ALK-positive Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Research Articles

39P Evaluation of body mass composition (BMC) changes in metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK-mNSCLC) patients treated with anti-ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (aALK-TKIs): Preliminary results

39P Evaluation of body mass composition (BMC) changes in metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (ALK-mNSCLC) patients treated with anti-ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (aALK-TKIs): Preliminary results

China expert recommendations on anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2024 edition)

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion represents one of pivotal driver genes within the realm of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) have demonstrated remarkable therapeutic efficacy for patients afflicted with ALK-positive NSCLC. As of June 27, 2023, seven ALK-TKI, including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and iruplinalkib, have garnered approval from the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)(ranking according to the approval time for marketing by NMPA), providing individualized treatment modalities for ALK-positive NSCLC patients. To standardize the application of ALK-TKI, the Chinese Association for Clinical Oncologists and the Medical Oncology Branch of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care has organized experts to compile the " China expert recommendations on anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2024 edition)". This treatment expert recommendation provides recommendations in four aspects, encompassing ALK fusion testing, ALK-TKI targeted therapy, ALK-TKI adverse events management, and patient post-treatment follow-up, thus serving as a valuable reference for the standardized treatment of Chinese advanced ALK fusion-positive NSCLC.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of brigatinib followed by lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

The ALTA-1 L trial and EXP-3B arm of NCT01970865 trial found that both brigatinib and lorlatinib showed durable and robust responses in treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, brigatinib and lorlatinib treatments are costly and need indefinite administration until the disease progression. Thus, it remains uncertain whether using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy is cost-effective compared to reserving these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy. We used a Markov model to assess clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of treating ALK-positive NSCLC individuals with brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy versus a strategy of reserving these drugs until progression after chemotherapy. Transition probabilities were estimated using parametric survival modeling based on multiple clinical trials. The drug acquisition costs, adverse events costs, administration costs were extracted from published studies before and publicly available data. We calculated lifetime direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of a United States payer. Our base-case analysis indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of using first-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib compared with second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib is $-400,722.09/QALY which meant that second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib had less costs and better outcomes. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the results were most sensitive to the cost of brigatinib. Probability sensitivity analysis revealed that using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy had a 0% probability of cost-effectiveness versus delaying these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses conducted revealed the robustness of this result, as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios never exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold. Using brigatinib as first-line treatment followed by lorlatinib for ALK-positive NSCLC may not be cost-effective given current pricing from the perspective of a United States payer. Delaying brigatinib followed by lorlatinib until subsequent lines of treatment may be a reasonable strategy that could limit healthcare costs without affecting clinical outcomes. More mature data are needed to better estimate cost-effectiveness in this setting.

HER3 overexpression: a predictive marker for poor prognosis in advanced ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer treated with ALK inhibitors.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) improve patient survival; however, some patients develop ALK-TKI resistance with unidentified mechanisms. We investigated ErbB family and c-MET expression in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) to understand their roles in the ALK-TKI response. We studied 72 patients with advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with EML4-ALK fusion variant subtyping and immunostaining for c-MET, EGFR, HER2, and HER3 on tissue specimens both pre- (primary) and post-treatment (secondary) with ALK-TKI. We investigated the association of their expression with survival outcomes and assessed the effectiveness of combining ALK and EGFR inhibitors in ALK-positive NSCLC cell lines stimulated with the HER3-specific ligand HRG1. High expression of c-MET, EGFR, HER2, and HER3 was observed in 4.9%, 18.0%, 1.6%, and 25.8% of primary tumors, respectively, and 18.5%, 37.0%, 10.7%, and 35.7% of secondary tumors, respectively. HER3 overexpression in primary tumors showed inferior survival (P=0.132). In the subgroup with EML4-ALK variant 1/2 (V1/V2), HER3 overexpression was significantly associated with inferior survival in both primary and secondary tumors (P=0.022 and P=0.004, respectively). Combination treatment with lorlatinib and erlotinib significantly reduced HRG1-induced activation of RTK signaling in ALK-positive NSCLC cells. HER3 overexpression has potential as a prognostic marker in ALK-positive NSCLCs, including ALK-TKI naïve and treated cases, especially those with EML4-ALK V1/V2. Assessing HER3 expression may be crucial for treatment planning and outcome prediction in these patients.

Economic Evaluation of Targeted Therapies for Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase- and ROS1 Fusion-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in India.

Targeted therapies, such as crizotinib and ceritinib, have shown promising results in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific oncogenic drivers like anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), c-ros (ROS1) oncogene, etc. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of these therapies for patients with NSCLC in India. The Markov model consisted of three health states: progression-free survival, progressive disease, and death. Lifetime costs and consequences were estimated for three treatment arms: crizotinib, ceritinib, and chemotherapy for patients with ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with crizotinib and ceritinib was compared to chemotherapy and assessed using a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time per capita gross domestic product in India. The total lifetime cost per patient for ALK-positive NSCLC was ₹332,456 ($4,054 US dollars [USD]), ₹1,284,100 ($15,659 USD), and ₹2,337,779 ($28,509 USD) in the chemotherapy, crizotinib, and ceritinib arms, respectively. The mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.20, 2.21, and 3.34, respectively. For patients with ROS1-positive NSCLC, the total cost was ₹323,011 ($3,939 USD) and ₹1,763,541 ($21,507 USD) for chemotherapy and crizotinib, with mean QALYs lived per patient of 1.16 and 2.73, respectively. Nearly 92% and 81% reduction in the price of ceritinib and crizotinib is required to make it a cost-effective treatment option for ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC, respectively. Our study findings suggest that the prices of ceritinib and crizotinib need to be reduced significantly to justify their value for inclusion in India's publicly financed health insurance scheme for treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic ALK- and ROS1-positive NSCLC, respectively.

Lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis detected dual fusion of LOC399815-ALK and ALK-EML4 in combined treatment of Alectinib and CyberKnife: A case report.

The anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion occurs in approximately 3% to 7% of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in which occurs approximately 23% to 31% of brain metastasis patients in poor prognosis. ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors have shown efficacy in treating ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. More than 90 distinct subtypes of ALK fusions have been identified through sequencing technique and would lead to significant differences in clinical efficacy, it is necessary to guide clinical treatment effectively by gene detection. A 56-year-old nonsmoking female admitted to hospital due to cough, expectoration, and chest pain. Chest computed tomography revealed a space-occupying lesion in the upper left lobe (5.0 cm × 2.4 cm × 2.9 cm), multiple enlarged lymph nodes in mediastinum 3A and 5 (largest size 1.5 cm × 1.4 cm), and evidence of thoracic vertebral metastasis, brain magnetic resonance imaging also showed brain metastasis. Lung adenocarcinoma with brain metastasis. The patient initially received conventional first-line chemotherapy, which led to a deteriorated condition. Blood-base liquid biopsy by next-generation sequencing resulted in double ALK fusions, in which with a neo-partner of lncRNA (LOC399815-ALK). Following subsequent treatment with Alectinib and stereotactic radiotherapy (CyberKnife) was subsequently employed to manage the brain metastatic lesions, resulting in a substantial decreased in both the number and size of tumor lesions. The patient's response to therapy efficacy resulted in a substantial decreased in both the number and size of tumor lesions that assessed comprehensively evaluated through computed tomography imaging and ctDNA sequencing. Patient's condition has been under control for over 29 months. Liquid biopsy may reveal the rare fusion forms of ALK, precisely guiding personalized treatment, and providing a reference method for longitudinal monitoring and efficacy evaluation of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors in NSCLC patients.

A computational examination of the therapeutic advantages of fourth-generation ALK inhibitors TPX-0131 and repotrectinib over third-generation lorlatinib for NSCLC with ALK F1174C/L/V mutations.

Background: In non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), a pivotal factor in promoting cancer development is the rearrangement in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase ALK gene, resulting in elevated ALK protein expression. F1174C/L/V is the acquired secondary resistant mutation in ALK. Significant survival improvements have been seen while tyrosine kinase inhibitors specifically target ALK. Nevertheless, the emergence of drug resistance hinders the clinical effectiveness of these drugs. Objective: This research sought to find the binding affinity/inhibitory effects of the existing drug lorlatinib (LOR) and upcoming TPX-0131 (zotizalkib/TPX) and repotrectinib (TPX-0005/REP) inhibitors against ALK F1174C/L/V mutations using computational approaches to identify potential strategies over resistance. Methods: We conducted molecular docking, molecular dynamics simulation, and MMPBSA calculations to investigate how compact macrocyclic inhibitors, such as TPX-0131 and repotrectinib, fit within the ATP-binding boundary and differ from LOR. Results: Our results demonstrated that TPX-0131 and repotrectinib contributed to higher binding energy in F1174C and F1174L mutations than LOR. Repotrectinib showed greater binding energy in the F1174V mutation, whereas LOR and TPX-0131 exhibited similar binding energy. However, all three inhibitors showed significant binding energy toward F1174C/L/V mutations found in NSCLC. Conclusion: This comparative study of the potential binding effects of fourth-generation inhibitors TPX-0131 and repotrectinib and third-generation inhibitor LOR for ALK F1174C/L/V mutations revealed the atomistic insights of the binding mechanism. These computational findings enable us to carry out further research for the clinical implementation of fourth-generation ALK inhibitors on ALK-positive NSCLC.

Real-world evidence of lorlatinib therapy in Taiwanese patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BackgroundLorlatinib is a brain-penetrant, third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor indicated for ALK-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In a global phase II study, patients who experience disease progression despite prior treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was assessed. Herein, we report real-world clinical outcomes of lorlatinib-treated patients with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC who were heavily pretreated and progressed on first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, in a Taiwanese population under the lorlatinib expanded access program (EAP). MethodsThis multicenter observational study examined the effectiveness and safety of ALK-positive advanced NSCLC patients that progressed from previous second-generation ALK-TKI therapy and received lorlatinib treatment subsequently. Patients who received lorlatinib treatment under EAP between Jul 2017 and Sep 2019 were eligible. Patients were followed for at least one year from the first lorlatinib treatment until study completion. ResultsSixty-three patients were eligible for safety analysis (male: 46.0 %; median age: 52.8 [27.5–78.3] years; brain metastases: 81.0 %). Fifty-four patients with more than one-month lorlatinib treatment were included in the effectiveness analysis. Prior to lorlatinib treatment, 10 patients (18.5 %) received one ALK-TKI, 27 (50.0 %) received two ALK-TKIs, and 17 (31.5 %) received three or more ALK-TKIs. The overall median rwPFS was 9.2 months (95 % confidence interval: 5.3–21.1). The best overall response rate (n = 51) was 13.7 %, with a disease control rate of 80.4 %. ConclusionLorlatinib exhibits substantial activity and tolerability when used clinically in a later-line setting in a Taiwanese population with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC.

Long-Term Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib in Japanese Patients With ALK-Positive Advanced NSCLC—A Brief Report From the CROWN Study

IntroductionLorlatinib was found to have improved efficacy versus crizotinib in the global phase 3 CROWN study (NCT03052608). Similar results were revealed for the Japanese population as for the overall population. We present results from the unplanned 3-year follow-up from the CROWN study in Japanese patients. MethodsPatients were randomized to either lorlatinib 100 mg once daily (n = 25) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily (n = 23). The primary end point was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. Secondary end points included objective and intracranial responses assessed by blinded independent central review and safety. ResultsAt the data cutoff of September 20, 2021, median progression-free survival was not reached with lorlatinib and 11.1 months with crizotinib (hazard ratio = 0.36). Objective response rate was 72.0% with lorlatinib and 52.2% with crizotinib. For patients with baseline brain metastases, intracranial response rate was 100.0% versus 28.6% with lorlatinib versus crizotinib. Nine patients in the lorlatinib group received more than or equal to 1 subsequent anticancer systemic therapy, with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor as the most common first subsequent therapy. The safety profile was consistent with that reported previously, with no new safety signals. ConclusionsThis updated analysis in the Japanese population revealed prolonged benefits of lorlatinib over crizotinib in patients with treatment-naive advanced ALK-positive NSCLC with and those without brain metastases.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of 6 Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors as First-Line Treatment for ALK-Positive NSCLC in China.

Lung cancer ranks first in both cancer incidence and mortality in China. The emergence of novel treatments for ALK-positive NSCLC led to an improvement in survival and quality of life for patients with advanced ALK mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study sought to assess the cost-effectiveness of 6 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)-crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, ensartinib, and lorlatinib-as first-line treatments for ALK-positive NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese health care system. A Markov model was developed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these 6 TKIs. In this model, ALK-positive NSCLC patients were initially simulated to receive 1 of the 6 TKIs as first-line therapy, followed by different TKIs as subsequent treatment and salvage chemotherapy as last-line treatment. Survival data were sourced from the latest published clinical trials. Costs were derived from recent national health insurance negotiations and hospital information systems of selected health care facilities. Utilities for healthy states and adverse events were obtained from the literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis as well as scenario analysis was conducted to assess the robustness of the results. Compared to ensartinib, crizotinib, alectinib, ceritinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib demonstrated incremental quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of -1.13, 0.39, -0.58, -0.09, and 0.35, respectively. The corresponding incremental costs were $10 677, $33 501, -$6426, $2672, and $24 358. This resulted in ICERs of -$9449/QALY, $85 900/QALY, $11 079/QALY, $29 689/QALY and $69 594/QALY, respectively. Crizotinib was considered to be absolutely dominated by ensartinib. Under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $38 223/QALY, ceritinib and brigatinib were cost-effective compared with ensartinib, while lorlatinib and alectinib were not cost-effective when compared with ensartinib. Overall, brigatinib emerged as the most cost-effective treatment among all the options considered.

Alectinib continuation beyond progression in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer with alectinib-refractory.

Alectinib, a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI), has demonstrated noteworthy efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, 53.3% of untreated patients receiving first-line treatment with alectinib developed resistance to alectinib. However, despite the widespread use of alectinib, studies on the efficacy and safety of continuing alectinib with other necessary therapies after progression of alectinib and possible population of benefit are still limited. This retrospective cohort study included fifteen patients with ALK-positive NSCLC from nine institutions in China who experienced disease progression after first- or second-line treatment and continued to receive alectinib treatment between 2019 and 2022. This study aimed to evaluate the median progression-free survival (mPFS), objective response rate (ORR), median overall survival (mOS), and adverse events (AEs) of continuing alectinib combined with other therapies after the emergence of drug resistance. Among fifteen patients eligible for this study, all patients started continuing treatment with alectinib after oligoprogression or central nervous system (CNS) progression. The mPFS for the whole cohort receiving continuing alectinib with other necessary therapies was 8 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 4 to not applicable (NA)], with an ORR of 46.7%. The mOS was not reached. During continuing alectinib treatment, only one patient experienced grade 2 elevation of aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT). The continuation of alectinib treatment combined with other necessary therapies demonstrates favorable response and safety in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC who experienced oligoprogression or CNS progression following alectinib in first- or second-line therapy. Instead of immediately switching to another ALK-TKI, continuing alectinib combined with other necessary therapies may offer greater survival benefits to the patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Crizotinib Readministration in Patients with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement: Case Report and Review of Literature

AbstractRecent studies have demonstrated promising outcomes of the first-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ALK-TKI) “crizotinib” in patients with locally advanced and metastatic lung cancers with high expression of the fusion protein “EML4-ALK.” High drug resistance, however, restricts the therapeutic advantages of ALK-TKIs in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The contemporary literature documents limited treatment approaches for patients with NSCLC relapse or nonresponsiveness to second-/third-generation ALK-TKIs. We hereby provide a descriptive analysis of five NSCLC cases treated with crizotinib, ceritinib, and alectinib for a median duration of 54 months. The outcomes indicate a profound therapeutic response in patients receiving 4th and subsequent line of treatment with crizotinib. The crizotinib retreatment actively reduced patient resistance to the ALK-TKIs by reversing the mesenchymal epithelial transition amplification. The results from this case series also emphasize the possible role of next-generation sequencing in determining therapeutic resistance and transforming the treatment paradigm for NSCLC. Partial response was observed in the patients after 6 months of crizotinib readministration. This is possibly the first case series reporting crizotinib rechallenge in patients of ALK positive NSCLC who failed on subsequent ALK-TKIs and multiple lines of chemotherapies.

Identification of Crucial Genes and Signaling Pathways in Alectinib-Resistant Lung Adenocarcinoma Using Bioinformatic Analysis.

Alectinib, a second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor, has been shown to be effective for patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, alectinib resistance is a serious problem worldwide. To the best of our knowledge, little information is available on its molecular mechanisms using the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database. In this study, the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected from the gene expression profile GSE73167 between parental and alectinib-resistant human lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) cell samples. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway and Gene Ontology (GO) annotation enrichment analyses were conducted using Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). The construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) network was performed to visualize DEGs. The hub genes were extracted based on the analysis of the PPI network using plug-in cytoHubba of Cytoscape software. The functional roles of the key genes were investigated using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA), University of Alabama at Birmingham Cancer (UALCAN), Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA), and Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) analysis. The networks of kinase, miRNA, and transcription-factor targets of SFTPD were explored using LinkedOmics. The drug sensitivity analysis of SFTPD was analyzed using the RNAactDrug database. Results showed a total of 144 DEGs were identified. Five hub genes were extracted, including mucin 5B (MUC5B), surfactant protein D (SFTPD), deleted in malignant brain tumors 1 (DMBT1), surfactant protein A2 (SFTPA2), and trefoil factor 3 (TFF3). The survival analysis using GEPIA displayed that low expression of SFTPD had a significantly negative effect on the prognosis of patients with LUAD. GSEA revealed that low expression of SFTPD was positively correlated with the pathways associated with drug resistance, such as DNA replication, cell cycle, drug metabolism, and DNA damage repair, including mismatch repair (MMR), base excision repair (BER), homologous recombination (HR), and nucleotide excision repair (NER). The SFTPD expression was negatively correlated with the drug sensitivity of alectinib according to RNAactDrug database. The expression of SFTPD was further validated in parental H3122 cells and alectinib-resistant H3122 cells by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (RT-qPCR). In conclusion, our study found that the five hub genes, especially low expression of SFTPD, are closely related to alectinib resistance in patients with LUAD.

Ensartinib is effective in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with MET amplification after multi-line ALK-TKIs resistance: a case report.

Although patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are initially effective on treatment with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), resistance will inevitably develop. Of these patients, 2/3 will develop ALK-independent resistance and little is known about the mechanisms of ALK-independent resistance. In pre-clinical studies, the activation of several bypass signaling pathways has been implicated in the development of resistance, including the MET, EGFR, SRC and IGF1R pathways. Among these, the MET pathway is one of the signaling pathways that has recently been extensively studied, and activation of this pathway is one of the mechanisms of ALK-independent drug resistance. Here, we report a successful case of an advanced NSCLC patient who was resistant to treatment with ALK TKIs and developed MET amplification, who achieved 23 months of progression-free survival after post-line treatment with ensartinib.

Dissecting the role of ALK double mutations in drug resistance to lorlatinib with in-depth theoretical modeling and analysis

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) is implicated in the genesis of multiple malignant tumors. Lorlatinib stands out as the most advanced and effective inhibitor currently used in the clinic for the treatment of ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer. However, resistance to lorlatinib has inevitably manifested over time, with double/triple mutations of G1202, L1196, L1198, C1156 and I1171 frequently observed in clinical practice, and tumors regrow within a short time after treatment with lorlatinib. Therefore, elucidating the mechanism of resistance to lorlatinib is paramount in paving the way for innovative therapeutic strategies and the development of next-generation drugs. In this study, we leveraged multiple computational methodologies to delve into the resistance mechanisms of three specific double mutations of ALKG1202R/L1196M, ALKG1202R/L1198F and ALKI1171N/L1198F to lorlatinib. We analyzed these mechanisms through qualitative (PCA, DCCM) and quantitative (MM/GBSA, US) kinetic analyses. The qualitative analysis shows that these mutations exert minimal perturbations on the conformational dynamics of the structural domains of ALK. The energetic and structural assessments show that the van der Waals interactions, formed by the conserved residue Leu1256 within the ATP-binding site and the residues Glu1197 and Met1199 in the hinge domain with lorlatinib, play integral roles in the occurrence of drug resistance. Furthermore, the US simulation results elucidate that the pathways through which lorlatinib dissociates vary across mutant systems, and the distinct environments during the dissociation process culminate in diverse resistance mechanisms. Collectively, these insights provide important clues for the design of novel inhibitors to combat resistance.

Management strategies for intracranial progression in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world cohort study.

ALK-positive NSCLC patients exhibit a particularly high propensity for the development of brain metastases. Current guidelines suggest transit to next-line therapy (SysTx) or local radiotherapy (RadTx) including whole-brain radiotherapy and radiosurgery. However, the clinical impact of these two strategies remains unclear. We conducted a retrospective analysis focusing on patients with stage IV ALK-positive NSCLC who underwent first-line ALK TKI treatment. Patients with intracranial progression may receive two different treatment strategies: SysTx and RadTx. Our objective was to investigate the outcomes associated with these two distinct treatment pathways. A total 20 patients of ALK-positive NSCLC who received first-line ALK TKI therapy and subsequently developed intracranial progression were enrolled. About 55% of patients had brain metastasis initially. Nine patients (45%) were treated with crizotinib at first. Patients treated with crizotinib demonstrated a significantly shorter intracranial PFS1 (crizotinib: 8.27 months vs. others: 27.0 months, p = 0.006). Following intracranial progression, approximately 60% of patients transitioned to the next line of systemic treatment (SysTx), while the remaining 40% opted for local cranial radiotherapy (RadTx). Intriguingly, our analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in intracranial progression-free survival (PFS2) between these two distinct treatment strategies. (SysTx: 20.87 months vs. RadTx: 28.23 months, p = 0.461). The intracranial progression-free survival showed no difference between the two strategies suggesting that both local radiotherapy and systemic therapy may be valid options. Individualized strategy, molecular analysis, and multidisciplinary conferences may all play a pivotal role in decision-making.

Comparing efficacy and safety of upfront treatment strategies for anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a network meta-analysis

Aim: This article is based on our previous research, which was presented as a post at the Congress Aiom 2022 Congress and published in Tumori Journal as Conference Abstract (Tumori J. 2022;108:1–194. doi: 10.1177/03008916221114500). In this paper, a comprehensive presentation of all the achieved results is provided. Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been investigated to treat patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, direct comparisons between these TKIs are lacking, with many only being compared to crizotinib. To address this gap, a network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and safety of various first-line systemic therapies for ALK-positive NSCLC. Methods: A thorough search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published between January 01, 2000 and April 01, 2022, and included trials that investigated upfront treatments for this molecular subgroup and reported overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) of grade 3 or higher (grade ≥ 3 AEs). Results: The analysis included 9 RCTs with 2,443 patients receiving eight different treatments: alectinib (at two different dosages), brigatinib, ceritinib, crizotinib, ensartinib, lorlatinib, and chemotherapy. Second and third-generation TKIs significantly prolonged PFS compared to crizotinib, with lorlatinib having the highest probability of yielding the most favorable PFS, followed by alectinib (300 mg or 600 mg). However, only alectinib has been shown to significantly prolong OS compared to crizotinib to date. Lorlatinib appears superior in reducing the risk of central nervous system (CNS) progression, followed by alectinib 600 mg. Ceritinib had the highest rate of AEs, followed by lorlatinib and brigatinib. Conclusions: Based on the network meta-analysis, alectinib and lorlatinib emerged as the most promising upfront treatment options. These treatments provide prolonged disease control while maintaining an acceptable safety profile.

First-line treatment option for patients with ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) that occupies a leading place in the pattern of cancer incidence and mortality is a highly heterogeneous group of diseases. The presence of a wide spectrum of NSCLC driver mutations has led to a fundamentally different understanding of the treatment strategy for this cohort of patients and a significant improvement in long-term oncological outcomes, even in the metastatic process. Chromosomal rearrangements involving the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene loci on chromosome 2 are found in approximately 3–5% of patients with metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) and in most cases are associated not only with a number of specific clinical features, but also with high sensitivity to targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI). Crizotinib was the first approved ALK inhibitor, but although most patients achieved response within the first two years after start of the treatment, disease progression occurred often due to intracranial injury. The development of second-(ceritinib, alectinib), brigatinib and third-generation (lorlatinib) drugs has led to a statistically significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) rates, as well as control over intracranial manifestations of the disease and a change in the initial treatment strategy for these patients. In addition, new-generations of TKIs were developed to solve the problem of acquired resistance, as well as to achieve the best outcomes in the presence of such unfavourable factors as the presence of a TP53 mutation and/or ALK inhibitor low-sensitive translocation variants of the intracellular kinase domain of EML4 (echinoderm microtubule‐associated protein‐like 4)‐ALK (anaplastic lymphoma kinase) protein. Thus, advances in the therapeutic options for ALK-positive mNSCLC has completely changed the course of the disease, resulting in a significant increase in overall survival (OS) rates not only with the sequential use of different generation TKIs, but also with the choice of the most effective first-line option. In this article, we present an analysis of data on the efficacy and toxicity of lorlatinib, a third-generation TKI, in the first-line treatment for ALK+ mNSCLC.

Real-World Data on Treatment Outcome of ALK-Positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from an Indian Multicentric Cancer Registry.

Lalatendu Moharana The Anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors (ALKi) represent the standard of care for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EML4-ALK rearrangements. Various ALKi agents are available; however, not all eligible patients receive treatment with them due to various reasons. Given the limited real-world data available in our country, we aimed to assess treatment outcomes through a multicenter collaboration. This retrospective, multi-institutional study was conducted under the Network of Oncology Clinical Trials India and included a total of 67 ALK-positive metastatic lung cancer patients from 10 institutes across India, with a median follow-up of 23 months. In the first line setting, the objective response rate (ORR) with ALKi was 63.6% (crizotinib: 60.7%, ceritinib: 70%, alectinib: 66.6%, p = 0.508), while with chemotherapy, it was 26.1%. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for the first line ALKi group was significantly higher than that for chemotherapy (19 vs. 9 months, p = 0.00, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.30, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.17-0.54). The mPFS for crizotinib, alectinib, and ceritinib was 17, 22, and 19 months, respectively ( p = 0.48). Patients who received ALKi upfront or after 1 to 3 cycles of chemotherapy or after 4 or more cycles of chemotherapy had mPFS of 16, 22, and 23 months, respectively ( p = 0.47). ALKi showed superior mPFS compared to chemotherapy in the second line (14 vs. 5 months; p = 0.002) and the third line (20 vs. 4 months; p = 0.009). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly better in patients who received ALKi in any line of therapy (44 vs. 14 months, p < 0.001, HR = 0.10, 95% CI: 0.04-0.23). Brain progression was higher among those who did not receive ALKi (69.2 vs. 31.5%). In conclusion, the use of ALKi as first line treatment for ALK-positive metastatic NSCLC patients resulted in improved PFS. PFS and ORR did not significantly differ between patients who received ALKi upfront or after initiating chemotherapy. Notably, patients who received ALKi in second or later lines demonstrated significantly better outcomes compared to those receiving chemotherapy. The use of ALKi in any line of therapy was associated with significantly prolonged OS.

Efficacy of alectinib in comparison with lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: pharmacoeconomic study

Objective: to evaluate the clinical and economic effectiveness of alectinib in comparison with lorlatinib in adult patients with advanced anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Materials and methods. The calculations included the direct costs of the healthcare system: the costs of drug therapy, detecting and relieving adverse events, palliative care. A Markov model consisting of three patient states (“alive without progression”, “alive with progression”, “death”) was constructed, the probabilities of which were obtained from previously conducted clinical studies. Due to the equivalence of strategies regarding overall and non-progressive survival, the cost minimization analysis was applied.Results. The total costs per 1 patient when using lorlatinib were 40.63% higher than for alectinib (12,551,770 and 7,451,522 rubles, respectively). At the same time, the difference was mainly determined by different costs of targeted therapy: in the alectinib group, the cost of drug therapy per 1 patient amounted to 6,646,247 rubles, in lorlatinib group – to 11,922,814 rubles (44% higher).Conclusion. The use of alectinib in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC is justified not only from clinical, but also from an economic point of view.