Advanced Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

Liposomal irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and S-1 as first-line therapy for patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (NASOX): A multicenter phase I/IIa study

IntroductionThis multicenter phase I/IIa study aimed to determine the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) and evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of liposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI), oxaliplatin, and S-1 (NASOX) as first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. MethodsPatients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease, aged ≥ 19 years, with measurable disease, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–1 were eligible. The primary endpoints were to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the phase I cohort and overall response rate (ORR) in the phase IIa cohort. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included patients who received the RP2D. ResultsIn phase I, seven patients were screened, and six were assessed for DLT. None experienced DLT during the first cycle. The RP2D was determined as nal-IRI 50 mg/m2 and oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on day 1, S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1–7 every 14 days. For the ITT (N = 41; 7, and 34 from phases I and IIa, respectively), the most common grade 3–4 treatment-emergent adverse events were neutropenia (31.7 %), enterocolitis (9.8 %), anorexia (7.3 %), and diarrhea (2.4 %). The ORR was 58.5 % (1 complete, and 23 partial responses). Two underwent conversion surgery; both achieved R0 resection. With median follow-up of 17.5 months, median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95 % confidence interval [CI], 5.0–8.1) and median overall survival was 11.4 months (95 % CI, 9.8–15.5). ConclusionNASOX exhibited a manageable safety profile and encouraging efficacy outcomes consistent with NALIRIFOX, showing potential to replace infusional 5-fluorouracil with oral S-1 in the triplet regimen.

Disparities in neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with vascular involvement

BackgroundMultiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has been linked with improved survival for locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the existence of disparities in its utilization remains to be elucidated. MethodsAll adults with PDAC were tabulated from the 2011–2017 Nationwide Cancer Database. Tumor vascular involvement was determined using the clinical T stage and CS_EXTENSION variables. The significance of temporal trends was calculated using Cuzick's non-parametric test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of NAT utilization on hazard of two-year mortality. A logistic regression model was developed to determine factors associated with receipt of NAT. ResultsOf 3811 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.8 % received NAT. NAT utilization significantly increased over the study period, from 31.7 % in 2011 to 81.1 % in 2017 (p < 0.001). NAT was associated with significantly reduced two-year mortality (Hazards Ratio 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.18–0.67).After adjustment, younger (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 0.97/year, CI 0.96–0.98) and Black (AOR 0.65, CI 0.48–0.89; ref: White) patients demonstrated reduced odds of NAT. Furthermore, patients with Medicare (AOR 0.73, CI 0.59–0.90; ref: Private) or Medicaid insurance (AOR 0.67, CI 0.46–0.97; ref: Private) had lower odds of NAT, as did those treated at non-academic institutions (Community: AOR 0.42, CI 0.35–0.52, Integrated: 0.68, CI 0.54–0.85) or in the lowest education quartile (AOR 0.52, CI 0.29–0.95; ref: Highest). ConclusionsWe identified increasing utilization of NAT for BR/LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite being linked with significantly reduced two-year mortality, socioeconomic disparities affect odds of NAT.

Pancreatectomy with En Bloc Superior Mesenteric Vein and All Its Tributaries Resection without PV/SMV Reconstruction for "Low" Locally Advanced Pancreatic Head Cancer.

The "vein definition" for locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (LA PDAC) assumes portal-to-superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) unreconstructability due to tumor involvement or occlusion. Radical pancreatectomies with SMV resection without PV/SMV reconstruction are scarcely discussed in the literature. Retrospective analysis of 19 radical pancreatectomies for "low" LA PDAC with SMV and all its tributaries resection without PV/SMV reconstruction has shown zero mortality; overall morbidity-56%; Dindo-Clavien-3-10.5%; R0-rate-82%; mean operative procedure time-355 ± 154 min; mean blood loss-330 ± 170 mL; delayed gastric emptying-25%; and clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula-8%. In three cases, surgery was associated with superior mesenteric (n2) and common hepatic artery (n1) resection. Surgery was completed without vein reconstruction (n13) and with inferior mesenteric-to-splenic anastomosis (n6). There were no cases of liver, gastric, or intestinal ischemia. A specific complication of the SMV resection without reconstruction was 2-3 days-long intestinal edema (48%). Median overall survival was 25 months, and median progression-free survival was 18 months. All the relapses, except two, were distant. The possibility of successful SMV resection without PV/SMV reconstruction can be predicted before surgery by CT-based reconstructions. The mandatory anatomical conditions for the procedure were as follows: (1) preserved SMV-SV confluence; (2) occluded SMV for any reason (tumor or thrombus); (3) well-developed inferior mesenteric vein collaterals with dilated intestinal veins; (4) no right-sided vein collaterals; and (5) no varices in the upper abdomen. Conclusion: "Low" LA PDACs involving SMV with all its tributaries can be radically and safely resected in highly and specifically selected cases without PV/SMV reconstruction with an acceptable survival rate.

Efficacy and side effects of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs. chemotherapy alone in patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: A meta‑analysis.

Recently, the treatment plan of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was regarded as a promising treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC). However, the efficacy and side effects of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy still lack evidence-based medical evidence to support. Therefore, a meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the hot issue. By searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, any randomized clinical studies of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC/GEJC met the inclusion criteria were included. The quality of the literature was evaluated and the data was extracted. A correlative software was also used to analyze the data and to draw a conclusion. After screening 14,015 studies, four studies were eligible for the meta-analysis. Compared with chemotherapy alone group, the overall survival (OS) rate was significantly longer. In programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) combined positive score (CPS) ≥1 subgroup and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup analyses, the results showed that the response rate (RR) and complete response rate (CR) were both higher in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group compared with chemotherapy alone group. There were not significant differences in the CR, the treatment-related adverse events, succumbed to drug-related events and succumbed to immune-mediated events between the two groups. However, the effect events such as the treatment-related adverse events led to discontinuation, the 3-5 treatment-related adverse events and the immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions were more common in pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy group. In conclusion, the current meta-analysis revealed that, in treating advanced GC/GEJC, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had improved therapeutic efficacies than chemotherapy alone, as evidenced by the significantly longer OS. Furthermore, the patients in PD-L1 CPS ≥1 subgroup and PD-L1 CPS ≥10 subgroup appeared to benefit from pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy treatment because of higher RR and CR. However, side effects such as the treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation, the 3-5 treatment-related adverse events, and immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions deserved more attention.

Organoids for Functional Precision Medicine in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

BackgroundPatient-derived organoids (PDO) are promising tumor avatars that could enable ex vivo drug tests to personalize patients’ treatment in the frame of functional precision oncology (FPM). Yet, clinical evidence remain scarce. This study aims to evaluate whether PDO can be implemented in clinical practice to benefit patients with advanced refractory pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MethodsDuring 2021-2022, 87 patients were prospectively enrolled in an IRB-approved protocol. Inclusion criteria were: histologically-confirmed PDAC, tumor site accessible. A panel of 25 approved antitumor therapies (chemogram) was tested and compared to patient responses to assess PDO predictive values and map the drug sensitivity landscape in PDAC. ResultsFifty-four PDOs were generated from 87 pretreated patients (take-on rate 62%). The main PDO mutations were KRAS (96%), TP53 (88%) and CDKN2A/B (22%), with 91% concordance rate with their tumor of origin. The mean turnaround-time to chemogram was 6.8 weeks. In 91% of cases, ≥1 hit was identified (gemcitabine (n=20/54), docetaxel (n=18/54) and vinorelbine (n=17/54) with a median of 3 hits/patient [range:0-12]).Our cohort included 34 evaluable patients with full clinical follow-up. We report a chemogram sensitivity of 83.3% and specificity of 92.9%. The overall-response rate and progression-free survival were higher when patients received a “hit” treatment as compared to patients that received a “non-hit” drug (as part of routine management).Finally, we leveraged our PDO collection as a platform for drug validation and combo identification. We tested the anti-KRASG12D (MRTX1133), alone or combined, and identified a specific synergy with anti-EGFR therapies in KRASG12D variants. ConclusionWe report the largest prospective study aiming at implementing PDO-based FPM and identify very robust predictive values in this clinical setting. In a clinically relevant turnaround-time, we identify putative hits for 91% of patients, providing unexpected potential survival benefits in this very aggressive indication. While this remains to be confirmed in interventional precision oncology trials, PDO collection already provide powerful opportunities for drugs and combinatorial treatment development.

Prospective randomized multicenter phase III trial comparing perioperative chemotherapy (FLOT protocol) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CROSS protocol) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus (ESOPEC trial).

LBA1 Background: The most effective multimodal approach for treatment of resectable locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is under debate. A prior ranking question is if neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy or perioperative chemotherapy is superior. ESOPEC (NCT02509286) is a multicenter prospective randomized trial comparing neoadjuvant CROSS (41.4Gy plus carboplatin/paclitaxel) followed by surgery versus perioperative FLOT (5-FU/ leucovorin/oxaliplatin/docetaxel) and surgery for the curative treatment of EAC. Methods: Patients with cT1 cN+ cM0 or cT2-4a cNany cM0 resectable EAC were eligible. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS; 90% power; hazard ratio [HR] 0.645, 218 events needed; one sided significance level of 2.5%). Analysis is by intention-to-treat in all randomized patients. The effect of treatment on OS is estimated using Cox regression stratified by study site, and including N stage (N0, N+), and age as covariates. Results: Between Feb 2016 and Apr 2020, 438 patients from 25 sites in Germany were randomly assigned to two treatment groups (221 FLOT; 217 CROSS). Baseline characteristics (male sex 89.3%, median age 63 [range 30-86], cT3/4 80.5%; cN+ 79.7%) were well balanced between both arms. Neoadjuvant treatment was started in 403 patients (207 FLOT; 196 CROSS). Surgery was done in 371 patients (191 FLOT; 180 CROSS). R0 resection was achieved in 351 patients (180 FLOT; 171 CROSS). 90 days postsurgical mortality was 4.3% (3.2% FLOT; 5.6% CROSS). After a median follow up of 55 months, 218 patients had died (97 FLOT; 121 CROSS). Median OS was 66 (95% CI 36 – not estimable) months in the FLOT arm, and 37 (95% CI 28 – 43) months in the CROSS arm. The 3-year OS rates were 57.4% (95% CI 50.1 – 64.0%) for FLOT and 50.7% (95% CI 43.5 – 57.5%) for CROSS (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.53-0.92, p=0.012). In 359 patients with available tumor regression status, pathological complete response was achieved in 35 (19.3%, 95%-CI 13.9 – 25.9%) in FLOT and in 24 (13.5%, 95%-CI 8.8 – 19.4%) in CROSS. Conclusions: Perioperative FLOT improves survival in resectable EAC compared to neoadjuvant CROSS. Funding: The trial was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation), project number 264590883. Clinical trial information: NCT02509286 .

Preliminary result of combined treatment with scanning carbon-ion radiotherapy and image-guided brachytherapy for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma.

Although there is growing evidence of the efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma, reports on combined treatment with CIRT and image-guided brachytherapy (IGBT) are scarce. We retrospectively analyzed patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (2008) stage II-IVA locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma who received combined scanning CIRT (sCIRT) and IGBT between April 2019 and March 2022. sCIRT consisted of whole-pelvic irradiation with 36Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in 12 fractions and subsequent local boost irradiation with 19.2Gy (RBE) in 4 fractions. Three sessions of IGBT were administered after completion of sCIRT. Concurrent chemotherapy using weekly cisplatin (40mg/m2/week) was also administered. Efficacy, toxicity and dose-volume parameters were analyzed. Fifteen patients were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 25months. The 2-year overall survival, progression-free survival and local control rates were 92.3% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 77.8-100%), 52.5% (95% CI = 26.9-78.1%) and 84.8% (95% CI = 65.2-100%), respectively. Neither severe acute toxicity necessitating treatment cessation nor grade 3 or higher late toxicity were observed. The sigmoid D2cm3 of the patient who developed grade 2 late sigmoid hemorrhage was 65.6Gy, which exceeded the standard deviation and target dose. The combination of sCIRT and IGBT for locally advanced cervical adenocarcinoma showed acceptable efficacy and safety. Further large-scale and long-term studies are warranted to confirm the efficacy and safety of this treatment.

The impact of a bloodless medicine program on pancreatic resections: A single-institution experience incorporating patients with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer

BackgroundPatients undergoing pancreatic resection who decline blood transfusion represent a clinical challenge. While bloodless medicine programs are valuable, their impact remains unclear, especially for those with borderline-resectable and locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). MethodsRetrospective review of institutional databases identified patients who did not accept blood transfusion and underwent pancreatic resection from 2013–2022. We collated hemoglobin values, interventions to minimize symptomatic anemia, and patient outcomes. ResultsThirteen patients were identified. Median age was 63 years (range: 52–75 years) and eight (61.5 %) were female. All procedures were performed electively for invasive malignancy with PDAC as the most common diagnosis (11/13; 84.6 %) and pancreaticoduodenectomy as the most common procedure (11/13; 84.6 %). Vascular involvement was common in the 11 patients with PDAC (borderline-resectable: 7/11; 63.6 % and locally advanced: 3/11; 27.3 %), as was the use of multi-agent chemotherapy (n = 10) and preoperative radiotherapy (n = 8) prior to surgery. Median blood loss was 400 mL (range: 100–2200 mL). Intraoperative measures included acute normovolemic hemodilution in one patient and red blood cell salvage in three patients. Median preoperative hemoglobin was 12.3 g/dL (range: 10.3–14.2 g/dL) and median nadir hemoglobin was 9.2 g/dL (range: 5.2–11.8 g/dL). Median hospital stay was 10 days (range: 6–42 days). Thirty-day mortality was 0 % and one-year overall survival was 69.2 % with median follow-up of 26.4 months. ConclusionPancreatic resections can be performed safely in patients who decline blood transfusion, even with borderline-resectable and locally advanced PDAC. Avoiding transfusions and employing blood-conservation techniques does not appear to detrimentally impact survival.

Cost-effectiveness of tislelizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy as first-line treatment of PD-L1 positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma from a Chinese perspective

ABSTRACT Background This work was designed to assess the cost-effectiveness of front-line tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (TIS+Chemo) in advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC) with positive expression of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. Research design and methods A 10-year partitioned survival model was undertaken utilizing clinical data from RATIONALE 305. Costs and utilities were both discounted at an annual rate of 5%. The primary outcome was incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) and calculated as the cost per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold was set as $18,625/QALY. Only direct medical costs were considered. Sensitivity analyses and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the robustness of the model. Results In the base-case analysis, the incremental cost and effectiveness associated with TIS+Chemo vs Chemo was 7,361 and 0.38 QALYs, respectively, leading to an ICER of 19,371/QALY. At the WTP threshold of $18,625/QALY, the TIS+Chemo was not a cost-effective first-line treatment option. The model outcomes were robust. Conclusions TIS+Chemo did not provide a cost-effective approach for PD-L1 positive advanced GC/GEJC in China setting. However, TIS+Chemo might be cost-effective in provinces with higher WTP threshold. Clinical trial registration RATIONALE 305, www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier is NCT03777657.

Comparison of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus concurrent or sequential radiochemotherapy in patients with driver mutation-lacking lung adenocarcinoma presenting with recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion leading to hoarseness.

e14635 Background: For patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), particularly those with adenocarcinoma lacking a driver mutation, the encroachment upon the recurrent laryngeal nerve causing hoarseness presents a substantial challenge in treatment. Such patients, at TNM stage IIIB or higher, may undergo platinum-based doublet chemotherapy combined with concurrent or sequential radiotherapy. Despite these treatments, survival rates remain modest, and quality of life is significantly impaired by symptoms such as hoarseness, dysphagia, and coughing. Recently, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy has emerged as a frontline treatment for adenocarcinoma patients, showing promising outcomes in unresectable, advanced stages of the disease. However, its efficacy in patients experiencing hoarseness due to recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement has not been previously investigated. Methods: Between September 2018 and October 2022, Jiangmen Central Hospital admitted 71 patients with advanced adenocarcinoma and hoarseness, who lacked a driver mutation as confirmed by NGS testing. After excluding patients who did not complete the treatment plan, the remaining subjects were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group, consisting of 21 patients, received pembrolizumab, pemetrexed, and platinum-based doublet chemotherapy. The control group, also comprising 21 patients, underwent concurrent or sequential radiotherapy alongside pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Results: Among the treatment group, hoarseness was reversed in 13 out of 21 patients, with a return to normal vocal function. In the control group, 5 out of 21 patients experienced a reversal of hoarseness. The treatment group showed superior outcomes in reversing hoarseness caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement (p=0.013). The objective response rate (ORR) in the treatment group was 28.57%, with a disease control rate (DCR) of 66.67%. In contrast, the control group had an ORR of 9.52% and a DCR of 28.57% (p&lt;0.05). The Progression-Free Survival (PFS), as calculated by the Kaplan-Meier survival curve method, was 11.77 months (95% CI: 11.19-12.35) in the treatment group and 7.53 months (95% CI: 6.73-8.33) in the control group, indicating a significantly higher survival rate in the treatment group (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: In patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy appears to effectively reverse hoarseness caused by recurrent laryngeal nerve involvement, higher objective response rates, and increased PFS. This suggests the necessity for multicentric, prospective, evidence-based studies in the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma patients with hoarseness due to recurrent laryngeal nerve invasion.

A single-arm exploratory clinical study of β-glucan combined with camrelizumab and SOX chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma.

e16008 Background:The combination of immunotherapy plus chemotherapy has revolutionized the therapy pattern of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, but the efficacy is still unsatisfactory. β-glucan has been reported to be a potential natural immune modulator for tumor growth inhibition. Therefore, we aimed to evalute the efficacy and safety of β-glucan plus immunotherapy and chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Methods:This is a prospective, single-arm, investigator-initiated trail. All included patients are adults with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score ≤ 2. Eligible patients received WGP β-glucan (500 mg; twice daily on days 1-14) + camrelizumab (day 2; fixed-dose 200 mg) + oxaliplatin (day 1; 130 mg/m2)+ oral S-1 (twice daily on days 1-14; body surface area &lt; 1.25 m2: 40 mg; body surface area 1.25-1.5 m2: 50 mg; body surface area &gt; 1.5 m2: 60 mg) every 3 weeks. The curative effect is evaluated (RECIST 1.1) every 2 cycles. Safety evaluation indicators include vital signs, laboratory indicators and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). The primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety; the secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS); the exploratory endpoint treatment-related biomarker changes from liquid biopsies. Results:From April 2021 to October 2022, a total of 30 patients with average of 67.5 years old had been enrolled, incuding 20 (66.7%) males and 8 (26.7%) patients with an ECOG PS score of 2. The ORR was 60%; the mPFS was 10.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.52-11.27); the mOS was 14.0 months (95% CI, 11.09-16.91). A total of 19 patients (63.3%) had TRAEs, with 9 patients (30%) with grade ≥ 3. The most common treatment-related adverse events were nausea (53.3%) and hemangioma (33.3%). No TRAEs associated with β-glucan were observed. After 2 cycles of treatment, the levels of IL-2 and IFN-γ significantly increased ( P &lt; 0.05), and the number of CD4+ T cells also significantly increased ( P &lt; 0.05). Furthermore, the protein expressions of GZMA, GZMH, and CD244 were significantly lower in the responding group (CR+ PR) than in the non-responding group (SD + PD) (P &lt; 0.05). Conclusions: This preliminary study demonstrates that β-glucan plus camrelizumab and SOX chemotherapy offers favorable efficacy and a manageable safety profile in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma, and further studies are needed to verify its efficacy and safety. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100044088.

A phase II study of cadonilimab plus mFOLFIRINOX as induction therapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).

TPS4213 Background: Locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC) constitutes a significant proportion of pancreatic cancer, which ranks among the most lethal malignancies globally. Treatment options specifically tailored for LAPC patients (pts) are scarce, and chemotherapy alone yields limited efficacy. Various studies have provided supportive evidence for the synergistic effects of combining immunotherapy with chemotherapy in the context of pancreatic cancer. Cadonilimab, a novel recombinant humanized bispecific antibody, holds the capability to concurrently inhibit PD-1 and CTLA-4 pathways, thereby restoring T-cell immune response to the tumor. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of combining cadonilimab with modified FOLFIRINOX for the treatment of LAPC. Methods: This ongoing phase II trial is enrolling pts with histologically or cytologically confirmed unresectable LAPC who have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) of 0-1 and have not previously received systemic anti-tumor therapy. Eligible pts will be administered cadonilimab (6mg/kg, intravenous drip, Day 1, every 2 weeks) plus mFOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin 85mg/m2, Day 2 + leucovorin 400mg/ m2, Day 2 + irinotecan 150mg/ m2, Day 2 + 5-fluorouracil 2,400mg/ m2, continuous infusion for 46 hours) for a total of 4 cycles (8 weeks). After the completion of every 4 treatment cycles, pts will undergo imaging examinations of tumor lesions. Pts will receive treatment continuously until surgical resection, disease progression, intolerable toxic reactions, initiation of new anticancer drug treatments, withdrawal from the study, death, or loss of follow-up. Following the 12th cycle of treatment, maintenance treatment will consist of capecitabine or S-1 in combination with cadonilimab. The primary endpoint of this study was the R0/R1 resection rate. The main secondary endpoints include the objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST 1.1, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety assessments. Additionally, pts will undergo peripheral blood next-generation sequencing (NGS) panel analysis before and after treatment to investigate the correlation between circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) changes, surgical decisions, and prognosis. Enrollment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT06153368 .

Envafolimab in combination with lenvatinib and albumin paclitaxel for previously treated advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: Preliminary analysis of a phase II, two-cohort study.

e16039 Background: The combination of first-line chemotherapy and PD-1 has emerged as a standard treatment, enhancing the efficacy in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. The efficacy of the combination of second-line chemotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 remains unclear. This study aims to observe the efficacy of Envafolimab plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma. Methods: This prospective, open-label, phaseⅡ, two cohort study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Envafolimab-based therapy in patients experiencing progression after initial first-line treatment. Eligible patients with HER2-negative, microsatellite stable (MSS), advanced GEJ adenocarcinoma were consecutively enrolled and assigned into cohort A or cohort B, according to whether they received PD-1 inhibitors in the first-line treatment. Patients in both cohorts received Envafolimab (200mg, hypodermic injection, days 1 and 15, Q4W) combined with Lenvatinib (8mg/12mg, po, once a day) and albumin paclitaxel (100mg/m2, IV, days 1, 8 and 15, Q4W, up to 6 cycles) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or patients refusal to continue treatment. The primary endpoint was objective response rate(ORR) per iRECIST v1.1, and the secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. The efficacy and safety data in this analysis were from patients in cohort A who previously failed in first-line chemotherapy and did not receive PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors ever. Results: From October 2022 to June 2023, cohort A enrolled 16 patients, and 15 of them were evaluable for efficacy analysis. The average age was 58.87 ±11.81 years, 80% patients were male. 6 patients had been tested for PD-L1 status, of which 1 (16.7%) was positive and 5 (83.3%) were negative. As of Jan29, 2024, the median follow-up was 10.6 months (95%CI = 8.67-12.53), the median number of treatment cycles was 7 cycles (IQR: 5, 8). Based on the iRECIST v1.1, the ORR was 60.00% (90% CI = 35.96%-80.91%), the DCR was 100.00% (90% CI = 81.90%-100.00%). The median PFS (mPFS) was 8.23 months (90% CI =6.27-8.61), and the median OS (mOS) was 10.6 months (90% CI =8.79-12.15). Overall incidences of adverse events (AEs) of any grade was 100%, and 75.00% (n = 12) had ≥ grade 3 AEs during treatment. Most treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) of grade ≥3 included neutrophil count (56.25%), decreased leukocyte count (37.5%). Conclusions: In patients of advanced gastric cancer who have not previously received PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, this second-line combination therapy demonstrates promising preliminary effects. Clinical trial information: NCT06030934 .

Social factors in the receipt of treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

e16093 Background: Treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer consists of chemoradiation (chemoRT) followed by esophagectomy. Studies have suggested Black patients were less likely to undergo surgery for esophageal cancer with inferior survival rates, attributing this to differences in access to surgery. These studies have not always accounted for differences in the natural history of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, which have strong racial correlations and different rates of surgical resection. The current study examined outcomes and patterns of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, in relation to their sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T2-4, N0-2, and M0 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus diagnosed between 2010-2021 were included from 11 hospitals across our healthcare system. Treatment decision-points included receipt of chemoRT, unresectable disease after chemoRT defined by metastatic disease or upper mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and receipt of surgery stratified by histology. Age, race, sex, insurance status, socioeconomic status measured by social deprivation index (SDI), and outcome data were collected. Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables. Results: 513 patients were included, of whom 472 patients underwent chemoRT (366 adenocarcinoma, 106 squamous cell). Female patients (n =97) were less likely to undergo chemoRT (84% vs. 94%, p = 0.003). Patients without insurance were less likely to undergo chemoRT (86% vs 93%, p = 0.023). After completing chemoRT, 419 patients (82%) were resectable. Surgery was performed in 262/330 patients (79%) with adenocarcinoma and 38/89 patients (43%) with squamous cell carcinoma, reflecting the differences in natural history by histology. Among 330 patients with resectable adenocarcinoma, higher SDI was associated with a lower rate of surgery, while there was no difference in the receipt of surgery based on sex, race or insurance status. There were no detectable social factors associated with receipt of surgery for squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Within our healthcare system, female and Medicaid/uninsured patients are less likely to undergo chemoRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether sex-specific bias plays a role in the receipt of chemoRT. Among patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with chemoRT, those with high SDI are less likely to undergo surgery. Further studies are needed to assess which component factors of socioeconomic status most impact the receipt of surgery so they can be targeted. The previous findings that race impacts treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer are not seen in our healthcare system when accounting for histology.

Safety and efficacy of IBI343 (anti-claudin18.2 antibody-drug conjugate) in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or biliary tract cancer: Preliminary results from a phase 1 study.

3037 Background: Prognosis for advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and biliary tract cancer (BTC) remains poor, with limited treatment options available. Expression of claudin18.2 (CLDN18.2) has emerged as a potential target for anti-cancer treatment. Herein, we report preliminary safety and efficacy results of IBI343, an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) consisting of anti-CLDN18.2 monoclonal antibody conjugated to exatecan (topoisomerase I inhibitor), in patients (pts) with advanced PDAC or BTC in a phase 1 study. Methods: Eligible pts who failed or were intolerant to standard treatment were enrolled. IBI343 were intravenously administered at 6 mg/kg or 8 mg/kg Q3W. In dose escalation, pts were enrolled regardless of CLDN18.2 expression. In dose expansion, pts were required to have CLDN18.2 expression ≥40% (1+/2+/3+ staining intensity by immunohistochemistry). Primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and progression free survival (PFS) assessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1. Results: As of December 19, 2023, 35 pts (1 pt in dose escalation and 34 pts in dose expansion) were enrolled from China and Australia (males: 57.1%, median age: 58.0 years, ECOG PS 1: 71.4%, stage IV: 91.4%, median lines of prior treatment: 2) including 28 PDAC pts and 7 BTC pts. Pts received IBI343 at 6 mg/kg (n=17) or 8 mg/kg (n=18). Median duration of treatment was 7.0 weeks (range: 3.0-23.6) with 23 (65.7%) pts still on treatment. In all pts, treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 28 (80.0%) pts including grade ≥3 TRAEs in 9 (25.7%) pts. Common TRAEs (≥20%) were anemia (42.9%), neutrophil count decreased (28.6%), nausea (25.7%), vomiting (25.7%) and white blood cell count decreased (22.9%). Serious TRAEs occurred in 4 (11.4%) pts. TRAEs leading to dose interruption and treatment discontinuation occurred in 7 (20.0%) pts and 1 (2.9%) pt respectively. No TRAE led to death. Safety profiles of IBI343 in PDAC and BTC were comparable with the whole study cohort and no new safety signal was observed. As of January 15, 2024, 25 pts at 6 mg/kg and 8 mg/kg were efficacy evaluable. Partial response (PR) was observed in 7 pts (5 PDAC and 2 BTC). The ORR was 28.0% (95%CI: 12.1-49.4) and DCR was 80.0% (95%CI: 59.3-93.2). In evaluable pts at 6 mg/kg with CLDN18.2 expression ≥60% (1+/2+/3+, n=13), 5 pts had PR with ORR of 38.5% (95%CI: 13.9-68.4) and DCR of 84.6% (95%CI: 54.6-98.1). Among 10 PDAC pts in this subgroup, ORR was 40% (95%CI: 12.2-73.8). DoR and PFS data were immature. More updated data on safety and efficacy will be presented at the meeting. Conclusions: IBI343 was well tolerated with favorable safety profiles and encouraging efficacy in CLDN18.2-positive PDAC and BTC. Clinical trial information: NCT05458219 .

Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel for gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: the randomized phase 3 FRUTIGA trial.

The vascular endothelial growth factor pathway plays a key role in the pathogenesis of gastric cancer. In the multicenter, double-blind phase 3 FRUTIGA trial, 703 patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma who progressed on fluorouracil- and platinum-containing chemotherapy were randomized (1:1) to receive fruquintinib (an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-1/2/3; 4 mg orally, once daily) or placebo for 3 weeks, followed by 1 week off, plus paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1/8/15 per cycle). The study results were positive as one of the dual primary endpoints, progression-free survival (PFS), was met (median PFS, 5.6 months in the fruquintinib arm versus 2.7 months in the placebo arm; hazard ratio 0.57; 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.68; P < 0.0001). The other dual primary endpoint, overall survival (OS), was not met (median OS, 9.6 months versus 8.4 months; hazard ratio 0.96, 95% confidence interval 0.81-1.13; P = 0.6064). The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were neutropenia, leukopenia and anemia. Fruquintinib plus paclitaxel as a second-line treatment significantly improved PFS, but not OS, in Chinese patients with advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma and could potentially be another treatment option for these patients. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03223376 .

Efficacy of chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation versus initial chemoradiation as part of the total neoadjuvant therapy for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: An NCDB analysis.

e15629 Background: Results from multiple trials lead to modern management for locally advanced rectal cancer, with total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) followed by surgery. However, the best sequence of different treatment modalities is unclear. Methods: We used the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma. We divided patients into different categories based on the timing of chemo and radiation therapy relative to surgery. We used chi-square and Wilcoxon rank test for unadjusted comparison. To compare treatment efficacy with initial chemotherapy to concurrent chemoradiation in downstaging (clinical to pathological stage), we used a linear mixed effect model (LME) with adjustments on age, sex, race, facility type, and year of diagnosis. Also, we evaluated the probability of having positive lymph nodes in the pathological specimen (N+) in the multivariable logistic regression model with adjustment on the clinical stage in addition to the previously mentioned variables. All analyses were done using R 4.6.2. Results: A total of 100509 patients were identified. Only 695 patients received six cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy before concurrent chemoradiation (TNT chemotherapy), and 8677 patients received upfront radiation therapy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy administered within 12 weeks of neoadjuvant radiation therapy (TNT radiation). Patients whose start date of chemotherapy or radiation after surgery were excluded. The median age of participants was 63 (IQR = 54-63), and 83% were white. Patients who had TNT chemotherapy were younger (56.4 VS 59.5, P-value &lt; 0.01), had clinically and pathologically advanced stage (IIIB, IIIC) compared to TNT radiation (64%VS 37% and 33%VS 29%, P-value &lt; 0.01). Patients who received TNT radiation had an upgrade in their pathological stage compared to their clinical stage by 0.67 points in the LME (P value &lt; 0.01). In multivariable logistic regression. TNT chemotherapy had a 17% lower risk of (N+) with an OR of 0.83 (0.95 CI 0.59-1.16). However, it was not statistically significant. The two groups had no difference in OS, with a median OS of 137 months (0.95 CI 110 -NR) and 143 (0.95 CI 137-151), respectively. Conclusions: Upfront chemotherapy before starting chemoradiation could be associated with more significant downstaging. Future trials to validate our finding is warranted. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

494TiP Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab and COX-2 inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) in perioperative treatment for locally advanced resectable gastric adenocarcinoma: A prospective, single-center, randomized, phase II trial

494TiP Efficacy and safety of cadonilimab and COX-2 inhibitor combined with oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) in perioperative treatment for locally advanced resectable gastric adenocarcinoma: A prospective, single-center, randomized, phase II trial

A phase II multicenter study of enfortumab vedotin with or without pembrolizumab in rare genitourinary tumors (E-VIRTUE).

TPS4628 Background: Enfortumab vedotin (EV) is an antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targeting nectin-4 with a monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE) payload, a potent microtubule inhibitor. It is standard of care (SOC) in metastatic urothelial carcinoma in combination with pembrolizumab in untreated patients and as monotherapy in post-chemotherapy, post-immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) patients. Nectin-4 expression has been retrospectively observed in 66.7-100% of urinary tract adenocarcinoma, 70-100% of urinary tract squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (Case et al., 2022; Hoffman-Censits et al., 2021) and 36% of testicular germ cell tumors (GCTs) (The Human Protein Atlas). Metastatic urinary tract adenocarcinoma and SCC, and treatment refractory GCTs do not have an established SOC. Given the known nectin-4 expression, we hypothesize that EV with or without pembrolizumab will be active in these rare GU tumors. Methods: E-VIRTUE is an open-label, non-randomized, Phase 2 multicenter study. Eligible patients must have locally advanced or metastatic urinary tract pure adenocarcinoma, urinary tract pure SCC or refractory GCTs and have measurable disease by RECIST 1.1. Patients may have received any number of lines of prior systemic therapy except EV or other MMAE-based ADCs, and GCT patients must be refractory to all curative SOC treatments. Each histology will have an ICB-naïve and post anti-PD-1/PD-L1 ICB cohort: ICB-naïve patients will be given EV 1.25 mg/kg (maximum 125 mg) on Days 1 and 8 and pembrolizumab 200 mg on Day 1 of 21-day cycles, and post ICB patients will be given EV 1.25 mg/kg (maximum 125 mg) on Days 1, 8 and 15 of 28-day cycles. EV will be given for up to 5 years and pembrolizumab will be given for up to 2 years, or until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Patients who stop pembrolizumab after achieving a complete response may resume it for 1 year after developing PD. The primary objective is to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR) in all cohorts. Secondary objectives include safety, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The initial 6 cohorts will each be evaluated with exploratory intent. With 10 patients in each cohort, an exact binomial test with a 10% one-sided significance level will have 85.3% power to detect the difference between a very low (5%) ORR and a higher (30%) ORR. If there are ≥2/10 objective responses in any cohort, activity will be demonstrated. Additional histologies may be added after nectin-4 data emerges to justify their inclusion. Exploratory objectives include estimating the level of nectin-4 expression for each histology, performing DNA and RNA sequencing of tumor and blood samples, and observing changes in levels of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) with treatment and disease status. Clinical trial registration NCT06041503. Clinical trial information: NCT06041503 .

Meta-analysis comparing the incidence of serious adverse events, overall survival, and progression-free survival in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma harboring unresectable tumors treated with modified FOLFIRINOX or FOLFIRINOX regimen.

e16318 Background: The evolution of first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) from Gemcitabine-based therapies to FOLFIRINOX-based regimens (fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, oxaliplatin) have demonstrated significant improvements in survival outcomes, however, this was associated with increased side effects such as neuropathy, fatigue, and diarrhea due to its heightened potency. Modified versions of FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) have since been developed with lower doses and longer breaks between cycles to manage side effects. Methods: To systematically test the efficacy and side effects of mFOLIFINOX treatment, we conducted a meta-analysis relating FOLFIRINOX treatment with modified FOLFIROX on the frequency of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events reported in published literature (9 studies), and Serious Adverse Events (SAE) recorded from clinical trials (17 arms accessed from clinicaltrials.gov) in PDAC patients with unresectable tumors. Results: For adverse events occurring in greater than 10% of patients, significant reductions in the frequency of patients experiencing the following events were observed in PDAC patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX: Neutropenia (29.31 % (226/771 patients across 8 arms) versus 18.8% (144/766 across 8 arms; Fisher Exact test, 2-tailed, P &lt; 0.001)), Anorexia (18.57 % (44/237 across 3 arms) versus 5.39% (18/334 across 3 arms); P &lt; 0.001), Peripheral sensory neuropathy (10.63 % (27/254 across 2 arms) versus 3.45% (4/116 across 2 arms); P = 0.025)), and Fatigue (10.57 % (83/785 across 9 arms) versus 6.77% (55/812 across 8 arms); P = 0.007)). Examination of 8 studies (N = 635) for PDAC patients treated with FOLFIRINOX exhibited a median OS time of 11.37 (Range = 10.07 - 13.9) months. Patients treated with mFOLFIRINOX (N = 475) exhibited a median OS time of 12.8 (10.2 - 14.4) months (Two-sample Wilcoxon test, P = 0.372). Conclusions: In conclusion, modified FOLFIRINOX has maintained similar efficacy while reducing severe adverse events, making it more tolerable for adjuvant treatment after surgery.