Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Research Articles

The Effect of Lipoic Acid Therapy on Cognitive Functioning in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease.

Diabetes mellitus (DM) is an important risk factor for Alzheimer's disease (AD). Most diabetic patients have insulin resistance (IR) that is associated with compensatory hyperinsulinemia, one of the mechanisms suggested for increased AD risk in patients with DM. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is a disulfide molecule with antioxidant properties that has positive effects on glucose metabolism and IR. This study evaluated the effect of ALA treatment (600 mg/day) on cognitive performances in AD patients with and without DM. One hundred and twenty-six patients with AD were divided into two groups, according to DM presence (group A) or absence (group B). Cognitive functions were assessed by MMSE, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-Cog), Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Severity (CIBIC), Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR), and Alzheimer's Disease Functional and Change Scale (ADFACS). IR was assessed by HOMA index. At the end of the study, MMSE scores showed a significant improvement in 43% patients of group A (26 subjects) and 23% of group B (15 subjects), compared to baseline (P = .001). Also ADAS-Cog, CIBIC, and ADFACS scores showed a significant improvement in group A versus group B. IR was higher in group A. Our study suggests that ALA therapy could be effective in slowing cognitive decline in patients with AD and IR.

The effectiveness of acupuncture on the sleep quality of elderly with dementia: a within-subjects trial

PurposeElderly with dementia are often afflicted with sleep problems. Recent studies have suggested that acupuncture may be a feasible alternative to traditional sleep medicine for treating sleep disturbance. This study investigated the effectiveness of acupuncture on sleep quality of elderly with dementia.Patients and methodsNineteen elders with dementia were followed through a control period and an acupuncture treatment period, each lasting 6 weeks. Outcome measures were subjects’ sleep quality and cognitive function. Sleep parameters were recorded by wrist actigraphy. Cognitive function was assessed by the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale – Cognitive (ADAS-Cog). Pretests and posttests were conducted immediately before and after the control and treatment periods. Changes in the outcome measures between control and treatment periods were compared.ResultsWilcoxon signed rank tests revealed that the subjects gained significantly more resting time and total sleep time in the treatment period than in the control period (P < 0.05). A nonsignificant trend for improvement in sleep efficiency was observed. Improvement in cognitive function was not statistically significant. A total of 86% of the subjects completed the treatment regime.ConclusionResults reveal that acupuncture was effective in improving some domains of sleep quality of elderly with dementia, and the subjects showed acceptance towards the intervention. Strengths and limitations of the present study as well as suggestions for further studies were considered.

Type 2 diabetes and/or its treatment leads to less cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's disease patients

AimTo evaluate the cognitive performance of a homogeneous population of Alzheimer's disease (AD), non-demented Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (DIAB), demented with concomitant diseases (AD+DIAB) and healthy control subjects. AD is a progressive dementia disorder characterized clinically by impairment of memory, cognition and behavior. Recently, a major research interest in AD has been placed on early evaluation. Diabetes is one of the clinical conditions that represent the greatest risk of developing oxidative stress and dementia. Glucose overload, leading to the development of impaired-induced insulin secretion in DIAB and has been suggested to slow or deter AD pathogenesis. MethodsThe degree of cognitive impairment was determined on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) and the Folstein's Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE); the severity of dementia was quantified applying the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) test; the Hamilton test was employed to evaluate depressive conditions; the final population studied was 101 subjects. ResultsThe cognitive deterioration is statistically significantly lower (p<0.05) in AD+DIAB patients as compared with AD patients. ConclusionsIn this longitudinal study the superimposed diabetic condition was associated with a lower rate of cognitive decline, while diabetic non-demented patients and controls present normal scores.

Predictors of comprehensive stimulation program efficacy in patients with cognitive impairment. Clinical practice recommendations

The aim of the present study was to identify which factors may predict the best response to a comprehensive stimulation program in patients with dementia and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) as well as in their caregivers. A six-month longitudinal study has been performed on 145 patients (55 with MCI and 90 with dementia), participating to a cognitive motor rehabilitation program, and their 131 caregivers, attending informational/psychoeducational interventions. Mini mental state examination, Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition, and Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change-plus were used as primary outcome measures. Sixty-eight (46.9%) of the 145 subjects were classified as clinical responders. At baseline, responders had a significant less insight impairment, larger functional ability as well as less delusions, euphoria, and aberrant motor behaviors than the non-responder. After 6 months along with an improvement in cognition, responders showed decrease in behavioral disturbances and severity of the disturbances. During the 6 months of analysis, stability has been observed in caregiver's burden distress. After 6 months, the caregivers of MCI responders have their burden reduced. The high level of insight, the preserved functional abilities as well as the lack of severe delusions, euphoria, and aberrant motor behaviors are significant predictors of responsiveness to stimulation program.

What is the clinically relevant change on the ADAS-Cog?

ObjectiveTo establish the minimal clinically relevant change (MCRC) on the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) for patients with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD).DesignCohort study.Setting59 recruiting sites for the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging...

Alzheimer's disease - input of vitamin D with mEmantine assay (AD-IDEA trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundCurrent treatments for Alzheimer's disease and related disorders (ADRD) are symptomatic and can only temporarily slow down ADRD. Future possibilities of care rely on multi-target drugs therapies that address simultaneously several pathophysiological processes leading to neurodegeneration. We hypothesized that the combination of memantine with vitamin D could be neuroprotective in ADRD, thereby limiting neuronal loss and cognitive decline. The aim of this trial is to compare the effect after 24 weeks of the oral intake of vitamin D3 (cholecalciferol) with the effect of a placebo on the change of cognitive performance in patients suffering from moderate ADRD and receiving memantine.MethodsThe AD-IDEA Trial is a unicentre, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, intent-to-treat, superiority trial. Patients aged 60 years and older presenting with moderate ADRD (i.e., Mini-Mental State Examination [MMSE] score between 10-20), hypovitaminosis D (i.e., serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25OHD] < 30 ng/mL), normocalcemia (i.e., serum calcium < 2.65 mmol/L) and receiving no antidementia treatment at time of inclusion are being recruited. All participants receive memantine 20 mg once daily -titrated in 5 mg increments over 4 weeks- and each one is randomized to one of the two treatment options: either cholecalciferol (one 100,000 IU drinking vial every 4 weeks) or placebo (administered at the same pace). One hundred and twenty participants are being recruited and treatment continues for 24 weeks. Primary outcome measure is change in cognitive performance using Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognition score. Secondary outcomes are changes in other cognitive scores (MMSE, Frontal Assessment Battery, Trail Making Test parts A and B), change in functional performance (Activities of Daily Living scale, and 4-item Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scale), posture and gait (Timed Up & Go, Five Time Sit-to-Stand, spatio-temporal analysis of walking), as well as the between-groups comparison of compliance to treatment and tolerance. These outcomes are assessed at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks, together with the serum concentrations of 25OHD, calcium and parathyroid hormone.DiscussionThe combination of memantine plus vitamin D may represent a new multi-target therapeutic class for the treatment of ADRD. The AD-IDEA Trial seeks to provide evidence on its efficacy in limiting cognitive and functional declines in ADRD.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01409694

Cognitive activity for the treatment of older adults with mild Alzheimer's Disease (AD) - PACE AD: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

BackgroundParticipation in cognitive stimulation therapy (CST) may reduce the rate of cognitive decline in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD), however it is unclear if the training of carers to deliver activities is sufficient to improve the clinical outcome of patients. The Promoting Healthy Ageing with Cognitive Exercise for Alzheimer's Disease (PACE-AD) study has been designed to determine if change in cognitive function over a six month period can be achieved with participation in cognitive stimulating activities when the intervention is delivered to carers only as opposed to carers and patients.Methods/DesignThe study will aim to recruit 128 community-dwelling men and women with probable AD according to NINCDS-ADRDS criteria. Participants will be randomly allocated to one of two cognitive activity treatment groups: (1) Participants with mild AD and their companions together (2) Companions of participants with mild AD alone. The intervention will consist of a twelve-week program of cognitive stimulation. Seven weeks of the program will involve 90-minute group sessions delivered once per week while the remaining weeks of the program will involve structured home based activities with telephone support. The primary outcome measure of the study is the change from baseline in the total score on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-COG). Secondary outcomes of interest include changes in health related quality of life, mood, memory, language, executive functions, independent living abilities and psychiatric symptoms for participants with mild AD. Changes in companion quality of life, mood, and general health will also be monitored. Primary endpoints will be collected 13 and 26 weeks after the baseline assessment.DiscussionThe proposed project will provide evidence as to whether CST for people with AD and their companions is more beneficial than when used for companions alone. Outcomes sought include a reduction of further cognitive decline and improved quality of life amongst older adults with mild AD. We anticipate that the results of this study will have implications for the development of cost-effective evidence-based best practice to treat people with mild AD.Trial registrationACTRN12610000653066

Effects of Lacunar Infarctions on Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Cerebral Autosomal-Dominant Arteriopathy with Subcortical Infarcts and Leukoencephalopathy

Background and PurposeCerebral autosomal-dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is an inherited microangiopathy caused by mutations in the Notch3 gene. Although previous studies have shown an association between lacunar infarction and cognitive impairment, the relationship between MRI parameters and cognition remains unclear. In this study we investigated the influence of MRI parameters on cognitive impairment in CADASIL.MethodsWe applied a prospective protocol to 40 patients. MRI analysis included the normalized volume of white-matter hyperintensities (nWMHs), number of lacunes, and number of cerebral microbleeds. Cognition was assessed with the aid of psychometric tests [Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-cognition (ADAS-cog), Trail-Making Test, and Stroop interference (Stroop IF)].ResultsA multivariate regression analysis revealed that the total number of lacunes influenced the performance in the MMSE, ADAS-cog, and Stroop IF, while nWMHs had a strong univariate association with ADAS-cog and Stroop IF scores. However, this association disappeared in the multivariate analysis.ConclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the number of lacunes is the main predictive factor of cognitive impairment in CADASIL.

Relationship between cognitive impairment and behavioural disturbances in Alzheimer's disease patients.

Background and Aims: Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a neurodegenerative disorder in which the patients can exhibit some behavioural disturbances in addition to cognitive impairment. The aims of the present study were to investigate the relationship between severity and rate of decline of the cognitive and behavioural impairment in patient with AD. Methods: 54 AD patients were assessed at baseline and after 12 months with the Mental Deterioration Battery (MDB), the Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment ScaleCognitive (ADASCog) and the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI10). Results: MDB was more accurate than ADASCog in the early diagnosis of AD. Conversely, ADASCog was more sensitive at revealing the progression of cognitive decline. Depression, Apathy and Anxiety are the most frequent and severe behavioural disturbances at baseline. At followup Delusions and Irritability increased significantly. Significant correlations were observed between severity of cognitive impairment and behavioural disorders both at baseline and in the progression rate passing from T0 to T12. Conclusions: Severity and progression rate of behavioural and cognitive alterations in patients with AD are significantly associated.

Circulating plasmalogen levels and Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive scores in Alzheimer patients

Plasmalogens, which are key structural phospholipids in brain membranes, are decreased in the brain and serum of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD). We performed this pilot study to evaluate the relation between the levels of circulating plasmalogens and Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) scores in patients with AD. We evaluated participants' ADAS-Cog scores and serum plasmalogen levels. For the 40 included AD patients with an ADAS-Cog score between 20 and 46, were tested their ADAS-Cog score 1 year later. The levels of docosahexaenoic acid plasmalogen were measured by use of liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. We found that the ADAS-Cog score increased significantly in AD patients with circulating plasmalogen levels that were <or= 75% of that of age-matched controls at entry into the study. There was no change in score among participants with normal serum plasmalogen levels at baseline (> 75%). This was a pilot study with 40 patients, and the results require validation in a larger population. Our study demonstrates that decreased levels of plasmalogen precursors in the central nervous system correlate with functional decline (as measured by ADAS-Cog scores) in AD patients. The use of both ADAS-Cog and serum plasmalogen data may be a more accurate way of predicting cognitive decline in AD patients, and may be used to decrease the risk of including patients with no cognitive decline in the placebo arm of a drug trial.

Combination of intensive cognitive rehabilitation and donepezil therapy in Alzheimer's disease (AD)

Acetylcholinesterase inhibitors (AchEIs) are extensively used in Alzheimer's disease (AD) while reality orientation therapy (ROT) is a cognitive rehabilitation indicated for mentally deteriorated patients. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combination of donepezil with an intensive ROT with active participation of the caregiver. Patients with AD ( n = 100, mean age 78.4 ± 4.3 years) initiated treatment with donepezil, 5 mg/day; 62 of them underwent a 3-week, daily ROT and physical reactivation training with the caregiver (Group A); 38 participants received only donepezil therapy (Group B). All subjects were tested for cognitive and functional abilities at baseline, at the end of the training program, and after 2 months of follow-up. There was a significant improvement in mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score ( p < 0.001) and the AD assessment scale-cognitive (ADAS-Cog) subscale ( p < 0.001), without changes in impaired activity of daily living (ADL) and instrumental ADL (IADL) after intensive ROT training in Group A. MMSE was maintained after 2 months in-home ROT continuation. There were no significant changes in MMSE in drug-only treated patients (Group B) after 3 weeks, with a non-significant tendency to improvement in ADAS-Cog. Our results suggest benefit of an intensive ROT program in dementia patients receiving donepezil that seems to be maintained as far as ROT is continued by the caregiver.

A randomized controlled study on effects of ibuprofen on cognitive progression of Alzheimer’s disease

Epidemiological studies have examined the association between the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recently, a variety of experimental studies indicates that a subset of NSAIDs, such as ibuprofen or flurbiprofen, also have Abeta-lowering properties in both AD transgenic mice and cell cultures of peripheral, glial and neuronal origin. In this trial, we evaluated whether the non-selective NSAID ibuprofen slows disease progression in patients with mild to moderate AD. This was a 12-month multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group trial. Participants with mild-moderate AD (Mini-Mental State Examination score >15, <26; Clinical Dementia Rating= 0.5-1), 65 years or older, with reliable caregivers, were recruited between April 2003 and September 2004. Seven AD Outpatient Treatment Centers screened 530 patients, 132 of whom were enrolled. Intervention consisted of 400 mg ibuprofen twice a day or placebo, together with 20 mg once a day of esomeprazol, or placebo. The primary measure was any one-year change in the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale- Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) subscale score. Secondary measures included changes in MMSE, CDR, Basic and Instrumental Activities of Daily Living scales, and Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI). Fifty-one patients (77%) in the ibuprofen vs 46 (70%) in the placebo group completed the protocol (p>0.20). In intention-to- treat analysis, ADAS-Cog score worsening was similar in the two groups (p=0.951, treatment difference= 0.1, CI -2.7; 2.9). No differences were found for any secondary outcomes. In a subsample of genotyped patients, ApoE epsilon4 carriers treated with ibuprofen (n=27) were the only group without significant cognitive decline. Ibuprofen, if used for relatively short periods of time and although well tolerated thanks to gastroprotection, does not seem to be effective in tertiary prevention of mild-moderate AD. Our results suggest the need to examine whether differences in the response to NSAIDs exist, based on ApoE epsilon4 carrier status.

Administration and Scoring Variance on the ADAS-Cog

The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) is the most commonly used primary outcome instrument in clinical trials for treatments of dementia. Variations in forms, administration procedures and scoring rules, along with rater turnover and intra-rater drift may decrease the reliability of the instrument. A survey of possible variations in the ADAS-Cog was administered to 26 volunteer raters at a clinical trials meeting. Results indicate notable protocol variations in the forms used, administration procedures, and scoring rules. Since change over time is used to determine treatment effect in clinical trials, standardizing the instrument's ambiguities and addressing common problems will greatly increase the instrument's reliability and thereby enhance its sensitivity to treatment effects.

Med Check

Med Check

The Art of Prescribing

The Art of Prescribing offers a question-and-answer forum that can help you maintain your knowledge of advances in prescribing and psychopharmacology with implications for safe psychiatric care. Do you have a question related to prescribing psychotropic medications? Send to the Editor, Mary Paquette, at: mary@artwindows.com. Question: Please discuss the use of acetylcholinesterase inhibitors in dementia. Specifically, the criteria for use, when to begin, and when to increase the dosage would be helpful. Deborah Antai-Ontong responds: Primary clinical issues critical to successful use of these agents involve knowing when to initiate therapy, assessing patient response and benefit, monitoring side effects, and determining the appropriate length of treatment. The decision to treat dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is determined by the patient's presentation, particularly if there is evidence of psychosis, agitation, depression, or behavioral problems. This process involves performing a comprehensive physical, neuropsychologic workup, psychiatric evaluation, and ordering relevant laboratory and diagnostic studies. Caregiver input into this process is critical to understanding the patient's cognitive status and global level of function. Accumulating evidence shows support for cholinesterase inhibitors (ChE-Is) as the mainstay treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD); this is the only class that has FDA approval for the treatment of this disorder (Cummings, 2003; Cummings et al., 2002). The FDA has approved four ChE-Is, of which rivastigmine, donezepil, and galantamine are the most widely used. Tacrine is no long considered first-line treatment for AD due to its high incidence of serious side effects, including hepatoxicity. These drugs act to delay the degradation of acetylcholine, a neurotransmitter important in memory and learning. Primary treatment goals involving these agents include modest reduction of symptoms, temporary stabilization of cognition, or deterrence in cognitive declines with mild to moderate forms of AD. Patients most likely to benefit from these agents are those who have mild to moderate memory loss with some preservation of forebrain cholinergic neurons (Rogers, Farlow, Doody, Mohs, & Friedhoff, 1998; Tariot et al., 2000). The efficacy of these agents lies in their ability to partially restore the memory and cognitive impairments by raising the acetylcholine levels in the brain that result from inhibition of acetylcholinesterase. This enzyme is responsible for degradation of acetylcholine in the synaptic cleft, hence reducing the hydrolysis of acetylcholine released from presynaptic neurons. Major benefits are modest improvement in cognition and global function. Assessing Cognitive Deficits The FDA stipulates that prior to initiation of treatment with ChE-Is there must be clinical evidence of cognition and global changes based on standardized measures. Several clinician-based rating scales have been used extensively to measure cognitive changes in clinical trials of ChE-Is and the global portion of outcome criteria. The five areas that require assessment and episodic reassessment in people with AD are (a) daily function, Co) cognition, (c) co-morbid medical conditions, (d) mood and emotional disorders, and (e) status of the caregiver. Scales available to measure change in a patient's cognitive status are: * The Activities of Daily Living Scale (Katz, Ford, Moskowitz, Jackson, & Jaffe (1963) * Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition portion (ADAS-Cog) (Leber, 1990) * Clinical Global Impression (CGI) (Rosen, Mohs, & Davis, 1984) * Clinical Interview-Based Impression of Change with caregiver input (CIBIC-plus) (Schneider et al., 1997). * Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) (Folstein, Folstein, & McHugh, 1975) Initiation of Treatment Most data indicate that initiation of treatment with ChE-Is should begin as soon as possible with patients diagnosed with AD. …

The discovery and early validation of novel plasma biomarkers in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease patients responding to treatment with rosiglitazone

Recent advances in clinical, pathological and neuroscience studies have identified disease-modifying therapeutic approaches for Alzheimer's disease that are now in clinical trials. This has highlighted the need for reliable and convenient biomarkers for both early disease diagnosis and a rapid signal of drug efficacy. We describe the identification and assessment of a number of candidate biomarkers in patients with Alzheimer's disease and the correlation of those biomarkers with rosiglitazone therapeutic efficacy, as represented by a change in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog). Plasma from 41 patients with Alzheimer's disease were analysed by open platform proteomics at baseline and after receiving 8 mg rosiglitazone for 24 weeks. From a comparison of protein expression following treatment with rosiglitazone, 97 proteins were observed to be differentially ediffer xpressed with a p-value<0.01. From this analysis and comparison to recently published data from our laboratory, a prioritized list of 10 proteins were analysed by immunoassay and/or functional assay in a wider set of samples from the same clinical study, representing a rosiglitazone dose response, in order to verify the changes observed. A number of these proteins appeared to show a correlation with change in ADAS-Cog at the higher treatment doses compared with the placebo. Alpha-2-macroglobulin, complement C1 inhibitor, complement factor H and apolipoprotein E expression showed a correlation with ADAS-Cog score at the higher doses (4 mg and 8 mg). These results are discussed in light of the pathology and other recently published data.

Validation of the modified mini- mental state examination (3ms) in a German population

Post hoc analyses from clinical trials in Alzheimer's disease (AD) suggest that more cognitively impaired participants respond differently from less impaired on cognitive outcomes. We examined pooled clinical trials data to assess the utility of enriching trials using baseline cognition.We included 2882 participants with mild to moderate AD in seven studies from a meta-database. We used mixed effects models to estimate the rate of decline in Alzheimer's disease Assessment Scale-cognitive (ADAS-Cog) scores among Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) groups.Baseline MMSE category was associated with baseline scores and rate of decline on the ADAS-Cog, adjusting for age and education (both P < .001). Greater baseline cognitive impairment was associated with more rapid progression.Although we found significant differences in rate of decline, most differences between individuals were from baseline ADAS-Cog values. Since enrichment based on MMSE would reduce the recruitment pool while adding only slightly to detecting differences in rate of progression, it is not advised.

Volumetry of amygdala and hippocampus and memory performance in Alzheimer's disease

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is showing increased utility in examining medial temporal lobe atrophy and its relationship to memory performance in Alzheimer's disease (AD). We studied 56 AD patients and 42 older healthy subjects with neuropsychological assessment and MRI. Hippocampal and amygdaloid volumes (normalized to intracranial volume) were contrasted between AD patients and healthy controls and correlated with neuropsychological performance. Comparisons between AD patients and healthy controls revealed highly significant differences in the normalized volume of hippocampus and amygdala by analysis of covariance. Group differences tended to be at least as large for amygdaloid as hippocampal volume, including when the subset of AD patients with the mildest symptoms was considered separately. Within the AD group, performance on the Memory–Orientation subscale of the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition (ADAS-Cog) was significantly correlated with normalized amygdaloid volume but not with normalized hippocampal volume. Other ADAS-Cog subscales (Language, Praxis) were uncorrelated with either volume. In the healthy control sample, neither hippocampal nor amygdaloid volumes were significant predictors of any neuropsychological measure. While a substantial literature continues to justify the focus on the hippocampus in MRI studies of AD, these results suggest that the amygdala should receive similar attention, including in studies of the prodromal stages of AD.

The Characteristics of Patients With Uncertain/Mild Cognitive Impairment on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale

The performances of the uncertain/mild cognitive impairment (MCI) patients on the Alzheimer Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) subscale were compared with those of normal controls, Alzheimer disease patients with CDR 0.5, and Alzheimer disease patients with CDR 1.0. The Uncertain/MCI group was significantly different from normal controls and Alzheimer disease CDR 0.5 or 1.0 groups on the ADAS-Cog except on a few non-memory subtests. Age was significantly correlated with total error score in the normal group, but there was no significant correlation between age and ADAS-Cog scores in the patient groups. Education was not significantly correlated with the ADAS-Cog scores in any group. Regardless of age and educational level, there were clear differences between the normal group and the Uncertain/MCI group, especially on the total error scores. We found that the total error score of the ADAS-Cog was the most reliable variable in detecting patients with mild cognitive impairment. The present study demonstrated that the ADAS-Cog is a promising tool for detecting and studying patients with mild cognitive impairment. The results also indicated that demographic variables such as age and education do not play a significant role in the diagnosis of mild cognitive impaired patients based on the ADAS-Cog scores.

A Pilot Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Rivastigmine in Patients with Mixed Dementia

The two most common causes of dementia in the elderly are Alzheimer's disease (AD) and vascular dementia (VaD), which can coexist as mixed dementia. The object of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of rivastigmine in patients with mixed dementia (AD with VaD). This 26-week open-label pilot study was conducted at 19 centres in the US. To reduce bias, the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive (ADAS-Cog) raters were blinded to all efficacy measures and to patient dosage information. Patients were treated with rivastigmine and titrated to their highest tolerated dose, up to 12 mg/day (6 mg twice daily). The primary efficacy measure was cognitive function assessed by the ADAS-Cog subscale (without the concentration/distractibility item, to be consistent with cognitive outcome measures used in previous rivastigmine trials). Forty-seven percent of patients treated with rivastigmine 6-12 mg/day demonstrated improvement on the ADAS-Cog at 26 weeks, with >25% of patients having a clinically significant improvement of > or =4 points. Treatment with rivastigmine (6-12 mg/day) was well tolerated by the majority of patients. The most common adverse effects occurring in >10% of patients were nausea, vomiting, dizziness and diarrhoea. This pilot study suggests that rivastigmine treatment may have beneficial effects in the treatment of patients with mixed dementia.