Social factors in the receipt of treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

Abstract

e16093 Background: Treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer consists of chemoradiation (chemoRT) followed by esophagectomy. Studies have suggested Black patients were less likely to undergo surgery for esophageal cancer with inferior survival rates, attributing this to differences in access to surgery. These studies have not always accounted for differences in the natural history of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, which have strong racial correlations and different rates of surgical resection. The current study examined outcomes and patterns of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, in relation to their sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T2-4, N0-2, and M0 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus diagnosed between 2010-2021 were included from 11 hospitals across our healthcare system. Treatment decision-points included receipt of chemoRT, unresectable disease after chemoRT defined by metastatic disease or upper mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and receipt of surgery stratified by histology. Age, race, sex, insurance status, socioeconomic status measured by social deprivation index (SDI), and outcome data were collected. Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables. Results: 513 patients were included, of whom 472 patients underwent chemoRT (366 adenocarcinoma, 106 squamous cell). Female patients (n =97) were less likely to undergo chemoRT (84% vs. 94%, p = 0.003). Patients without insurance were less likely to undergo chemoRT (86% vs 93%, p = 0.023). After completing chemoRT, 419 patients (82%) were resectable. Surgery was performed in 262/330 patients (79%) with adenocarcinoma and 38/89 patients (43%) with squamous cell carcinoma, reflecting the differences in natural history by histology. Among 330 patients with resectable adenocarcinoma, higher SDI was associated with a lower rate of surgery, while there was no difference in the receipt of surgery based on sex, race or insurance status. There were no detectable social factors associated with receipt of surgery for squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Within our healthcare system, female and Medicaid/uninsured patients are less likely to undergo chemoRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether sex-specific bias plays a role in the receipt of chemoRT. Among patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with chemoRT, those with high SDI are less likely to undergo surgery. Further studies are needed to assess which component factors of socioeconomic status most impact the receipt of surgery so they can be targeted. The previous findings that race impacts treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer are not seen in our healthcare system when accounting for histology.