Latex Allergens Research Articles

Latex content in adult vaccines.

Hypersensitivity reactions to natural rubber latex are well-characterized occupational concerns for health care personnel. Health care providers are at increased risk for exposure and possibly transmission of vaccine preventable diseases. Therefore, many health care facilities require providers to be vaccinated against these diseases to maintain employment. Mandatory vaccination for these health care providers presents potential challenges and safety concerns. Using a commercial Latex Allergen ELISA Assay kit for Hev b 1, we evaluated the latex content of HAVRIX, ENGERIX-B, TWINRIX, and BOOSTRIX all manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. These data demonstrate undetectable Hev b 1 content among all of the vaccines tested. This study provides the first known data regarding natural rubber latex content in adult vaccines. Our study revealed undetectable levels of Hev b 1 natural rubber latex content in the tested adult vaccines. These data provide evidence for prospective studies into the safety of vaccinating latex allergic patients.

Evaluation of proteins in natural rubber latex gloves and pulmonary function amongst female nurses in two tertiary hospitals in southern, Thailand.

BACKGROUND Inhaled natural rubber latex (NRL) allergens in a healthcare environment can cause NRL sensitization and reduce pulmonary functions. OBJECTIVES To determine the amount of proteins and the effects of NRL gloves on the pulmonary functions of female nurses in two hospitals in the southern Thailand. METHODS The study included 340 female nurses from two hospitals in which self-reported information and a blood sample were collected. NRL sensitization was determined by using a solid-phase enzyme-labeled fluoroenzyme-immunoassay for anti-NRLIgE antibodies. Proteins in NRL gloves were measured by a modified Lowry method. Pulmonary function was measured by a spirometer. RESULTS The prevalences of respiratory effects self-attributed to NRL glove use and of NRL sensitization were 6.5 and 4.7%, respectively. Four of the 16 sensitized nurses reported respiratory symptoms. NRL sensitized nurses had lower forced expiratory flow (FEF25-75% predicted value) than those who were non-sensitized (Adj. difference = -12.56, 95% CI = -24.41 to -0.70). Furthermore, examination gloves contained protein levels in the range of 111-250 mg/dm2. Difference types of NRL glove contained with different amount of proteins.NRL sensitization was more prevalent in nurses with high concentrations of proteins in NRL gloves (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION Sensitization to NRL was associated with a decrease in FEF25-75% predicted value, indicating narrowing of the small airways of the lung. Use of gloves with low proteins can reducing NRL allergen exposure in these hospitals, which may reduce the risk of developing respiratory problems and NRL sensitization.

Boiling down the cysteine-stabilized LTP fold - loss of structural and immunological integrity of allergenic Art v 3 and Pru p 3 as a consequence of irreversible lanthionine formation

BackgroundNon-specific lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are important allergens in fruits, pollen, vegetables, nuts and latex. Due to their compact structure, LTPs are highly resistant to heat treatment. Here, Art v 3 from mugwort pollen and Pru p 3 from peach were used as model allergens to in-depth investigate structural and immunological properties upon thermal treatment at different buffer conditions. MethodsRecombinant Art v 3 and Pru p 3 were purified from E. coli and incubated at 95 °C up to 120 min using sodium phosphate buffer pH 3.4 or 7.3. Physicochemical properties of allergens were analyzed in circular dichroism spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, size exclusion chromatography, and mass spectrometry. The crystal structure of Art v 3.0201 was determined to 1.9 Å resolution. IgG and IgE binding was investigated in ELISA using murine and LTP allergic patients’ sera. ResultsHighly pure and homogenous recombinant allergens were obtained from bacterial production. The crystal structure of Art v 3.0201 revealed an antiparallel four helix bundle with a C-terminal extension mediating an asymmetric, transient dimer interface and differently sized cavities. Both allergens showed high thermal stability at acidic conditions. In contrast, extensive heat treatment in neutral buffer induced irreversible structural changes due to lanthionine-based cysteine rearrangement. This fostered loss of the typical α-helical structure, increased molecular size and abrogation of IgG and IgE binding epitopes. Pru p 3 lost its structural integrity at shorter heat stress duration than Art v 3, which did however only partially affect the molecule’s IgE binding epitopes. ConclusionDuring thermal treatment, susceptibility to structural changes of the LTP-fold is highly dependent on the surrounding environment but also on intrinsic features of individual LTPs. This is a crucial fact to consider when processing LTP-containing food or food products as this will directly influence their allergenic potential.

ENEA, a peach and apricot IgE-binding protein cross-reacting with the latex major allergen Hev b 5

Peach and apricot can cause allergic reactions with symptoms ranging from mild to very severe, including anaphylaxis. Sometimes subjects allergic to fruits of the Prunus genus have been reported to be also allergic to rubber latex products. The objective of this study is the characterization of a newly identified peach and apricot protein showing similarities with the allergens Hev b 5 from rubber latex and Man e 5 from manioc. This protein has been named ENEA on the basis of the single letter amino acid code of the first four N-terminal residues of the isolated molecule. It has been found in very variable amounts in different peach cultivars and batches. ENEA was isolated from peach pulp extracts by chromatographic separations and identified by direct protein sequencing. At that time, the full length sequence was available only for the homologous protein of the taxonomically closely related apricot, which was produced as a recombinant molecule in Escherichia coli. The following availability of the full length sequence of peach ENEA revealed a very high identity (97%) with the apricot homolog. Similarly to Hev b 5 and to Man e 5, the structural characterization indicated that ENEA is an intrinsically disordered protein. The immunological properties, investigated by dot blotting, the ABA system and the FABER test, showed that ENEA is recognized by specific IgE of allergic patients. In a selected population of 31 patients reporting allergic reactions to peach fruit and/or IgE positive to Hev b 5, 28 and 27 subjects resulted co-sensitized to rENEA and Hev b 5 in the ABA and ISAC test, respectively. In a random population of 3305 suspected allergic patients, analyzed with the FABER test, 17 of them were sensitized to rENEA and 10 of them were also positive to Hev b 5. In addition, both the natural molecule from peach and the recombinant protein of apricot partially inhibited the IgE binding to Hev b 5. In conclusion, a new peach and apricot IgE-binding protein, cross-reacting with the major latex allergen Hev b 5, has been identified. Its variable concentration in the fruit might explain some occasionally occurring allergic reactions. The apricot molecule has recently been registered by the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Sub-Committee with the allergen name Pru ar 5. The recombinant form of apricot ENEA, now available, will contribute to allergy diagnosis.

Allergen-specific IgE to recombinant latex allergens in occupational allergy diagnostics.

ObjectivesSpecific challenge tests (SICs) are considered reference tests for allergic occupational diseases diagnosis. However, in numerous cases, SICs cannot be carried out in the diagnosis of allergy to latex due to the risk of generalized reactions. The aim of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of sIgE determination to recombinant latex allergens in diagnostics of occupational respiratory allergy.Materials and MethodsThe study group comprised 44 healthcare workers (HCW) suspected of suffering from occupational respiratory allergy to latex (they underwent a physical examination, skin‐prick tests (SPTs) to common and latex allergens, spirometry and SIC) and 17 controls not occupationally exposed to latex, with a positive sIgE against latex. Each serum was tested for allergen‐specific IgE to aeroallergens, latex, eight recombinant latex allergens and CCD‐markers.ResultsSpecific IgE against Hev b5, 6.01, and 6.02 were significantly more frequently detected in HCWs and their mean serum levels were higher compared with the control group. In 26 HCWs with occupational asthma (OA), sensitization to Hev b5, Hev b6.01, Hev b6.02 was significantly more frequent than in 18 HCWs with work‐exacerbated asthma (WEA); they had positive results SPT to latex significantly more frequently in comparison with subjects with WEA.ConclusionsTest for recombinant latex allergens is much more accurate in recognition of latex allergy than test for latex extract, which seems to produce false‐positive results in patients with pollen allergy. The measurements of sIgE against recombinant latex allergens Hev b 6.01, 6.02, 5, and 8 are useful in differentiating OA from WEA.

Peptides of the Innate Immune System of Plants. Part II. Biosynthesis, Biological Functions, and Possible Practical Applications

One of the means for regulating the plant innate immune system is activating the synthesis of various defense peptides having diverse structural organization. Some of them possess antimicrobial activity. In plants, defense peptides have various localization; they are often synthesized as multidomain precursor proteins or produced by limited proteolysis, as well as through other degradation pathways. In addition to antimicrobial activity, some of these peptides also display an insecticidal effect, inhibit endo- and exogenous proteases, as well as α-amylases, participate in the transfer of building and signaling hydrophobic molecules, and affect the functioning of ion channels. As a result, peptides of plant innate immune systems not only protect plants against viruses, bacteria, fungi, and insects, but also reinforce their resistance to various types of abiotic stresses and participate in the regulation of plant growth and development. In addition, plant defense peptides can suppress the growth of some human pathogens, possess antitumor activity, exhibit properties of food, inhalation, and latex allergens, and can be used in various areas of medicine. This review summarizes data on biosynthesis, biological functions, and possible practical application of the peptides of the plant innate immune system.

Plant food allergy: Influence of chemicals on plant allergens

Plant-derived foods are the most common allergenic sources in adulthood. Owing to the rapidly increasing prevalence of plant food allergies in industrialized countries, the environmental factors are suspected to play a key role in development of allergic sensitization. The present article provides an overview of ways by which chemicals may influence the development and severity of allergic reactions to plant foods, with especial focus on plant allergens up-regulated under chemical stress. In plants, a substantial part of allergens have defense-related function and their expression is highly influenced by environmental stress and diseases. Pathogenesis-related proteins (PR) account for about 25% of plant food allergens and some are responsible for extensive cross-reactions between plant-derived foods, pollen and latex allergens. Chemicals released by anthropogenic sources such as agriculture, industrial activities and traffic-related air pollutants are potential drivers of the increasing sensitization to allergenic PRs by elevating their expression and by altering their immunogenicity through post-translational modifications. In addition, some orally-taken chemicals may act as immune adjuvants or directly trigger non-IgE mediated food allergy. Taken together, the current literature provides an overwhelming body of evidence supporting the fact that plant chemical exposure and chemicals in diet may enhance the allergenic properties of certain plant-derived foods.

Profilin, a Change in the Paradigm.

Profilin is a protein that is present in all eukaryotic cells and is responsible for cross-reactivity between pollen, latex, and plant foods. It has been classically acknowledged as a minor or nearly irrelevant allergen, although recent data are changing this conception. The objective of this manuscript is to provide a comprehensive review of published data on the role of this ubiquitous allergen in pollen, latex, and plant food allergy. The patterns of recognition of this minor allergen follow a north-south gradient. Although present in all pollens and vegetables, profilin is significantly associated with allergy to grass pollen and to Cucurbitaceae fruits. Heb v 8, the latex profilin, is usually a marker of profilin allergy in plant food-allergic patients, although it has no clinical relevance in latex allergy. Sensitization to profilin jeopardizes the diagnosis of pollen allergy and selection of immunotherapy, and although component-resolved diagnosis can identify its impact, there are no tailored treatments available. In recent years, several new publications have shown how profilin should be taken into account and, under certain circumstances, considered a marker of severity, an allergen capable of inducing respiratory symptoms, and, in its natural purified form, a potential candidate for etiological treatment of food allergy. Current data on profilin strongly support the need for a shift in the previously accepted paradigm for this allergen. More research should be done to assess the real clinical impact of sensitization in specific populations and to develop therapeutic strategies.

Latex-food syndrome – case presentation

Introduction. Latex allergy is a growing concern worldwide, with a prevalence of 1-20%, and a major impact on the patients quality of life of the patient, as well as a high risk of potentially life-threatening reactions. The clinical manifestations of latex hypersensitivity can be triggered by direct cutaneous contact, ingestion of cross-reacting foods, and inhalation of latex glove powder. Aim. We present a case of latex allergy in a patient with initial type I hypersensitivity reactions to latex cross-reacting foods, subsequently also showing the classical manifestations of latex hypersensitivity, and we highlight sensitization profiles in relation to their clinical impact. Method. We report the unusual course of disease in a 35-year-old female, without a family history of atopy, professionally exposed to latex for a period of seven years. the clinical manifestations of latex allergy were preceded by four years of anaphylaxis to several cross-reacting fruit and vegetables, which she merely avoided. The patient was referred to the Allergy department of the “Prof. Dr. Octavian Fodor“ Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, when she began experiencing asthma-like attacks within minutes after arriving at the workplace. Results. Skin prick tests revealed sensitization to standardized latex extract and foods mentioned in the patient’s history. Spirometry test was within physiological limits. Serological tests showed normal tryptase levels and high specific IgE to latex (33 KU/L). Of the component allergens requested, only Hevb5 was available, with a value of 2.7 KU/L. The other components would have been useful in identifying the cross-reactivity patterns. Specific IgE panel to respiratory and food allergens were negative, but the lack of synchronization with the in vivo tests is not an unusual finding in our field and does not rules out the diagnosis. Documentation of in vivo sensitization has a positive predictive value superior to laboratory testing. The patient was educated to avoid latex and cross-reactive foods, and to self-administer epinephrine, if needed. Conclusions. Clinicians must be aware of the sources of latex allergens, as well as of the cross-reacting components found in food. Latex allergy must be suspected not only in at risk individuals (healthcare workers, spina bifida patients, atopic individuals, and those with a personal history of repeated surgeries), but also in those who react to cross-reactive foods. Diagnosing latex allergy is a challenge for both the patient and the clinician.

Crossreactive allergen-specific IgE in children with birch pollen allergic rhinitis

Objective. The aim of this study was to research a sIgE allergen profile of birch pollen and to evaluate a contribution of some homologous food allergens as well as latex allergen to the development of sensibility in allergic rhinitis (AR) / rhinoconjunctivitis patients, in focus of cross-reactivity and oral allergy syndrome.. Methods. Blood sera of 21 AR/rhinoconjunctivitis patients (at the age of 3 to 16) and 20 healthy persons without allergy symptoms were used. sIgE to birch pollen, soybean, latex, apple and celery as well as the total IgE levels were measured by the ImmunoCAP method (Phadia, Sweden) and the ELISA kits (Alkorbio, Russia). Results. We detected high total IgE levels, sIgE to allergens of birch pollen, apple, celery, as well as to recombinant allergens of birch Bet v 1, Bet v 2 and soybean - Gly m 4 in AR patients. Correlation analysis of IgE humoral response to homologous proteins showed the direct valid dependence between the sIgE levels to birch isoallergen Bet v 1 and soy isoallergen Gly m 4 (r=0,84; p

Quantification of protein and latex allergen content of various natural rubber latex products.

Introduction: The use of natural rubber latex (NRL) products can cause IgE-mediated allergic reactions in exposed people. The aim of this study was to quantify the content of protein and latex allergens of currently available NRL products to estimate the allergenic potential of these products. Methods: 14 household articles (pacifiers, baby bottle nipples, condoms, household and disposable gloves, toy balloons, and Band-Aids) as well as 18 NRL examination gloves currently used by healthcare workers were investigated. Extracts of the examination gloves were prepared according to the standard method DIN EN 455-3, which contains requirements and testing for biological evaluation of single use medical gloves. The protein content was determined with a modified Lowry method. Latex allergen content was measured using an IgE-inhibition immunoassay with a mix of serum-sensitized patients as detection antibody sources and the latex ImmunoCAP as solid phase. The allergens Hev b 1, 3, 5, and 6.02 were determined using available immunoassays. Results: In 5 out of 18 examination gloves, the protein content was under the detection limit. The other 13 gloves contained protein between 7.1 and 92.3 µg protein/g material. Five glove brands contained protein concentrations above the recommended reference value of 30 µg protein/g material. Latex allergen could be measured in 12 out of 18 NRL gloves. In only 3 gloves could none of the allergens Hev b 1, 3, 5, and 6.02 be detected. Protein and Hev b 1 could be measured in the examined childcare products, while the concentrations of the latex allergens Hev b 3, 5, and 6.02 were mostly under the detection limit. Boiling of childcare products led to a reduction of protein and allergen content. In some of the other daily-used NRL articles, the protein and allergen contents were even higher than in gloves. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that protein, and particularly latex allergens, were detectable in currently available examination gloves as well as in household articles whereby a risk for sensitization and/or induction of allergic symptoms could not be excluded.

A Collective Review on Hazards of Powder on Surgical and Examination Gloves.

This article reviews information on the hazards associated with dusting powders on latex surgical and examination gloves. Dusting powders were first applied to latex gloves to facilitate donning. After 1980, manufacturers devised innovative techniques to manufacture gloves without dusting powders. It has been well documented that the powders on gloves present a health hazard to patients, as well as to operating-room personnel. First, these powders elicit tissue toxicity in every tissue in the body. Second, these powders serve as carriers of latex allergen and may precipitate a life-threatening allergic reaction in sensitized patients. These well-documented hazards of glove powders have caused a growing number of hospitals in the world to abandon the use of examination and surgical gloves coated with powder, and instead to use only powder-free gloves.

Proteomics analysis of latex from Hevea brasiliensis (clone RRIM 600).

The natural rubber latex extracted from the bark of Hevea brasiliensis plays various important roles in today's modern society. Following ultracentrifugation, the latex can be separated into 3 layers: C-serum, lutoids, and rubber particles. Previous studies have shown that a large number of proteins are present in these 3 layers. However, a complete proteome for this important plant is still unavailable. Protein sequences have been recently translated from the completed draft genome database of H. brasiliensis, leading to the creation of annotated protein databases of the following H. brasiliensis biosynthetic pathways: photosynthesis, latex allergens, rubberwood formation, latex biosynthesis, and disease resistance. This research was conducted to identify the proteins contained within the latex by way of de novo sequencing from mass spectral data obtained from the 3 layers of the latex. Peptides from these proteins were fragmented using collision-induced dissociation, higher-energy collisional dissociation, and electron-transfer dissociation activation methods. A large percentage of proteins from the biosynthetic pathways (63% to 100%) were successfully identified. In addition, a total of 1839 unique proteins were identified from the whole translated draft genome database (AnnHBM).

Baklagillere Allerjisi Olan Bir Olguda Deri Testi Sırasında Anafilaksi

The most common causes of food allergy vary among countries according to the dietary habits and the frequency of consumption of foods. Legumes are important sources of protein that are widely consumed all over the world. The legume family includes lentils, chickpeas, beans, broad beans as well as peanuts and soybeans. Skin prick tests are generally considered safe. However, systemic reactions may develop during skin prick testing, Systemic reactions from skin testing are more frequent with food, drug, latex and venom allergens. Systemic reactions occur more frequently after prick to prick tests that are performed with fresh food than those with standard extracts. This paper reports a case with a history of anaphylaxis to lentils and peas. The patient was found to have type 1 reaction to chick peas, broad beans and green beans although she did not describe a reaction to these legumes in her history. The patient experienced anaphylaxis during skin testing with legumes when multiple tests were performed at the same time. There was no reaction when skin prick tests were performed in more than one session. The patient is noteworthy in this regard and discussed in detail.

Floral Nectary Morphology and Proteomic Analysis of Nectar of Liriodendron tulipifera Linn.

Nectar is a primary nutrient reward for a variety of pollinators. Recent studies have demonstrated that nectar also has defensive functions against microbial invasion. In this study, the Liriodendron tulipifera nectary was first examined by scanning electron microscopy, and then the nectar was analyzed by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry, which led to identification of 42 nectar proteins involved in various biological functions. Bioinformatic analysis was then performed on an identified novel rubber elongation factor (REF) protein in L. tulipifera nectar. The protein was particularly abundant, representing ∼60% of the major bands of 31 to 43 kDa, and showed high, stage-specific expression in nectary tissue. The REF family proteins are the major allergens in latex. We propose that REF in L. tulipifera nectar has defensive characteristics against microorganisms.

The role of allergen components for the diagnosis of latex-induced occupational asthma.

Recombinant Hevea brasiliensis (rHev b) natural rubber latex (NRL) allergen components have been developed to assess the patients' allergen sensitization profile and to improve the diagnosis of NRL allergy. To examine whether the determination of specific IgE (sIgE) reactivity to a panel of recombinant allergen components would be helpful for diagnosing NRL-induced occupational asthma (OA) in predicting the outcome of a specific inhalation test. sIgE levels to NRL extract and 12 recombinant NRL allergen components were assessed in 82 subjects with OA ascertained by a positive specific inhalation challenge (SIC) with NRL gloves and in 25 symptomatic subjects with a negative challenge. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of a NRL-sIgE level ≥0.35 kUA /l as compared to the result of SICs were 94%, 48%, 86%, and 71%, respectively. The positive predictive value increased above 95% when increasing the cutoff value to 5.41 kUA /l. Subjects with a positive SIC showed a significantly higher rate of sIgE reactivity to rHev b 5, 6.01, 6.02, and 11 than those with a negative SIC. A sIgE sum score against rHev b 5 plus 6.01/6.02 ≥ 1.46 kUA /l provided a positive predictive value >95% with a higher sensitivity (79%) and diagnostic efficiency (Youden index: 0.67) as compared with a NRL-sIgE ≥5.41 kUA /l (49% and 0.41, respectively). In suspected OA, high levels of sIgE against rHev b 5 combined with rHev b 6.01 or 6.02 are the most efficient predictors of a bronchial response to NRL.

How should occupational anaphylaxis be investigated and managed?

Anaphylaxis is a systemic allergic reaction that can be life-threatening or fatal and can result from work-related exposures. This review study focuses on the assessment, main triggers, and management of occupational anaphylaxis. Exposed workers can be sensitized through inhalation and skin contact, and the risks increase with penetration of the allergen through the skin. The main eliciting agents of occupational anaphylaxis include stinging insects and animal bites, natural rubber latex and other vegetable allergens, food products, and drugs. Workers sensitized to occupational allergens may also develop anaphylaxis outside the work environment from exposure to the same or to cross-reacting allergens. Cofactors at work such as exercise may increase the risk. The relevant medical records and laboratory tests (e.g. tryptase) performed during the episode should be reviewed. It is very important to confirm the diagnosis and to identify the specific trigger of anaphylaxis. Component-resolved diagnosis may help in the identification of primary sensitizers or cross-reactive allergens. Adrenaline must be administered to all patients experiencing anaphylaxis. Removal from exposure is mandatory to prevent further episodes. A written emergency management plan, health and safety education, and training and surveillance should be enforced in occupations at greater risk.

Current prevalence rate of latex allergy: Why it remains a problem?

This article aims to review the current prevalence rate of latex allergy among healthcare workers, susceptible patients, and the general public, and to investigate why latex is still a ubiquitous occupational health hazard. Scientific publications on PubMed, particularly those published within the last five years, and current regulations from agencies such as Food and Drug Administration (FDA) were reviewed. Consumer and commercial products that may contain latex were also surveyed. Approximately 12 million tons of natural rubber latex is produced annually and is widely used to manufacture millions of consumer and commercial products. Only limited number of latex-derived products have been approved and regulated by government agencies, such as FDA, whereas the majority of finished products do not label whether they contain latex. Owing to millions of unidentifiable products containing latex and many routes for exposure to latex, preventing contact with latex allergens and reducing the prevalence of latex allergy are more difficult than expected. Reported data suggest that the average prevalence of latex allergy worldwide remains 9.7%, 7.2%, and 4.3% among healthcare workers, susceptible patients, and general population, respectively. Latex-derived products are ubiquitous, and latex allergy remains a highly prevalent health risk in many occupations and to the general population. Developing alternative materials and increasing the ability to identify and label latex-derived products will be practicable approaches to effectively control the health risks associated with latex.

Differentiating of cross-reactions in patients with latex allergy with the use of ISAC test.

IntroductionDifferentiating between cross-reactivity and double sensitization is still a challenging issue in allergology.AimTo differentiate cross-reactions accompanying latex allergy with the use of the ISAC test.Material and methodsThirty-nine patients reporting immediate allergic reactions to latex were enrolled into the study (group A). The control group was comprised of 41 patients with allergic diseases not associated with latex (group B) and 20 healthy individuals (group C). Their history was recorded and skin prick tests were performed with latex, airborne and food allergens. Specific IgE against food allergens, latex (k82) and recombined latex allergens were determined. ImmunoCAP ISAC test was performed with 103 molecules.ResultsSensitization to latex was found by means of skin tests in 16 cases and sIgE against latex was revealed in 12 cases (including 10 positive in both SPT and sIgE). In the ISAC test antibodies against recombined latex allergens were found in 8 patients with rHev b 6 as the most common. All the patients positive for rHev b 1, 5, 6, 8 had allergy or asymptomatic sensitization to food allergens cross-reacting with latex. Some reactions could not have been differentiated due to the lack of allergens in the ISAC test. Others, not related to latex-fruits syndrome were explained by cross-reactivity with other profilins or PR-10 proteins.ConclusionsImmunoCAP ISAC test could be useful in differentiating between cross-reactions and double sensitizations. However, in the case of latex its advantages are limited due to a small panel of allergens.

Content of Asthmagen Natural Rubber Latex Allergens in Commercial Disposable Gloves.

The use of natural rubber latex (NRL) gloves in many occupations may lead to latex sensitization, allergic asthma, and skin reactions. Due to their good properties and environmental safety NRL gloves are still being used in the healthcare setting, but also in the food industry, by hairdressers, cleaners, etc. The aim of our study was to assess the protein and NRL allergen content in commercial gloves by different methods, including a new assay. Twenty commercially available NRL gloves were analyzed. Protein extraction was performed according to the international standard ASTM D-5712. Total protein content was measured with a modified Lowry method, NRL content with the CAP Inhibition Assay, the Beezhold ELISA Inhibition Assay, and an innovative ELISA with IgY-antibodies extracted from eggs of NRL-immunized hens (IgY Inhibition Assay). We found a high protein content in a range of 215.0-1304.7μg/g in 8 out of the 20 NRL gloves. Seven of the 20 gloves were powdered, four of them with a high protein content. In gloves with high protein content, the immunological tests detected congruently high levels of NRL allergen. We conclude that a high percentage of commercially available NRL gloves still represent a risk for NRL allergy, including asthma. The modified Lowry Method allows to infer on the latex allergen content.