Adjuvant Radiotherapy In Patients Research Articles

Adjuvant radiotherapy in oesophageal cancer with positive circumferential resection margins-recurrence and survival outcomes.

The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with microscopically positive circumferential resection margins (CRM), R1 specimen, in oesophageal resections for cancer with curative intent remains unclear. However, R1 specimens are associated with poorer survival outcomes. The aim was to assess the benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy on recurrence and survival in these patients. Patients were identified in a single centre between July 2000 and December 2016. Patient demographics, tumour characteristics and survival outcomes were assimilated and compared between those who received adjuvant therapy and those who did not. Sixty-eight patients were included in the study; 57 (83.8%) male and 11 (16.2%) female with a median age of 67 years. The adjuvant radiotherapy regimen used was 40-50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Median follow-up was 13 months (interquartile range, 6-27 months). Twenty-five (36.8%) patients received adjuvant radiotherapy. There was no statistically significant correlation between administration of adjuvant radiotherapy and local recurrence (P=0.148), distant metastases (P=0.605), overall disease progression (P=0.561), progression-free survival (P=0.663) and overall survival (P=0.538). This study detects no benefit to oncological outcomes with the use of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with microscopically positive CRM. Larger randomized studies are needed to further confirm these results.

Management trends for anaplastic meningioma with adjuvant radiotherapy and predictors of long-term survival.

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to describe effects of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for anaplastic meningiomas (AMs) on long-term survival, and to analyze patient and RT characteristics associated with long-term survival.METHODSThe authors queried a retrospective cohort of patients with AM from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 to describe treatment trends. For outcome analysis, patients with at least 10 years of follow-up were included, and they were stratified based on adjuvant RT status and propensity matched to controls for covariates. Survival curves were compared. A data-driven approach was used to find a biologically effective dose (BED) of RT with the largest difference between survival curves. Factors associated with long-term survival were quantified.RESULTSThe authors identified 2170 cases of AM in the NCDB between 2004 and 2015. They observed increased use of adjuvant RT in patients treated with higher doses. A total of 178 cases met the inclusion criteria for outcome analysis. Forty-five percent (n = 80) received adjuvant RT. Patients received a BED of 80.23 ± 16.6 Gy (mean ± IQR). The median survival time was not significantly different (32.8 months for adjuvant RT vs 38.5 months for no RT; p = 0.57, log-rank test). Dichotomizing the patients at a BED of 81 Gy showed maximal difference in survival distribution with a decrease in median survival in favor of no adjuvant RT (31.2 months for adjuvant RT vs 49.7 months for no RT; p = 0.03, log-rank test), but this difference was not significant after false discovery rate correction. Age was a significant predictor for long-term survival.CONCLUSIONSAMs are aggressive tumors that carry a poor prognosis. Conventional adjuvant RT improves local control. However, the effect of adjuvant radiation on overall survival is unclear. Further investigation into this area is warranted.

Analysis of isolated loco-regional recurrence rate in intermediate risk early cervical cancer after a type C2 radical hysterectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy.

The efficacy of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with intermediate risk early cervical cancer after radical hysterectomy is still under debate. Most guidelines recommend adjuvant radiotherapy, whereas others consider observation a viable option. To investigate if patients with intermediate risk factors for cervical cancer who underwent radical hysterectomy may benefit from adjuvant radiotherapy. Consecutive patients with tumor confined to the cervix and intermediate risk factors (according to Sedlis), treated between January 1982 and December 2014 who were observed after a type C2 radical hysterectomy formed the basis for this study. The frequency of recurrences, specifically isolated loco-regional recurrences, and the risk of death from recurrences, were analyzed. Data were analyzed using SPSS, version 23.0 for Windows RESULTS: A total of 161 patients were included in the analysis. Median age was 40 (range 20-76). Stages IB1 and IB2 were seen in 87 (54%) and 74 patients (46%), respectively. Squamous cell and non-squamous histology was seen in 114 (70.8%) and 47 patients (29.2%), respectively. Of the 161 patients, 25 (15.5%) had recurrent disease, of whom nine had an isolated loco-regional recurrence (5.6%). Median time to recurrence for isolated loco-regional recurrences was 28 months (range 9-151). Treatment for an isolated loco-regional recurrence was radiotherapy (n = 4) and chemoradiotherapy (n = 5). Four patients (2.5%) died from disease as a result of an isolated loco-regional recurrence. Actuarial disease- specific survival was 93.0% for the total group. No variables were found that predicted an isolated loco-regional recurrence. The mortality from isolated loco-regional recurrence in patients with intermediate risk factors for cervical cancer who underwent only radical hysterectomy type C2 was 2.5%. Further studies should compare outcomes between patients who undergo a type C2 radical hysterectomy without adjuvant radiotherapy with those undergoing a less radical hysterectomy but with adjuvant radiotherapy.

Outcomes after adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients with and without germline mutations: A large, single-institutional experience.

1502 Background: Women with germline mutations in DNA repair pathways are at an increased risk of developing breast cancer. We posit that tumors arising in these patients may be more sensitive to radiotherapy and, therefore, patients may experience improved locoregional control and survival outcomes following adjuvant radiotherapy as compared to patients without DNA repair pathway mutations. Methods: We evaluated the records of 2,221 women with stage 0-III de novo primary breast cancer treated with surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy who all underwent genetic testing at our institution from 1993 to 2018. Mutations were categorized as pathogenic variant, variant of unknown significance (VUS), or negative. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), rate of distant metastasis (DM), disease-free survival (DSS), and overall survival (OS) from the time of surgery. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 45 years (range 19-84). Median follow-up time was 7 years (95% confidence interval 6.6-7.4). Among 1,960 patients with evaluable radiation records, 752 (38.4%) received breast only radiation, 12 (0.6%) received chest wall only radiation, and 1,196 (61.0%) received breast/chest wall and regional nodal radiation. A total of 255 (11.4%) and 162 (7.3%) patients had a pathogenic variant mutation and a VUS only, respectively. Pathogenic variant and VUS in BRCA1/2 mutations were detected in 216 (9.7%) and 82 (3.7%) patients, respectively. Perturbations in ATM, CHEK2, MLH, MSH2/6, MUTYH, PALB2, RAD50/51, and/or TP53 were detected in 71% (85/119) of patients who tested positive for a non- BRCA1/2 pathogenic variant or VUS. On univariate analysis, there was no significant association between BRCA1/2 mutation status or any genetic mutation and rate of LRR or DM, DSS, or OS ( p > 0.10 for all). Clinicopathological features including advanced stage and lymphovascular invasion were associated with higher cumulative incidence of LRR and DM as well as shorter DFS and OS ( p < 0.01 for all). Conclusions: Herein we report on the largest cohort of women with breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy at a single institution who have undergone germline testing. Our findings suggest that the overall prognosis of breast cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with germline BRCA1/2 or other genetic predisposition is similar to patients with sporadic breast cancer. Further investigation to evaluate acute or late toxicities and secondary cancers as a result of radiotherapy is warranted.

Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictor of adjuvant radiotherapy response in endometrioid endometrial carcinoma.

5586 Background: Adjuvant radiotherapy improves progression-free survival in intermediate and high-risk endometrial cancer. However, so far there is no evidence of improved overall or disease-specific survival after adjuvant radiotherapy. There is accumulating evidence that MMR proteins are involved in DNA repair following radiotherapy. We investigated the predictive value of MMR status in terms of survival benefit after adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with stage IB/II, grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). Methods: A retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed to compare patients with histopathologically confirmed stage IB/II grade 3 EEC with and without adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients were classified according to the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) identifying ECs as either MMR-deficient, POLE, p53abn or p53wt. Multivariable Cox regression analysis explored associations between patient characteristics, adjuvant treatment and outcome. Results: A total of 128 patients were analyzed, including 57 patients (43.0%) with MMR-deficient EECs. Baseline characteristics were comparable, except a higher proportion of MMR-deficient EECs were stage II (36.8% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.006). Eighty-two patients (64.1%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (external beam [n = 55], vaginal brachytherapy [n = 27]). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was independently associated with improved disease-specific survival in patients with MMR-deficient EECs (hazard ratio 0.19, 95%-CI 0.05 - 0.77), but not in patients with MMR-proficient EECs (hazard ratio 0.92, 95%-CI 0.37 - 2.31). Conclusions: Adjuvant radiotherapy improved disease-specific survival in patients with MMR-deficient EECs, but not in those with MMR-proficient EECs. This study demonstrates the predictive ability of MMR IHC to identify women who likely have increased benefit from radiotherapy.

Mismatch repair deficiency as a predictive marker for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in endometrial cancer

BackgroundMismatch repair (MMR) deficiency is found in 20 to 40% of endometrial cancers (ECs) and was recently identified as a discerning feature of one of the four prognostic subgroups identified by The Cancer Genome Atlas. There is accumulating evidence that MMR proteins are involved in the DNA repair processes following radiotherapy. We investigated the predictive value of MMR status for response to adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with stage IB/II, grade 3 endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC). MethodsA retrospective multicenter cohort study was performed to compare patients with histopathologically confirmed stage IB/II grade 3 EEC with and without adjuvant radiotherapy. Patients were classified according to the Proactive Molecular Risk Classifier for Endometrial Cancer (ProMisE) identifying ECs as either MMR-deficient, POLE, p53abn or p53wt. Multivariable Cox regression analysis explored associations between adjuvant treatment and outcome. ResultsA total of 128 patients were analyzed, including 57 patients (43.0%) with MMR-deficient EECs. Baseline characteristics were comparable, except a higher proportion of MMR-deficient EECs were stage II (36.8% vs. 15.5%, p = 0.006). Eighty-two patients (64.1%) received adjuvant radiotherapy (external beam [n = 55], vaginal brachytherapy [n = 27]). In multivariable analysis, adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with improved disease-specific survival in patients with MMR-deficient EECs (hazard ratio 0.19, 95%-CI 0.05–0.77), but not in patients with MMR-proficient EECs (hazard ratio 0.92, 95%-CI 0.37–2.31). ConclusionAdjuvant radiotherapy improved survival in patients with MMR-deficient EECs. MMR status could be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients that benefit most from adjuvant radiotherapy.

The Effect of Prognostic Factors and Adjuvant Radiotherapy on Survival in Patients with High-Grade Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer: A Retrospective Clinical Study

BackgroundThis retrospective clinical study aimed to investigate the effect of prognostic factors and adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with high-grade early-stage endometrial cancer on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).Material/MethodsThe medical records of patients diagnosed with high-grade, early stage (I or II) endometrial adenocarcinoma who had received adjuvant radiotherapy after surgery were reviewed.ResultsSeventy-nine patients included 39 patients (49.4%) with stage II endometrial cancer, 25 patients (31.6%) with histologic grade 3 tumors, and 47 patients (59.5%) with endometrial cancer showing lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). There were 45 patients (57.0%) who received external pelvic radiotherapy with an average dose of 46.0 Gy (range, 11.2–50.4 Gy), and 34 patients (43.0%) received vaginal brachytherapy (VBT) with an average dose of 21.5 Gy (range, 10–36 Gy). Multivariate analysis showed that tumor stage (HR, 4.066; 95% CI, 1.227–13.467; p=0.022) and histologic grade (HR, 16.652; 95% CI, 4.430–62.589; p<0.001) were independent predictors for OS. Increased serum CA-125 levels (HR, 1.136; 95% CI, 0.995–1.653; p=0.047) and histologic grade (HR, 3.236; 95% CI, 1.107–15.156; p=0.015) were independent predictors for DFS. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not found to be significantly associated with improved OS (HR, 1.259; 95% CI, 0.518–3.058; p=0.612) or DFS (HR, 1.056; 95% CI, 0.994–1.123; p=0.078).ConclusionsThis retrospective study showed that in high-grade early-stage endometrial cancer treated with postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy, independent predictors for OS were tumor stage and grade. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with improved OS or DFS.

The necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in China.

Nearly 50% of the new gastric cancer cases and gastric cancer-related deaths worldwide occur in China. Although the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer from the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China have explicitly emphasized the necessity of adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer, few clinical institutions in China routinely administer postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with gastric cancer. At present, radical resection combined with postoperative chemotherapy alone is the most common treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in China. However, several phase III prospective randomized controlled trials in Europe have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy alone after a radical resection does not improve the disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer. As in Japan and South Korea, D2 radical resection is the recommended surgical approach for gastric cancer in China. However, several studies have shown that the rate of D2 resection in the treatment of gastric cancer patients in China is low. Nearly 50% of patients undergo a D0-1 radical resection, even at the leading gastric cancer centers in China. The results of the INT-0116 study in the US suggest that gastric cancer patients who undergo a D0-1 radical resection and have stage T3-4 or N+ disease should receive concurrent postoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy. In conclusion, many patients with gastric cancer do not receive a standard D2 resection in China. As a result, it is important to consider postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation especially in those patients who undergo a D0-1 radical resection.

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma of the Parotid: Very Close Margins and Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Background/Aims: The importance of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with close margin resections for mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the parotid gland remains unclear. Methods: Patients who underwent parotidectomy for mucoepidermoid carcinoma with or without adjuvant radiotherapy at a single academic tertiary care center from 2000 to 2014 were identified. Included patients had negative but close (≤2 mm) surgical margins without other high-risk histopathological factors including advanced T-stage, positive nodal disease, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, or high-grade histology. Results: Nineteen patients were identified, of whom 15 (79%) were observed postoperatively, while 4 (21%) underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. There were no significant differences in extent of parotidectomy, elective neck dissection, T staging, or tumor size between patients who were observed and those undergoing adjuvant radiation. There were no locoregional or distant recurrences in any patients at a mean follow up 74.3 months. Patients undergoing adjuvant radiation, however, had significantly more intermediate-grade as compared to low-grade histology (75% vs. 13%, difference 62%, 95% CI 4% to 100%). Conclusions: Patients with negative but close (≤2 mm) surgical margins without other high-risk histopathological factors have excellent long-term locoregional control with surgery alone. The effects of adjuvant radiotherapy for those who have intermediate-grade disease remain uncertain.

The role of radiotherapy in the management of non-melanoma skin cancer.

The global incidence of non-melanoma skin cancer continues to increase as the global population ages with the highest incidence in the world occurring in Australian and New Zealand patients. There are numerous treatment options available for non-melanoma skin cancer patients of which radiotherapy is an efficacious and versatile tissue preserving non-surgical (or medical) option. In patients where excision may not be an option (medically/technically inoperable) or considered less ideal (e.g. cosmetic outcome), radiotherapy offers an excellent option. Following surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with unfavourable pathology can decrease the risk of recurrence and associated morbidity. Elderly and co-morbid patients with poor performance status can benefit from short-course hypofractionated radiotherapy in the setting where surgery is not an option. As with any modality, radiotherapy has advantages and disadvantages and it is therefore important for clinicians to appreciate these. We aim to present an update for clinicians that manage patients with non-melanoma skin cancer on the role of radiotherapy.

The necessity of adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer in China

Nearly 50% of the new gastric cancer cases and gastric cancer-related deaths worldwide occur in China. Although the Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer from the National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China have explicitly emphasized the necessity of adjuvant chemoradiation for gastric cancer, few clinical institutions in China routinely administer postoperative adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with gastric cancer. At present, radical resection combined with postoperative chemotherapy alone is the most common treatment for locally advanced gastric cancer in China. However, several phase III prospective randomized controlled trials in Europe have shown that adjuvant chemotherapy alone after a radical resection does not improve the disease-free survival (DFS) or overall survival (OS) of patients with gastric cancer. As in Japan and South Korea, D2 radical resection is the recommended surgical approach for gastric cancer in China. However, several studies have shown that the rate of D2 resection in the treatment of gastric cancer patients in China is low. Nearly 50% of patients undergo a D0-1 radical resection, even at the leading gastric cancer centers in China. The results of the INT-0116 study in the US suggest that gastric cancer patients who undergo a D0-1 radical resection and have stage T3-4 or N+ disease should receive concurrent postoperative radiation therapy and chemotherapy. In conclusion, many patients with gastric cancer do not receive a standard D2 resection in China. As a result, it is important to consider postoperative adjuvant chemoradiation especially in those patients who undergo a D0-1 radical resection.

Ophthalmic Changes Following Maxillectomy With or Without Postoperative Radiation Therapy.

To evaluate ophthalmic complications and quantitatively assess anatomic changes following maxillectomy with or without adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with midface malignancy. Twenty-four patients who underwent maxillectomy for sinus and/or paranasal cancer were included for retrospective review. Patients with complete ophthalmic examinations were evaluated for postoperative findings corresponding to sequelae of treatment. When available, anatomical changes including eyelid position were quantified from preoperative and postoperative full-face photos using computer software. The most common complications identified in patients after maxillectomy were retraction/ectropion (50%), epiphora (29%), and exposure keratopathy/dry eye syndrome (25%). Patients treated with maxillectomy with adjuvant radiation therapy were more frequently found to have ophthalmic complications following treatment. In patients with available postoperative photos (n = 10), the mean ipsilateral margin reflex distance (MRD)2 and inferior scleral show were 8.4 mm and 2.4 mm, respectively. In patients with available preoperative photos (n = 5), the mean change in MRD2 and inferior scleral show following maxillectomy was 3.4 mm and 2.8 mm, respectively. Patients undergoing maxillectomy for the treatment of head and neck malignancy may be at significant risk for development of specific periocular complications. Lower eyelid malposition was the most significant postoperative quantitative eyelid change following maxillectomy, which may be exacerbated by adjuvant radiotherapy and inferior orbital rim removal.

723 - Persistent under-utilization of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with adverse pathological features at radical prostatectomy: A national cancer database (NCDB) analysis

723 - Persistent under-utilization of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with adverse pathological features at radical prostatectomy: A national cancer database (NCDB) analysis

Adjuvant radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma: A Single-institutional experience.

There is no consensus regarding the management of Stage 1 seminomas following inguinal orchiectomy. In this study, we evaluated the treatment results and treatment-related toxicity for patients with Stage 1 seminomas treated with adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) at a single institution. Sixty-five patients who underwent adjuvant RT following orchiectomy for Stage 1 seminomas between January 1996 and December 2007 were retrospectively reviewed. The age, tumor location, histopathological type, stage, tumor size, RT field, and radiation dose were recorded for all patients. The patients' ages ranged from 17 to 61 years (median, 37 years). Sixty-three patients (97%) were diagnosed with classical seminoma and the remaining two patients (3%) had spermatocytic seminoma. After orchiectomy, 37 patients (57%) received para-aortic RT and 28 patients (43%) received dog-leg field RT. RT was applied with 1.8-2 Gy/day fractionation and the median RT dose was 26 Gy (range, 20-38). Follow-up ranged from 0.3 to 18 years (median, 9.5 years). Local control had been achieved in all patients and all of them were alive with no evidence of disease. Fifty-one patients (77%) had at least 5 years of follow-up and 27 patients (41%) had at least 10 years of follow-up. Overall survival at 10 years was 100%. Although retrospective in nature, this single-institutional study provides useful information about the outcomes and toxicities associated with adjuvant RT in patients with Stage 1 seminomas reporting excellent disease control and survival rates at the expense of acceptable toxicity.

Adjuvant radiotherapy after surgical resection for adrenocortical carcinoma: A systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis.

Historically, the role of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for patients with adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) has been controversial. The objective of this research is to review systematically the literature evaluating the role of adjuvant RT in patients with ACC undergone a surgical resection. The electronic databases were searched for articles published until July 2017 without language restriction: Lilacs, Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane. Two reviewers independently appraised the eligibility criteria and extracted data. When possible, a fixed-effect meta-analysis was done. The systematic review (SR) followed all the criteria of the MOOSE guideline. Overall, 382 citations were identified. After the screening of titles and abstracts, 12 articles (eight case series [48 patients] and 4 cohort studies [136 patients]) were included in the final analysis. For the local recurrence, the pooled relative risk (RR) was RR = 0.46 (95% confidence interval: 0.28-0.75), in favor of adjuvant RT when compared with surgery alone. Concerning overall mortality and disease recurrence, no significant difference between adjuvant RT and surgery was detected, RR = 0.77 (CI 95% 0.49-1.22, P = 0.27), and RR = 0.95 (IC 95% 0.74-1.24, P = 0.67). In all cohort studies, the acute toxicities were graduated as mild and self-limited with nausea and fatigue being the most common symptoms. Only one case (1/50) of impairment of kidney function was detected as late toxicity in these studies. This SR and meta-analysis indicate that adjuvant RT dramatically reduces the local recurrence of ACC after surgery. Moreover, the treatment has a low acute and late toxicity, resulting in a high therapeutic index. Further, prospective studies are needed to confirm or refute the role of RT on survival and disease recurrence.

Toxicity of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Review Study Toxicity of Breast Adjuvant Radiotherap

Conservative treatment in early-stage breast cancer is considered a standard approach. Breast preserving surgery with adjuvant radiotherapy is as effective as mastectomy in the early stages of breast cancer to control local disease and distant metastasis and maintain the overall survival rate. Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of axillary spread and new techniques of breast preservation surgery will probably lead to a reduction in mastectomy-related complications. However, the complications of adjuvant radiotherapy remain a challenge. Cutaneous, cardiac, and pulmonary toxicity are the main complications of adjuvant breast irradiation. The multidisciplinary features (systemic treatment, endocrine therapy, and surgery), patient profile (history of underlying diseases, age, and habits), and irradiation-associated parameters are the factors affecting safe adjuvant radiotherapy. Advances in irradiation techniques and facilities related to the preservation of organs at risk (such as IGRT, tracing and tracking systems, and respiratory gating) are modern tools for reducing the risk of toxicity. Reported data from clinical trials or retrospective surveys greatly help physicians in consulting the patients on the efficacy and potential side effects of treatment and leads to the improvement of the decision making process.

Adherence to guidelines and benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with invasive breast cancer: results from a large population-based cohort study of a cancer registry.

According to German S3 guidelines, radiotherapy (RT) is indicated in patients with invasive breast cancer after breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The aim of this analysis was to assess adherence to guidelines, long-term survival, recurrence rates, and recurrence-free survival after adjuvant RT in patients with BCT in daily clinical practice. This retrospective cohort study comprised data from the population-based clinical cancer registry of the Tumor Centre Regensburg (Bavaria, Germany). 6370 patients with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer and UICC tumor stages I, II, and III who were treated in certified breast cancer centers by BCT and diagnosed between 2003 and 2013 were included in the study. 6184 (97.1%) breast cancer patients received guideline concordant RT and showed a 3-year overall survival (OAS) of 96.8% in contrast to 90.9% in patients without RT (5-year OAS of 93.1% vs. 79.0%, p < 0.001). In multivariable Cox regression models, better overall survival was confirmed for the RT group (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.46-0.88, p = 0.007). The 5-year local recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) in the irradiated patients was 92.1% vs. 62.0% in the comparison group (p < 0.001). The 10-year RFS was 80.5% vs. 36.0% (p < 0.001). This difference persisted after adjusting in multivariable analysis (HR 0.20, 95% CI 0.16-0.26, p < 0.001). This population-based analysis showed that the implementation of German guidelines in clinical routine was successful and guideline concordant adjuvant radiotherapy after BCT leads to better overall and recurrence-free survival and lower local recurrence rates.

Statement of Retraction: Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in advanced stage (III/IV) improves the outcome in the rituximab era

This article refers to:Retracted article: Adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma in advanced stage (III/IV) improves the outcome in the rituximab era

Analysis of postoperative radiotherapy effects within risk groups in patients with FIGO I, II, and III endometrial cancer.

To define indications for adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with endometrial cancer, the risk groups have been established according to clinical and pathological prognostic factors. The purpose was to determine precise criteria for adjuvant radiotherapy and identify patients with increased risk for disease relapse who may benefit from postoperative radiotherapy, with an acceptable level of toxicity. A retrospective study was conducted at the Department of Oncology and Radiology, Kragujevac, during a 5-year period. A group of 80 patients with endometrial cancer treated with adjuvant radiotherapy were included in the study. Patients were divided into four risk groups according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference classification. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for overall and progression-free survival. A statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 20.0 statistical software. The 5-year survival rate was 80%, and 66.3% patients were progression-free during this period. Fatal outcome occurred in 20% of patients. The results showed survival was shortest in patients from the high-risk group. Factors that had impact on the 5-year survival were comorbidities, FIGO stage, postoperative radiotherapy, organ site of late toxicity, and localization of metastases. The analysis of postoperative radiotherapy effects showed that 72.5% of patients had no complications. The most common symptoms of late irradiation toxicity arose from the gastrointestinal tract. Toxicity was usually moderate. Adjuvant radiotherapy can potentially prolong survival and prevent recurrence, with acceptable level of toxicity, to preserve patient's quality of life. Patient classification into appropriate risk groups allows for adjuvant treatment individualization.

Association of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy With Survival in Patients With Advanced Cutaneous Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck

Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. There is conflicting evidence regarding the indications for and benefits of adjuvant radiation therapy for advanced CSCC tumors of the head and neck. To assess indications for adjuvant radiation therapy in patients with CSCC. Retrospective analysis of 349 patients with head and neck CSCC treated with primary resection with or without adjuvant radiation therapy at 2 tertiary referral centers from January 1, 2008, to June 30, 2016. Data were compared between treatment groups with a χ2 analysis. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression. A total of 349 patients had tumors that met the inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 70 [12] years; age range, 32-94 years; 302 [86.5%] male), and 191 (54.7%) received adjuvant radiation therapy. The 5-year Kaplan-Meier estimates were 59.4% for DFS and 47.4% for OS. Patients with larger, regionally metastatic, poorly differentiated tumors with perineural invasion (PNI) and younger immunosuppressed patients were more likely to receive adjuvant radiation therapy. On Cox proportional hazards multivariate regression, patients with periorbital tumors (hazard ratio [HR], 2.48; 95% CI, 1.00-6.16), PNI (HR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.12-3.19), or N2 or greater nodal disease (HR, 2.16; 95% CI, 1.13-4.16) had lower DFS. Immunosuppressed patients (HR, 2.17; 95% CI, 1.12-4.17) and those with N2 or greater nodal disease (HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.42-4.17) had lower OS. Adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved OS for the entire cohort (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.38-0.90). In a subset analysis of tumors with PNI, adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.93) and OS (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.24-0.86). Adjuvant radiation therapy was also associated with improved DFS (HR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.15-0.84) and OS (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.15-0.61) in patients with regional disease. Among patients with advanced CSCC, receipt of adjuvant radiation therapy was associated with improved survival in those with PNI and regional disease.