Frames What can be said to, about, and with the categories of self and other in relation to visual art that has not already been said? Given the discursive contexts in which the explorations of and debates about the status of the self and other must be undertaken, where can these go? Because of the vast context of identity politics and politics concerning the construction and representation of selfhood and otherness, found in fields ranging from philosophy to critical theory to literary and cultural studies to psychoanalysis, ethnic, feminist/gender and postcolonial studies, it is clearly no longer possible, desirable or productive to frame debates around representation in terms of self and other as clear-cut, distinguishable categories. Likewise, given the plethora of theoretical positions which has been covered regarding the ethics of representing, speaking for, of, and with the other, this terrain seems well worn to the point of exhaustion. Therefore, with specific reference to South African artistic production over approximately the past decade, in this themed edition the question as to whether there may be 'new' ways of conceptualising selfhood and otherness emerging in visual representation is posed, and if so, what forms might these take? In a panel discussion held at the Johannesburg Art Gallery on 12 April 2008, (1) Sarah Nuttall, taking a lead from Jacques Derrida and Homi K. Bhabha, commented that a point has been reached in South African visual culture where perhaps debates and artistic expressions might rather consider concerns about to whom, of whom and how we are speaking. She proposed that this might be a way of imaging the future in South Africa and globally. It is for this reason that the title 'The address of the other' has been chosen. The use of the word 'address' is intended to connote all of the following: dialogic acts of speaking; an engagement with issues (dealing with, attending to, focusing on, taking up, adopting), referential acts (referring to, gesturing towards, indicating), and the location of speaking (where one is, literally and figuratively, when one speaks- the address of one's address). Although phrased in the singular (the other), it is with the acknowledgement that addresses by and for the other are always multiple, but that in each instance, the address is a singular occurrence. 'The address' encompasses both the self and other speaking; those in-between spaces of interchange and how we speak to and of each other (that is, how the other addresses one, pointing along the continuum of that interchange towards how one addresses the other). The address is also the codified (or possibly even informal or illegal or legislated) site where the other dwells. The thematic title of the edition thus suggests a working through of discussions/ conversations/engagements with the possible explorations and 'calls' or 'addresses' of home/site/space and/or place. Following on Nuttall's observation, the articles in this issue combine in an attempt to skirt the narrowing or rote means for addressing these continuing and necessary problems surrounding the construction of identities as well as the self in relation to the other in South African visual art. The post-1994 South African political dispensation and the consequent ever-changing socio-political environment have called into question (and continue to call into question) power dynamics in the interplay between racial groupings previously legislatively categorised as 'black', 'white' and 'coloured'. While the post-apartheid context is reflective of global concerns regarding identity formation and the politics of representation, (2) the articles and artworks discussed in this edition are emergent from South Africa's particular historicity of apartheid, and yet, simultaneously, reflect the diversity of transforming conceptions of South African identities (individual and collective), which hold such currency in its post-1994 democracy. …