Administration Of Parecoxib Research Articles

The Effectiveness of Parecoxib on Inflammatory Cytokines, Prostaglandin Levels, and Visual Analogue Scale Value among Preeclamptic Patients that Undergo Caesarean Section

Introduction: Preeclampsia is produced by the maternal immune system and trophoblast proinflammatory cytokines. Effective perioperative analgesics reduce surgery-related pain and inflammation. It explores how parecoxib affects IL-1, IL-6, prostaglandin and VAS in preeclampsia patients who had a spinal anesthesia cesarean. Materials and methods: This experiment uses a 2-group pretest and posttest. Samples were taken consecutively. The study group (n = 18) received parecoxib 40 mg IV bolus every 12 h 4 times and paracetamol 1,000 mg IV infusion every 8 h until 48 h postoperatively, while the control group (n = 18) received placebo NaCl 0.9 % IV bolus every 12 h 4 times and paracetamol 1,000 mg IV drip every 8 to 48 h. Participants’ postoperative pain was assessed by VAS before, 12, 24 and 36 h after surgery. Statistical analysis was conducted on biomolecular examination data, including IL-1β, IL-6, PGE2 and VAS values. Results and discussion: The study group had lower IL-1β levels than the control group, although the difference was not significant (p > 0.05). In the study group, IL-6 levels were 4,782 ± 5,673 lower than in the control group (6,147 ± 5,957). Study group IL-6 levels were higher than control group values, although not significantly (p > 0.05). The study group had lower PGE2 than the control group, but not significantly (p > 0.05). The study group’s mean VAS value was 1.722 ± 1.994, lower than the control group’s 1.833 ± 2.007 and not significant (p > 0.05). The study group had considerably lower VAS values than the control group (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In preeclampsia patients who underwent caesarean delivery under spinal anesthesia, parecoxib administration influences IL-1β levels after 24 h and VAS values after 12 h. It did not affect IL-6 or PGE2 levels in preeclamptic individuals who had spinal anesthesia caesarean sections. HIGHLIGHTS Parecoxib, a powerful analgesic, anti-inflammatory drug and moderately toxic maternal and newborn drug Parecoxib has the ability to reduce IL-1β levels after 24 h in preeclampsia patients undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia After 12 h, parecoxib has an effect on the pain scale (VAS) values of preeclampsia patients who underwent a caesarean section under spinal anesthesia GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT

Haemodynamics, side effects and safety of the combination of continuous femoral nerve block and intravenous parecoxib for pain management after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A pilot study.

Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) is a well-established surgical procedure for the treatment of knee joint diseases. This operation leads to severe acute and chronic pain, and intravenous administration of parecoxib could provide significant pain relief. The aim of the study was to compare the hemodynamic data and safety profile of patients who received parecoxib compared to placebo following TKA. Ninety patients were followed during this study and were randomly assigned into two equal groups. Group P received parecoxib and Group C received the placebo. Exclusion criteria included age < 40 or > 80 years, ASA III or higher, obesity (>140 kg), allergy to local anaesthetics, opioid dependence, contraindications for subarachnoid anaesthesia, femoral block or the administration of parecoxib.The haemodynamic data collected were Systolic Arterial Pressure (SAP), Diastolic Arterial Pressure (DAP), Heart Rate (HR), Oxygen Saturation (Ox-Sat), blood transfusion requirements and side effects. Recordings were performed every hour for up to 10 hours and at 15min, 4, 8, 12, 24, 36 hours postoperatively. The postoperative SAP and DAP data presented similar findings among groups (p>0.05) within the aforementioned time intervals. The postoperative HR data for both groups displayed no statistically significant difference between the two cohorts (p>0.05). Regarding the occurrence of transfusion, there is no statistically significant difference between the parecoxib and placebo cohorts. The frequency of side effects was negligible and could not be correlated with either group. Therefore, parecoxib did not render any noticeable impact on the hemodynamic profile of the patients.

Intravenous Parecoxib for Pain Relief after Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

IntroductionOrthopedic procedures have been associated with increased pain, making perioperative analgesia a major clinical concern. We assessed the efficacy and safety of intravenous parecoxib administration during the perioperative period for postoperative pain relief after orthopedic surgery in adults.MethodsPubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and clinicaltrial.gov were searched from inception to 23 August 2021 without language restrictions. Randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous parecoxib with placebo or another active treatment for acute postoperative pain in adults after orthopedic surgery were included. The primary outcomes were the pain scores and cumulative morphine consumption. The secondary outcomes included the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesics and the incidence of adverse events. The meta-analysis followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines and was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews Registration (PROSPERO).ResultsTwenty-seven trials (n = 2840) from more than 20 countries involving six types of orthopedic surgery met the inclusion criteria. Compared with placebo, intravenous parecoxib administration led to reductions in postoperative resting pain scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h [mean difference (MD) −0.87, 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.71 to −0.03; MD −0.86, 95% CI −1.26 to −0.46; MD −0.57, 95% CI −0.84 to −0.31; MD −0.40, 95% CI −0.69 to −0.11, respectively], postoperative movement pain scores at 24 and 48 h (MD −0.66, 95% CI −1.14 to −0.19; MD −0.78, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.39, respectively), cumulative morphine consumption (MD −11.30 mg, 95% CI −14.79 to −7.81 mg), and the proportion of patients requiring rescue analgesia (relative risk 0.83, 95% CI 0.77–0.89). There was no difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups.ConclusionLow to moderate evidence indicates that parecoxib might be an effective and safe analgesic in perioperative orthopedic settings. It relieves postoperative orthopedic pain while sparing opioid analgesic consumption without increasing the incidence of adverse events.PROSPERO RegistrationCRD42021274939.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40122-022-00400-1.

Parecoxib Reduced Postsurgical Pain and Facilitated Movement More Than Patient Controlled Analgesia.

BackgroundPostoperative pain management is an imperative issue for patients undergoing lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Delayed pain relief is associated with poor clinical outcomes. This study compared the effects of intravenously administered patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with intravenous parecoxib, both commonly used methods for analgesic pain control after surgery.MethodsA non-randomized study was used to recruit 68 patients who were scheduled to receive lumbar spinal fusion surgery at a hospital in Taiwan from April through December of 2020. The group treated with parecoxib received an initial perioperative dose of parecoxib 40 mg during a 30-min period and then postoperative intravenous parecoxib at 40 mg per 12-h period, for 72 h. Those with PCA received morphine (0.4 mg/ml), droperidol (0.02 mg/ml), diphenhydramine (0.48 mg/ml), midazolam (0.02 mg/ml) and saline solution during the 3-day study course. Major outcomes, including visual scale pain score and Barthel index of activities of daily living, were collected via review of medical records at 4 times: 12, 24, 48 and 72 h after surgery. Comparative effects between two groups were assessed by the generalized estimating equations.ResultsAfter adjusting for potential confounders, the administration of parecoxib was associated with a significant decrease in pain scores and an increase in the Barthel Index, when compared with the PCA group (all p < 0.05). Notably, both effects would maintain for 72 h after surgery.DiscussionThis is the first trial of which the authors are aware, that supports intravenous parecoxib as significantly enhancing patient mobility, in addition to having pain control efficacy, when compared with PCA. This study could be used as a reference when instituting interventions to improve the adaptation process and clinical prognoses after lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

The Effectiveness of Perioperative Parecoxib Intravenous Administration in Foot and Ankle Surgery: A Prospective, Double-Blinded, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial

Category:Trauma; AnkleIntroduction/Purpose:Parecoxib is indicated for the short-term treatment of postoperative pain in adults. A systematic review assessed the analgesic efficacy of single dose intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) parecoxib in acute postoperative pain and concluded that parecoxib is an effective analgesic in the postoperative setting in adults. However, little is known about its effectiveness in the perioperative intravenous administration in foot and ankle surgery. The present study conducts a double- blinded prospective randomized controlled trial via an 'intention-to-treat analysis' principle to compare the effectiveness of perioperative parecoxib versus placebo in patients with unstable ankle fractures who have surgical indications.Methods:A total of 40 patients undergoing open reduction and internal fixation of the unstable ankle fractures were randomly allocated either to Group A (parecoxib 40 mg IV 30 min before surgery and then an additional 40 mg every 12 hours for 48 hours after surgery [n=20]) or Group B (placebo (saline) [n=20]). The baseline data were recorded in each patient. The efficacy of pain control was assessed by total morphine used, pain intensity (at rest/ambulation) and pain relief (at rest/ambulation) using the verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain) and the verbal numerical rating percentage (VNRP) from 0 (no relief) to 100 (best relief) respectively, as well as each patient's subjective rating of the medication. The patients' subjective rating of the medication used the classifications of 'excellent', 'good', 'fair', or 'poor'. When the patients were moved to the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) after surgery, the study procedure was to record the time as 0. The data were then recorded at 0, 4, 12, 24, and 48 hours after surgery by trained personnel. The overall adverse effects experienced by patients were reported in both groups. All outcomes were recorded by trained personnel who were blind to the patient group allocation. All surgeons, anesthesiologists, and patients involved in the process were also blind to the group allocations. The outcomes including efficacy, patients' subjective ratings of the medication, and overall adverse effects were statistically compared between the two groups.Results:From a total of 40 patients in the study, four patients were excluded by the study criteria. The remaining 36 patients continued in the study. The mean age of patients was 49.3 +/- 18.0 years. No significant difference was found regarding the mean age of patients between the two groups (p-value > 0.05). Male patients appeared more frequently in the saline group than the parecoxib group (p-value = 0.018). For the main outcomes, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the pain intensity, pain relief, patients' subjective ratings of the medication at both preoperative and postoperative periods, total quantity of morphine used, and side effects and acute complications of surgery (p-values > 0.05).Conclusion:Based on the results of the present study, the perioperative administration of parecoxib could not significantly improve postoperative pain control as defined by the reduction in opioid requirements, lower pain scores, higher pain relief, and higher patients' subjective ratings of the medication when compared to the placebo. Male predominance was significantly found in the placebo group. This may have influenced the level of pain tolerance between the two groups. This may also affect the results as no significant differences of pain parameters between the two groups in the study. Further study with larger numbers of patients is still necessary to clarify the role of preemptive parecoxib on ankle fracture surgery.

Efficacy of Perioperative Administration of Intravenous Parecoxib on Postoperative Morphine Consumption after Video-Assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery

Background: Morphine is commonly used to relief pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS), however high dose morphine is usually related with many complications. Parecoxib is a potent cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor for parenteral administration that has a role in acute pain management addition to opioid protocol. Objective: To investigate the potential benefits of intravenous parecoxib for relieving postoperative pain after VATS. Materials and Methods: The present study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned 22 patients undergoing VATS into two groups to received either parecoxib 40 mg as P group with 11 patients, or placebo using 2 mL of Normal Saline Solution as C group with 11 patients with an intravenous administration at 30 minutes prior to surgery and then 12 hours later. In the postoperative period, all patients received intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with morphine. The primary outcome was the total morphine consumption for 24 hours postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were pain score at 2, 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively, using a numeric rating scale (NRS, 0 to 10) and the incidence of side effects. Results: The total morphine consumption was significantly lower in P group (26.64±4.41 mg) than C group (39.82±3.87 mg) at 24 hours postoperatively (p&lt;0.001). The NRS pain score at rest and on coughing at 24 hours postoperatively between P group compared with C group were 1.09±1.04 versus 4.45±0.69 (p&lt;0.001) and 2.91±0.83 versus 5.36±0.81 (p&lt;0.001), respectively. The incidences of nausea and vomiting were found in both groups at 2, 6, and 12 hours, postoperatively, but there was no statistically significant difference between both groups (p&gt;0.05). Other adverse events such as sedation, pruritus, dyspepsia, headache, hypotension, and respiratory depression were not found. Conclusion: Perioperative administration of parecoxib was safe and effectively decrease postoperative morphine consumption and pain score at rest and on coughing within 24 hours postoperatively after VATS. Keywords: Intravenous parecoxib; Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery; Acute postoperative pain

Correlation between perioperative parecoxib use and postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort analysis

ObjectiveThe association of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) is controversial. However, there are few studies focusing on the association between parecoxib and postoperative AKI. Our study...

Efficacy of intravenous perioperative parecoxib administration in the surgical fixation of unstable ankle fracture: a prospective, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

Little is known about the efficacy of perioperative intravenous (IV) non-opioid medication administration in patients undergoing orthopedic surgery. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of perioperative parecoxib in patients with unstable ankle fractures who were scheduled to undergo surgery. In this double-blinded, prospective, randomized controlled trial, 40 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation for unstable ankle fractures were randomly allocated to the parecoxib group (parecoxib 40 mg IV 30 min before surgery and then 40 mg IV every 12 h for the initial 48 h postoperatively [n=20]) or the placebo group (saline [n=20]). The efficacy of pain control was assessed according to the total morphine used. Pain intensity (at rest/ambulation) and pain relief (at rest/ambulation) were assessed using the verbal numerical rating score (VNRS) and verbal numerical rating percentage (VNRP), respectively. Subjective rating of medication was performed by each patient. All outcomes were recorded by trained personnel who were blinded to the patient group allocation. The mean patient age was 49.3±18.0 years. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of pain intensity, pain relief, patients' subjective ratings of the medication at both the preoperative and postoperative periods, total quantity of morphine used, side effects, and acute complications of surgery (p>0.05). The mean length of hospital stay tended to be shorter in the parecoxib group than in the placebo group (6 vs. 9.9 days; p=0.183). Although the perioperative administration of parecoxib did not provide significantly better postoperative pain control or reduce the opioid requirement relative to placebo, its use led to a shorter hospital stay.

Parecoxib alleviates the motor behavioral decline of aged rats by ameliorating mitochondrial dysfunction in the substantia nigra via COX-2/PGE2 pathway inhibition

Mitochondrial dysfunction manifests as an early event in the substantia nigra (SN) in aging and Parkinson disease. Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2), the rate-limiting enzyme in the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) synthesis pathway, is implicated in aging and age-related neurodegenerative diseases; moreover, inhibition of COX-2 expression has been shown to be neuroprotective for nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons. However, it is not known whether the neuroprotective effect of COX-2 inhibition is related to improved mitochondrial function during the aging process. To this end, we explored the effects of the selective COX-2 inhibitor parecoxib on mitochondrial function in the SN of aged rats. We found that parecoxib administration to aged rats for 10 weeks decreased COX-2/PGE2 expression, increased tyrosine hydroxylase and dopamine transporter expression in nigrostriatal dopaminergic neurons, and alleviated motor behavioral decline. Decreased malondialdehyde levels and an increased GSH/GSSG ratio as well as enhanced enzymatic activities of catalase and manganese superoxide dismutase in parecoxib-treated aged rats indicate that parecoxib administration elevated antioxidative ability in the SN during the aging process. Parecoxib treatment to aged rats promoted mitochondrial biogenesis by upregulating PGC-1α/NRF-1/TFAM, enhancing mitochondrial fusion by decreasing Drp1 levels and increasing Mfn1 and OPA1 levels, and activated mitophagy by increasing PINK1/Parkin levels while reducing p62/SQSTM1 levels, thereby coordinating mitochondrial homeostasis via inhibiting the COX-2/PGE2 pathway. Thus, our results strongly support the conclusion that parecoxib treatment is conducive to improving mitochondrial dysfunction in the SN upon aging in rats.

Perioperative Intravenous Patient-Controlled Analgesic Efficacy of Morphine with Combined Nefopam and Parecoxib versus Parecoxib in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind Study.

Background Nefopam is a non-NSAIDs and opioid sparing centrally acting drug which is effective for a multimodal postoperative analgesia. The present study aimed to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of nefopam combined with parecoxib for gynecologic surgery. Methods This randomized double-blinded control trial recruited participants (n = 72) who underwent gynecologic surgeries and divided them into either a nefopam or control group. The study group received parecoxib 40 mg plus nefopam 20 mg, while the control group received parecoxib 40 mg plus normal saline solution intravenously during open abdominal gynecological surgery. Both groups then received either nefopam or normal saline every 6 hours postoperatively for 24 hours. Intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with morphine was given for breakthrough pain within 24 h. The participants were evaluated for morphine consumption within 24 hours and postoperative pain using a verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) at a postanesthetic care unit, at 6-, 12-, and 24-hour postoperative periods. Adverse effects were recorded. Results Morphine consumption within 24 hours and adverse effects were not significantly different between both groups. Mean difference and 95% confident interval of morphine consumption between both groups was 1.00 (−4.56, 4.76), P=0.97. The VNRS on movement at 6 hours after surgery of the nefopam group was significantly different from that of the control group [mean (SD), 4.14 (2.11) vs. 5.14 (1.80), P=0.04]. The VNRS of the nefopam group at 12 hours after operation during resting and on movement was significantly different from that of the control group ([mean (SD), 1.47 (1.80) vs. 2.54 (2.15), P=0.03], [mean (SD), 3.22 (1.84) vs 4.17 (1.74), P=0.03]), respectively. Conclusions The combined administration of nefopam and parecoxib during gynecologic surgery slightly reduced the VNRS at 6 and 12 hours postoperatively more than treatment with parecoxib.

A randomized controlled trial comparing the efficacies of ketorolac and parecoxib for early pain management after total knee arthroplasty

BackgroundNonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely used to reduce pain after orthopedic surgery. Currently, selective COX-2 inhibitors can provide effective pain reduction with less platelet inhibition compared with conventional NSAIDs. We aimed to compare the analgesic effect and perioperative blood loss (PBL) after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between ketorolac and parecoxib administration. MethodsWe conducted a prospective randomized controlled study of 100 unilateral TKAs. The ketorolac group of 50 patients received an intraoperative periarticular injection (PAI) with 100 mg of bupivacaine and 30 mg of ketorolac. Afterwards, 30 mg of ketorolac was intravenously injected every 12 h until 48 h. In the parecoxib group of 50 patients, 20 mg of parecoxib was added to PAI, and the first intravenous dose was 20 mg followed by 40 mg every 12 h. The primary outcomes were visual analog scales (VASs) of postoperative pain, amount of morphine consumption, PBL, and blood transfusion rate. ResultsThe ketorolac group had a significantly lower VAS pain score than the parecoxib group at 6 h after TKA (2.38 ± 2.52 vs. 4.12 ± 2.86, P < 0.01). Thereafter, the VAS of both groups and total morphine consumption at 24 and 48 h were comparable. The PBLs of the ketorolac and parecoxib groups were 529.72 ± 263.02 and 402.40 ± 191.47 ml, respectively (P = 0.01). However, the blood transfusion rates between groups were not different. ConclusionParecoxib provides comparable analgesic effects to ketorolac. Additionally, perioperative use of parecoxib is safe and is associated with significantly less blood loss after TKA.

Intravenous parecoxib for early postoperative cognitive dysfunction in elderly patients: evidence from a meta-analysis

ABSTRACT Background Inflammation plays a key role in the etiology and pathology of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). Cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitor parecoxib is used for the treatment of acute pain due to its potent anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of parecoxib on early POCD in geriatric patients. Objective This study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of parecoxib for early postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in elderly patients. Methods Comprehensive literature search based on six electronic databases was applied to retrieve all related randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Two independent reviewers screened each article for eligibility according to the predetermined inclusion criteria. The Cochrane’s Tool was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of included studies. RevMan 5.3 was used to conduct meta-analysis. Results Eight RCTs comprising a total of 1106 subjects prepared for orthopedic surgical operation were selected. All the identified RCTs were conducted in China. The methodological qualities of included studies were judged to be medium to high. The integrated data showed that perioperative intravenous parecoxib could remarkably reduce the incidence of POCD with improved Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score. Parecoxib could significantly reduce the concentrations of interleukin-6, but results regarding the changes in tumor necrosis factor-alpha, C-reactive protein, and S100β levels remained inconsistent. Conclusion Perioperative parecoxib administration is effective in reducing the incidence of POCD and improving the MMSE score compared with control. However, the beneficial effect of parecoxib has been tested only in the Chinese population. Future RCTs in western countries with larger-scale and more comprehensive neurological tests are needed.

Prevention of Severe Acute Pancreatitis With Cyclooxygenase-2 Inhibitors: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVES:Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is still a big challenge. Accumulated data showed that overexpression of cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in acute pancreatitis and experimental pancreatitis could be attenuated with COX-2 inhibitors. This study was aimed to evaluate whether the occurrence of SAP could be prevented by selective COX-2 inhibitors.METHODS:A total of 190 patients with predicted SAP were randomized into convention group or convention plus COX-2 inhibitors (C+COX-2-Is) group. Besides conventional treatment to all patients in 2 groups, parecoxib (40 mg/d intravenous injection for 3 days) and celecoxib (200 mg oral or tube feeding twice daily for 7 days) were sequentially administrated to the patients in the C+COX-2-Is group. The primary outcome was predefined as the occurrence of SAP. The serum levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) for all of the patients were measured.RESULTS:The occurrence of SAP in the C+COX-2-Is group was decreased 47.08% compared with the convention group, 21.05% (20/95) vs 39.78% (37/93), P = 0.005. A reduction of late local complications was also shown in the C+COX-2-Is group, 18.95% (18/93) vs 34.41% (32/95), P = 0.016. The serum levels of IL-6 and TNF-α were significantly lower in the C+COX-2-Is group than those in the convention group, P < 0.05. Parecoxib relieved abdominal pain more rapidly and decreased the consumption of meperidine. An incremental reduction of cost for 1% decrease of SAP occurrence was RMB475.DISCUSSION:Sequential administration of parecoxib and celecoxib in patients with predicted SAP obtained about half-reduction of SAP occurrence through decreasing serum levels of TNF-α and IL-6. This regimen presented good cost-effectiveness.

Celecoxib versus parecoxib versus oxycodone in pain control for transcatheter chemoembolization in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

509 Background: Abdominal pain is one of the most common side effects of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Previous studies reported that perioperative controlled-release oxycodone (CRO) intake or administration of parecoxib resulted in adequate pain control after TACE. However, there are currently no studies comparing opioids with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in controlling postoperative pain. Therefore, we conducted a clinical trial to compare the analgesic effect and safety among celecoxib (oral COX-2 inhibitor), parecoxib (injectable COX-2 inhibitor), and CRO (oral opioids) in patients undergoing TACE. Methods: The study was a prospective, randomized, paralleled trial in which 213 patients were enrolled between September 2016 and March 2019. Patients were randomly assigned at the ratio of 1:1:1 to receive celecoxib, parecoxib or CRO 1 h before TACE (T0) and once every 12 h for 2 days after TACE. Pain level, morphine consumption and adverse events were evaluated and compared among the three regimens. Results: Highest incidence of pain occurred within the first 12 hours (T12) after TACE. Analysis of pain control showed no significant difference among the mean highest pain scores, percentage distribution of pain categories and mean morphine consumption in the three groups at T0, T12, T24, T36, and T48. At T24, 11 patients (15.7%) in oxycodone group had fever, which was higher than parecoxib regimen (1 patient [1.5%], P = 0.003). At T36, 13 patients (18.6%) in oxycodone regimen had fever, which was higher than celecoxib regimen (2 patients [2.9%], P = 0.003) and parecoxib regimen (1 patient [1.5%], P &lt; 0.001). At T48, 11 patients (15.7%) in oxycodone regimen had fever, which was higher than celecoxib regimen (2 patients [2.9%], P = 0.010) and parecoxib regimen (0 patients, P = 0.001). Conclusions: The results suggested that patients obtained celecoxib, parecoxib or CRO once every 12 hours can have the same level of analgesic effect during each time period of TACE. However, body temperature balance in oxycodone regimen was significantly worse than celecoxib regimen and parecoxib regimen. Clinical trial information: NCT03059238.

Local anaesthesia for haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation reduces immediate post-operative recovery time and use of opioid analgesia.

Haemorrhoidal rubber band ligation (RBL) is a well-established, safe and cost-effective treatment for bleeding haemorrhoids. It is generally well tolerated; however, some patients may require narcotic analgesia or even admission to hospital for pain management. This comparative cohort study reports on the difference in peri-procedural analgesia administration and post-operative recovery time between patients who received local anaesthetic (LA) infiltration in addition to RBL, compared with patients treated only with RBL. Consecutive patients with haemorrhoids treated over a 3-month period with LA infiltration in addition to RBL were compared to a consecutive control group who received RBL alone in the preceding 3 months. Clinical data were collected prospectively for LA group and retrospectively for the control group. Data collected included analgesia administered during the procedure and in recovery, as well as the mean time to discharge. A total of 32 patients treated with LA infiltration following RBL for haemorrhoids were compared with 22 patients who were treated with RBL alone. There was a reduction in the administration of intra-procedural parecoxib in the LA group (P < 0.001). Following the procedure, there was a reduction in the administration of both oral and intravenous opioid analgesia (P = 0.009) and reduced mean time to discharge in the LA group (P < 0.001). Infiltration of LA proximal to the band following RBL for haemorrhoids reduced the administration of analgesia both during the procedure and in recovery, as well as mean time to discharge following the procedure.

Intraoperative use of single dose of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs was not associated with cancer recurrence and mortality after bladder cancer surgery: a retrospective study

Recently, intraoperative use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) has been demonstrated to be associated with improved outcomes after surgery for several cancers; however, the effect of intraoperative NSAIDs use on bladder cancer (BCa) is not known. Therefore, the present study investigated the association between intraoperative NSAIDs use and oncological outcomes after radical cystectomy (RC). We retrospectively analyzed 248 patients with BCa who underwent RC. Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression model were used to evaluate the association between intraoperative NSAIDs (parecoxib) use and oncological outcomes after RC. After excluding 63 patients, 82 of the remaining 185 patients received parecoxib during surgery. In the parecoxib group, the overall recurrence rate did not decrease significantly (P=0.310). Time to recurrence, cancer-specific mortality, and overall mortality were not significantly different between the groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no association of the intraoperative use of parecoxib with an improved recurrence-free survival (RFS) or overall survival (OS) (P=0.431, P=0.185, respectively). Similarly, the multivariate analysis model showed no association between the administration of parecoxib and RFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.964; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.599-1.551, P=0.878] or OS (HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 0.621-1.750; P=0.875). In these patients, elevated preoperative neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was demonstrated to be associated with RFS and OS. The present study found that intraoperative parecoxib use was not associated with improved outcome after BCa surgery. Prospective, randomized trials should be performed to further evaluate the results of this study.

Parecoxib Improves the Outcomes of Acute Mild and Moderate Pancreatitis: A 3-Year Matched Cohort Study Based on a Prospective Database.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of parecoxib in patients with different severities of acute pancreatitis (AP). A total of 772 eligible patients with AP were divided into 4 groups: mild and moderately AP (MAP) treated with parecoxib (group A, n = 236), MAP without parecoxib treatment (group B, n = 453), severe AP (SAP) treated with parecoxib (group C, n = 28), and SAP without parecoxib treatment (group D, n = 55). Patients in group A were exactly matched with patients in group B by propensity score matching, similar to the matching between group C and group D. The morbidity of abdominal infection in group A was significantly lower as compared with that in group B (P < 0.050). The progression of MAP to SAP significantly decreased in group A than group B (P < 0.050). No significant differences were observed between group C and group D. The risk factors independently related to the progression of MAP included alcoholic/high-fat dietary (P = 0.028) and parecoxib administration (P = 0.011). Early administration of parecoxib could reduce the morbidity of complications among patients with MAP. Parecoxib may prevent the progression of MAP to SAP and improve its outcomes.

Short-term perioperative parecoxib is not detrimental to shaft fracture healing in a rat model.

ObjectivesExperimental studies indicate that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may have negative effects on fracture healing. This study aimed to assess the effect of immediate and delayed short-term administration of clinically relevant parecoxib doses and timing on fracture healing using an established animal fracture model.MethodsA standardized closed tibia shaft fracture was induced and stabilized by reamed intramedullary nailing in 66 Wistar rats. A ‘parecoxib immediate’ (Pi) group received parecoxib (3.2 mg/kg bodyweight twice per day) on days 0, 1, and 2. A ‘parecoxib delayed’ (Pd) group received the same dose of parecoxib on days 3, 4, and 5. A control group received saline only. Fracture healing was evaluated by biomechanical tests, histomorphometry, and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at four weeks.ResultsFor ultimate bending moment, the median ratio between fractured and non-fractured tibia was 0.61 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.45 to 0.82) in the Pi group, 0.44 (IQR 0.42 to 0.52) in the Pd group, and 0.50 (IQR 0.41 to 0.75) in the control group (n = 44; p = 0.068). There were no differences between the groups for stiffness, energy, deflection, callus diameter, DXA measurements (n = 64), histomorphometrically osteoid/bone ratio, or callus area (n = 20).ConclusionThis study demonstrates no negative effect of immediate or delayed short-term administration of parecoxib on diaphyseal fracture healing in rats.Cite this article: G. A. Hjorthaug, E. Søreide, L. Nordsletten, J. E. Madsen, F. P. Reinholt, S. Niratisairak, S. Dimmen. Short-term perioperative parecoxib is not detrimental to shaft fracture healing in a rat model. Bone Joint Res 2019;8:472–480. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2018-0341.R1.

APPLICATION OF DRUG-RELATED PROBLEMS APPROACH TO ANALYSIS OF NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS’ SAFETY

A Drug-Related Problem is an event or circumstance involving drug therapy that actually or potentially interferes with desired health outcomes.The aim of the study was the analysis of the adverse drug reactions (ADR) associated with prescription of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) using the DRP PCNE V5.01 qualification system.Materials and methods. The objects of the study were 415 notification forms about adverse drug reactions of NSAIDs recorded in the regional database of spontaneous reports and called ARCADe (Adverse Reactions in Crimea, Autonomic Database) for the period from 1 January 2009 to 31 December of 2018. The study and analysis of the problems associated with drugs were carried out using the qualification system DRP PCNE V5.01 (Pharmaceutical Care Network Europe) 2006 in the modification of Prof. Zimenkovsky.Results. Among other representatives of the NSAID group, Ibuprofen and Diclofenac became the “leaders” in the incidence of ADR. The frequency of ADR cases for Ibuprofen was 142 reports (34.22% of the total number of ADR for NSAIDs), and for Diclofenac it was 90 cases (21.69%). The calculation of DRP values for each of the presented cases made it possible to determine that in 81 (19.51%) and 91 (21.9%) cases, the DRP value was 6 and 7, respectively. DRP values in the range of 8–10 were found in 92 reports. The highest DRPs value was observed after the administration of Parecoxib (13 problems but only one case was found in the database), the DRPs value of Dexketoprofen was 12.5 (95% CI: 7–17) and the DRPs value of Diclofenac combinations was 10 DRPs; 95% CI: 5–17 DRP). The minimum DRPs values were associated with Naproxen, Rofecoxib, and Etoricoxib prescriptions.Conclusion. Using the DRP system in the analysis of NSAIDs, ADRs allow to identify the medicines which have a high risk of causing safety problems, such as Parecoxib, Dexketoprofen and Diclofenac combinations. The prescription of these drugs should be carried out with special cautions and control to the indications and contraindications, the dose and duration of treatment, as well as to a possible interaction of them with concomitant drugs.

Efficacy of parecoxib for the prevention of catheter-related bladder discomfort after transurethral resection of bladder

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the prevention profiles of parecoxib on catheter-related bladder discomfort (CRBD) after transurethral resection of bladder tumor(TURBT). Methods Fifty-six male adult patients undergoing transurethral resection of bladder tumor were enrolled. Induction and maintenance of anesthesia were standardized. Patients were randomly divided into two groups according to the random number table method that received either intravenous 0.9% NaCl solution[control group (group C)] or parecoxib (40 mg) (group P) at 10 min before the end of the operation. The incidence and severity of CRBD, postoperative pain, Ramsay scores, patient satisfaction, postoperative additional drugs and adverse effects were assessed at 5 min (T1), 1 h (T2), 6 h (T3) and 12 h (T4) after administration of the parecoxib by another observer who does not know research grouping situation. Results The incidence of CRBD in group P at T1, T2 and T3 was significantly lower than that in group C (89.3% vs 46.4%, 89.3% vs 35.7%, 67.9% vs 39.3%)(P 0.05). Conclusions Not only can a single intravenous injection of parecoxib 40 mg at the end of surgery effectively reduce the incidence and severity of postoperative CRBD in patients with TURBT, but also has certain analgesic effect without causing serious adverse reaction. Key words: Parecoxib; Catheter-related bladder discomfort; Transurethral resection of bladder tumor