Introduction: Despite the use of guideline based selection criteria between 10 to 20% of patients will be non-responders to CRT. We evaluated the predictors of response using pre-implant clinical, echocardiographic, 12L advanced ECG (A-ECG) and the application of machine learning. Methods: 61 consecutive patients referred for CRT were identified. Digital ECG files were processed using a novel algorithm, echocardiographic metadata, clinical factors and outcomes were sourced from electronic clinical records. Statistical analysis using Medcalc and Microsoft Azure Machine Learning (ML) was applied. Results: 15 (26%) patients were considered non-responders, based on clinical and echocardiographic criteria. Non-responders had lower stroke volume, LV mass, as well as larger LVESD and LVOT area. A-ECG univariate predictors of response included QTc (AUC 0.74, 95%CI 0.6 - 0.8, p = 0.0007), QRS area and vectorcardiographic markers of RV dysfunction. A neural network of 4 ECG features yielded an AUC 0.77 compared with an AUC of 0.56 using a control feature set of traditional CRT selection criteria (cardiomyopathy type, QRSd, LVEF, and AF presence). Conclusion: Numerous clinical features are associated with CRT nonresponse. Of these, QTc had the highest discriminatory ability, though this was enhanced with multivariate ML.
Read full abstract