. 9 Op. cit. (note 5 above), especially pp. 202-3. 10 Essentially the same point was made by Roger Buck in his comment on Gram's paper at the Symposium on Transcendental Arguments, APA Western Division Meeting, Chicago, May 7, 1971.

Studies in the Theory of Knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, No. 4. Edited by Nicholas Rescher. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1970. Pp. 132. £1.75 (U.S. $6.00).

Studies in the Theory of Knowledge. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, No. 4. Edited by Nicholas Rescher. Oxford: Basil Blackwell, 1970. Pp. 132. £1.75 (U.S. $6.00).

On Being ‘Rational’ About Norms

The Southern Journal of PhilosophyVolume 5, Issue 3 p. 180-186 On Being ‘Rational’ About Norms Rem B. Edwards, Rem B. Edwards University of Tennessee Rem B. Edwards received his B.D. degree from Yale in 1959 and his Ph.D. degree in Philosophy from Emory in 1962. He is now Associate Professor at the University of Tennessee. He has previously contributed articles to Mind, The Monist, The American Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy of Science and The Personalist.Search for more papers by this author Rem B. Edwards, Rem B. Edwards University of Tennessee Rem B. Edwards received his B.D. degree from Yale in 1959 and his Ph.D. degree in Philosophy from Emory in 1962. He is now Associate Professor at the University of Tennessee. He has previously contributed articles to Mind, The Monist, The American Philosophical Quarterly, Philosophy of Science and The Personalist.Search for more papers by this author First published: Fall 1967 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2041-6962.1967.tb02009.x Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Volume5, Issue3Fall 1967Pages 180-186 RelatedInformation