Abstract

Retrotransposons have had a considerable impact on the overall architecture of the human genome. Currently, there are three lineages of retrotransposons (Alu, L1, and SVA) that are believed to be actively replicating in humans. While estimates of their copy number, sequence diversity, and levels of insertion polymorphism can readily be obtained from existing genomic sequence data and population sampling, a detailed understanding of the temporal pattern of retrotransposon amplification remains elusive. Here we pose the question of whether, using genomic sequence and population frequency data from extant taxa, one can adequately reconstruct historical amplification patterns. To this end, we developed a computer simulation that incorporates several known aspects of primate Alu retrotransposon biology and accommodates sampling effects resulting from the methods by which mobile elements are typically discovered and characterized. By modeling a number of amplification scenarios and comparing simulation-generated expectations to empirical data gathered from existing Alu subfamilies, we were able to statistically reject a number of amplification scenarios for individual subfamilies, including that of a rapid expansion or explosion of Alu amplification at the time of human–chimpanzee divergence.

Highlights

  • A collection of evolutionarily recent and older ‘‘fossil’’ mobile element sequences compose more than 45% of the human genome [1,2,3,4,5]

  • Alu Insertion Polymorphism In addition to p, we modeled the behavior of insertion polymorphism level (IPL), which indicates the percentage of polymorphic insertion loci in a subfamily

  • Observed (p and IPL) values for ten recent human Alu subfamilies are shown as black diamonds

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A collection of evolutionarily recent and older ‘‘fossil’’ mobile element sequences compose more than 45% of the human genome [1,2,3,4,5]. Observed (p and IPL) values for ten recent human Alu subfamilies are shown as black diamonds These results are based on a generation time of 25 y and an effective population size of 10,000 individuals. When using standard values for effective population size (Ne 1⁄410,000) and generation time (25 y), our results exclude the possibility that the majority of human Alu insertions occurred during a brief, intense burst of retrotransposition activity after the divergence between humans and chimpanzees. The possibility remains that an extended simulation model, one that accounts for additional biological and spatial parameters, may generate results that are consistent with a retrotransposon burst at the time of speciation

Conclusion
Findings
Materials and Methods

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.