Intentionality and Causal Analysis

Abstract

3Pp. 27-30 of the paperback edition. 4 I have argued for this interpretation on several occasions. See on the Mathematical Method, The Monist vol. 51 (1967), pp. 352-375 (reprinted in Kant Studies To-Day, ed. by Lewis White Beck, Open Court, La Salle, Ill., 1969, pp. 117-140); my papers in Deskription, Analytizitdt und Existenz, ed. by Paul Weingarter, Pustet, Salzburg and Munich, 1966; On Notion of Intuition (Anschauung), in The First Critique: Reflections on Critique of Pure Reason, ed. by Terence Penelhun and J. J. MacIntosh, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, Calif., 1969, pp. 38-53; Kantian Intuitions, Inquiry (1971, forthcoming); Kant's 'New of Thought' and his Theory of Mathematics, Ajatus vol. 27 (1965), pp. 37-47; Kantin oppi matematiikasta (in Finnish), Ajatus vol. 22 (1959), pp. 5-85. 5 See, e.g., T. E. Wilkerson, The Philosophical Quarterly, vol. 20 (1970), pp. 200-212, especially p. 200. 6 Moltke Gram, Nous vol. 5 (1971), pp. 15-26. Unspecified references in the sequel are to this paper. 7Most explicitly in Language-Games, and Transcendental forthcoming in the Proceedings of the New York University Metaphysics Colloquium for 1970-71. See also Language-Games for Quantifiers, American Philosophical Quarterly, Monograph Series, vol. 2: Studies in Logical Theory, Blackwell's, Oxford, 1968, pp. 46-72, and on the Mathematical Method (above note 4). 8See on the Mathematical Method (note 4 above), and Information, Deduction, and A Priori, Nouis vol. 4 (1970), pp. 135-152. 9 Op. cit. (note 5 above), especially pp. 202-3. 10 Essentially the same point was made by Roger Buck in his comment on Gram's paper at the Symposium on Transcendental Arguments, APA Western Division Meeting, Chicago, May 7, 1971.