Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Research Articles

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence

BackgroundA substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine backbone. Patients and MethodsWe analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined. ResultsOne thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, P < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, P < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (P < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, P < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, P < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, P = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, P = .18). ConclusionOP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.

Risk Factors for Thrombocytopenia Induced by Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Therapy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) therapy is used as an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Although oxaliplatin induces thrombocytopenia, the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in oxaliplatin-treated patients with CRC are not well established. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in CapeOX-treated patients with CRC. In addition, we evaluated platelet counts and non-invasive liver fibrosis indices, specifically the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), during CapeOX therapy in these patients. Between July 2017 and June 2020, we enrolled CapeOX-treated patients with high-risk stage II or stage III CRC at seven hospitals collaborating with the Division of Oncology, Aichi Prefectural Society of Hospital Pharmacists (Aichi prefecture, Japan). In this retrospective study, we investigated patients' backgrounds, laboratory data, concomitant medications, number of cycles of CapeOX and oxaliplatin, cumulative dose of oxaliplatin, and administration period. The cut-off values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis of platelet counts and APRI and FIB-4 scores. Fifty-five patients without thrombocytopenia and 44 patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. During CapeOX therapy, the thrombocytopenia group showed a significant decrease in platelet count and a significant increase in APRI and FIB-4 scores compared to the non-thrombocytopenia group. Baseline albumin level ≤3.5 g/dl and platelet count ≤238×103/μl were independently associated with ≥grade 2 thrombocytopenia in CapeOX-treated patients. Baseline albumin level and platelet count may be useful for predicting thrombocytopenia in CapeOX-treated patients with high-risk stage II or stage III CRC.

Evaluation of the predictive effect of PD-L1 expression on survival in early triple-negative breast cancer

Objectives: To find the prognostic factors related to early triple-negative breast cancer to optimize the therapeutic strategies, and explore the influence of programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1)expression in early triple-negative breast cancer on its prognosis, so as to provide support for clinical treatment decisions. Methods: Early triple-negative breast cancer patients treated at the National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences during 1st June, 2009 and 31st Oct, 2015 were enrolled in this study. All the clinicopathological data of patients were collected, and the paraffin sections of the surgical specimens were stained with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), androgen receptor, PD-L1 and other antibodies by the immunohistochemical method. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression curves were used for survival analysis of relevant clinical and pathological results and nomogram survival prediction models were established to explore the influence of relevant factors on the prognosis. Results: A total of 205 patients with triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled. Ninety patients (43.9%) were PD-L1 positive. The median follow-up time was 63 months. Thirty-seven patients were relapsed or recurrent and 16 patients were dead. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 86.1% (95% CI: 81.4%-90.8%) and 93.6% (95% CI: 91.0%-97.6%), respectively, in the general population. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that PD-L1 expression and lymph node metastasis were correlated with DFS and OS (P<0.05). In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 expression was an independent influencing factor of DFS, with PD-L1 positive patients possessing a significant survival benefit in DFS (HR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.13-0.73). Lymph node metastasis was an independent influencing factor of OS, and OS was significantly shortened in patients with positive lymph node metastasis (HR=3.24, 95% CI: 1.15-9.17). PD-L1, lymph node metastasis, menopausal status, Ki-67 index and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen were included to establish the 1- and 3-year DFS and OS nomogram prediction models, resulting in C indices of 0.698 and 0.748, respectively. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker of good prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer patients. DFS is significantly prolonged in PD-L1 positive patients and OS also shows a prolongation trend. The nomogram prognosis prediction models have reference values for adjuvant chemotherapy in this patient group.

Major cardiovascular adverse events in older adults with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane + anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens: A SEER-medicare study

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive as compared to other subtypes of breast cancer with characteristic metastatic patterns and a poor prognosis. The standard of care for early-stage TNBC is historically anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (ATAX). Despite the effectiveness of this regimen, anthracyclines carry a small but important risk of cardiotoxicity, which is specifically a concern in the older population. This study evaluates major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in older women with TNBC treated with ATAX compared to taxane-based chemotherapy (TAX). MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified women aged 66 and older with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 (N = 2215). We compared patient and clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate three-year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmia, and cerebral vascular incidence. Few patients experienced a cardiac death and therefore this was excluded in the analysis. ResultsOf the 2215 patients in our cohort, most patients (n = 1334; 60.26%) received TAX compared to ATAX (n = 881; 39.78%). Patients who received ATAX were not statistically significantly more likely than those who received TAX to experience acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), or potentially fatal arrhythmia when controlling for traditional risk factors. Among patients who experienced MACE, there was no difference in OS or CSS in patients who received TAX vs ATAX. Patients who received ATAX were less likely to develop heart failure than those who received TAX (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.45–0.88], p < 0.01). Patients who developed MACE and who were > 76 years old had worse OS compared to those who experienced MACE and were age 66–75 years old (HR 1.67, 95% CI [1.07–2.62], p = 0.02). ConclusionAmong older women with TNBC, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX was not associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. For those who experienced a cardiac event, there was no difference in survival amongst those who received TAX vs ATAX. Other factors including additional chemotherapy toxicities should be investigated as a potential etiology for the inferior OS previously observed with ATAX vs TAX in older women with node negative or 1–3 positive lymph nodes.

Small bowel adenocarcinomas with favorable prognoses by radical resection and adjuvant chemotherapy: a case series of five cases

BackgroundSmall bowel cancer is very rare, accounting for less than 5% of all gastrointestinal cancers, and small bowel adenocarcinoma accounts for approximately 40% of all small bowel cancers. Small bowel adenocarcinoma is often found in advanced stages, with only 40–65% of cases being curatively resectable. The prognosis is poor, with a 5-year survival rate of 14–33% for all patients and 40–60% for those who are curatively resectable. In Japan, practice guidelines for duodenal cancer were instituted in 2021. However, evidence-based standard treatments have not been established for jejunal and ileal cancers. In particular, chemotherapeutic options are limited, and there are only a few reports on multidisciplinary treatments, including adjuvant chemotherapy.Case presentationWe report five cases of jejunal or ileal lesions that were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy after radical resection. Three patients were male and two were female, with a median age of 67 years. Tumor localization was observed in the jejunum in all cases. Clinical staging was as follows: stage IIIA in two cases and stage IIIB in three cases. Laparotomy was then performed in all cases, employing partial resection with lymph node dissection. Pathological staging in all cases was as follows: stage IIB in two cases, stage IIIA in one case, and stage IIIB in two cases. In all cases, the regimen for adjuvant chemotherapy was selected based on the colorectal cancer guidelines. No serious complications arose from adjuvant therapy; however, adverse events occurred in patients receiving multi-agent chemotherapy. No recurrence was observed in any of the cases, and all the patients survived, with a median survival time of 32 months. As a representative case, we present a case of adjuvant chemotherapy for jejunal adenocarcinoma staged as pT3N2M0, pStage IIIB, with no recurrence at 32 months postoperatively.ConclusionsIn general, favorable outcomes were achieved with adjuvant therapy applied in accordance with the criteria for colorectal cancer. These favorable outcomes suggest that it is necessary to identify the risk factors and indications for adjuvant therapy, specifically for small bowel adenocarcinoma.

Effectiveness of perioperative chemotherapy and radical cystectomy in treating bladder cancer

BackgroundDespite abundant evidence supporting the use of perioperative chemotherapy from clinical trials, no study to date has comprehensively evaluated its use in the treatment of muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) in the real-world setting. Little is known regarding the impact of pretreatment disease stage and real-world factors such as patient comorbidities preventing timely completion of therapy on its effectiveness. This study aims to assess the usage of perioperative chemotherapy and examines its impact on pathologic downstaging rates and recurrence free survival in patients undergoing radical cystectomy. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted in 805 patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer undergoing radical cystectomy with no perioperative chemotherapy, 761 with presurgical chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy, and 134 radical cystectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Relevant clinicopathologic features were reviewed. Recurrence-free survival and Overall Survival probability estimates were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and compared using the Log-rank or Gehan-Breslow tests. The prognostic effects of presurgical chemotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were evaluated by estimating hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval from an adjusted Cox proportional hazards model. Statistical tests were 2-sided, and significance was defined as P-value < 0.05. ResultsIn this contemporary, real-world cohort, 5-yr RFS was found to be 65.6% in pT0, 59.1%in <pT2, 35.4% in pT2, 15.3% in >pT2, and 10.8% in pN+ patients. Presurgical chemotherapy increased pathologic downstaging rates from 27.5% to 41.1% in patients with ≥cT2 BCa. Stratified by clinical T-stage, only cT2 patients derived recurrence-free survival (Median 45.3 months vs. 29.0 months, P < 0.01) and overall survival (Median 62.3 months vs. 41.9 months, P < 0.001) benefits. In patients with adverse pathologic features (≥pT3 or pN+), adjuvant chemotherapy improved recurrence-free survival (Median 22.8 months vs. 10.0 months, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (Median OS 32.4 months vs. 16.3 months, P < 0.0001). ConclusionsWe report real-world outcomes from a large cohort of muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment with/out perioperative chemotherapy. Pathologic response rates to pre-surgical chemotherapy were modest and led to clinical benefit only in cT2 patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy provided survival benefit for pathologically advanced MIBC patients irrespective of pT/N staging.

Review of surgical strategies in gastric cancer

Abstract Successful and effective management of gastric cancer involves a multidisciplinary approach. Accurate and appropriate staging of gastric cancer is mandatory to define the optimum treatment strategy. Safe surgery achieving R0 resection is considered potentially curative. Surgery remains the cornerstone of multimodal therapy. There is a well-defined role for neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Newer medications and chemotherapy combinations have improved tumor response rates, which have translated into more effective surgery and reduced local recurrences and improved long-term survivals.

Using oral tegafur/uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colorectal cancer: a propensity score matching study from Taiwan

BackgroundEarly-stage colorectal cancer had excellent outcomes after curative resection, typically. However, a perplexing survival paradox between stage II and stage III was noted. This paradox could be influenced by the administration of routine postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy and the presence of high-risk factors in stage II CRC. The objective of the study was to investigate the influence of high-risk factors on patients with stage II CRC and assess the efficacy of oral tegafur/uracil (UFT) plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II CRC patients.MethodsA retrospective study was conducted using propensity score matching at a single medical institution. A total of 1544 patients with stage II colorectal cancer who underwent radical surgery between January 2004 and January 2009 were included. The intervention used was tegafur/uracil plus leucovorin as adjuvant chemotherapy. The main outcome measures were disease-free survival and overall survival.ResultsAfter propensity score matching, 261 patients were included in three groups: no-treatment, half-year treatment, and one-year treatment. The clinical characteristics of each group tended to be more consistent. The Cox proportional hazard models showed that tegafur/uracil treatment or not was a significant independent factor for oncological outcome. Kaplan–Meier analysis also showed significantly better disease-free survival and overall survival. Further investigation revealed that tegafur/uracil duration was an independent factor for oncological outcome. While the survival curve did not reach statistical significance, the one-year UFT treatment group demonstrated the best treatment trend.ConclusionsThis study suggests that tegafur/uracil plus leucovorin is a feasible adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with stage II colorectal cancer after curative surgical treatment. Prolonged tegafur/uracil plus leucovorin treatment for 12 months showed a trend towards better outcomes in patients with stage II colorectal cancer.

Survival Differences of Patients with Resected Extraskeletal Osteosarcoma Receiving Two Different (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

AimsExtraskeletal osteosarcoma (ESOS) is a malignant tumour developing in soft tissues, characterised by the production of osteoid or bone matrix by tumour cells. The standard treatment for localised ESOS is wide resection. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy are usually incorporated into the management of patients. Two types of chemotherapy regimen are mostly used: an osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy, based on cisplatin, and a soft-tissue sarcoma (STS)-type chemotherapy, using the combination of doxorubicin and ifosfamide. To investigate the difference in survival between these two chemotherapy regimens, a systematic review of studies reporting the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates among patients with ESOS submitted to surgery and who received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy with osteosarcoma-type or STS-type chemotherapy was carried out. Materials and methodsOf the 401 articles identified by systematically searching the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, six retrospective studies were included in the final analysis. In total, 319 patients with localised/resected ESOS were included in the study. ResultsOur meta-analysis showed a benefit in 5-year DFS favouring the use of osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy (relative risk = 1.32, 95% confidence interval 1.03–1.69; P = 0.54); I2 heterogeneity was 0%. The 5-year DFS rate was 56.3% (95% confidence interval 48.3–64.3) with osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy and 45.2% (95% confidence interval 34.5–55.9) with STS-type chemotherapy, with I2 heterogeneity of 27% and 0%, respectively. ConclusionsOur analysis suggests that there may be a difference regarding the type of (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy regimen used in the treatment of patients with resected ESOS in favour of osteosarcoma-type chemotherapy. Future studies evaluating the role of this treatment modality in this scenario need to consider the type of chemotherapy regimen when comparing with an arm of surgery with/without radiotherapy alone.

Risk Factors for Relapse in Nonseminomatous Testicular Cancer After Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection With Viable Residual Cancer.

No consensus exists on the management of men with nonseminoma and viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in the postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (pcRPLND) specimen after first-line chemotherapy. We analyzed surveillance versus different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and the influence of time to pcRPLND on oncologic outcomes. Data on 117 men treated with cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy between 1990 and 2018 were collected from 13 institutions. All patients had viable nonteratomatous germ cell tumor in the pcRPLND specimen. Surgery was performed after a median of 57 days, followed by either surveillance (n = 64) or adjuvant chemotherapy (n = 53). Primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). After controlling for International Germ Cell Cancer Cooperative Group risk group and percent of viable malignant cells found at RPLND, no difference was observed between men managed with surveillance or adjuvant chemotherapy regarding PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI, 0.32 to 1.6]; P = .4), CSS (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.20 to 2.39; P = .6), and OS (HR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.25 to 2.44]; P = .7). No statistically significant differences for PFS, CSS, or OS were observed on the basis of chemotherapy regimen or in men treated with pcRPLND ≤57 versus >57 days after first-line chemotherapy. Residual disease with <10% versus ≥10% viable cancer cells were associated with a longer PFS (HR, 3.22 [95% CI, 1.29 to 8]; P = .012). Relapse in the retroperitoneum was observed in 34 (29%) men. Men with a complete resection at pcRPLND and <10% viable cells have favorable outcomes without further treatment. Complete retroperitoneal resection seems more important than early pcRPLND.

Coq10 for preventing cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab.

Trastuzumab is a successful treatment option for HER2-positive breast cancer, but a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and an increase in inflammatory and cardiac enzyme biomarkers can lead to cessation and termination of therapy. This study aimed to investigate the ability of Coenzyme Q10 (Coq10) to avoid these adverse effects. The study included 100 female patients with HER2+ (HER2+3 or amplified gene) breast cancer. All patients underwent standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, which involved a four-cycle treatment of Adriamycin, Cyclophosphamide, Docetaxel, and an initial 8 mg/kg loading dose of trastuzumab, followed by a year of 6 mg/kg maintenance doses every three weeks. One group of 50 patients received trastuzumab and a placebo, while the other 50 were given trastuzumab and CoQ10 for a full year. The CoQ10-treated group exhibited a statistically significant decrease in levels of monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), interleukin-6 (IL6), soluble toll-like receptor 4 (sTLR4), and cardiac troponin I (cTnI) compared to the control group (p<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in the mean F2-isoprostane levels between the treated and the control groups at any data collection point. Furthermore, the CoQ10-treated group experienced a significant reduction in the decline of EF levels compared to the control group at all stages except for baseline. According to our findings, Coenzyme Q10 protected patients with HER2+3 breast cancer from the cardiotoxicity of trastuzumab by increasing ejection fraction and decreasing inflammatory biomarkers and cardiac enzyme levels.

Retrospective Study of Treatment Patterns and Natural History of Patients with T1a/b N0 Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: A Single-Institution Experience

Introduction: T1a/b, node-negative (node−), triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) are underrepresented in randomized drug-approving clinical trials. Given their low incidence, the clinicopathological features, natural history, and treatment patterns of these tumors remain insufficiently understood. Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective cohort study of patients with T1a/b, N0, M0 TNBCs. Deidentified patient- and tumor-related data were collected and summarized. Kruskal-Wallis, χ2, or Fisher exact tests were used to evaluate associations of interest. Kaplan-Meier methods, log-rank tests, and Cox’s proportional hazards models were applied for survival analyses. Results: Of 108 cases of node– TNBCs measuring ≤2 cm, 34 node– T1a/b tumors were included in our analysis. All cases had an intermediate to high histological grade, and most had a Ki-67 score of ≥20%. All patients received adjuvant chemotherapy, and many underwent mastectomy (47%). Docetaxel combined with cyclophosphamide was the most common adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (75%). We did not observe significant associations between improved outcomes and treatment with anthracycline-containing regimens. Among patients with node– pT1a/b tumors, the estimated 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) and distant RFS rates were both 96.3% (95% CI: 76.5–99.5), and the overall survival rate was estimated to be 100% (95% CI: 100–100). There were no cases of local recurrences observed. Conclusions: In our cohort, all patients with T1a/b node– TNBCs were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy and had favorable outcomes even when treated with anthracycline-sparing regimens.

Long-term prognostic benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach after radical resection: A national multicenter study

BackgroundThere is no consensus on whether adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is effective for hepatoid adenocarcinoma of the stomach (HAS). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between AC and the long-term prognosis of patients with HAS. MethodsThe clinicopathological data of 239 patients with primary HAS who underwent radical surgery from April 1, 2004 to December 31, 2019 in 14 centers in China were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into the AC group (127 patients) and the nonadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group (112 patients). ResultsKaplan‒Meier (KM) analysis showed that there were no significant differences in the 1-year3-year overall survival rate (OS) and 1-year, 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) between the AC group and the NAC group (1-year OS: 85.6% vs. 79.8%, 3-year OS: 59.8% vs. 62.4%, 1-year RFS: 69.8% vs. 74.4%, 3-year RFS: 57.2% vs. 55.9%, all P > 0.05). The subpopulation treatment effect pattern plots (STEPP) did not show treatment heterogeneity of AC in patients with HAS. The proportions of local recurrence and metastasis sites in the two groups were similar. Although the smoothed hazard curves of the NAC and AC groups crossed, the peak hazard time was later in the AC group (5.9 and 4.7 months), and the peak hazard rate was lower (0.032 and 0.038, P = 0.987). ConclusionThe current AC regimen may not significantly improve the survival of patients with HAS after radical surgery.

Characteristics and Perioperative Risk Factors for Persistent Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study

Objective: Persistent pain is a common complication after breast cancer surgery. We sought to determine the characteristics of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery and identify perioperative risk factors associated with its development. Methods: This prospective cohort study uses data from a prior randomized controlled trial of 100 patients undergoing breast cancer surgery. Patients were assessed on the presence and characteristics of pain at 3 months after surgery. Baseline and perioperative data were explored for potential associations with persistent pain in univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: Fifty-three percent of patients reported persistent pain 3-months after surgery. Pain was primarily located in the axilla, chest, and shoulder, with the vast majority of patients with pain (96.2%) reporting a neuropathic pain feature. The mean intensity of pain was 2.5 (standard deviation [SD] 2.4, on a 0 to 10 pain scale) and persistent pain was associated with worse quality of life scores (p = 0.004) and increased use of analgesics (p = 0.015). Variables found to be associated with persistent pain in our univariable and multivariable-adjusted analyses were preoperative employment (OR 2.70, 95% CI 1.04–9.66, p = 0.042), acute postoperative pain during movement (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.06–2.51, p = 0.027), and adjuvant chemotherapy (OR 3.30, 95% CI 1.19 to 9.15, p = 0.022). Conclusions: Persistent pain after breast cancer surgery is neuropathic and is associated with reduced quality of life and increased analgesic need. Future research should focus on perioperative interventions to reduce acute postoperative pain and consideration of modified adjuvant chemotherapy regimens to address modifiable risk factors and potentially reduce the incidence of persistent pain after breast cancer surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer in South Africa.

Colon cancer incidence is rising in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where resource limitations and cost often dictate treatment decisions. In this study, we evaluate the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer treatment in South Africa (ZA) and illustrate how such analyses can inform cancer treatment recommendations in a LMIC. We created a decision-analytic Markov model to compare lifetime costs and outcomes for patients with high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer treated with three adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in a public hospital in ZA: capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) for 3 and 6 months, and capecitabine for 6 months, compared to no adjuvant treatment. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) in international dollars (I$) per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted, at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold equal to the 2021 ZA gross domestic product per capita (I$13,764/DALY averted). CAPOX for 3 months was cost-effective for both patients with high-risk stage II and patients with stage III colon cancer (ICER = I$250/DALY averted and I$1042/DALY averted, respectively), compared to no adjuvant chemotherapy. In subgroup analyses of patients by tumor stage and number of positive lymph nodes, for patients with high-risk stage II colon cancer and T4 tumors, and patients with stage III colon cancer with T4 or N2 disease. CAPOX for 6 months was cost-effective and the optimal strategy. The optimal strategy in other settings will vary by local WTP thresholds. Decision analytic tools can be used to identify cost-effective cancer treatment strategies in resource-constrained settings. Colon cancer incidence is increasing in low- and middle-income countries, including South Africa, where resource constraints can impact treatment decisions. This cost-effectiveness study evaluates three systemic adjuvant chemotherapy options, compared to surgery alone, for patients in South African public hospitals after surgical resection for high-risk stage II and stage III colon cancer. Doublet adjuvant chemotherapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) for 3 months is the cost-effective strategy and should be recommended in South Africa.

Decision-making for Subsequent Therapy for Patients With Recurrent or Advanced Endometrial Cancer Based on the Platinum-free Interval.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) of patients with recurrent endometrial cancer (REC) or advanced endometrial cancer (AEC) retreated with platinum-containing chemotherapy (PCC) based on the platinum-free interval (PFI). We compared our results with those reported in the KEYNOTE-775 study (that used pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib). A retrospective analysis was conducted of 65 patients with REC or AEC retreated with PCC between 2005 and 2020 at our hospital. Various clinicopathologic variables were analyzed: (1) age, (2) performance status, (3) histology, (4) history of pelvic irradiation in the adjuvant setting, (5) PFI, (6) chemotherapy regimen, (7) PFS and overall survival after retreatment with PCC, and (8) best ORR. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests. The best ORR and PFS were 43.3% and 9.5 months, respectively, in patients with REC/AEC with a PFI ≥6 months. These results were comparable with those of patients treated with pembrolizumab and lenvatinib. The best ORR and PFS of patients with a PFI of <6 months appeared to be inferior to those of patients treated with pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib. Pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib seems to be a better treatment choice for patients with REC or AEC with a PFI of <6 months. For a PFI of ≥6 months, pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib or PCC can be used depending on the degree of residual side -effects associated with cytotoxic agents.

A randomized trial of consolidation-targeted adjuvant therapy with encorafenib and cetuximab versus usual care for patients with stage II/III BRAF V600E colon cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology A022004.

TPS3641 Background: Patients with mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) BRAF V600E mutant high-risk stage II (T4) or stage III colon cancer have a substantial risk of recurrence despite standard adjuvant therapy. In patients with metastatic BRAF V600E mutant colorectal cancer, the combination of the RAF inhibitor encorafenib and the EGFR inhibitor cetuximab has been shown to improve overall and progression-free survival compared to standard therapy after at least one prior line of therapy. This study will evaluate if this combination improves disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with resected BRAF V600E mutant pMMR/microsatellite stable (MSS) high-risk stage II (T4) or stage III colon cancer after standard adjuvant therapy. Methods: The study has a seamless phase II/III design, enrolling a maximum of 394 patients. BRAF mutation status can be determined locally or submitted for central testing in trial pre-screening. Eligible patients will be randomized 1:1 to usual surveillance versus 6 months of treatment with encorafenib (300mg oral daily) plus cetuximab (500mg/m2 intravenous every 14 days). Stratification factors are adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (FOLFOX versus CAPOX), duration of adjuvant therapy (3 months versus &gt; 3 months), tumor stage (T4N0 versus T1-3N1 versus T4N1/TanyN2), and ctDNA marker status (detectable versus undetectable) at randomization. Adjuvant therapy must be completed at most 8 weeks prior to registration. For the phase II component, in the ctDNA detectable cohort, the primary endpoint will be ctDNA clearance rate at 6 months, and, in the ctDNA undetectable cohort, the primary endpoint will be 6-month ctDNA recurrence-free survival, where events consist of death, recurrence, or ctDNA positivity. The primary endpoint of the phase III component is DFS, and secondary endpoints are overall survival, adverse events, and alternative DFS calculated from the date of primary resection, rather than date of study randomization. Patient reported symptoms (PRO-CTCAE) will be collected and analyzed as an exploratory endpoint, and serial blood banking will support future correlative studies. The trial will proceed to the phase III portion if either of the two endpoints in the phase II cohorts is statistically superior in patients receiving encorafenib plus cetuximab. The phase III study sample size will provide 80% power at a one-sided α of 0.05 to detect an approximately 10% improvement in the three-year DFS rate, assuming 68% in the control arm. Two interim analyses will be performed for DFS endpoint. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . U10CA180820 (ECOG-ACRIN); U10CA180868 (NRG); U10CA180888 (SWOG); Pfizer, Eli Lilly; Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT05710406. Clinical trial information: NCT05710406 .

The impact of adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy in early adult granulosa cell tumor of the ovaries: A meta-analysis of comparative studies.

5547 Background: Adult granulosa cell tumors (AGCT) are the most common type of malignant ovarian sex chord stromal tumors but only comprise 2 to 5 percent of all malignant ovarian neoplasms. Most granulosa cell tumors have an indolent growth pattern, and prognosis depends on the disease stage at diagnosis and the presence of residual disease after surgery. Though these tumors have metastatic potential, their tendency for late relapses is well documented. Despite the lack of supporting data, the National Cancer Centers Network recommends platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for Stage I with intermediate and high-risk features. Most studies have failed to show any benefit of AC with disease-free or overall survival. However, several of these studies were small, and some had short median follow-ups. Others included advanced stages and the juvenile variant of the disease. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of AC on disease recurrence in a stage I enriched AGCT. Methods: A review of the medical literature was conducted using online databases. Inclusion criteria consisted of English language, diagnosis of AGCT, studies with a preponderance of stage I, comparative studies of AC versus none, and studies that reported recurrence rates. Studies that had a preponderance of advanced stages or juvenile variants were excluded. A meta-analysis using the fixed effects and random effects models was conducted. Results: Seven retrospective comparative studies with a total of 500 patients were included. The average median age was 47 years, and the average median follow-up was 58 months. Approximately 79% of the sample were stage I, and 79% of stage I were IC. Most AC regimens used were BEP and EP, though it varied among the regions. Platinum-based AC in early-stage AGCT failed to impact recurrence rates compared to clinical observation (HR=1.39, 95%CI 0.86-2.25, I2=48%, p=0.18). Conclusions: This is the first meta-analysis to show that adding platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy to surgery does not improve the recurrence rate in early AGCT. Therefore, in the absence of evidence supporting any benefit of AC in this disease, recommendations to use AC should be re-evaluated, especially since the risk of platinum-based AC with or without Bleomycin is well-documented and carry potentially serious side effects.

Utility of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a predictive biomarker for disease monitoring in patients (pts) with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) before and during adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT): Sub-analysis of the randomized phase 2 STAMP trial.

4123 Background: Detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in blood is a powerful predictive biomarker for identifying molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery. Not much is known about the utility of identifying MRD using ctDNA in pts with resected CCA, despite its associated poor prognosis. The STAMP trial (NCT03079427), a randomized phase 2 study comparing adjuvant capecitabine (CAP) to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GemCis) showed no difference in recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) between the 2 arms. The goal of this analysis was to evaluate the feasibility of monitoring ctDNA to predict the risk of recurrence in pts with resected CCA. Methods: A total of 254 plasma samples were collected from a cohort of 89 CCA (hilar, N = 43; distal, N = 46) pts post-surgery at 3 separate time points; pre-ACT (baseline, N = 89), on-ACT C5D1 (after 5 cycles of treatment) (N = 88), and on-ACT C8D1 (after 8 cycles of treatment) (N = 77). Longitudinal ctDNA testing was performed using a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay (Signatera, bespoke mPCR-NGS assay). ctDNA results were analyzed and evaluated for its correlation with RFS and OS. Results: At the MRD timepoint (baseline, pre-ACT), 24.7% (22/89) pts were ctDNA-positive, 90.9% (20/22) of whom recurred demonstrating a trend for shorter RFS (HR = 1.7, 95%Cl 0.98-2.8, p = 0.069) compared to ctDNA-negative pts. All pts who remained ctDNA-positive on-ACT at C5D1 (N = 17) and C8D1 (N = 15), recurred clinically with a significantly shorter RFS (HR = 8.1, 95%Cl 4.3-15, p &lt; 0.0001 and HR = 5.0, 95%Cl 2.7-9.4, p &lt; 0.0001, respectively). The primary cancer site (hilar vs distal) or type of ACT (CAP vs GemCis) had no impact on RFS irrespective of ct-DNA result. Pts who remained ctDNA-negative on ACT (N = 56) showed significantly better RFS compared to pts who remained positive (N = 10, HR = 6.6, 95%Cl 3.1-14, p &lt; 0.001), or who turned positive (N = 11, HR = 5.2, 95%Cl 2.54-10.5, p &lt; 0.001). In multivariate analysis including primary tumor site, sex, pathological grade and ACT regimen, positive ctDNA status at baseline (pre-ACT) remained significant for poor RFS (HR = 1.82, 95%CI 1.04-3.18, p = 0.035). Conclusions: Personalized monitoring of ctDNA both pre and on-ACT is feasible and predictive for recurrence in pts with resected CCA. To our best knowledge, this is one of the first reports presenting the clinical implication of ctDNA monitoring on ACT, in pts with CCA. Our findings suggest ctDNA monitoring may help optimize clinical decision-making in pts with resected CCA. Larger prospective studies would be needed to validate the findings of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT03079427 .

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant cisplatin-gemcitabine versus cisplatin-5-fluorouracil chemotherapy for N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial.

6000 Background: Patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma have a high risk of failures, despite the current practice of concurrent adjuvant cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (PF) regime. Adjuvant PF regimen may not be adequate for tumor control of high risk patients, emphasizing the need for more effective regimen of adjuvant chemotherapy in N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Methods: We conducted this multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial in four centers in China. Patients aged 18–65 years with stage T1–4N2–3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive concurrent cisplatin (100mg/m2 intravenously) on days 1, 22, and 43 of radiotherapy followed by either gemcitabine (1 g/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) (GP) once every 3 weeks or 5-fluorouracil (4 g/m2 in continuous intravenous infusion over 96 h) and cisplatin (80 mg/m2 on day 1 given intravenously) once every 4 weeks for three cycles. Randomisation was by a computer-generated random number code with a block size of six, stratified by treatment centre and nodal stage (N2 or N3). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03321539. Results: From October 30, 2017 to July 9, 2020, 240 were randomly assigned to PF group (n = 120) or GP group (n = 120). After a median follow-up of 40 months (IQR: 32-48), the 3-year progression-free survival was 83.9% (95% CI 75.9–89.4) in GP group and 71.5% (62.5–78.7) in PF group (stratified HR 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93; p = 0.023). Significantly lower cumulative incidence of locoregional relapse (2.6% vs. 12.5%; HR 0.33; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.90; Fine-Gray p = 0.030) and distant metastasis (10.4% vs. 20.1%; HR 0.50; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.98; Fine-Gray p = 0.042) were also observed in GP group than PF group. However, there was no effect on early 3-year overall survival (90.7% vs. 94.0%; HR 1.12; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.55; log-rank p = 0.779). Overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events was not significant different between the two treatment groups in the concurrent phase. In the adjuvant phase, significant higher incidence of grade 3-4 leucopenia (42 [41.2%] vs. 19 [16.8%], p &lt; 0.001), neutropenia (33 [32.0%] vs. 10 [8.9%], p = 0.001) and thrombocytopenia (9 [8.7%] vs. 2 [1.8%], p = 0.044) was observed in GP group than PF group, whereas the frequency of diarrhea (6 [5.3%] vs. 0 [0%], p = 0.030) and mucositis (21 [18.6%] vs. 7 [6.8%], p = 0.010) was higher in PF group than in GP group. Conclusions: Concurrent adjuvant GP regimen significantly improved progression-free survival in patients with N2-3 nasopharyngeal carcinoma with acceptable toxicity. Long term follow-up is needed to confirm the ultimate therapeutic ratio. Clinical trial information: NCT03321539 .