ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

Characterization of Central Nervous System Clinico-Genomic Outcomes in ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Brain Metastases Treated with Alectinib

IntroductionHighly effective brain-penetrant ALK-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been developed for the management of NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM). Local therapy (LT) such as SRS or therapeutic craniotomy is increasingly being deferred for such patients. Herein we report detailed patient- and lesion-level intracranial outcomes and co-mutational genomic profiles from a cohort of NSCLC patients with BM treated with alectinib, with or without LT. MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed ALK fusion-positive NSCLC patients with BMs who received alectinib at the diagnosis of BM from 1/2012 and 5/2021. Outcome variables included intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS), overall survival (OS), duration of TKI therapy, and CNS response rates. Genomic characteristics from tumor specimens were assessed with MSK-IMPACT, a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based genomic profiling assay. ResultsA total of 38 patients with 114 CNS lesions were included. Twelve of these patients also received contemporaneous LT (SRS, WBRT, or surgical resection). Maximal BM diameter in the TKI + LT group was greater (p < 0.003) but despite this difference, iPFS (TKI only, HR 1.21, 95 % CI 0.51–2.89; p = 0.66) and OS (TKI only, HR 5.99, 95 % CI 0.77–46.6; p = 0.052) were similar between groups and trended towards more favorable outcomes with the addition of LT. SMARCA4 co-alterations were associated with inferior OS (HR 8.76, 1.74–44.2; p = 0.009). ConclusionsOur study demonstrated that patients with ALK fusion-positive NSCLC treated with TKI + LT had larger BM and higher likelihood of pre-treatment neurologic symptoms. Despite these differences, iPFS was similar between groups. Results should be interpreted with caution as our study was limited by an underpowered sample size. SMARCA4 co-alterations were associated with inferior OS and these findings warrant further investigation.

Efficacy and safety of first-line treatments for patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutated, non-small cell cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

This study compares the safety and efficacy of first-line treatments for anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. Abstracts related to lung cancer presented at important international conferences were also reviewed. Randomized clinical trials that qualified the inclusion criteriawere subjected to Bayesian network meta-analysis and systematically reviewed. The authors included a total of nine studies including 2441 patients and seven first-line treatments (ensartinib, brigatinib, crizotinib, lorlatinib, alectinib, ceritinib, and pemetrexed-based chemotherapy). Overall, lorlatinib appeared to confer the best progression-free survival (PFS) (probability of being the best [Prbest], 90%; surface under the cumulative ranking curve [SUCRA], 98%), and the same conclusion was obtained on paired comparisons (lorlatinib vs. ceritinib [hazard ratio (HR), 0.31; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20-0.47); lorlatinib vs. chemotherapy [HR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.12-0.23]; crizotinib vs. lorlatinib [HR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.4-5.2]; and brigatinib vs. lorlatinib [HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0-2.8]). Alectinib conferred the best overall survival (OS) and safety profile. In the Asian population, ensartinib conferred the best PFS (Prbest 50%, SUCRA 87%), and for patients with brain metastases at baseline, lorlatinib showed the best PFS (Prbest 70%, SUCRA 93%). For first-line treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, lorlatinib was associated with the best PFS and objective response rate, but poorer safety profile, whereas alectinib demonstrated the best OS and safety profile. In Asians, ensartinib conferred the best PFS benefit, and in the brain baseline metastasis population, lorlatinib conferred the best PFS benefit. Among the many molecularly targeted drugs currently used to treat anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer, lorlatinib may be one of the most effective targeted drugs. Lung cancer has long been at the top of cancer rankings in terms of incidence and mortality. Today, the treatment of lung cancer has moved into the era of precision therapy. In this article, we use a statistical approach to compare the efficacy and safety of targeted drugs that have been used in the first-line treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase mutations to improve the reference for clinicians to make treatment decisions in the real world.

Early-stage anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer: a narrative review.

While anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard of care treatment for metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the benefit of moving ALK inhibitors to earlier disease stages is unclear. The objective of this review is to summarize the literature regarding the prevalence and prognosis of early-stage ALK-positive NSCLC and the utility of targeted therapies, immunotherapy, and chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. We identified the references for this narrative review through a literature search of papers about early stage ALK-positive NSCLC using PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov. Last search was run on July 3, 2022. There were no language or time frame restrictions. The incidence of oncogenic ALK alterations in early-stage NSCLC ranges from 2-7%, and ALK-positive NSCLC patients are more likely to be younger and never or light smokers. Studies on the prognostic impact of ALK in early-stage disease have had conflicting results. ALK TKIs are not approved in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting and there is a lack of large, randomized trial results. Several trials are currently accruing but results are not expected for several years. Attempts at large, randomized trials to evaluate the benefit of ALK TKIs in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant has been hampered by slow recruitment given the rarity of ALK alterations, lack of universal genetic testing, and the rapid pace of drug development. Expanded lung cancer screening recommendations, liberalization of surrogate endpoints (i.e., pathological complete response and major pathological response), growth of multicenter national clinical trials, and new diagnostic technologies (i.e., cell-free DNA liquid biopsies) provide hope of generating much needed data to definitively answer the question of the utility of ALK-directed therapies in the early-stage setting.

Cardiac Toxicity of Alectinib in PatientsWith ALK+ Lung Cancer: Outcomes of Cardio-Oncology Follow-Up.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (3% to 7%) predict for response to ALK-inhibitors (eg, alectinib, first line), resulting in a 5-year survival rate of ∼60% and median progression-free survival of 34.8months. Although the overall toxicity rate of alectinib is acceptable, unexplained adverse events, including edema and bradycardia, may indicate potential cardiac toxicity. This study's aim was to investigate the cardiotoxicity profile and exposure-toxicity relationship of alectinib. Between April 2020 and September 2021, 53 patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with alectinib were included. Patients starting with alectinib after April 2020 underwent a cardiac work-up at start, at6months and at 1 year at the cardio-oncology outpatients' clinic. Patients already receiving alectinib >6months underwent 1 cardiac evaluation. Bradycardia, edema, and severe alectinib toxicity (grade≥3 and grade≥2 adverse eventsleading to dose modifications) data were collected. Alectinib steady-state trough concentrations were used for exposure-toxicity analyses. Left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable in all patients who underwent an on-treatment cardiac evaluation (n=34; median 62%; IQR: 58%-64%). Twenty-two patients (42%) developed alectinib-related bradycardia (6 symptomatic bradycardia). One patient underwent a pacemaker implantation for severe symptomatic bradycardia. Severe toxicity was significantly associated with a 35% higher alectinib mean Ctrough (728 vs 539ng/mL, SD=83ng/mL; 1-sided P=0.015). No patients showed signs of a diminished left ventricular ejection fraction. Alectinib caused more bradycardia than previously reported (42%) with some instances of severe symptomatic bradycardia. Patients with severe toxicity generally had an elevated exposure above the therapeutic threshold.

Evolocumab como tratamiento de la dislipemia secundaria a lorlatinib

Anti-PCSK9 monoclonal antibodies have reduced the risk of cardiovascular events in patients with atheroesclerosis cardiovascular disease. However, its use has not been described in hyperlipidemia associated with lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK tyrosin kinasa inhibitor approved as treatment for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Real-World Treatment and Outcomes of ALK-Positive Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in a Southeast Asian Country.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are associated with good overall survival (OS) for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, these treatments can be unavailable or limited by financial constraints in developing countries. Using data from a nationwide lung cancer registry, the present study aimed to identify treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of ALK-positive NSCLC in Malaysia. This retrospective study examined data of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC from 18 major hospitals (public, private, or university teaching hospitals) throughout Malaysia between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2020 from the National Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgical Database (NCTSD). Data on baseline characteristics, treatments, radiological findings, and pathological findings were collected. Overall survival (OS) and time on treatment (TOT) were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. There were 1581 NSCLC patients in the NCTSD. Based on ALK gene-rearrangement test results, only 65 patients (4.1%) had ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Of these 65 patients, 59 received standard-of-care treatment and were included in the analysis. Crizotinib was the most commonly prescribed ALK inhibitor, followed by alectinib and ceritinib. Patients on ALK inhibitors had better median OS (62 months for first-generation inhibitors, not reached at time of analysis for second-generation inhibitors) compared to chemotherapy (27 months), but this was not statistically significant (P=0.835) due to sample-size limitations. Patients who received ALK inhibitors as first-line therapy had significantly longer TOT (median of 11 months for first-generation inhibitors, not reached for second-generation inhibitors at the time of analysis) compared to chemotherapy (median of 2 months; P<0.01). Patients on ALK inhibitors had longer median OS and significantly longer TOT compared to chemotherapy, suggesting long-term benefit.

An update on lorlatinib: a novel first line treatment for ALK-positive advanced lung cancer

ABSTRACT Introduction Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have significantly improved the prognosis of ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but these patients will eventually develop resistance and progression of disease after 10 months of first-generation and more than 30 months after second-generation TKIs. Lorlatinib is a third-generation highly selective ALK-TKI capable of inducing significant and durable CNS responses and overcoming known ALK resistance mutations. Areas covered This review summarizes the mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety of lorlatinib in ALK-positive NSCLC. The authors provide their expert opinions on the use of this drug, including its future prospects. Expert opinion Lorlatinib has shown good efficacy and safety in ALK-positive NSCLC patients progressing to first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs. The phase III trial CROWN evaluating lorlatinib as first-line therapy has provided promising results; however, the comparing arm was crizotinib, supplanted now by second-generation agents. Whether lorlatinib can replace them as upfront strategy is a relevant question that still remains open. In our opinion, longer follow-up and face-to-face studies are required to determine which is the best treatment sequence strategy. The advent of liquid biopsy will contribute to treatment tailoring according to the genomic profile at progression.

Phase II Trial of the Combination of Alectinib with Bevacizumab in Alectinib Refractory ALK-Positive Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NLCTG1501)

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung cancer is a rare cancer that occurs in approximately 5% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLCs) patients. Despite the excellent efficacy of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitor in ALK-positive NSCLCs, most patients experience resistance. We conducted a phase II study to investigate the combination of alectinib with bevacizumab in ALK-positive NSCLC patients after failure of alectinib. In this study, ALK-positive nonsquamous NSCLC patients previously treated with alectinib received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg on day 1 every 3 weeks and alectinib 600 mg/day until disease progression. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and the safety of alectinib and bevacizumab. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and correlation of circulating tumor DNA and plasma proteins with PFS. Of the 12 patients treated, the median PFS was 3.1 months (95% CI 1.2-16.1), and the median OS was 24.1 months (95% CI 8.3-not estimable). The EML4-ALK fusion gene in circulating tumor DNA was significantly correlated with shorter PFS (1.2 months vs. 11.4 months, HR 5.2, p = 0.0153). Two patients experienced grade 3 adverse events; however, none of the patients required dose reduction. Although the primary endpoint was not met, alectinib combined with bevacizumab showed clinical efficacy in ALK-positive patients.

Impact of systemic inflammatory markers in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with crizotinib

ObjectivesTo evaluate the prognostic utility of inflammation-based prognostic scores in patients with ALK-positive metastatic or non-resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with crizotinib. Patients and MethodsA total of 82 patients with ALK-positive metastatic or non-resectable NSCLC who received ALK TKI crizotinib were included. Pre-treatment modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), prognostic nutritional index (PNI), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression and Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the impact of pretreatment mGPS, PNI, and SII on overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR). ResultsThe ORR was 77.2%, while 1-year OS and PFS rates were 95.0% and 93.5%, respectively. The univariate analysis revealed significantly higher 1-year PFS (89.4 vs. 64.4%, p=0.043) and OS (92.0 vs. 83.3%, p=0.01) rates in patients with low (<934.7) vs. high (≥934.7) SII scores. Multivariate analysis revealed that PNI ≥0.09 was a significant determinant of poorer 1-year OS rates (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88–4.85, p=0.035). No significant difference was observed in survival rates according to gender, age, smoking status, prior lines of therapy, or mGPS scores, while higher mGPS scores (odds ratio [OR]: 0.1, 95%CI 0.16–1.04; p=0.009) and higher PNI scores (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.02–0.55; p=0.035) were associated with poorer ORR. ConclusionOur findings indicate the prognostic significance of PNI and SII in terms of survival outcome and the impact of mGPS and PNI on treatment response in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with crizotinib.

High incidence and reversible bradycardia events following alectinib initiation.

With the widespread use of alectinib in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), its cardiotoxicity has gradually emerged, including new-onset sinus bradycardia (SB). However, the incidence, timing, severity, and risk factors of alectinib-induced bradycardia remain unknown. From January 2020 to June 2022, 93 patients with ALK-positive NSCLC treated with alectinib were enrolled in this retrospective analysis. These patients had heart rate (HR) recorded before and after alectinib administration. By reviewing electronic medical records and follow-up, the HR changes of patients during medication were recorded. The potential risk factors associated with alectinib-induced SB were explored. According to an HR cut-off of 60 beats per minute (bpm), 47 patients (50.54%) experienced at least one recorded bradycardia. The mean HR of total participants before alectinib administration was 78.32 (standard deviation [SD], 9.48) and after was 64.88 (SD, 12.21). The median maximum change in HR (range) for all patients was 11 (-55, +4) bpm. For the bradycardia subgroup, the HR of most patients (76.60%) hovered around 50-60 bpm, and 61.70% of SB occurred within 3months after alectinib administration. Multivariate analysis indicated that baseline HR (odds ratio [OR] 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79-0.93, p< 0.001) and history of hypertension (OR 13.71, 95% CI 2.49-76.38, p= 0.003) were independent risk factors for alectinib-related bradycardia. Alectinib-induced bradycardia had a high incidence, appeared relatively early, and was reversible by dose reduction or withdrawal.

Efficacy and safety of alectinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer and blood markers for prognosis and efficacy: a retrospective cohort study

Alectinib is a second generation of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), which has attracted much attention in the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). At present, there are few reports on the efficacy and safety of alectinib in Chinese population. Moreover, biomarkers reflecting prognosis and efficacy are exceedingly needed. This study assessed the efficacy of alectinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC and analyzed the prognostic factors. Patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who were confirmed by histopathology or cytology at the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Nanjing Medical University between October 2018 and October 2021 were enrolled. All patients were treated with alectinib. The clinical characteristics and circulating tumor biomarkers before and after treatment were collected. Kaplan-Meier test was used to calculate the progression-free survival (PFS). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to explore the influencing factors on PFS. Incidence of adverse events was observed. Twenty patients progressed after first-line treatment (n=59) with alectinib, and 21 patients progressed following second-line treatment (n=36) with alectinib. The median PFS of first-line treatment patients was not achieved, and the median PFS of patients undergoing second-line treatment was 15.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.00-32.23]. The most common adverse reactions were liver dysfunction (37.50%), anemia (37.50%), and constipation (20.83%). The incidence of grade III and above adverse reactions was 6.25%. Univariate analysis showed that neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR; hazard ratio (HR) =0.424, P=0.005] carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA; HR =0.482, P=0.029), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH; HR =0.327, P<0.001), carbohydrate antigen (CA)199 (HR =0.313, P=0.002), and circulating cell free DNA (cfDNA; HR =0.229, P=0.008) concentration levels were associated with PFS, and multivariate analysis showed that NLR (HR =3.058, P=0.034) was independent prognostic factor. After three months of treatment, CEA, CA199, NLR, and LDH, could further predict the prognosis of alectinib treatment. The efficacy and safety of alectinib as a first-line or second-line treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC in keeping with published prospective studies. CEA, CA199, NLR, and LDH within the normal range after three months of treatment were associated with good prognosis. Detection of serum tumor markers can indicate therapeutic success in patients treated with alectinib.

Longitudinal monitoring of cell-free DNA methylation in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients

BackgroundDNA methylation (5-mC) signals in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of cancer patients represent promising biomarkers for minimally invasive tumor detection. The high abundance of cancer-associated 5-mC alterations permits parallel and highly sensitive assessment of multiple 5-mC biomarkers. Here, we performed genome-wide 5-mC profiling in the plasma of metastatic ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. We established a strategy to identify ALK-specific 5-mC changes from cfDNA and demonstrated the suitability of the identified markers for cancer detection, prognosis, and therapy monitoring.MethodsLongitudinal plasma samples (n = 79) of 21 ALK-positive NSCLC patients and 13 healthy donors were collected alongside 15 ALK-positive tumor tissue and 10 healthy lung tissue specimens. All plasma and tissue samples were analyzed by cell-free DNA methylation immunoprecipitation sequencing to generate genome-wide 5-mC profiles. Information on genomic alterations (i.e., somatic mutations/fusions and copy number alterations) determined in matched plasma samples was available from previous studies.ResultsWe devised a strategy that identified tumor-specific 5-mC biomarkers by reducing 5-mC background signals derived from hematopoietic cells. This was followed by differential methylation analysis (cases vs. controls) and biomarker validation using 5-mC profiles of ALK-positive tumor tissues. The resulting 245 differentially methylated regions were enriched for lung adenocarcinoma-specific 5-mC patterns in TCGA data and indicated transcriptional repression of several genes described to be silenced in NSCLC (e.g., PCDH10, TBX2, CDO1, and HOXA9). Additionally, 5-mC-based tumor DNA (5-mC score) was highly correlated with other genomic alterations in cell-free DNA (Spearman, ρ > 0.6), while samples with high 5-mC scores showed significantly shorter overall survival (log-rank p = 0.025). Longitudinal 5-mC scores reflected radiologic disease assessments and were significantly elevated at disease progression compared to the therapy start (p = 0.0023). In 7 out of 8 instances, rising 5-mC scores preceded imaging-based evaluation of disease progression.ConclusionWe demonstrated a strategy to identify 5-mC biomarkers from the plasma of cancer patients and integrated them into a quantitative measure of cancer-associated 5-mC alterations. Using longitudinal plasma samples of ALK-positive NSCLC patients, we highlighted the suitability of cfDNA methylation for prognosis and therapy monitoring.

Alectinib as first-line treatment for advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer in the real-world setting: preliminary analysis in a Chinese cohort

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been a major advance in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which have been substantiated in clinical trials. However, real-world data on first-line alectinib in a Chinese patient population are limited. We enrolled patients diagnosed with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC treated with first-line alectinib at 8 centers in China, including cases with symptomatic or active CNS metastases. Continuation of alectinib was permitted after local or gradual progression at the treating clinician's discretion. Time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was defined as the period from the start of alectinib to discontinuation for any cause including disease progression, death, adverse events and patient's preference. We defined longer EML4-ALK variants as containing EML4 fusions to at least exon 13 and shorter variants had EML4 fusions up to exon 6. Of the 110 patients included, 26.4% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG) ≥2 points. The objective response rate (ORR) was 88.5% [95% confidence interval (CI): 79.9-94.3%] and median tumor shrinkage rate was 60% (range, 0-100%) in patients with target lesions. For patients with measurable central nervous system (CNS) metastases, the CNS-ORR was 92.9% (95% CI: 66.1-99.8%), additionally, 80% (8/10) of patients experienced significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms following alectinib treatment. With a median follow-up of 18.3 months, the estimated 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and 2-year treatment failure-free rate were 81.1% (95% CI: 71.5-87.7%) and 81.0% (95% CI: 70.6-88.0%) respectively. Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 6.4% and only 2 patients (1.8%) permanently discontinued alectinib due to adverse events. Multivariate analysis indicated that patients with metastases in ≥3 distant organs and a tumor reduction rate ≤50% demonstrated more unfavorable mPFS than their counterparts. Furthermore, patients carrying longer variants showed superior mPFS to those with shorter variants (not reached vs. 24.2 months, hazard ratio =0.17, 95% CI: 0.04-0.68, P=0.004). Alectinib showed substantial efficacy and an excellent safety profile in a real-world setting of Chinese patients. Clinical outcomes and long-term survival still require longer follow-up. Tumors with shorter EML4 fusion variants, more extensive metastases and less reduction in tumor lesions may require more aggressive strategies.

Ensartinib in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, open-label, two-staged, phase 1 trial.

Ensartinib, a potent second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that targets anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), MET and ROS1, was evaluated in a phase I clinical trial in patients with advanced, ALK-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients with advanced, ALK or ROS1-positive NSCLC were recruited from 2 centers in China. This study consisted of dose escalation and expansion stages. Patients were treated with oral ensartinib [dosage of escalation stage was from 150, 200, 225 to 250 mg per day, expansion stage was recommended phase II dose (RP2D)] in continuous 28-day cycles. The primary objectives were safety, dose limited toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and RP2D based on tolerability. Key secondary objectives included pharmacokinetic (PK) and anti-tumor activity. Forty-eight patients were enrolled, 37 (77.1%) were ALK TKI-naïve, 11 (22.9%) patients had previously received crizotinib, ceritinib or alectinib. Ensartinib was well tolerated and common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) included rash (87.5%), transaminase elevation (60.4%), pruritus (45.8%) and creatinine elevation (35.4%). The top 3 grade 3-5 TRAEs were rash (14.6%), elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (12.5%) and aspartate transaminase (AST) (4.2%). Two DLTs were observed in 250 mg, so MTD and RP2D was 225 mg per day. Ensartinib was moderately absorbed (median Tmax: 3.00-4.00 h) and slowly eliminated (mean T1/2: 21.0-30.2 h). The area under the curve (AUC) of ensartinib reached saturation at 200 to 225 mg and no major accumulation after daily administration. For all patients, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rates (DCR) were 64.6 % and 81.3%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 16.79 months. In subgroup analysis, the ORR and mPFS was 81.3% and 45.5%, 25.73 and 4.14 months in TKI-naïve and -treated ALK+ patients, respectively. The intra-cranial ORR and mPFS for patients with measurable brain metastases were 66.7% and 22.90 months. ALK abundance may predict the efficacy of ensartinib. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis showed specific signaling pathways enrichment in long and short progression-free survival (PFS) groups. Ensartinib was well tolerated under 225 mg (MTD) and demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity in ALK+ NSCLC patients, including those with CNS metastases and those previously TKI-treated. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02959619.

Conteltinib (CT-707) in patients with advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study

BackgroundConteltinib (CT-707) is a potent second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) showing promising anti-tumor activities in preclinical studies. This study aimed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy of conteltinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsIn this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study, conteltinib was taken orally at doses of 50 to 800 mg quaque die (QD) in a dose-escalation phase. If the response was observed in a dose cohort of the dose-escalation phase, dose expansion was started. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and adverse events assessed by investigators.ResultsBetween April 13, 2016, and February 8, 2020, 64 ALK-positive NSCLC patients were enrolled, including 41 (64.1%) patients with ALK TKI-naïve and 23 (35.9%) patients who received crizotinib previously. In the dose-escalation phase, 26 patients were treated with conteltinib at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 450 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg QD. One DLT event was reported at the dose of 600 mg. MTD was not reached. Overall, 58 (90.6%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 9 (14.1%) patients had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (46 [71.9%]), serum creatinine elevated (29 [45.3%]), aspartate aminotransferase elevated (25 [39.1%]), and nausea (24 [37.5%]). Among 39 ALK TKI-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 64.1% (25 of 39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47.2–78.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 9.26–23.3), and median duration of response (DoR) was 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.06–25.8). Among 21 patients who received crizotinib previously, the ORR was 33.3% (7 of 21; 95% CI, 14.6–57.0), median PFS was 6.73 months (95% CI, 4.73–8.54), and median DoR was 6.60 months (95% CI, 3.77–13.3).ConclusionsIn this study, conteltinib showed manageable safety profile, favorable PK properties, and anti-tumor activity in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 600 mg QD for ALK TKI-naïve patients and 300 mg bis in die (BID) for patients who received crizotinib previously.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02695550.

Patient-reported outcomes from the randomized phase 3 CROWN study of first-line lorlatinib versus crizotinib in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

ObjectivesQuality of life (QoL) for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is negatively impacted by their disease and treatment side effects. We present detailed patient-reported outcome (PRO) data from the phase 3 CROWN study, which compared lorlatinib with crizotinib in patients with previously untreated ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Materials and methodsPROs were assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QoL Questionnaire with Lung Cancer module. A longitudinal, random-intercept, random-slope, mixed-effect model assessed score changes from baseline up to (not including) end of treatment. Mean changes of absolute scores from baseline at each cycle were calculated and presented up to cycle 18 (≥ 10-point change considered clinically meaningful). ResultsIn both lorlatinib (n = 148) and crizotinib (n = 140) arms, there were longitudinal improvements across multiple functioning and symptom scores during treatment compared with pre-treatment. Numerical improvements for most longitudinal functioning scores (physical, role, emotional, social) favored lorlatinib; cognitive functioning favored crizotinib. Numerical improvements favored lorlatinib for several symptoms (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea [clinically meaningful improvement], and cough); peripheral neuropathy favored crizotinib. Subgroup analyses showed PROs did not differ by presence/absence of baseline brain metastases. ConclusionsPatients receiving first-line lorlatinib or crizotinib showed improvements and delayed deterioration in QoL, functioning, and several symptoms. Alongside the previously reported significantly longer progression-free survival and higher intracranial response rates for lorlatinib versus crizotinib, these data further support the use of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with/without baseline brain metastases and provide evidence of several QoL improvements with lorlatinib when used in the first-line setting.

Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Brigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to analyze the pooled effects and adverse events of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC. The pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model. The pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of brigatinib were 64% (95% CI 45%-83%) and 88% (95% CI 80%-96%), respectively. The pooled mPFS was 10.52 months (95% CI 7.66-13.37). In the subgroup analyses by treatment line, the highest mPFS was reached in first-line treatment (24.00 months, 95% CI 18.40-43.20), followed by post-crizotinib second-line treatment (mPFS=16.26 months, 95% CI 12.87-19.65), and second-line with any prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mPFS=12.96 months, 95% CI 11.14-14.78). Among patients with any baseline brain metastases, the pooled intracranial ORR (iORR) was estimated as 54% (95% CI 35%-73%) for any treatment line, and 60% (95% CI 39%-81%) for first-line treatment. Intracranial PFS (iPFS) reached 19.26 months (95% CI 14.82-23.70) in patients with any baseline brain metastases. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased (44%, 95% CI 26%-63%), diarrhea (37%, 95% CI 27%-48%), and nausea (28%, 95% CI 17%-39%) of any grade were the most common adverse events. Brigatinibis effective in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, particularly showingrobust intracranial PFS. Brigatinib used as first-line treatment yielded superior PFS compared with brigatinib used as other treatment lines. These results suggested a benefit of using brigatinib earlier in the patient's management. All adverse events are manageable, with CPK increased and gastrointestinal reactions found to be the most common types. https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0142/, identifier (INPLASY202230141).

Lorlatinib: new therapeutic options for ALK-positive patients

In less than 10 years, the standard of drug therapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has changed tremendously. The emphasis on a personalized approach in the choice of treatment tactics in patients with advanced NSCLC yields tangible results. The identification of patients with activating mutations and the administration of targeted therapy to them has significantly improved the results of treatment. Translocations in the ALK gene are classified as rare mutations. As a rule, these are quite young people, non-smokers or with little experience of smoking. One of the characteristic features of ALK-positive NSCLC is frequent metastasis to the CNS, so one of the important criteria for the effectiveness of new drugs is the assessment of their intracranial activity. Lorlatinib is a thirdgeneration tyrosine kinase (TKI) ALK that penetrates the blood-brain barrier well and has a wide spectrum of antitumor activity against most known resistance mutations that appear during targeted therapy with crizotinib and second-generation TKI. Like its predecessors, lorlatinib was initially approved for second- and third-line use in patients already treated sequentially with crizotinib and one of the second-generation drugs, or starting their treatment with a second-generation TCT. After the publication of the results of the randomized comparative study CROWN, which demonstrated a convincing advantage of the drug compared to crizotinib in the first line of treatment, its high intracranial activity, the indications were expanded. Currently, lorlatinib is registered in the Russian Federation for use in ALK-positive patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), both those who have already received targeted therapy for first and/or second generation ALK TKIs, and in untreated patients.

Therapeutic Advances of Rare ALK Fusions in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancer cases and is the leading cause of cancer-related death. Despite advances in chemotherapy and immunotherapy, the prognosis for advanced patients remains poor. The discovery of oncogenic driver mutations, such as anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) mutations, means that a subset of patients has opportunities for targeted therapy. With the improvement of genetic testing coverage, more and more ALK fusion subtypes and ALK partners have been discovered, and more than 90 rare ALK fusion subtypes have been found in NSCLC. However, unlike the common fusion, echinoderm microtubule-associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK, some rare ALK fusions such as striatin (STRN)-ALK and huntingtin interacting protein 1 (HIP1)-ALK, etc., the large-scale clinical data related to its efficacy are still immature. The clinical application of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs) mainly depends on the positivity of the ALK gene, regardless of the molecular characteristics of the fusion partner. Recent clinical studies in the ALK-positive NSCLC population have demonstrated differences in progression-free survival (PFS) among patients based on different ALK fusion subtypes. This article will introduce the biological characteristics of ALK fusion kinase and common detection methods of ALK fusion and focus on summarizing the differential responses of several rare ALK fusions to ALK-TKIs, and propose corresponding treatment strategies, so as to better guide the application of ALK-TKIs in rare ALK fusion population.

Prediction of Resistance Mutations Against Upcoming Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Inhibitors.

Chromosomal aberrations involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene have been observed in approximately 4% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although these patients clinically benefit from treatment with various ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), none of these can inhibit the development of resistance mutations. Considering inevitable drug resistance and the variety of available ALK-TKIs, it is necessary to predict the pattern of drug-resistance mutations to determine the optimal treatment strategy. We aimed to establish a polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based system to predict the development of resistance mutations against ALK-TKIs and identify therapeutic strategies using the upcoming ALK-TKIs repotrectinib (TPX-0005) and ensartinib (X-396) following recurrence on first-line alectinib treatment for ALK-positive NSCLC. An error-prone PCR-based method for predicting drug resistance mutations was established and the half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of the predicted ALK mutations were evaluated in a Ba/F3 cell-based assay. We predicted several resistance mutations against repotrectinib and ensartinib, and demonstrated that the next-generation ALK-TKI TPX-0131, was active against repotrectinib-resistant mutations and that the FLT3 inhibitor gilteritinib was active against ensartinib-resistant mutations. We developed a PCR-based system for predicting drug resistance mutations. When this system was applied to repotrectinib and ensartinib, the results suggested that these drugs can be used for the second-line treatment of ALK-positive NSCLC. Predicting resistance mutations against TKIs will provide useful information to aid in the development of effective therapeutic strategies.