Alu Retrotransposons Research Articles

Recently integrated Alu retrotransposons are essentially neutral residents of the human genome

Alu elements represent the largest family of human mobile elements in copy number. A controversial issue with implications for both Alu biology and human genome evolution is whether selective pressures are affecting Alu elements on a large scale. To address this issue, we analyzed the genomic distribution of the three youngest known human Alu subfamilies (Ya5a2, Ya8 and Yb9) in conjunction with their insertion polymorphism status in the human population, since selection can only act on polymorphic elements. Our results indicate that: (i) polymorphic and fixed recently integrated Alu elements are found in genomic regions whose GC contents are statistically indistinguishable, and (ii) recently integrated Alu elements are inserted randomly, regardless of the GC content of the surrounding genomic DNA. These results provide strong evidence that recently integrated “young” Alu elements are not subject to positive or negative selection on a large scale. Therefore, young Alu elements can be regarded as essentially neutral residents of the human genome. These results also imply that selective processes specifically targeting Alu elements can be ruled out as explanations for the accumulation of Alu elements in GC-rich regions of the human genome.

Modeling the Amplification Dynamics of Human Alu Retrotransposons

Retrotransposons have had a considerable impact on the overall architecture of the human genome. Currently, there are three lineages of retrotransposons (Alu, L1, and SVA) that are believed to be actively replicating in humans. While estimates of their copy number, sequence diversity, and levels of insertion polymorphism can readily be obtained from existing genomic sequence data and population sampling, a detailed understanding of the temporal pattern of retrotransposon amplification remains elusive. Here we pose the question of whether, using genomic sequence and population frequency data from extant taxa, one can adequately reconstruct historical amplification patterns. To this end, we developed a computer simulation that incorporates several known aspects of primate Alu retrotransposon biology and accommodates sampling effects resulting from the methods by which mobile elements are typically discovered and characterized. By modeling a number of amplification scenarios and comparing simulation-generated expectations to empirical data gathered from existing Alu subfamilies, we were able to statistically reject a number of amplification scenarios for individual subfamilies, including that of a rapid expansion or explosion of Alu amplification at the time of human–chimpanzee divergence.

The Biased Distribution of Alus in Human Isochores Might Be Driven by Recombination

Alu retrotransposons do not show a homogeneous distribution over the human genome but have a higher density in GC-rich (H) than in AT-rich (L) isochores. However, since they preferentially insert into the L isochores, the question arises: What is the evolutionary mechanism that shifts the Alu density maximum from L to H isochores? To disclose the role played by each of the potential mechanisms involved in such biased distribution, we carried out a genome-wide analysis of the density of the Alus as a function of their evolutionary age, isochore membership, and intron vs. intergene location. Since Alus depend on the retrotransposase encoded by the LINE1 elements, we also studied the distribution of LINE1 to provide a complete evolutionary scenario. We consecutively check, and discard, the contributions of the Alu/LINE1 competition for retrotransposase, compositional matching pressure, and Alu overrepresentation in introns. In analyzing the role played by unequal recombination, we scan the genome for Alu trimers, a direct product of Alu-Alu recombination. Through computer simulations, we show that such trimers are much more frequent than expected, the observed/expected ratio being higher in L than in H isochores. This result, together with the known higher selective disadvantage of recombination products in H isochores, points to Alu-Alu recombination as the main agent provoking the density shift of Alus toward the GC-rich parts of the genome. Two independent pieces of evidence-the lower evolutionary divergence shown by recently inserted Alu subfamilies and the higher frequency of old stand-alone Alus in L isochores-support such a conclusion. Other evolutionary factors, such as population bottlenecks during primate speciation, may have accelerated the fast accumulation of Alus in GC-rich isochores.

Duplication, coclustering, and selection of human Alu retrotransposons.

Alu and L1 are families of non-LTR retrotransposons representing approximately equal 30% of the human genome. Genomic distributions of young Alu and L1 elements are quite similar, but over time, Alu densities in GC-rich DNA increase in comparison with L1 densities. Here we analyze two processes that may contribute to this phenomenon. First, DNA duplications in the human genome occur more frequently in Alu- and GC-rich than in AT-rich chromosomal regions. Second, most Alu elements tend to be coclustered with each other, but recently retroposed elements are likely to be inserted outside the existing clusters. These "stand-alone" elements appear to be rapidly eliminated from the genome. We also report that over time, the densities of recently retroposed Alu families on chromosome Y decline rapidly, whereas Alu densities on chromosome X increase relative to autosomal densities. We propose that these changes in the chromosomal proportions of Alu densities and the elimination of stand-alone Alus represent the same process of paternal Alu selection. We also propose that long-term Alu accumulation in GC-rich DNA is associated with DNA duplication initiated by elevated recombinogenic activities in Alu clusters.