21st Century Jocks is an ambitious, engaging and fundamentally successful examination of social trends relating to gay and straight adolescent men in a culture of decreased homophobia. This is a summary of an impressive amount of data collected over 14 years, and develops Anderson’s theoretical and empirical arguments presented in his previous book, Inclusive Masculinities (Anderson 2009). It is for these reasons that 21st Century Jocks serves as a strong addition to the literature on sport, sexuality and masculinity in adolescence. 21st Century Jocks draws upon this body of qualitative, quantitative and ethnographic research to appropriately generalize a gendered shift in millennial young men. Anderson uses 40 of his own studies, alongside a comprehensive review of the literature on adolescent athletes throughout the United States and the United Kingdom. While Anderson focuses on athletes, he does so to make broader arguments about adolescent masculinities. He contends that ‘‘jocks’’ are commonly understood as exhibiting a range of behaviors and attitudes that collectively portray teamsport athletes as being homophobic, sexist, violent, stoic, and physically distant from one another. The central thesis of 21st Century Jocks is that this is no longer the case. By the turn of the millennium, Anderson found athletes engaging in behaviors that once would have socially homosexualized them, a trend that spread to nonathletes as well. This is because teamsport athletes were not immune from the larger cultural changes occurring in relation to homosexuality around them. Having positive relationships with gay men and positive attitudes toward homosexuality, young heterosexual male teamsport athletes now partake in a range of behaviors that were once socially taboo. Anderson theorizes this as a matter of decreasing cultural homohysteria—which he defines as the fear of being socially perceived as gay. Central to Anderson’s notion of homohysteria is that, unlike gender or race, sexuality is not socially marked. Accordingly, heterosexual men cannot prove that they are straight. In a homohysteric culture straight men are thus compelled to prove that they are not gay, and they rely upon all the traits and characteristics of ‘‘the jock’’ in order to dispel suspicion that they might be. Yet, in a culture that is inclusive of homosexuality, straight men no longer need to prove their sexuality, and more gendered space is open to them. It is Anderson’s argument that athletes first engaged in behaviors that were once coded as feminine/gay, and that as they continued to recode these behaviors as being acceptable for heterosexual men, non-athletes were also permitted to follow. In this sense, Anderson says that this is a political project. He describes contemporary adolescent male culture as a progressive victory in the cultural wars of the 1980s and 1990s. In the opening chapter, Anderson begins by explaining the birth of the jock. Here he describes the jock as a product of industrialization, Christianity, and as a backlash to the first wave of feminism. Highlighting the social construction of adolescence and gendered behaviors, Anderson discusses how advanced democracies used sport as a way to make young men into heterosexual factory workers and soldiers. He emphasizes the importance of the mass appeal of sport, arguing that it reflects a cultural zeitgeist—suggesting that changing attitudes to adolescent sexuality and health mean that the ethos we attach to these sports is under rapid change. Jared Rimmer, Independent Scholar, London.
Read full abstract