Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens Research Articles

Analysis of sequential chemotherapy efficacy in ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma and primary peritoneal carcinoma

Objective: To explore the sequential chemotherapy efficacy of different chemotherapeutic regimens in ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on clinical and pathological data of 100 patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma treated at Peking University Peopel's Hospital from January 1992 to January 2019. All patients underwent staging surgery or cytoreductive surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Based on different postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, patients were divided into the sequential chemotherapy group (70 cases) and the conventional chemotherapy group (30 cases). Clinical and pathological characteristics, chemotherapy efficacy, adverse reactions, and prognosis were compared between the two groups. Results: (1) Clinical and pathological characteristics: the age, tumor types (including ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma), pathological types, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, postoperative residual disease size, presence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and total number of chemotherapy cycles were compared between the sequential chemotherapy group and the conventional chemotherapy group. There were no statistically significant differences observed in these characteristics between the two groups (all P>0.05). (2) Chemotherapy efficacy: the median sum of complete response (CR)+partial response (PR) duration in the sequential chemotherapy group was 80.0 months (range: 39 to 369 months), whereas in the conventional chemotherapy group, it was 28.0 months (range: 13 to 52 months). A statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups (Z=-7.82, P<0.001). (3) Chemotherapy adverse reactions: in the sequential chemotherapy group, 55 cases (79%, 55/70) experienced bone marrow suppression and 20 cases (29%, 20/70) had neurological symptoms. In the conventional chemotherapy group, these adverse reactions occurred in 11 cases (37%, 11/30) and 2 cases (7%, 2/30), respectively. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both bone marrow suppression and neurological symptoms (all P<0.05). For the other chemotherapy adverse reactions compared between the two groups, no statistically significant differences were observed (all P>0.05). (4) Prognosis: during the follow-up period, the recurrence rate in the sequential chemotherapy group was 73% (51/70) and in the conventional chemotherapy group was 100% (30/30). The median sum of recurrence-free interval was 70.5 months (range: 19 to 330 months) in the sequential chemotherapy group and 15.0 months (range: 6 to 40 months) in the conventional chemotherapy group. Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both recurrence rate and median recurrence-free interval (all P<0.01).In the sequential chemotherapy group, the median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 84.0 months (range: 34 to 373 months), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 87.0 months (range: 45 to 377 months). In contrast, in the conventional chemotherapy group, the median PFS time was 30.5 months (range: 14 to 60 months), and the median OS time was 37.5 months (range: 18 to 67 months). Statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups for both PFS and OS (all P<0.001). In the sequential chemotherapy group, the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year OS rates were 100% (70/70), 93% (65/70), and 21% (15/70), respectively. In contrast, in the conventional chemotherapy group, the OS rates were 50% (15/30) at 3 years, 3% (1/30) at 5 years, and 0 at 10 years, respectively. The two groups were compared respectively, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.05). Conclusions: Sequential chemotherapy significantly prolongs PFS and OS in patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma. The efficacy is superior to that of the conventional chemotherapy, with manageable adverse reactions. The use of sequential chemotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with ovarian epithelial carcinoma, fallopian tube carcinoma, and primary peritoneal carcinoma is recommended.

Update on management of pancreatic cancer: a literature review.

Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy with high mortality. At the time of diagnosis, majority of patients (80-90%) present with either locally advanced unresectable disease or metastatic disease. Even after curative resection, the recurrence rate remains quite high. This article aimed at reviewing the updated management of pancreatic cancer. We identified literature by searching Medline and PubMed from January 2010 to June 2023 using the keywords. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimize the outcomes for both curable and advanced diseases. Management of pancreatic cancer divided into resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced, and metastatic diseases. Surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach for resectable pancreatic cancer. The recommended adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with good functional status is modified FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin). The recommended adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with suboptimal functional status is gemcitabine plus capecitabine or monotherapy gemcitabine. The optimal treatment strategy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer is still uncertain. Traditionally, upfront surgery is the choice of treatment. There is increasing evidence showing benefits of neoadjuvant therapy in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer. However, the optimal neoadjuvant treatment regimen was not certain yet. Advancement of chemotherapy has a positive impact for the survival of advanced disease. For patients with good functional status, the recommended first-line systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease or metastatic disease is combination chemotherapy regimens such as FOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine plus nabpaclitaxel. For patients with suboptimal functional status, the recommended first-line systemic chemotherapy for unresectable locally advanced disease or metastatic disease is gemcitabine plus capecitabine or monotherapy gemcitabine. Recently, more researches showed promising results in the use of nanoliposomal irinotecan, targeted agents such as a poly [adenosine diphosphate (ADB)-ribose] polymerase inhibitor, tyrosine receptor kinase (TRK) inhibitors, and immune checkpoint-inhibitors. Pancreatic cancer is a challenging disease for management. Radical surgery itself is not enough for prolong survival. The improvement of chemotherapy, target agents and immunotherapy with multidisciplinary approach will be the only solution for improvement of survival outcome and quality of life for patients with pancreatic cancer.

Evaluating the efficacy of laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy in selected early-stage left-sided pancreatic cancer: a propensity score matching study.

Laparoscopic radical pancreatectomy is safe and beneficial for recectable pancreatic cancer, but the extent of resection for early-stage tumors remains controversial. Consecutive patients with left-sided pancreatic cancer who underwent either laparoscopic radical antegrade modular pancreatosplenectomy (LRAMPS, n = 54) or laparoscopic distal pancreatosplecnectomy (LDP, n = 131) between October 2020 and December 2022 were reviewed. The preoperative radiological selection criteria were as follows: (1) tumor diameter ≤ 4cm; (2) located ≥ 1cm from the celiac trunk; (3) didn't invade the fascial layer behind the pancreas. After 1:1 propensity score matching (LRAMPS, n = 54; LDP, n = 54), baseline data were well-balanced with no differences. LRAMPS resulted in longer operation time (240.5 vs. 219.0min, P = 0.020) and higher intraoperative bleeding volume (200 vs. 150mL, P = 0.001) compared to LDP. Although LRAMPS harvested more lymph nodes (16 vs. 13, P = 0.008), there were no statistically significant differences in lymph node positivity rate (35.2% vs. 33.3%), R0 pancreatic transection margin (94.4% vs. 96.3%), and retroperitoneal margin (83.3% vs. 87.0%) rate. Postoperative complications did not significantly differ between the two groups. However, LRAMPS was associated with increased drainage volume (85.0 vs. 40.0 mL, P = 0.001), longer time to recover semi-liquid diet compared to LDP (5 vs. 4days, P < 0.001) and increased daily bowel movement frequency. Tumor recurrence pattern and recurrence-free survival were comparable between the two groups, but the adjuvant chemotherapy regimens varied, and the completion rate of the 6-month intravenous chemotherapy was lower in the LRAMPS group compared to the LDP group (51.9% vs. 75.9%, P = 0.016). LRAMPS did not provide oncological benefits over LDP for left-sided pancreatic cancer within the selection criteria, but it increased operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative bowel movement frequency. These factors impacted the regimen selection and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy, consequently compromising the potential benefits of LRAMPS in achieving better local control.

Abstract PO2-17-07: Risk analysis of the differences in eligibility criteria between monarchE and POTENT clinical trials

Abstract Background Luminal subtype recurrence risk classifications for breast cancer have been updated and put into practice with the development of treatment. Despite this, it is noteworthy that from 2008 to 2016, early breast cancer (EBC) of luminal subtype has been reported to have little improvement in survival probability. For early-stage luminal breast cancer, several clinical trials, such as monarchE, NATALEE (which is not available in Japan) or POTENT, were being conducted. In order to avoid overtreating individuals who might not benefit from adjuvant therapy, those at high risk of recurrence ought to be accurately picked up. In monarchE and POTENT trials, abemaciclib and S-1 have shown to be effective in adjuvant therapies for luminal breast cancer although it is unrevealed if the eligible patients for each criterion are at higher risk of recurrence than ineligible patients. Besides, some of the eligibility for POTENT overlaps with those for monarchE, the patients who met POTENT but did not meet monarchE criteria at how much risk of recurrence still remains unknown. Here, we investigated recurrence risk according to the criteria of each trial in Japanese patients in real world. Methods We reviewed the records of 1209 patients who received surgery for stage I–III breast cancer from January 2016 to May 2022 and selected 637 analytic cohort patients and retrospectively analyzed the recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the patients using the Kaplan–Meier method. High-recurrence-risk was defined according to monarchE trial and POTENT trial. Patients’ RFS was the primary endpoint. Results The 5-year RFS for all luminal breast cancer patients was 94.87% at Chiba University Hospital. Among monarchE eligible patients, the 5-year RFS was 82.49% and cohort 1 and cohort 2 eligible patients was 78.62% and 92.18% respectively, which were statistically lower than monarchE non-eligible patients (98.58%) (p &amp;lt; 0.0001, p = 0.0216, respectively). Even though the 5-year RFS rate for POTENT eligible patients (91.16%) was lower than POTENT non-eligible patients (99.13%) (p &amp;lt; 0.0001), while excluding those who met the monarchE criteria, the prognosis of POTENT eligible patients (5-year RFS rate 97.76%) had no significant differences from the patients with POTENT non-eligible breast cancer (p =0.0660). Our results suggested that the eligible patients of both monarchE and POTENT were associated with poor prognoses so the criteria set are considered to be appropriate. However, although POTENT criteria suggested a reasonable capacity for recurrence prediction, there was no dramatic difference in recurrence between POTENT non-eligible patients and the patients who are POTENT eligible but are not monarchE eligible. This might offer justification for reconsidering the use of S-1 in monarchE non-eligible patients. With the use of clinicopathological factors, it may assist in identifying individuals with high recurrence risk who would benefit from lengthier adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Conclusion MonarchE criteria accurately identifies patients at high risk of relapse but the relapse in the patients who only qualified for POTENT is statistically almost the same as that in POTENT non-eligible patients. Citation Format: Muhan Yu, Mamoru Takada, Hideyuki Yamada, Hiroshi Fujimoto, Junta Sakakibara, Hiroto Yamamoto, Takeshi Nagashima, Masayuki Otsuka. Risk analysis of the differences in eligibility criteria between monarchE and POTENT clinical trials [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-17-07.

Abstract PS09-04: The benefit of adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab according to estrogen receptor and HER2 expression: sub-analysis of the APHINITY trial

Abstract Background: Some studies suggest that response to HER2-targeting agents may differ according to estrogen receptor (ER) and HER2 expression levels. This study aimed to investigate the magnitude of benefit from the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab and chemotherapy according to ER and HER2 expression levels in the APHINITY trial. Methods: APHINITY (NCT01358877; BIG 4-11) was a randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing the addition of pertuzumab or placebo to adjuvant trastuzumab and chemotherapy in an ITT population of 4804 patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer. The primary objective of this exploratory, unplanned analysis was to compare whether the addition of pertuzumab to trastuzumab had an impact in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) within different subgroups defined by HER2 FISH amplification ratio and/or ER percentage of positivity on immunohistochemistry (IHC) (centrally assessed). Patients with a FISH ratio less than 2 were excluded from this analysis, leaving 4782 patients. IDFS was defined as the time from randomization until the date of the first occurrence of an IDFS event. HER2 FISH amplification ratio was categorized as low (2≤ FISH ratio &amp;lt; 5) vs. high (FISH ratio ≥5). ER expression on IHC was categorized as negative ( &amp;lt; 1%) vs. positive (≥1%). A subgroup analysis using Cox proportional hazards regression models was used to model IDFS, assessing four categories formed by cross classifying the FISH ratio and ER groups. The model was adjusted for randomized arm, adjuvant chemotherapy regimen received, and a combined variable of nodal status and protocol version. Results: The 4782 patients had a median age of 51 years old (IQR 44-59), with a median follow up time of 73.6 months (IQR 63.0-75.2). Most patients received an anthracycline-based chemotherapy (n=3712, 77.6%). ER expression was positive in 3047 patients (63.7%). HER2 FISH amplification ratio was high in 2479 patients (51.8%). All FISH ratio/ER subgroups seem to derive IDFS benefit from the addition of pertuzumab (HR &amp;lt; 1) (Table 1). The HER2 FISH ratio-low/ER positive subgroup had the largest reduction in risk of an IDFS event, 30% for the pertuzumab arm (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.51-0.95) versus placebo. Smaller differences in IDFS events were observed between the treatment arms in the other subgroups. The subgroup of tumors with HER2 FISH ratio-high/ER-negative expression showed the numerically smallest benefit in IDFS events with the addition of pertuzumab (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59-1.25), see Table 1. Conclusions: In this APHINITY sub-analysis, patients treated with pertuzumab/trastuzumab derive similar benefit regardless of ER and HER2 expression levels. More research is needed to find predictive biomarkers to escalate or de-escalate treatments. Table 1. Abbreviations: FISH: fluorescence in situ hybridization, ER: estrogen receptor; IDFS: invasive disease-free survival; CI: confidence interval; HR: hazard ratio Citation Format: Evandro de Azambuja, Elisa Agostinetto, Faye Samy, Serena Di Cosimo, Philippe Aftimos, Noam Pondé, Daniel Eiger, Matteo Lambertini, David Cameron, Astrid Kiermaier, Andrew Bailey, Giuseppe Viale, Sherene Loi, Martine Piccart. The benefit of adjuvant pertuzumab and trastuzumab according to estrogen receptor and HER2 expression: sub-analysis of the APHINITY trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PS09-04.

Abstract PO2-16-11: Real-World Data of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Breast

Abstract Background: Primary neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN) of breast are rare and heterogeneous. WHO has classified NENs of non-endocrine organs into three distinct categories in 2022, however real-world data on outcomes of patients with NENs of non-endocrine organs under this new classification system are still sparse. Real world experience regarding demography, clinical presentation, treatment response, and prognosis can help identify potential areas of improvement in the management of breast NEN. Methods: Here, we present our findings from patients with NEN of breast in the Cleveland Clinic Foundation between 2000 and 2023. Pathology reports were reviewed to confirm NEN of breast origin. Neuroendocrine differentiation was determined by tumor histology and immunohistochemistry (IHC). For metastatic tumors at presentation, primary organ was determined by IHC and clinical presentation. Overall survival (OS) was from date of diagnosis of NEN. Recurrence is redemonstration of tumor following curative intent therapy, and progression is increase in tumor burden. T-test and log-rank test were used in statistical analyses. Results: Total of 97 patients were identified. Of these, 79 presented with localized disease, 18 were metastatic at presentation. 88 (91%) were invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and 64 (81%) were local disease at presentation and rest were metastatic. Gender spread was 92:5 (F:M). Patients with ER + disease was 84/96, PR + disease was 71, and 4/93 patients had overexpression of HER2. Median age was 70 at diagnosis. 11 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 15 patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy (AC), and 58/84 patients underwent hormonal adjuvant therapy. For localized disease, median recurrence free survival (RFS) was 165 months (144-NA), and recurrence rate was 8/79 (10%). Recurrence rate for local IDC was 10% (6/64). Patients with metastatic disease at presentation had a median progression free survival (PFS) of 30 months, and progression rate was 7/18 (39%). For patients with metastatic disease, median lines of palliative therapy used was 2, with median duration of first line treatment being 3.5 months, and 10 months for second line. Most common surgical procedure was mastectomy, with 37% of patients undergoing management. Median duration from diagnostic biopsy to definitive surgery was 1 month. Median follow up was 28 months. Most common hormonal adjuvant option was anastrozole (58%), most common AC regimen was docetaxel and cyclophosphamide (39%), and most common first line palliative agent was letrozole (42%). Patients who underwent AC did not reach median OS, and patients who did not receive AC had a median OS of 148 months (p=0.8). Patients with grade 3 tumors had a median OS of 58.6 months, and grade 1 and 2 had a median OS of 148.1 months (p=0.5). Discussion: Current treatment strategies for NEN of breast mirror those of non-NEN of breast with similar histology and stage based on extrapolation of data. Recurrence rate was similar between IDC and SPC. In our cohort, survival was not significantly dependent on grade and use of AC. This might be due to the number of patients included in our study, as there was a non-significant trend towards lower OS in patients with high-grade neoplasms, and further limitations from retrospective design of study. Further research towards benefit of AC in NEN of breast and prognostic value of grading is necessary to explore management options in comparison to non-NEN of the breast. Citation Format: Serhan Unlu, Olisaemeka Ogbue, Gloria Lewis, Abdo Haddad, Hamed Daw, Baidehi Maiti. Real-World Data of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Breast [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-16-11.

Enhancing survival outcomes in stage Ⅲ gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer: a retrospective study of immune checkpoint inhibitors and adjuvant chemotherapy based on real-world data

Objective: To explore the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with phase III gastric cancer and esophagogastric junction cancer. Methods: This study used a retrospective cohort study method based on real-world data. Clinical data of 403 patients with stage III gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer who underwent gastrectomy followed by adjuvant therapy in the Department of Gastric Surgery at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from January 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively collected. The study cohort comprised 147 (36.5%) patients with stage IIIA, 130 (32.3%) with stage IIIB, and 126 (31.3%) with stage IIIC gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer. Of them, 15 (3.7%) were HER-2 positive, 25 (6.2%) dMMR, and 22 (5.5%) patients Epstein-Barr virus encoding RNA (EBER) positive. Based on treatment plans, the patients were divided into immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with chemotherapy group (immune therapy group, n=110, 71 males and 39 females, median age 59 years old) and chemotherapy alone group (chemotherapy group, n=293, 186 males and 107 females, median age 60 years old). All patients in the immunotherapy group received immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting the programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Of them, 85 received pembrolizumab, 10 received sintilimab, 8 received tislelizumab, 4 received camrelizumab, 2 received toripalimab, and 1 received pabocizumab. The adjuvant chemotherapy regimens used among the chemotherapy alone group includes SOX regimen (132 cases), XELOX (102 cases), S-1 monotherapy (44 cases), and other regimens (15 cases). The 3-year DFS rate of the two groups was compared, and subgroup analysis was conducted based on different ages, molecular phenotypes, pTNM staging, extranodal infiltration, and tumor length. Results: The median follow-up was 20.5 months (range 3.1~46.3), with a 3-year overall DFS rate of 61.4% for the entire 403 patients. The 3-year DFS rate for the immunotherapy group was 82.7%, higher than the chemotherapy alone group (58.8%), with a statistically significant difference (P=0.021). Multivariate analysis showed that postoperative immunotherapy was a protective factor for DFS (HR=0.352, 95%CI: 0.180~0.685). Subgroup analysis showed that stage IIIC (HR=0.416, 95%CI: 0.184~0.940), aged ≥60 years (HR=0.336, 95%CI: 0.121~0.934) and extranodal invasion (HR=0.378, 95%CI: 0.170~0.839) were associated with benefit from the combined immune adjuvant chemotherapy, while no association was observed for MMR, HER-2 or EBER status. Conclusion: Stage III gastric/esophagogastric junction cancer patients may benefite from postoperative immune checkpoint inhibitor combined with adjuvant chemotherapy in real-world settings.

Abstract 7623: Biomarker study to personalized neoadjuvant chemotherapy using preoperative gastric cancer specimens of biopsy from the COMPASS trial, a phase II randmazed controlled trial

Abstract Background and Aim: The results of COMPASS, a randomized phase II trial, suggest that preoperative adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen or course for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) does not affect overall survival (OS). However, we hypothesized that some NAC regimens may be more effective for OS on a case-by-case basis. Furthermore, we searched for biomarkers, assuming that further improvement in the outcome of locally advanced GC could be expected if appropriate NAC regimens could be selected using biomarkers before treatment initiation. Materials and Methods: RNA was extracted from endoscopic biopsy specimens of primary tumors collected prior to NAC administration in COMPASS patients, and real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of 127 genes was performed to identify genes with significant (P &amp;lt; 0.05) interaction P values for survival with each regimen and stratified OS with each regimen. Genes were identified and biomarkers were searched at the protein level using immunohistochemical analysis. Results: The THBS1, MSI1, and IGF2BP3 genes were identified as genes whose expression levels significantly (P &amp;lt; 0.05) stratified survival for each regimen and had significant (P &amp;lt; 0.05) interaction P values. Furthermore, a strong correlation was observed between each gene and THBS1, MSI1, and IGF2BP protein expression by immunohistochemical analysis, confirming that protein expression levels by immunohistochemical analysis are also useful as biomarkers. Conclusion: Using endoscopic biopsy specimens prior to NAC for locally advanced GC, biomarkers were identified to select NAC regimens over predicted OS. The results of this study may guide the conduct of clinical trials of individualized treatment of NAC using biomarkers. Citation Format: Takashi Oshima. Biomarker study to personalized neoadjuvant chemotherapy using preoperative gastric cancer specimens of biopsy from the COMPASS trial, a phase II randmazed controlled trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 7623.

Patients with testicular cancer receiving adjuvant chemotherapy: Compliance with follow-up in the first three years

PurposeThe aim of this study was to investigate the compliance with follow-up in patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for testicular cancer at two academic hospitals. Materials and methodsThe study analyzed 104 patients with testicular tumors who had undergone surgery at least a year before and received ACT between March 2017 to March 2022. The mean follow-up was 29.2±16.2 (12–73) months. Patients were classified as fully compliant (100% compliance), moderately compliant (50–99%), poorly compliant (1–49%), and non-compliant (no attendance) according to their compliance with the follow-up schedule. ResultsAt the end of the first year, 76% of patients were fully compliant. By the end of the second year, this number dropped to 50%. Furthermore, 25% of patients were identified as non-compliant in the second year and only 4.3% in the third year. When comparing patients who were compliant and non-compliant at first- and second-year follow-up, no statistically significant difference was found according to age, tumor size, disease stage, or ACT regimen (P=0.938, P=0.784, P=0.867, and P=0.282, respectively). ConclusionThis study showed that full compliance with follow-up gradually decreased over the years and that the factors examined were not able to predict this decrease. Prospective studies can help design individualized education and follow-up programs, considering each patient's tumor stage. Level of evidence3.

Machine learning reveals diverse cell death patterns in lung adenocarcinoma prognosis and therapy

Cancer cell growth, metastasis, and drug resistance pose significant challenges in the management of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, there is a deficiency in optimal predictive models capable of accurately forecasting patient prognoses and guiding the selection of targeted treatments. Programmed cell death (PCD) pathways play a pivotal role in the development and progression of various cancers, offering potential as prognostic indicators and drug sensitivity markers for LUAD patients. The development and validation of predictive models were conducted by integrating 13 PCD patterns with comprehensive analysis of bulk RNA, single-cell RNA transcriptomics, and pertinent clinicopathological details derived from TCGA-LUAD and six GEO datasets. Utilizing the machine learning algorithms, we identified ten critical differentially expressed genes associated with PCD in LUAD, namely CHEK2, KRT18, RRM2, GAPDH, MMP1, CHRNA5, TMPRSS4, ITGB4, CD79A, and CTLA4. Subsequently, we conducted a programmed cell death index (PCDI) based on these genes across the aforementioned cohorts and integrated this index with relevant clinical features to develop several prognostic nomograms. Furthermore, we observed a significant correlation between the PCDI and immune features in LUAD, including immune cell infiltration and the expression of immune checkpoint molecules. Additionally, we found that patients with a high PCDI score may exhibit resistance to immunotherapy and standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; however, they may benefit from other FDA-supported drugs such as docetaxel and dasatinib. In conclusion, the PCDI holds potential as a prognostic signature and can facilitate personalized treatment for LUAD patients.

Optimal duration of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with different risk factors for stage II-III colon cancer: a meta-analysis.

The duration of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in high-risk stage II, low-risk stage III, and high-risk stage III colon cancer (CC) patients is controversial. To reduce the risk of adverse events (AEs) without compromising efficacy while improving chemotherapy compliance is crucial. The authors searched Cochrane, Embase, Pubmed, and Web of Science databases for articles from inception to August 8, 2023, the main outcomes were disease-free survival, overall survival, chemotherapy completion rates, and AE frequency. Six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 10332 patients were included. Disease-free survival analysis revealed that only the high-risk stage III CC patients experienced better results with the 6-month FOLFOX regimen when compared with the 3-month regimen [Hazard ratio (HR): 1.32, 95% CI: 1.15-1.51, P <0.0001). Overall survival (OS) analysis revealed that extending the use of FOLFOX and CAPEOX regimens did not provide survival benefits for stage III CC patients (HR: 1.16, 95% CI: 0.9-1.49, and HR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.67-1.18, P =0.40). The completion rate of the 3-month oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was significantly higher than that of the 6-month regimen [Relative risk (RR): 1.16, 95% CI: 1.06-1.27, P =0.002]. Moreover, the 3-month regimen had significantly lower AE rates than the 6-month regimen (RR: 0.62, 95% CI: 0.57-0.68, P <0.00001), with differences mainly concentrated in grade 3/4 neutropenia (RR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.85, P =0.0002), peripheral sensory neuropathy at ≥grade 2 (RR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.38-0.53, P <0.00001), and hand-foot syndrome at ≥grade 2 (RR: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.77, P =0.009). The 6-month FOLFOX regimen should only be recommended for high-risk stage III CC, while the 3-month regimen can be recommended for other stages. A 3-month CAPEOX regimen can be recommended for stage II-III CC.

Survival trends and patient characteristics between 2004 and 2016 for breast cancer in Japan based on the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry.

This is a prognostic report by the Japanese Breast Cancer Society on breast cancer extracted from the National Clinical Database-Breast Cancer Registry of Japan. Here, we present a summary of 457,878 breast cancer cases registered between 2004 and 2016. The median follow-up duration was 5.6years. The median age at the start of treatment was 59years (5-95%: 38-82years) and increased from 57years between 2004 and 2008 to 60years between 2013 and 2016. The proportion of patients with Stage 0-II disease increased from 74.5% to 78.3%. The number of cases with estrogen and progesterone receptor positivity increased from 74.8% to 77.9% and 60.5% to 68.1%, respectively. Regarding (neo-)adjuvant chemotherapy, the taxane (T) or taxane-cyclophosphamide (C) regimen increased by 2.4% to 8.2%, but the (fluorouracil (F)) adriamycin (A)-C-T/(F) epirubicin (E)C-T and (F)AC/(F)EC regimens decreased by 18.6% to 15.2% and 13.5% to 5.0%, respectively. Regarding (neo-)adjuvant anti-human epidermal growth factor-2 (HER2)-targeted therapy, the use of trastuzumab increased from 4.6% to 10.5%. The rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy increased from 37.1% to 60.7%, while that of axillary dissection decreased from 54.5% to 22.6%. Improvements in disease-free and overall survival were observed in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer, but there was no apparent trend in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, or triple-negative breast cancers.

Oncology

The February 2024 Oncology Roundup360 looks at: Does primary tumour resection improve survival for patients with sarcomas of the pelvis with metastasis at diagnosis?; Proximal femur replacements for an oncologic indication offer a durable endoprosthetic reconstruction option: a 40-year experience; The importance of awaiting biopsy results in solitary pathological proximal femoral fractures: do we need to biopsy solitary pathological fractures?; Effect of radiotherapy on local recurrence, distant metastasis, and overall survival in 1,200 extremity soft-tissue sarcoma patients; What to choose in bone tumour resections? Patient-specific instrumentation versus surgical navigation; Optimal timing of re-excision in synovial sarcoma patients: immediate intervention versus waiting for local recurrence; Survival differences of patients with resected extraskeletal osteosarcoma receiving two different (neo) adjuvant chemotherapy regimens; Solitary versus multiple bone metastases in the appendicular skeleton: should the surgical treatment be different?.

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy after total mesorectal excision with selective lateral pelvic node dissection for lower rectal cancer.

50 Background: The standard strategy for lower rectal cancer (LRC) is neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) plus total mesorectal excision (TME) in Western countries. TME with or without lateral pelvic node dissection (LND) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard treatment for LRC in Japan. However, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for LRC after TME without LND remains unclear. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for LRC after TME without LND. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent R0 resection by TME without LND and received adjuvant chemotherapy between 2010 and 2020 at our institution. The inclusion criteria were as follows: age ≥ 20 years; histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma; pathological stage III (UICC 8th); lower rectal cancer (Ra/Rb); patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection without LND and no prior treatment before surgery. We evaluated relapse free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with LRC. Prognostic impact of location, adjuvant chemotherapy regimens, T factor, and N factor on RFS was explored by a multivariate analysis. Results: From a total of 197 patients, 117 patients were eligible. Median age was 65 years (range 26–82) and 54 patients (46%) were male. Tumor location was 67 (57%)/50 (43%) for Ra/Rb and pathologic stage was 47(40%) /61(52%)/ 9(8%) for IIIA/IIIB/IIIC. Eighty patients (68%) received fluoropyrimidine monotherapy (single agent) and 37 patients (32%) received oxaliplatin based therapy (doublet) as adjuvant chemotherapy. The 3-year RFS rate and 3-year OS rate were 70.7% (95% CI, 59.0-81.1%) and 94.5% (95% CI, 89.0-98.1%). The 3-year RFS rates according to tumor location (Ra/Rb) and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (single agent/doublet) were 76.9%/70.7% and 71.8%/68.5%, respectively. The 3-year RFS rates based on pathological stage (IIIA/IIIB/IIIC) were 76.7%/68.4%/64.8%. In a multivariate analysis, T3/4 were identified as an independent poor prognostic factor for RFS (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions: TME without LND followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with LRC demonstrated favorable 3-year RFS rate. adjuvant chemotherapy regimens after TME without LND suggested no additive efficacy of oxaliplatin on RFS.

Patterns of presentation and delivery of care of appendiceal neoplasms in the largest municipal health care delivery system in the United States.

14 Background: Appendiceal neoplasms (AN) are rare tumors with a broad spectrum of referral and treatment patterns. NYC Health+Hospital (HHC) is the largest municipal health care system in the United States. Here, we study patterns of presentation and management of AN in this safety-net setting. Methods: We identified 92 patients in HHC with AN between 01/01/2017 to 07/01/2023. Statistical analyses were performed in Python. Results: There were 38 (41.3%) mucinous neoplasms, 24 (26.1%) adenocarcinomas, 23 (25.0%) neuroendocrine, and 7 (7.6%) ex-goblet cell adenocarcinomas. 16 cases of pseudomyxoma peritonei were identified. The median age at diagnosis was 55 (IQR: 45-65). 49% were Hispanic, and African Americans were the largest racial block (28%). 50% of cases presented as appendicitis. Appendectomy and a second surgical intervention were more common in this group (p&lt;0.001 and p=0.044, respectively). Other surgical interventions included colon resections and cytoreduction ± Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Among the patients with mucinous neoplasm or adenocarcinoma, 35 had multidisciplinary tumor board discussion (15 mucinous neoplasm and 20 adenocarcinomas). The median follow-up period was 22.0 months (95% CI: 11.5-30.7 months). Surveillance modalities included CT (75%), CEA (74%), and colonoscopy (35%). 85% remained within HHC during treatment. 16 patients were planned to have chemotherapy, including 9 pseudomyxoma peritonei cases. 5 patients did not follow through, and the other cases had a median of 10 cycles. The following adjuvant chemotherapy regimens were employed: 50% FOLFOX, 20% FOLFIRI, 20% XELODA, and 10% CapeOX and FOLFIRI. There were 2 cancer-related deaths (pseudomyxomas). Excluding pseudomyxomas, none had evidence of disease at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Minorities and immigrants constitute the majority of the population of HHC. 50% of AN presented as appendicitis emphasizing the need for a robust system to identify these cases. Despite challenges encountered in providing long-term oncological care, HHC has treated and provided vigorous follow-up for this underserved population. [Table: see text]

NRG-GI008: Colon adjuvant chemotherapy based on evaluation of residual disease (CIRCULATE-NORTH AMERICA).

TPS243 Background: Currently, there are no biomarkers validated prospectively in randomized studies for resected colon cancer (CC) to determine need for adjuvant chemotherapy (AC). However, circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) represents a highly specific and sensitive approach (especially with serial monitoring) for identifying minimal/molecular residual disease (MRD) post-surgery in CC patients (pts), and may outperform traditional clinical and pathological features in prognosticating risk for recurrence. CC pts who do not have detectable ctDNA (ctDNA-) are at a much lower risk of recurrence and may be spared the toxicities associated with AC. Furthermore, for CC pts with detectable ctDNA (ctDNA+) who are at a very high risk of recurrence, the optimal AC regimen has not been established. We hypothesize that for pts whose CC has been resected, ctDNA status may be used to risk-stratify for making decisions about AC. Methods: In this prospective phase II/III trial, up to 1,912 pts with resected stage IIB, IIC, and III CC will be enrolled. Based on the post-operative ctDNA status using personalized and tumor-informed assay (SignateraÔ, bespoke assay), those who are ctDNA- (Cohort A) will be randomized to immediate AC with fluoropyrimidine (FP)+oxaliplatin (Ox) for 3-6 mos per established guidelines vs. serial ctDNA monitoring. Patients who are ctDNA+ post-operatively or with serial monitoring (Cohort B) will be randomized to FP+Ox vs. more intensive AC with addition of irinotecan (I) for 6 mos. One cycle of chemotherapy is allowed while awaiting ctDNA testing results for cohort assignment. The primary endpoints for Cohort A are time to ctDNA+ status (phase II) and disease-free survival (DFS) (phase III) in the immediate vs. delayed AC arms. The primary endpoint for Cohort B is DFS in the FP+Ox vs FP+Ox+I arms for both phase II and phase III portions of the trial. Secondary endpoints include prevalence of detectable ctDNA post-operatively, time-to-event outcomes (overall survival and time to recurrence) by ctDNA status, and the assessment of compliance to adjuvant therapy. Biospecimens including archival tumor tissue, as well as post-operative plus serial matched/normal blood samples, will be collected for exploratory correlative research. Active enrollment across the NCTN started in June 2022 with CCTG sites joining in August 2023. Support: U10-CA-180868, -180822; UG1CA-189867; Natera, Inc. Clinical trial information: NCT05174169 .

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Older Patients With Stage III Colorectal Cancer: A Real-World Analysis of Treatment Recommendations, Treatment Administered and Impact on Cancer Recurrence

BackgroundA substantial proportion of patients with stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) are older than 70 years. Optimal adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) for older patients (OP) continues to be debated, with subgroup analyses of randomized trials not demonstrating a survival benefit from the addition of oxaliplatin to a fluoropyrimidine backbone. Patients and MethodsWe analyzed the multisite Australian ACCORD registry, which prospectively collects patient, tumor and treatment data along with long term clinical follow-up. We compared OP (≥70) with stage III CRC to younger patients ([YP] <70), including the proportion recommended AC and any reasons for not prescribing AC. AC administration, regimen choice, completion rates, and survival outcomes were also examined. ResultsOne thousand five hundred twelve patients enrolled in the ACCORD registry from 2005 to 2018 were included. Median follow-up was 57.0 months. Compared to the 827 YP, the 685 OP were less likely to be offered AC (71.5% vs. 96.5%, P < .0001) and when offered, were more likely to decline treatment (15.1% vs. 2.8%, P < .0001). Ultimately, 60.0% of OP and 93.7% of YP received AC (P < .0001). OP were less likely to receive oxaliplatin (27.5% vs. 84.7%, P < .0001) and to complete AC (75.9% vs. 85.7%, P < .0001). The probability of remaining recurrence-free was significantly higher in OP who received AC compared to those not treated (HR 0.73, P = .04) but not significantly improved with the addition of oxaliplatin (HR 0.75, P = .18). ConclusionOP were less likely than YP to receive AC. Receipt of AC reduced recurrences in OP, supporting its use, although no significant benefit was observed from the addition of oxaliplatin.

Risk Factors for Thrombocytopenia Induced by Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Therapy in Patients With Colorectal Cancer.

Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (CapeOX) therapy is used as an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Although oxaliplatin induces thrombocytopenia, the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in oxaliplatin-treated patients with CRC are not well established. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in CapeOX-treated patients with CRC. In addition, we evaluated platelet counts and non-invasive liver fibrosis indices, specifically the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4), during CapeOX therapy in these patients. Between July 2017 and June 2020, we enrolled CapeOX-treated patients with high-risk stage II or stage III CRC at seven hospitals collaborating with the Division of Oncology, Aichi Prefectural Society of Hospital Pharmacists (Aichi prefecture, Japan). In this retrospective study, we investigated patients' backgrounds, laboratory data, concomitant medications, number of cycles of CapeOX and oxaliplatin, cumulative dose of oxaliplatin, and administration period. The cut-off values were calculated using receiver operating characteristic analysis of platelet counts and APRI and FIB-4 scores. Fifty-five patients without thrombocytopenia and 44 patients with thrombocytopenia were enrolled. During CapeOX therapy, the thrombocytopenia group showed a significant decrease in platelet count and a significant increase in APRI and FIB-4 scores compared to the non-thrombocytopenia group. Baseline albumin level ≤3.5 g/dl and platelet count ≤238×103/μl were independently associated with ≥grade 2 thrombocytopenia in CapeOX-treated patients. Baseline albumin level and platelet count may be useful for predicting thrombocytopenia in CapeOX-treated patients with high-risk stage II or stage III CRC.

Evaluation of the predictive effect of PD-L1 expression on survival in early triple-negative breast cancer

Objectives: To find the prognostic factors related to early triple-negative breast cancer to optimize the therapeutic strategies, and explore the influence of programmed cell death ligand-1(PD-L1)expression in early triple-negative breast cancer on its prognosis, so as to provide support for clinical treatment decisions. Methods: Early triple-negative breast cancer patients treated at the National Cancer Center, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences during 1st June, 2009 and 31st Oct, 2015 were enrolled in this study. All the clinicopathological data of patients were collected, and the paraffin sections of the surgical specimens were stained with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2, secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine (SPARC), androgen receptor, PD-L1 and other antibodies by the immunohistochemical method. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression curves were used for survival analysis of relevant clinical and pathological results and nomogram survival prediction models were established to explore the influence of relevant factors on the prognosis. Results: A total of 205 patients with triple-negative breast cancer were enrolled. Ninety patients (43.9%) were PD-L1 positive. The median follow-up time was 63 months. Thirty-seven patients were relapsed or recurrent and 16 patients were dead. The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate and overall survival (OS) rate were 86.1% (95% CI: 81.4%-90.8%) and 93.6% (95% CI: 91.0%-97.6%), respectively, in the general population. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that PD-L1 expression and lymph node metastasis were correlated with DFS and OS (P<0.05). In multivariate analysis, PD-L1 expression was an independent influencing factor of DFS, with PD-L1 positive patients possessing a significant survival benefit in DFS (HR=0.31, 95% CI: 0.13-0.73). Lymph node metastasis was an independent influencing factor of OS, and OS was significantly shortened in patients with positive lymph node metastasis (HR=3.24, 95% CI: 1.15-9.17). PD-L1, lymph node metastasis, menopausal status, Ki-67 index and adjuvant chemotherapy regimen were included to establish the 1- and 3-year DFS and OS nomogram prediction models, resulting in C indices of 0.698 and 0.748, respectively. Conclusions: PD-L1 expression is a predictive biomarker of good prognostic factor in triple-negative breast cancer patients. DFS is significantly prolonged in PD-L1 positive patients and OS also shows a prolongation trend. The nomogram prognosis prediction models have reference values for adjuvant chemotherapy in this patient group.

Major cardiovascular adverse events in older adults with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer treated with adjuvant taxane + anthracycline versus taxane-based chemotherapy regimens: A SEER-medicare study

BackgroundTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive as compared to other subtypes of breast cancer with characteristic metastatic patterns and a poor prognosis. The standard of care for early-stage TNBC is historically anthracycline and taxane-based chemotherapy (ATAX). Despite the effectiveness of this regimen, anthracyclines carry a small but important risk of cardiotoxicity, which is specifically a concern in the older population. This study evaluates major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in older women with TNBC treated with ATAX compared to taxane-based chemotherapy (TAX). MethodsUsing the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified women aged 66 and older with TNBC diagnosed between 2010 and 2015 (N = 2215). We compared patient and clinical characteristics according to adjuvant chemotherapy regimen (chemotherapy versus no chemotherapy and ATAX versus TAX). Logistic regression was performed to estimate the odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs), Kaplan-Meier survival curves were generated to estimate three-year overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS). Cox proportional hazards models were used to analyze OS and CSS while controlling for patient and tumor characteristics. MACE was defined as acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, potentially fatal arrhythmia, and cerebral vascular incidence. Few patients experienced a cardiac death and therefore this was excluded in the analysis. ResultsOf the 2215 patients in our cohort, most patients (n = 1334; 60.26%) received TAX compared to ATAX (n = 881; 39.78%). Patients who received ATAX were not statistically significantly more likely than those who received TAX to experience acute myocardial infarction, cerebral vascular accident (CVA), or potentially fatal arrhythmia when controlling for traditional risk factors. Among patients who experienced MACE, there was no difference in OS or CSS in patients who received TAX vs ATAX. Patients who received ATAX were less likely to develop heart failure than those who received TAX (OR 0.63, 95% CI [0.45–0.88], p < 0.01). Patients who developed MACE and who were > 76 years old had worse OS compared to those who experienced MACE and were age 66–75 years old (HR 1.67, 95% CI [1.07–2.62], p = 0.02). ConclusionAmong older women with TNBC, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy with ATAX was not associated with increased risk of major adverse cardiac events. For those who experienced a cardiac event, there was no difference in survival amongst those who received TAX vs ATAX. Other factors including additional chemotherapy toxicities should be investigated as a potential etiology for the inferior OS previously observed with ATAX vs TAX in older women with node negative or 1–3 positive lymph nodes.