Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Research Articles

Abstract P1-10-09: The MHCII immune activation assay is prognostic for disease free survival in basal-like TNBC breast cancer patients in the GEICAM/9906 clinical trial

Abstract Background: Approximately 40% of patients with stage I-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) recur after standard treatment, while the remaining 60% experience long-term disease-free survival (DFS). There are currently no clinical tests to assess the risk of recurrence in TNBC patients. We previously developed and validated an MHCII Immune Activation assay, which measures a gene expression signature that includes the major histocompatibility complex class II (MHCII) pathway genes and markers of activated tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. The MHCII Immune Activation assay was recently shown to accurately assess the risk of recurrence in Basal-like TNBC patients using FFPE tissues from an institutional cohort. A limitation of the previous study is that the patients’ treatment regimens in the institutional cohort were heterogeneous. The goal of this study was to determine if the MHCII Immune Activation assay can accurately assess the DFS in Basal-like TNBC patients who received uniform chemotherapy regimens in the context of a randomized clinical trial. Methods: The MHCII Immune Activation assay was applied to RNA isolated from 60 Basal-like TNBC FFPE specimens from the GEICAM/9906 clinical trial, a multicenter randomized phase III study evaluating adjuvant chemotherapy in node-positive operable BC patients. Thirty nine (65%) of the patients were treated with fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC), and 21 (35%) patients received FEC followed by paclitaxel (FEC-P) (median follow-up 9.7 years). The MHCII Immune Activation Score was calculated from the assay using methods described previously, and patients were categorized into a High Risk of Recurrence (High ROR) group using pre-specified thresholds. The association between the MHCII Immune Activation Score and DFS was assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis and cox proportional hazards models. Results: Across both arms, 32/60 (53.3%) patients were classified into the High ROR group based on their Low MHCII Immune Activation Scores. Patients in the High ROR group had significantly shorter DFS (Hazard Ratio (HR)=2.9 (CI95%:1.27-6.66), p-value=0.0081). Cox proportional hazard regression of the log10 transformed MHCII Immune Activation Score confirmed that MHCII Immune Activation Score is significantly associated with DFS (Wald Test p=0.0127). In the FEC arm, there were 22/39 (56.41%) patients classified into the High ROR group (Low MHCII Immune Activation Score). Patients in the High ROR group in the FEC arm showed a trend toward shorter DFS (HR=1.99 (CI95%:0.74-5.31)), but it was not significant (p-value=0.1595). In the FEC-P arm, there were 10/21 (47.62%) patients classified into the High ROR group (Low MHCII Immune Activation Score). Patients in the High ROR group in the FEC-P arm had significantly shorter DFS (HR=6.28 (CI95%:1.28-30.73), p-value=0.0111). Larger cohorts will be needed to confirm if the association between DFS and MHCII Immune Activation Score is stronger when patients are treated with chemotherapy regimens that include paclitaxel. Conclusions: The MHCII Immune Activation assay can be applied to RNA from FFPE tumor specimens to assess risk of recurrence in TNBC patients. The MHCII Immune Activation Score is associated with risk of recurrence in TNBC patients treated with uniform adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Citation Format: Miguel Martín, Katherine L Updike, Alvaro Rodríguez-Lescure, Lourdes Calvo, Jesús Herranz, Nuria Martín, Philip S Bernard, Katherine E Varley. The MHCII immune activation assay is prognostic for disease free survival in basal-like TNBC breast cancer patients in the GEICAM/9906 clinical trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-10-09.

Significance of intratumoral tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) as predictictive factors of nivolumab therapy after conversion surgery for unresectable gastric cancer: A retrospective study.

412 Background: Conversion surgery for unresectable advanced gastric cancer has been increasing with the development of chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after conversion surgery have not been standardized. The main mechanism of nivolumab is augmentation of antitumor immune response of tumor infiltrating cytotoxic T cells (CTL) to cancer cells, and it has recently been reported that nivolumab therapy before and after chemotherapy is effective in other carcinomas. We previously reported that tertiary lymphoid architecture (TLS) correlates with tumor-infiltrating T cells and is associated with a better prognosis in untreated patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the presence of TLS in the primary tumor and prognosis in patients with gastric cancer who underwent conversion therapy. Methods: We evaluated 52 patients with advanced gastric cancer including 17 patients underwent conversion surgery and 35 patients underwent palliative surgery without prior chemotherapy in our department from 2009 to 2017. The local immune environment and presence of TLS was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Results: Intratumoral TLS occurred in 20% of patients with advanced cancer who did not receive chemotherapy before surgery and in 52% of patients who received conversion surgery. And the prognosis of patients with the presence of TLS was better than no TLS. Intratumoral CD8 T-cell infiltration was slightly associated presence of TLS. We had a case in which nivolumab was highly effective and converted to conversion surgery, and a case in which nivolumab was highly effective in patients with recurrence after conversion surgery. TLS was observed in the vicinity of the tumor in these patients. Conclusions: The prognosis was good in the case in which intratumoral TLS was present after conversion surgery. These results suggest that the adjuvant nivolumab therapy may improve the outcome of patients underwent conversion surgery for advanced gastric cancer. These results suggest that peri-tumor TLS is a predictor of nivolumab efficacy in adjuvant therapy after conversion surgery.

Multicenter retrospective observational study of pancreatic cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology intended for surgical resection.

695 Background: Although macroscopically curative resection has been performed for pancreatic cancer with positive peritoneal lavage cytology (CY1), the prognosis is poor in most reports. In 2013, the JASPAC01 trial showed that S-1 was superior to Gemcitabine (GEM) as adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer, and S-1 was also administered to the patients with CY1 who had undergone macroscopically curative resection. Methods: This is a multicenter retrospective observational study that collected data of the patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were diagnosed with CY1 between 2007 and 2015 and had no other noncurable factors. Results: One hundred twenty-seven patients were enrolled from 14 institutions, and 3 were excluded due to liver metastasis or non-adenocarcinoma. The median age was 67 years old and almost patients had PS 0 or 1. Of the 124 patients, 114 underwent macroscopically curative resection and the median overall survival (OS) and recurrence free survival (RFS) were 16.7 and 7.2 months. Of the resected patients, 80 (70%) had no early recurrence and started postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were S-1 in 43 patients (54%), GEM in 31 (39%) and others in 6 (7%). The median OS was 21.0 months with S-1 and 19.2 months with GEM (HR: 0.73, 95%CI: 0.44-1.22, P = 0.23), whereas the median RFS was 10.2 and 7.1 months (HR: 0.58, 95%CI: 0.36-0.95, P = 0.03), respectively. Conclusions: After the report of JASPAC01, most patients with pancreatic cancer with CY1 received macroscopically curative resection and treated with S-1 as adjuvant therapy, however the efficacy was insufficient. We should consider appropriate treatment strategies for patients with pancreatic cancer with CY1 intended for surgical resection.

Survival outcomes of adjuvant chemotherapy with modified weekly nab-paclitaxel and carboplatin for completely resected nonsmall cell lung cancer: FAST-nab.

The relatively low toxicity profile of nab-paclitaxel plus carboplatin and its feasibility as an adjuvant administration was reported previously. This study aimed to evaluate the survival efficacy for completely resected patients with stage IB, II, and IIIA nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Twenty-nine eligible patients with NSCLC who received surgical resection for pathological stage IB, II, or IIIA, followed by postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with modified 3-week cycles of either nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) (100 mg/m2) on days 1 and 8 followed by carboplatin area (area under the curve = 6) on day 1 were prospectively enrolled and assessed for survival outcomes against patients with the same stages who received other postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens during the same period. There were no significant differences in clinicopathological features, including age, gender, smoking status, performance status, surgical procedures, tumor histology, and pathological stage between the two groups. The cumulative overall survival (OS) rates at 5 years of the experimental and control groups in pathological stage IB–IIIA were 85.4% and 63.9%, respectively (P = 0.598), while recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in these groups at 5 years were 65.2% and 34.8%, respectively (P = 0.344). Moreover, the cumulative OS rates of the experimental and control groups in pathological stage II–IIIA were 83.6% and 63.6%, respectively (P = 0.970), while RFS rates in these groups at 5 years were 61.1% and 37.3%, respectively (P = 0.460). This new regimen was considered an attractive alternative postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy option with relatively low toxicity and moderate survival outcomes for completely resected NSCLC.

Effect of Chemotherapy, Laparoscopy, and Cytology on Stage IC Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma: A Long-Term, Single-Center Study.

Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is the second common histology of epithelial ovarian cancer in Taiwan. Stage IC is common, especially during minimally invasive surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy in stage IC OCCC is unavoidable, and paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in Taiwan is self-paid. However, surgical spillage from minimally invasive surgery as a cause of unfavorable prognosis is still uncertain. The information of patients with stage IC OCCC, corresponding to a period of January 1995 to December 2016, was retrospectively collected following a chart and pathology review. Data regarding surgical methods, cytology status, regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy, survivorship, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) period were analyzed. In total, 88 patients were analyzed, and 64 and 24 patients were treated with paclitaxel- and nonpaclitaxel-based chemotherapy, respectively. Recurrence was identical between the two groups: PFS (47.5 ± 41.36 versus 54.0 ± 53.9 months, p = 0.157) and OS (53.5 ± 38.14 versus 79.0 ± 49.42 months, p = 0.070). Of the 88 patients, 12 had undergone laparoscopy for histological confirmation before complete open staging surgery; however, their PFS (49.5 ± 46.84 versus 49.0 ± 35.55 months, p = 0.719) and OS (56.5 ± 43.4 versus 51.0 ± 32.77 months, p = 0.600) were still comparable. Cytology results were only available for 51 patients, and positive washing cytology results seemed to worsen PFS (p = 0.026) but not OS (p = 0.446). In conclusion, adjuvant nonpaclitaxel chemotherapy and laparoscopic tumor spillage before the staging operation did not worsen the outcome in stage IC OCCC. Positive washing cytology has a negative effect on PFS but not on OS.

Survival Advantage With Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Locoregionally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Veterans Health Administration Analysis.

Adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) after chemoradiation (CRT) and surgery for locoregionally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is a standard of care in the United States. This study examined the role, optimal regimen, and duration of AC using data from the largest integrated health system in the United States. Using the Veterans Affairs Central Cancer Registry, patients with stage II-III rectal cancer diagnosed in 2001 through 2011 who received neoadjuvant CRT and surgery with or without AC were identified. Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank tests, and propensity score (PS) adjustment analysis were used to assess survival. A total of 866 patients were identified; 417 received AC and 449 did not (observation [OBS] group). Median follow-up was 109 months. Median disease-specific survival (DSS) was not reached. Six-year DSS was 73.7%; 79.5% for the AC group versus 68.0% for the OBS group. PS-matched analysis for DSS favored AC (P=.0002). Median overall survival (OS) was 90.8 months. Six-year OS was 56.7%; 64.3% for AC versus 49.6% for OBS. In PS-matched analysis, median OS was 117.4 months for AC and 74.3 months for OBS (P<.0001). A DSS advantage was seen when comparing ≥4 months with <4 months of AC (P=.023). No difference in DSS or OS was seen with single-agent versus multiagent AC. In this population of patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant CRT and surgery, OS and DSS were improved among those treated with AC versus OBS. DSS benefits were seen with ≥4 months of AC. No additional benefit was observed with multiagent therapy. In the absence of phase III data, these findings support the use of AC for LARC.

Factors Influencing Adjuvant Chemotherapy and Trastuzumab Choice in Older Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-positive Breast Cancer Patients

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate influence factors for adjuvant chemotherapy regimen choice on the basis of trastuzumab in older human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer under multi-disciplinary team (MDT) modality.Materials and Methods: HER2-positive breast cancer patients aged ≥ 60 years who received breast cancer surgery between April 2013 and December 2017 in Shanghai Ruijin Hospital were retrospectively enrolled. Clinical and pathological features, MDT recommendations, administration of adjuvant treatment, cardiotoxicity, and disease outcome information were reviewed and analyzed.Results: A total of 222 older HER2-positive breast cancer patients were included and recommended to receive adjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab therapy. Paclitaxel plus trastuzumab (PH, 41/222, 18.5%), docetaxel plus carboplatin and trastuzumab (TCH, 62/222, 27.9%), and antharcyclines plus cyclophosphamide followed by taxanes and trastuzumab (AC-TH, 119/222, 53.6%) were the three main regimens. Patients with T1a-b (P<0.001), grade 1-2 (P=0.008), node-negative (P<0.001), stage I (P<0.001), low Ki-67 level (P<0.001) disease, with cardiovascular comorbidities (P=0.011), and aged ≥ 70 years (P<0.001) were more likely to be recommended to PH regimen. Among the 178 patients who finally received adjuvant chemotherapy plus one-year trastuzumab treatment, only four patients (4/117, 3.4%) were recorded to have asymptomatic LVEF declining ≥ 10% but remaining ≥ 50% within one-year trastuzumab treatment.Conclusions: Clinical factors, including age, tumor size, node status, and cardiovascular comorbidity influenced the recommendation of trastuzumab with chemotherapy for older HER2-positive breast cancer patients. Low risk older HER2-positive breast cancer patients treated with PH had favorable outcome and good cardiac safety, which needed further clinical validation.

Long-term Efficacy of S-1 Monotherapy or Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin as Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Patients with Stage II or III Gastric Cancer after Curative Gastrectomy: a Propensity Score-Matched Multicenter Cohort Study.

PurposeTo compare long-term disease-free survival (DFS) between patients receiving tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1) or capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CAPOX) adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for gastric cancer (GC).Materials and MethodsThis retrospective multicenter observational study enrolled 983 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy with consecutive AC with S-1 or CAPOX for stage II or III GC at 27 hospitals in Korea between February 2012 and December 2013. We conducted propensity score matching to reduce selection bias. Long-term oncologic outcomes, including DFS rate over 5 years (over-5yr DFS), were analyzed postoperatively.ResultsThe median and longest follow-up period were 59.0 and 87.6 months, respectively. DFS rate did not differ between patients who received S-1 and CAPOX for pathologic stage II (P=0.677) and stage III (P=0.899) GC. Moreover, hazard ratio (HR) for recurrence did not differ significantly between S-1 and CAPOX (reference) in stage II (HR, 1.846; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.693–4.919; P=0.220) and stage III (HR, 0.942; 95% CI, 0.664–1.337; P=0.738) GC. After adjustment for significance in multivariate analysis, pT (4 vs. 1) (HR, 11.667; 95% CI, 1.595–85.351; P=0.016), pN stage (0 vs. 3) (HR, 2.788; 95% CI, 1.502–5.174; P=0.001), and completion of planned chemotherapy (HR, 2.213; 95% CI, 1.618–3.028; P<0.001) were determined as independent prognostic factors for DFS.ConclusionsS-1 and CAPOX AC regimens did not show significant difference in over-5yr DFS after curative gastrectomy in patients with stage II or III GC. The pT, pN stage, and completion of planned chemotherapy were prognostic factors for GC recurrence.

Adjuvant addition of capecitabine to early-stage triple-negative breast cancer patients receiving standard chemotherapy: a meta-analysis.

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) pertains to a breast cancer subtype that has the highest metastatic and recurrence rates. The effectiveness of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for TNBC has remained unclear. This study conducted a meta-analysis of the efficacy of capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage TNBC treated with taxane-/anthracycline-based chemotherapy. We identified relevant research reports in online databases until May 2019. We finally included seven randomized clinical trials to perform this meta-analysis. Altogether, the seven trials enrolled 3151 early-stage TNBC patients, with 1552 receiving standard (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy regimens and 1599 receiving addition of capecitabine in the adjuvant settings besides standard regimens. A meta-analysis of the seven trials revealed a significant increase in disease-free survival (DFS) with the addition of capecitabine (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.77, 95% CI 0.66-0.90). This improvement in DFS was significant both in trials conducted in America-Europe and in Asia. In trials involving six to eight cycles of capecitabine addition, we observed a significant improvement in DFS. Furthermore, in the meta-analysis of six trials, we detected a significant increase in overall survival (OS) favoring capecitabine (HR = 0.69, 95% CI 0.56-0.85). Adjuvant addition of capecitabine to early-stage TNBC patients receiving standard chemotherapy showed significant DFS and OS improvement. Future studies involving the selection of patients that may have the highest survival benefit from adding capecitabine are warranted.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen on survival outcomes in immunohistochemical subtypes of ampullary carcinoma.

Ampullary adenocarcinoma (AA) is classified by immunohistochemical (IHC) subtypes into intestinal (IN), pancreatobiliary (PB), and ambiguous (AM). The impact of adjuvant therapy on IHC subtype and disease stage is unclear. We examined the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy regimen on survival of ampullary cancers by IHC subtype and disease stage. Review of pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) performed for AA between 2005 and 2013 at a single center. The impact of regimen on IHC subtype and stage was analyzed. One hundred and twenty-one patients were subtyped: IN = 32%, PB = 48%, and AM = 20% with overall survival of 45.6, 31.3, and 46.9 months, respectively. PB had higher pathologic T-stage, positive lymph node disease, and perineural and lymphovascular invasion (P < .05). 5-Fluorouracil (FU)-based adjuvant therapy improved survival compared to no treatment (87.4 vs 32.1 months; P = .046), and receipt of 5-FU emerged as an independent predictor of improved survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.244; P = .031) regardless of subtype. 5-FU was superior to Gemcitabine in advanced-stage disease (stage IIB and III vs I+IIA, HR: 0.35; P < .05). Adjuvant therapy with 5-FU confers a survival benefit in patients with advanced-stage AA regardless of subtype. The impact of various chemotherapy regimens on subtypes of ampullary cancer warrants further investigation.

Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Stage II or III Colon Adenocarcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched, Nationwide, Population-Based Cohort Study.

Purpose: To determine the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with high-risk stage II or III colon adenocarcinoma, we conducted this propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate the effects of adjuvant treatments in high-risk stage II or III colon adenocarcinoma. Patients and Methods: Using propensity score matching, we minimized the confounding effects of sex, age, pathologic stage, tumor location, total chemotherapy cycles, and Charlson comorbidity index scores on adjuvant treatment outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II or III resectable colon adenocarcinoma. We selected the patients from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database and divided them into four groups: Group 1, comprising patients who received surgery alone; group 2, comprising those who received adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone; group 3, comprising those who received adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine-leucovorin (FOLFOX); and group 4, comprising those who received adjuvant folinic acid-fluorouracil-irinotecan (FOLFIRI). Results: In both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, the adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs, as well as the 95% confidence intervals (Cis)) for mortality observed for groups 1, 2, and 4 relative to group 3 were 1.55 (1.32 to 1.82), 1.22 (1.05 to 1.43), and 2.97 (2.43 to 3.63), respectively. After a stratified subgroup analysis for high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma, we noted that the aHR (95% CI) for mortality for group 2 relative to group 3 was 0.52 (0.30 to 0.89). Conclusions: Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone is the most optimal regimen for patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma compared with the other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Adjuvant FOLFOX can serve as an optimal regimen for patients with pathologic stage III colon adenocarcinoma, regardless of age, sex, or tumor location.

Upregulated OCT3 has the potential to improve the survival of colorectal cancer patients treated with (m)FOLFOX6 adjuvant chemotherapy.

To investigate the influence of organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3) expression on the effect of the combination regimen of 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin ((m)FOLFOX6) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. This is a retrospective study conducted at a single centre (Sichuan Academy of Medical Sciences & Sichuan Provincial People's Hospital, China). Patients with stage IIb-IV resectable CRC who were being postoperatively treated with (m)FOLFOX6 as a first-line adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for at least 5cycles and had resected primary tumour samples available were eligible for the study. Patients who preoperatively received chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy or were treated with targeted drugs or other anticancer drugs were excluded from the study. Immunohistochemical staining and digital image analysis were used to assess OCT3 expression in tumour samples. According to OCT3 expression level, the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was used to divide the patients into two groups. Cox proportional risk regression was performed with the forward LR (forward stepwise regression based on maximum likelihood estimation) method using SPSS17.0 software. The primary endpoint was the 2-year progression-free survival. In total, 57 patients were included between 2014 and 2016 according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria (22 had low OCT3 expression, and 35 had high OCT3 expression). The mean age was 55.7 (30-74) years, and 37 of the total patients were male. According to TNM stage, 5 patients had stage IV disease, 44 patients had stage III disease, and 8 patients had stage II disease. Through Cox regression analysis, we found that among patients receiving the (m)FOLFOX6 regimen, those with higher OCT3 expression had a higher two-year progression-free survival rate than those with lower OCT3 expression (P = 0.038). The hazard ratio of patients with high OCT3 expression compared with patients with low OCT3 expression was 0.247. Besides, it was found that the age of patients was negatively correlated with expression level of OCT3, which can explain why patients over 70years do not benefit from oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy. High OCT3 expression in CRC tissues may be a protective factor for CRC patients treated with (m)FOLFOX6.

Adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: retrospective real-life data

BackgroundThe recommendation for postoperative chemotherapy in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is based on prospective randomized trials. However, patients included in clinical trials do not often reflect the overall patient population treated in clinical practice.Materials and methodsA retrospective review of all patients undergoing pancreas resection for PDAC between 2001 and 2013 was performed. Follow-up data from oncologists, general practitioners, or hospital patient files were available for 92% of patients.ResultsA total of 251 patients were included in our analysis. Chemotherapy was recommended for 223 patients, but 86 patients did not follow the recommendation. The application of the recommended chemotherapy, consisting of 6 cycles of gemcitabine, was only applied to 45 patients. Forty patients received the recommended number of cycles with dose reduction or prolonged intervals between cycles, and adjuvant chemotherapy was terminated prior to the intended completion of all 6 cycles in 54 patients. Survival of patients after adjuvant chemotherapy was increased compared to that of patients without chemotherapy (with recurrence 25.6 vs. 14.3 months, p = 0.001, and without recurrence 27.4 vs. 14.3 months, p < 0.001). Terminating chemotherapy prior to completion (p = 0.009) as well as a lower number of chemotherapy cycles (p = 0.026) was associated with a decreased survival.ConclusionAdjuvant chemotherapy improves overall and disease-free survival after curative pancreatic resection, but only a small fraction of patients completes the recommended 6 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Our data indicates that performance status of patients after pancreas resections for PDAC requires not only highly biologically active but also well-tolerated adjuvant chemotherapy regimens.

91P - Adjuvant therapy for high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma: A propensity score-matched, nationwide, population-based cohort study

BackgroundTo estimate the optimal adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk stage II and III colon adenocarcinoma, we use a propensity score-matched (PSM), nationwide, population-based cohort study to estimate different adjuvant treatments in high-risk stage II or stage III colon adenocarcinoma. MethodsWe minimized the confounding effects with PSM of sex, age, pathologic stages, tumor locations, total cycles of chemotherapy, and Charlson comorbidity index in various adjuvant treatments outcomes in patients with high-risk stage II and III resctable colon adenocarcinoma from the Taiwan Cancer Registry database by dividing them as follows: group 1, those undergoing surgery alone; group 2, those undergoing adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone; group 3, those receiving adjuvant oxaliplatin, fluoropyrimidine, and leucovorin (FOLFOX) and group 4 those receiving adjuvant folinic acid, fluorouracil, irinotecan (FOFIRIL). ResultsIn both univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, adjusted HRs (aHRs) derived for mortality and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), reported as aHR (95% CI), derived for surgery alone, adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone, and adjuvant FOLFIRI groups compared with the adjuvant FOLFOX group were 1.55 (1.32-1.82), 1.22 (1.05-1.43), and 2.97 (2.43-3.63), respectively. After stratified subgroup analysis, at high-risk stage II, the aHR (95% CI) derived for mortality was 0.52 (0.30-0.89) for the adjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone group compared with the group 3. ConclusionsAdjuvant fluoropyrimidine alone were more suitable for patients with high-risk stage II colon adenocarcinoma rather than other adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Adjuvant FOLFOX could be the optimal regimen for patients with pathologic stage III colon adenocarcinoma whatever elderly, sex, or tumor locations. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Applicability of postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen levels in determining post-liver-resection adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for colorectal cancer hepatic metastasis.

Liver resection (LR) is the standard procedure for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) hepatic metastasis; however, LR associated with a high recurrence incidence. This study aimed to determine an optimal post-LR adjuvant chemotherapeutic strategy to improve overall long-term patient outcomes. A retrospective study of 490 patients who had undergone curative LR for CRC hepatic metastasis was performed. Patients who underwent post-LR adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated high overall survival (OS) rates (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.58, P = .002) but not high recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates (HR = 1.02, P = .885). Moreover, OS was significantly longer in patients who underwent 5-fluorouracil + leucovorin (5-FU/LV; HR = 0.63, P = .039), oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.45, P < .001), or irinotecan-based chemotherapy with bevacizumab (HR = 0.64, P = .040) than in those who did not. Among patients with carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels of <5 ng/mL at 1 month after LR, significant differences were noted only in those who underwent 5-FU/LV (HR = 0.58, P = .035) and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (HR = 0.38, P < .001). In conclusion, perioperative CEA levels are crucial in prognosis and treatment of patients with CRC hepatic metastasis after LR. Additionally, certain regimens of adjuvant chemotherapy alongside post-LR CEA levels may provide beneficial results.

Extra-axial Cerebellopontine Angle Adult Medulloblastoma: An Unusual Presentation at an Unusual Site

AbstractMedulloblastoma is a rare adult primary brain tumor and its presence in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA) constitutes an even rarer site for origin. There are only 40 reported cases of CPA medulloblastoma in the literature, with most being intra-axial and occurring in the pediatric population. Extra-axial CPA medulloblastoma in adults are extremely rare and only 10 adult cases have been reported in world literature.We report a rare case of primary extra-axial CPA medulloblastoma occurring in an adult. We review the literature for such an unusual presentation of medulloblastoma in adults and discuss its appropriate clinico-radiological features along with its possible pathogenesis and surgical management.With increasing reporting of such tumors, CPA region, medulloblastoma should be considered a differential diagnosis of intra-axial or extra-axial CPA tumor, as their further management and prognosis differ significantly. Adjuvant radiotherapy and combined chemotherapy regimen should be added to the postoperative management.

Dose-Dense Paclitaxel Plus Carboplatin (PCdd) versus Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide (ECdd) Followed by Paclitaxel (P) As Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Triple-Negative Breast Cancer at High Risk of Recurrence, A Randomised, Open-Label, Phase 3 Trial

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) may be more sensitive to platinum-based regimens. This open-label, randomized phase III trial aimed to compare dose dense paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PCdd) with dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by paclitaxel (ECdd-P) regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for high-risk early TNBC. Methods: We included Chinese patients with high recurrence risk TNBC who underwent primary breast surgery. They were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive PCdd (paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 on day 1 and carboplatin AUC=3 on day 2 for 8 cycles) or ECdd-P (epirubicin 80 mg/m2 divided in 2 days and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 on day 1 for 4 cycles followed by paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 on day 1 for 4 cycles) every 2 weeks, with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) support. The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS); the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety. Findings: The intent-to-treat population included 143 patients (70 in the PCdd arm and 73 in the ECdd-P arm). Compared with the ECdd-P arm, the PCdd arm had significantly higher 3-year DFS (93⋅9% vs.79⋅1%, hazard ratio[HR]=3⋅224, 95% confidence interval [CI] =1⋅420-7⋅321, log-rank p=0⋅0051) and OS (98⋅5% vs.92⋅9% [HR] =7⋅092, 95% CI=1⋅212-16⋅630, log-rank p=0⋅0281). The 3-year DFS in the PCdd arm was significantly higher (p 40 years, Ki-67>30, and clinically evaluated lymph nodes. Both regimens were well tolerated. Worse neutropenia (grade 3/4) was found in the ECdd-P arm (47⋅9% vs. 21⋅4%, p=0⋅001). Interpretation: PCdd was superior to ECdd-P as AC for early TNBC with respect to improving the 3-year DFS and OS. PCdd also yields lower hematological toxicity.Thus, PCdd might be a preferred AC regimen for early TNBC patients with high recurrence risk. Trial Registration: This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials. gov (number NCT01378533). Funding Statement: This study was supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC1312101); and Chinese Academy of Medical Science Initiative funded this study for Innovative Medicine (CAMS-12M-1-010). Declaration of Interests: All authors declare no conflicts of interest. Ethics Approval Statement: All interventions were performed in accordance with Chinese laws and regulations and the Helsinki declaration. The study protocol was approved by the independent ethics board committee at the National Cancer Center, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (Approval number: CH-BC-012).

Association of Chemoradiotherapy Regimens and Survival Among Patients With Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

The role of induction chemotherapy (IC) or adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in the treatment of locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains controversial. To update meta-analyses on the association of survival outcomes with IC and AC regimens in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC and assess whether the current evidence is conclusive by a trial sequential analysis (TSA) approach. PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science were searched for articles published from inception until June 1, 2019. Randomized clinical trials that assessed the efficacy of radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy among previously untreated patients and patients with nondistant metastatic NPC. Data were extracted by 2 investigators from each trial independently and synthesized by the 2 investigators. All trial results were combined and analyzed by a fixed- or random-effects model. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRFS). A total of 8036 patients (median age, 46.5 years; 5872 [73.1%] male) from 28 randomized clinical trials were included in the analysis. Pooled analyses revealed that concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) was significantly associated with improved OS, PFS, DMFS, and LRFS compared with radiotherapy across all subgroups. The TSA confirmed the treatment outcomes of CCRT compared with radiotherapy. The additional IC regimen was associated with an improvement in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.74-0.95), PFS (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.84), DMFS (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.78), and LRFS (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.85). These findings were consistent in subgroup analyses of multicenter trials with sample sizes greater than 250, years of survival rate of 5 or greater, median follow-up longer than 5 years, or low risk of bias. However, the additional AC regimen was not associated with a survival benefit in OS (HR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.78-1.23), PFS (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70-1.07), DMFS (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.64-1.10), or LRFS (HR, 0.80, 95% CI, 0.59-1.09). The TSA provided sound evidence on the additional benefit of IC but not AC. These data suggest a significant association of survival outcomes with CCRT in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. The addition of IC instead of AC could achieve survival benefits. The potential therapeutic gain of AC should be explored in the future.

Safety and efficacy of a modified XELOX adjuvant regimen for patients with operated stage III colon cancer: a Chinese single-center experience

BackgroundA fixed 8-cycle oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) regimen has been the standard adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III colon cancer. However, completing the full-cycle of oxaliplatin is often associated with severe neurotoxicity. To spare patients from the toxic effects, without comprising the required efficacy, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of a modified XELOX (mXELOX) adjuvant chemotherapy regimen with 6 cycles of oxaliplatin and a full cycle of capecitabine.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 330 eligible patients with stage III colon cancer who underwent curative tumor resection followed by mXELOX, standard XELOX or unfinished XELOX adjuvant chemotherapy between December 2007 and April 2015. Associated prognostic factors were investigated and their disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were also determined and compared among the different regimen groups.ResultsCompared with the standard XELOX group, the mXELOX group had lower total incidence rates of neurotoxicity (39.3% vs. 76.2%, P < 0.001), leucopenia (53.6% vs. 69.8%, P = 0.017) and thrombocytopenia (38.1% vs. 56.3%, P = 0.011). The standard XELOX and mXELOX adjuvant chemotherapy regimens presented with comparable 3-year DFS rates (86.3% vs. 89.2%; P = 0.838) and 3-year OS rates (92.7% vs. 97.6%; P = 0.227). Compared to unfinished XELOX chemotherapy, the oncologic benefits of the mXELOX regimen were greater for patients with T4 tumors (3-year DFS: Hazard ratio [HR], 2.184; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.051–4.540; P = 0.036; 3-year OS: HR, 4.529; 95% CI 1.245–16.479; P = 0.022) and for high-risk patients (3-year DFS: HR, 1.962; 95% CI 0.964–3.993; P = 0.044; 3-year OS: HR, 4.193; 95% CI 1.182–14.874; P = 0.026).ConclusionsThe mXELOX adjuvant chemotherapy presented a comparable survival benefit and lower incidence of toxicity than standard XELOX chemotherapy. It could be an alternative treatment for high-risk patients with operated stage III colon cancer.

267P - Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea: Prognostic impact on premenopausal Egyptian patients with breast cancer

BackgroundBreast cancer is the second most frequent cancer among women. Disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) have been improved by different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; as a consequence, premenopausal patients developed chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA). Although chemotherapy and ovarian ablation independently improve the outcome of breast cancer, there is controversy about the effect of CIA in these patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the prognostic impact of chemotherapy- induced amenorrhea (CIA) on disease-free survival and overall survival in premenopausal patients with breast cancer following adjuvant chemotherapy. MethodsRetrospectively, we reviewed the data of 200 premenopausal breast cancer patients, who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy at the Clinical Oncology Department of Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt during 2014. The data of one hundred ninety-two patients were analyzed in the study. CIA was defined as the absence of menstruation for a year after the end of chemotherapy. The survival analyses were done using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log Rank Test. ResultsThe median follow-up was 4 years. Mean age was 40.8 ± 6 years. CIA occurred in 66.1% of patients. Age and tumor grade were CIA predictors in logistic regression analysis. The 4-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in the CIA group than that in the non-CIA group (47.39 months vs 31.80 months, respectively; P=< 0.001), and the 4- year overall survival (OS) was higher in the CIA group than that of the non-CIA group (47.85 months vs 45.296 months, respectively; P=0.030). ConclusionsChemotherapy-induced amenorrhea positively affects disease-free survival and overall survival in the Egyptian premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. It was a better prognostic marker and might be used as a surrogate marker for effective chemotherapy in those patients. Legal entity responsible for the studyThe authors. FundingHas not received any funding. DisclosureAll authors have declared no conflicts of interest.