Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

ISG15/GRAIL1/CD3 axis influences survival of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Immunosuppression is a common feature of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) and has been linked to poor overall survival (OS). We hypothesized that upstream factors might negatively influence CD3 levels and T cell activity, thus promoting immunosuppression and worse survival. We used clinical data and patient samples of those who progressed from Barrett's to dysplasia to EAC, investigated gene (RNA-Seq) and protein (tissue microarray) expression, and performed cell biology studies to delineate a pathway impacting CD3 protein stability that might influence EAC outcome. We showed that the loss of both CD3-ε expression and CD3+ T cell number correlated with worse OS in EAC. The gene related to anergy in lymphocytes isoform 1 (GRAIL1), which is the prominent isoform in EACs, degraded (ε, γ, δ) CD3s and inactivated T cells. In contrast, isoform 2 (GRAIL2), which is reduced in EACs, stabilized CD3s. Further, GRAIL1-mediated CD3 degradation was facilitated by interferon-stimulated gene 15 (ISG15), a ubiquitin-like protein. Consequently, the overexpression of a ligase-dead GRAIL1, ISG15 knockdown, or the overexpression of a conjugation-defective ISG15-leucine-arginine-glycine-glycine mutant could increase CD3 levels. Together, we identified an ISG15/GRAIL1/mutant p53 amplification loop negatively influencing CD3 levels and T cell activity, thus promoting immunosuppression in EAC.

Prevalence of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Survivors From Infancy to Adulthood

BackgroundGastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common comorbidity associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), with reported cases of Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma before the age of 25. The prevalence and natural course of GERD in CDH survivors remain uncertain due to variations in diagnostic methods. We aimed to analyse the GERD prevalence from infancy through young adulthood. MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed pH-impedance measurements and endoscopic findings in 96 CDH survivors evaluated as routine care using well established clinical protocols.GERD was defined as an abnormal acid exposure time for pH-MII measurements and as presence of reflux esophagitis or BE at upper endoscopy. Clinical data including symptoms at time of follow-up and use of antireflux medication were collected. ResultsGERD prevalence remained consistently low (≤10%) across all age groups, yet many patients experienced GER symptoms. Histological abnormalities were observed in 80% of adolescents and young adults, including microscopic esophagitis in 50%. BE was diagnosed in 7% before the age of 18, all had GER symptoms. CDH severity, anatomy at the time of CDH correction, alcohol usage, and smoking did not emerge as significant risk factors for GERD. ConclusionsGiven the low GERD prevalence in CDH survivors, a symptom-driven approach to diagnosis and follow-up is warranted. We advise long-term follow-up for all adult patients due to the early onset of BE and the limited evidence available. The longitudinal course and impact of GERD on other long-term CDH-related comorbidities should be explored in larger cohorts. Level of EvidenceNot applicable

Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment in PD-L1-negative gastroesophageal cancer tumors.

e16062 Background: We aimed to investigate whether there is a subgroup of patients with gastroesophageal cancers who, despite having IHC-PD-L1 negative tumors, might still benefit from ICI treatment. Furthermore, the impact of ICI treatment on patients with tumors that are PD-L1 negative by IHC but exhibit high CD274 (PD-L1) expression remains undefined. Methods: 1,416 esophageal adenocarcinomas (EA), 486 esophageal squamous carcinomas (ES), 859 esophagogastric junction adenocarcinomas (EJA), and 1,613 gastric adenocarcinoma (GA) samples were analyzed using NGS of DNA (NextSeq, 592 genes and NovaSeq, WES) and RNA (NovaSeq, WTS) (Caris Life Sciences, Phx, AZ). PD-L1 IHC positivity was defined as > 1% CPS (Agilent's 22c3). Correlation between PD-L1 CPS and CD274 expression (transcripts per million – TPM) were assessed by Spearman’s coefficient. Tumors were divided into CD274-H (high expression) and CD274-L (low expression) cohorts, representing the top 25% and bottom 25% of expression levels, respectively. Real-world overall survival (OS) data were obtained from insurance claims records and analyzed using Cox proportional hazards with hazard ratios (HR) and log-rank tests. Results: Weak correlations were observed between PD-L1 CPS and CD274 expression in adenocarcinoma histology tumors (EA: 0.374, EJA: 0.358, GA: 0.387), while a stronger correlation was found in squamous tumors (ES: 0.537). Median CD274 expression was significantly higher in PD-L1+ compared to PD-L1- ES tumors (2.65-fold) and in EA (1.68-fold), EJA (1.92-fold), and GA (1.96-fold) tumors (p < 0.001). In PD-L1 IHC-negative ES, there was no association between CD274-H expression and OS (H 12.4 vs L 10.6 mo; HR 0.90, p = 0.48). However, in adenocarcinomas, CD274-H showed a slightly improved OS (12.8 vs 11.3 mo; HR 0.79, p < 0.05). CD274-H trended towards worse post-Carboplatin/paclitaxel (CP) OS (ES: 13.8 vs 18.2 mo; HR 1.60; p = 0.22; Adenocarcinoma: 18.2 vs 27.4 mo; HR 1.50, p = 0.19). Interestingly, CD274-H was associated with improved post-CP/nivolumab survival in ES (96.5 vs 28 mo; HR 0.32; p = 0.047), with a similar but not statistically significant pattern in Adenocarcinoma EGC (Not Reached vs 30.2 mo; HR 0.39, p = 0.23). Furthermore, in CD274-L GEC, there was no difference in post-treatment survival with the addition of Nivolumab to CP (Squamous: 30 vs 18.2 mo; HR 0.91, p = 0.83; Adenocarcinoma: 30.2 vs 27.4 mo; HR 1.14; p = 0.76). In contrast, CD274-H showed improved survival with the addition of Nivolumab (Squamous: 96.5 mo vs 13.8 mo; HR 0.15; p = 0.01; Adenocarcinoma: NR vs 18.2 mo; HR 0.30; p = 0.08). Conclusions: High CD274 expression was associated with improved survival when Nivolumab was added to chemotherapy in patients with PD-L1-negative tumors. Further investigation is needed to confirm the potential benefits of Nivolumab treatment in gastroesophageal cancer patients with tumors that are PD-L1-negative by IHC but exhibit high mRNA expression.

420P Q-TWiST analysis of nivolumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC) in patients with PD-L1 CPS≥1 and CPS≥5: 4-year follow-up from CheckMate 649 (CM 649)

420P Q-TWiST analysis of nivolumab + chemotherapy versus chemotherapy as first-line (1L) treatment for advanced gastric cancer, gastroesophageal junction cancer, or esophageal adenocarcinoma (GC/GEJC/EAC) in patients with PD-L1 CPS≥1 and CPS≥5: 4-year follow-up from CheckMate 649 (CM 649)

Social factors in the receipt of treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer.

e16093 Background: Treatment for locally advanced esophageal cancer consists of chemoradiation (chemoRT) followed by esophagectomy. Studies have suggested Black patients were less likely to undergo surgery for esophageal cancer with inferior survival rates, attributing this to differences in access to surgery. These studies have not always accounted for differences in the natural history of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, which have strong racial correlations and different rates of surgical resection. The current study examined outcomes and patterns of care for patients with locally advanced esophageal cancer, both adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma, in relation to their sociodemographic characteristics. Methods: Patients with clinical stage T2-4, N0-2, and M0 adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus diagnosed between 2010-2021 were included from 11 hospitals across our healthcare system. Treatment decision-points included receipt of chemoRT, unresectable disease after chemoRT defined by metastatic disease or upper mediastinal lymphadenopathy, and receipt of surgery stratified by histology. Age, race, sex, insurance status, socioeconomic status measured by social deprivation index (SDI), and outcome data were collected. Chi-squared test was used for categorical variables and Kruskal-Wallis for continuous variables. Results: 513 patients were included, of whom 472 patients underwent chemoRT (366 adenocarcinoma, 106 squamous cell). Female patients (n =97) were less likely to undergo chemoRT (84% vs. 94%, p = 0.003). Patients without insurance were less likely to undergo chemoRT (86% vs 93%, p = 0.023). After completing chemoRT, 419 patients (82%) were resectable. Surgery was performed in 262/330 patients (79%) with adenocarcinoma and 38/89 patients (43%) with squamous cell carcinoma, reflecting the differences in natural history by histology. Among 330 patients with resectable adenocarcinoma, higher SDI was associated with a lower rate of surgery, while there was no difference in the receipt of surgery based on sex, race or insurance status. There were no detectable social factors associated with receipt of surgery for squamous cell carcinoma. Conclusions: Within our healthcare system, female and Medicaid/uninsured patients are less likely to undergo chemoRT for locally advanced esophageal cancer. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether sex-specific bias plays a role in the receipt of chemoRT. Among patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma treated with chemoRT, those with high SDI are less likely to undergo surgery. Further studies are needed to assess which component factors of socioeconomic status most impact the receipt of surgery so they can be targeted. The previous findings that race impacts treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer are not seen in our healthcare system when accounting for histology.

488P Tumour buds with mesenchymal phenotype are associated with poorer outcomes in gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma

488P Tumour buds with mesenchymal phenotype are associated with poorer outcomes in gastric and oesophageal adenocarcinoma

A phase II/III study of peri-operative nivolumab (nivo) and ipilimumab (ipi) in patients (pts) with locoregional esophageal (E) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma: Results of the neoadjuvant pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (ECOG-ACRIN EA2174).

4000 Background: E/GEJ adenocarcinoma has a high mortality rate despite curative intent therapy. Although the use of immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) in combination with chemotherapy in the metastatic setting and as adjuvant monotherapy both confer survival benefits, its role in combination with neoadjuvant chemoradiation or with other ICIs in the adjuvant setting remains unclear. Here we report the impact of nivo on pCR rate in pts with E/GEJ adenocarcinoma receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiation as part of the EA2174 clinical trial. Methods: Pts with a localized T1N1-3M0 or T2-3N0-2M0 E/GEJ adenocarcinoma with an ECOG PS of 0-1 and deemed surgical candidates for an esophagectomy were eligible. In step 1, pts were randomized to neoadjuvant therapy with carboplatin AUC 2 and paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) weekly x 5 along with 41.4-50.4 Gy radiation without (Arm A) or with (Arm B) nivo 240 mg IV during weeks 1 and 3 of treatment, followed by esophagectomy. Pts underwent a second randomization (step 2) to 6-12 months of adjuvant nivo with or without 6 months of ipi. Planned accrual for step 1 was 278 pts. The primary neoadjuvant endpoint was pCR rate with H0= 23% vs HA= 38%, 90% power, one-sided α = 0.10. The primary adjuvant endpoint comparing nivo to nivo/ipi is disease free survival and will be reported separately once data are mature. Results: Between May 2019 and Dec 2022, 275 pts were enrolled to step 1 of the study (Arm A, n = 138; Arm B, n = 137). Male = 89.5%; White = 92%, Asian = 2.2%, Black 1.5%; median age 65.5 years; E = 60.4%, GEJ = 39.3%. Only 78.5% of pts proceeded to surgery (Arm A = 76.1%, Arm B 81.0%). The pCR rate in Arm A was 21.0% (95% CI, 14.5-28.8) and in Arm B was 24.8% (95% CI, 17.8-32.9), showing no statistically significant difference (p = 0.27). Surgical complication rates between the two arms were similar (Arm A = 28.7%, Arm B = 25.4%). Grade (G) 3/4 events occurring in at least 5% of pts on Arm A—anemia (n = 7), dysphagia (n = 9), esophagitis (n = 7), decreased lymphocytes (n = 80), decreased neutrophils (n = 7); decreased white blood cells (n = 20). G3/4 events occurring in at least 5% of pts on Arm B—anemia (n = 10), dysphagia (n = 8), nausea (n = 8), decreased lymphocytes (n = 84), decreased neutrophils (n = 20), decreased white blood cells (n = 31). Three treatment related deaths occurred on Arm A and two on Arm B. There were no notable differences in chemotherapy or radiation exposure between the two arms. Conclusions: The addition of nivo to neoadjuvant carboplatin, paclitaxel and radiation does not improve the pCR rate in pts with resected E/GEJ adenocarcinoma. Given the known benefit of the addition of ICI to chemotherapy, a further understanding of the impact of radiation on ICI activity is needed. Clinical trial information: NCT03604991 .

Neoadjuvant immuno-chemo-radiotherapy in operable esophageal and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with carboplatin, paclitaxel plus radiotherapy and avelumab (anti-PDL1 antibody): Neo-CREATE trial.

4086 Background: Neoadjuvant CROSS regimen followed by adjuvant nivolumab or perioperative FLOT are current standards of care for patients with curable esophageal/ gastroesophageal (GEJ) junction adenocarcinoma. We hypothesized that adding avelumab to neoadjuvant chemo-radiation (CRT-A) before surgery can further improve outcomes. Methods: Patients with cT1-3 and N0/N1 M0 esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinomas eligible for curative surgery received weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel concurrently with radiotherapy (41.4 Gy in 23 fractions) and bi-weekly avelumab (5 doses). The trial had a run-in phase of 10 patients to evaluate feasibility and safety and a planned futility analysis after 15 patients have undergone surgery. The primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) (Mandard criteria) by central pathology review, secondary endpoints were major histological response and survival outcomes. Using an A’hern single stage design for efficacy forty-seven patients were required to rule out a lower limit of a 20% pCR rate (p0) and to demonstrate an increase to a 40% pCR rate (p1), with 90% power and significance level α=0.05. Tissue, blood, and stool samples were collected for corelative analysis. Results: 48 patients were enrolled between Sept 2019 to Oct 2022 across seven Australian sites. Median age 65 [44-81], 95% were male (n=45), with majority of cancers being esophageal/GEJ type I (n = 35), with GEJ type II (n = 13). Forty-seven (97%) patients completed CRT -A and 46 (95%) had surgery. CRT-A was well tolerated, with two patients having > grade 2 adverse event of interest in the form of myocarditis attributed to avelumab. Notable toxicities included grade 2-4 myocarditis (4%), anastomotic leak (4%), infection (6%) and diarrhoea (6%). In 44 evaluable patients, pCR was 23%. MHR was 58.3% (95% CI, 43.3%-72.1%), complete or near complete response (Tumor Regression Grade 1-2) was 31%. Overall, 1-yr disease free survival was 83.8% and OS was 91.2%. 1-yr disease free survival was 91.7% for patients with MHR vs 73.3% without MHR, p=0.20. Conclusions: Combining avelumab with neoadjuvant CRT is feasible in patients with acceptable tolerability in locally advanced esophageal/ GEJ adenocarcinoma. Avelumab with CRT is active however observed pCR rate does not represent a signal of substantial improvement compared to historical controls. Exploratory analysis suggests improved outcomes in patients with optimal tumour regression after neoadjuvant CRT-A. Exploratory biomarker work to corelate with outcomes is underway. Clinical trial information: ACTRN12619000288123.

CLARITY-PanTumor01: A phase 2 trial of the claudin 18.2-specific antibody-drug conjugate AZD0901 (CMG901) in patients with CLDN18.2-expressing advanced solid tumors.

TPS3163 Background: Gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) and pancreatic cancer are associated with poor outcomes and high unmet need. Claudin 18.2 (CLDN18.2) is highly expressed in gastric, esophageal, and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), and is a clinically validated target. AZD0901 is a potential first-in-class antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) comprising a humanized anti-CLDN18.2 IgG1 antibody conjugated via a protease-cleavable linker to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), a cytotoxic microtubule-disrupting agent. Interim results from the ongoing, first-in-human, Phase 1 trial of AZD0901 monotherapy in patients with G/GEJ cancer (NCT04805307) who were refractory to and/or intolerant of standard therapies demonstrated promising efficacy and a manageable safety profile. Here we describe an ongoing, Phase 2 study of AZD0901 in patients with CLDN18.2-expressing advanced solid tumors, including G/GEJ cancer and PDAC. Methods: This open-label, multicenter study (NCT06219941) comprises multiple substudies. Substudy 1 is recruiting patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative, CLDN18.2-expressing G/GEJ cancer with ≤2 prior lines of therapy for unresectable or metastatic disease, who are randomized 1:1 to receive AZD0901 1.8 or 2.2 mg/kg intravenous (IV) every 3 weeks (Q3W). Substudy 2 is recruiting patients with previously untreated CLDN18.2-expressing metastatic PDAC to receive AZD0901 (up to 2.2 mg/kg IV Q3W) and either a combination of 5-fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 Q2W, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 or l-leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 2 Q2W, and irinotecan 150 or 180 mg/m2 or nanoliposomal irinotecan 50 mg/m2 IV on Day 1 Q2W (Arm 1), or gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 8 Q3W (Arm 2), per investigator’s choice. Treatment continues until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Eligible patients are aged ≥18 years with histologically confirmed, unresectable or metastatic disease, ≥1 measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) v1.1, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1. Key exclusion criteria include unstable and/or active peptic ulcer disease or digestive tract bleeding, ascites requiring drainage, central nervous system metastases, and prior exposure to an MMAE-based ADC or CLDN-18.2-targeted agents other than an anti-CLDN18.2 targeted monoclonal antibody. Primary endpoints include safety, tolerability, and objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate, best change in target lesion size, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics. Recruitment began in December 2023, and sites across Australia, Asia, Europe, and North America will enroll patients. Clinical trial information: NCT06219941 .

Use of artificial intelligence–based digital pathology to predict outcomes for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer.

4013 Background: Accurate prediction of response and survival outcomes with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) remains a significant challenge in gastro-esophageal cancers. In this study, we use an artificial intelligence (AI)-based single-cell analysis of digitized whole-slide H&E images (WSIs) to predict objective response and survival benefit of ICI in two independent cohorts of gastro-esophageal cancer patients. Methods: WSIs were obtained from 82 ICI-treated advanced gastroesophageal cancer patients (gastric, esophageal, and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma) at Stanford University for discovery, and 189 ICI-treated advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients at Southern Medical University for external validation. Deep learning models were deployed for automated tumor area detection and segmentation of cell nuclei within WSIs. We developed a fully automated cell annotation approach by leveraging multiplex immunofluorescence and trained a deep learning model to classify nuclei into four cell types from H&E (tumor cells, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and macrophages). A total of 66 features were computed to quantify cell composition and cell-cell interactions within the tumor microenvironment. Treatment outcomes were assessed using progression-free survival (PFS) and best objective response per the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (v1.1), with statistical significance reported at the 95% confidence level. Results: In the training cohort, a spatial feature characterizing lymphocyte and neutrophil interaction had the strongest association with PFS (hazard ratio = 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.79, P = 0.0046). In the validation cohort, the spatial biomarker positive population had significantly improved PFS compared to the spatial biomarker negative population (hazard ratio = 0.41, 95% CI 0.27-0.61, P < 0.0001; median time to event: 19 months vs 9 months). For predicting objective response in the validation cohort, a multivariate model combining the spatial features achieved AUROC = 0.81 compared to AUROC = 0.65 for PD-L1 CPS (P = 0.0014), while combining the multivariate model with PD-L1 CPS achieved AUROC = 0.84. Conclusions: A single-cell computational pathology approachidentifies spatial biomarkers with predictive utility for determining ICI treatment outcomes in advanced gastro-esophageal cancer. Further validation of these findings is being pursued in additional cohorts.

Descriptive analysis of brain metastases (BM) of solid neoplasms in an academic hospital from a low- and middle-income country (LMIC) with a Hispanic population.

e14015 Background: Multidisciplinary management of BM of solid cancers integrates different combinations of treatment modalities. The scarcity of SRS centers has prevented widespread adoption of this therapy for appropriately selected patients. Methods: One-hundred eighteen (51.7% female, 48.3% male, median age 59 years) BM patients from a National Health Institute from Mexico (INCMNSZ) were included and analyzed. Results: The most common primary tumors were lung and breast cancers (25 cases each, representing 21% of the whole cohort), kidney cancer (14%), male germ cell tumors (10%), metastatic carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP) (5%), upper- and lower- gastrointestinal cancers (5%), thyroid differentiated cancers (5%), followed by melanoma, prostate, ovarian, hepatobiliary cancers and sarcoma (3% each of them) and urothelial carcinoma (2%) being the least common. No biopsy was reported for only one case. The most common histomolecular tumors were adenocarcinoma of the lung (17 cases), renal cell carcinoma (17), triple negative (TN) breast cancer (BC) (9), HER-2+ BC (7), Nonseminomatous germ cell tumor (7), CUP (6), ER+/HER-2+ BC (5), Germ cell tumor with choriocarcinoma (5), small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) (5), melanoma (5), prostate adenocarcinoma (5), thyroid differentiated cancer not otherwise specified (NOS) (5). Rectal adenocarcinoma, high-grade serous ovarian cancer, ER+/PR+ BC, sarcomas and NSCLC (3 cases, each) and urothelial carcinoma (2). Rare tumor subtypes, with one case, each included hepatocellular carcinoma, PR+/HER2+ BC, follicular thyroid cancer, esophageal, gastric and colonic adenocarcinomas, neuroendocrine prostate, neuroendocrine gallbladder, endometrial, large cell neuroendocrine lung carcinomas and cholangiocarcinoma. A solitary BM was present in 44 patients (37.3%), 2-3 BM in 30 (25.4%) and >3 BM in 44 patients (37.3%). 18 patients (15.2%) were not symptomatic at the time of diagnosis. 79 patients were treated with Whole-Brain Radiotherapy (WBRT), ten with a combination of surgery and adjuvant WBRT, seven with surgical resection without radiotherapy, only five included SRS as part of their treatment and seventeen received only supportive care. There was no difference in overall survival (OS) between treatment modalities excluding supportive care (p=0.05). Conclusions: Our experience from a LMIC with Hispanic population highlights that more than 50% of BM metastasize from solid tumors different from lung and breast cancers. Even though SRS has been included in recent guidelines from ASCO and ESMO, WBRT is the option most commonly included in multimodality treatments.

416P Evolutionary and immune microenvironment dynamics determine response to neoadjuvant treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma

416P Evolutionary and immune microenvironment dynamics determine response to neoadjuvant treatment of oesophageal adenocarcinoma

Deep Learning for Histopathological Assessment of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Precursor Lesions

Histopathological assessment of esophageal biopsies is a key part in the management of patients with Barrett esophagus (BE) but prone to observer variability and reliable diagnostic methods are needed. Artificial intelligence (AI) is emerging as a powerful tool for aided diagnosis but often relies on abstract test and validation sets while real-world behavior is unknown. In this study, we developed a 2-stage AI system for histopathological assessment of BE-related dysplasia using deep learning to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of the pathology workflow. The AI system was developed and trained on 290 whole-slide images (WSIs) that were annotated at glandular and tissue levels. The system was designed to identify individual glands, grade dysplasia, and assign a WSI-level diagnosis. The proposed method was evaluated by comparing the performance of our AI system with that of a large international and heterogeneous group of 55 gastrointestinal pathologists assessing 55 digitized biopsies spanning the complete spectrum of BE-related dysplasia. The AI system correctly graded 76.4% of the WSIs, surpassing the performance of 53 out of the 55 participating pathologists. Furthermore, the receiver-operating characteristic analysis showed that the system’s ability to predict the absence (nondysplastic BE) versus the presence of any dysplasia was with an area under the curve of 0.94 and a sensitivity of 0.92 at a specificity of 0.94. These findings demonstrate that this AI system has the potential to assist pathologists in assessment of BE-related dysplasia. The system’s outputs could provide a reliable and consistent secondary diagnosis in challenging cases or be used for triaging low-risk nondysplastic biopsies, thereby reducing the workload of pathologists and increasing throughput.

Design and Evaluation of ScanCap: A Low-Cost, Reusable Tethered Capsule Endoscope with Blue-Green Illumination Imaging for Unsedated Screening and Early Detection of Barrett's Esophagus.

Esophageal carcinoma is the sixth-leading cause of cancer death worldwide. A precursor to esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) is Barrett's Esophagus (BE). Early-stage diagnosis and treatment of esophageal neoplasia (Barrett's with high-grade dysplasia/intramucosal cancer) increase the five-year survival rate from 10% to 98%. BE is a global challenge; however, current endoscopes for early BE detection are costly and require extensive infrastructure for patient examination and sedation. We describe the design and evaluation of the first prototype of ScanCap, a high-resolution optical endoscopy system with a reusable, low-cost tethered capsule, designed to provide high-definition, blue-green illumination imaging for the early detection of BE in unsedated patients. The tethered capsule (12.8 mm diameter, 35.5 mm length) contains a color camera and rotating mirror and is designed to be swallowed; images are collected as the capsule is retracted manually via the tether. The tether provides electrical power and illumination at wavelengths of 415 nm and 565 nm and transmits data from the camera to a tablet. The ScanCap prototype capsule was used to image the oral mucosa in normal volunteers and ex vivo esophageal resections; images were compared to those obtained using an Olympus CV-180 endoscope. Images of superficial capillaries in intact oral mucosa were clearly visible in ScanCap images. Diagnostically relevant features of BE, including irregular Z-lines, distorted mucosa, and dilated vasculature, were clearly visible in ScanCap images of ex vivo esophageal specimens.

Association Between Body Mass Index (BMI) and Occurrence of Esophageal Cancer

Aim: Esophageal cancer, one of the leading causes of cancer deaths globally, has been linked to body mass index (BMI). Studies have shown varying associations between BMI and different subtypes of esophageal cancer, namely adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. However, there is limited literature from Pakistan on this topic. This study aims to investigate the association between BMI and the occurrence of esophageal cancer in a Pakistani population. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted at the Oncology Department of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Center, Pakistan. Participants included patients over 18 years old with suspected adenocarcinoma or squamous carcinoma of the esophagus. The study utilized a non-probability consecutive sampling technique, and data was collected using a predefined proforma. The association between BMI and types of esophageal carcinoma was analyzed using Chi-square tests. Results: The study found a statistically significant relationship between increasing BMI and the risk of developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Conversely, a lower BMI was associated with a higher risk of squamous cell carcinoma. These findings align with existing literature that suggests different BMI associations with esophageal cancer subtypes. Conclusion: This study underscores the distinct relationships between BMI and different types of esophageal cancer. It highlights the importance of considering BMI as a factor in the risk assessment for esophageal cancer, particularly in the Pakistani population. Keywords: Esophageal Cancer, Body Mass Index (BMI), Adenocarcinoma, Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Multicenter, Prospective Trial of Nonendoscopic Biomarker-Driven Detection of Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma.

Preliminary data suggest that an encapsulated balloon (EsoCheck), coupled with a 2 methylated DNA biomarker panel (EsoGuard), detects Barrett's esophagus (BE) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) with high accuracy. The initial assay requires sample freezing upon collection. The purpose of this study was to assess a next-generation EsoCheck sampling device and EsoGuard assay in a much-enlarged multicenter study clinically enhanced by using a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988-compliant assay and samples maintained at room temperature. Cases with nondysplastic BE (NDBE), dysplastic BE (indefinite for dysplasia, low-grade dysplasia, high-grade dysplasia), EAC, junctional adenocarcinoma, plus endoscopy controls without esophageal intestinal metaplasia, were prospectively enrolled. Medical assistants at 6 institutions delivered the encapsulated balloon per orally with inflation in the stomach. The inflated balloon sampled the distal 5 cm of the esophagus and then was deflated and retracted into the capsule, preventing sample contamination. EsoGuard bisulfite sequencing assayed levels of methylated vimentin and methylated cyclin A1. A total of 243 evaluable patients-88 cases (median age 68 years, 78% men, 92% White) and 155 controls (median age 57 years, 41% men, 88% White)-underwent adequate EsoCheck sampling. The mean procedural time was approximately 3 minutes. Cases included 31 with NDBE, 16 with indefinite for dysplasia/low-grade dysplasia, 23 with high-grade dysplasia, and 18 with EAC/junctional adenocarcinoma. Thirty-seven NDBE and dysplastic BE cases (53%) were short-segment BE (<3 cm). Overall sensitivity was 85% (95% confidence interval 0.78-0.93) and specificity was 85% (95% confidence interval 0.79-0.90). Sensitivity for NDBE was 84%. EsoCheck/EsoGuard detected 100% of cancers (n = 18). EsoCheck/EsoGuard demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity in detecting BE and BE-related neoplasia.

Long- vs short-segment Barrett's esophagus-derived adenocarcinoma: clinical features and outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection.

The incidence of Barrett's esophageal adenocarcinoma (BEA) is increasing, and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been frequently performed for its treatment. However, the differences between the characteristics and ESD outcomes between short- and long-segment BEA (SSBEA and LSBEA, respectively) are unclear. We compared the clinicopathological characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes of ESD between both groups. We retrospectively reviewed 155 superficial BEAs (106 SSBEAs and 49 LSBEAs) treated with ESD in 139 patients and examined their clinicopathological features and ESD outcomes. SSBEA and LSBEA were classified based on whether the maximum length of the background mucosa of BEA was < 3cm or ≥ 3cm, respectively. Compared with SSBEA, LSBEA showed significantly higher proportions of cases with the macroscopically flat type (36.7% vs. 5.7%, p < 0.001), left wall location (38.8% vs. 11.3%, p < 0.001), over half of the tumor circumference (20.4% vs. 1.9%, p < 0.001), and synchronous lesions (17.6% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). Compared with SSBEA, regarding ESD outcomes, LSBEA showed significantly longer resection duration (91.0min vs. 60.5min, p < 0.001); a lower proportion of submucosal invasion (14.3% vs. 29.2%, p = 0.047), horizontal margin negativity (79.6% vs. 94.3%, p = 0.0089), and R0 resection (69.4% vs. 86.8%, p = 0.024); and a higher proportion of post-procedural stenosis cases (10.9% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.027). The 5-year cumulative incidence of metachronous cancer in patients without additional treatment was significantly higher for LSBEA than for SSBEA (25.0% vs. 0%, p < 0.001). The clinicopathological features of LSBEA and SSBEA and their treatment outcomes differed in many aspects. As LSBEAs are difficult to diagnose and treat and show a high risk of metachronous cancer development, careful ESD and follow-up or eradication of the remaining BE may be required.

The pluripotency factor NANOG contributes to mesenchymal plasticity and is predictive for outcome in esophageal adenocarcinoma

BackgroundDespite the advent of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT), overall survival rates of esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) remain low. A readily induced mesenchymal transition of EAC cells contributes to resistance to CRT.MethodsIn this study, we aimed to chart the heterogeneity in cell state transition after CRT and to identify its underpinnings. A panel of 12 esophageal cultures were treated with CRT and ranked by their relative epithelial-mesenchymal plasticity. RNA-sequencing was performed on 100 pre-treatment biopsies. After RNA-sequencing, Ridge regression analysis was applied to correlate gene expression to ranked plasticity, and models were developed to predict mesenchymal transitions in patients. Plasticity score predictions of the three highest significant predictive models were projected on the pre-treatment biopsies and related to clinical outcome data. Motif enrichment analysis of the genes associated with all three models was performed.ResultsThis study reveals NANOG as the key associated transcription factor predicting mesenchymal plasticity in EAC. Expression of NANOG in pre-treatment biopsies is highly associated with poor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation, the occurrence of recurrences, and median overall survival difference in EAC patients (>48 months). Perturbation of NANOG reduces plasticity and resensitizes cell lines, organoid cultures, and patient-derived in vivo grafts.ConclusionsIn conclusion, NANOG is a key transcription factor in mesenchymal plasticity in EAC and a promising predictive marker for outcome.

Associations between “Cancer Risk”, “Inflammation” and “Metabolic Syndrome”: A Scoping Review

Background: Individuals with metabolic syndrome exhibit simultaneously pro-thrombotic and pro-inflammatory conditions which more probably can lead to cardiovascular diseases progression, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and some types of cancer. The present scoping review is aimed at highlighting the association between cancer risk, inflammation, and metabolic syndrome. Methods: A search strategy was performed, mixing keywords and MeSH terms, such as “Cancer Risk”, “Inflammation”, “Metabolic Syndrome”, “Oncogenesis”, and “Oxidative Stress”, and matching them through Boolean operators. A total of 20 manuscripts were screened for the present study. Among the selected papers, we identified some associations with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, esophageal adenocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and cancer in general. Conclusions: Cancer and its related progression may also depend also on a latent chronic inflammatory condition associated with other concomitant conditions, including type 2 diabetes mellitus, metabolic syndrome, and obesity. Therefore, prevention may potentially help individuals to protect themselves from cancer.

Disentangling oncogenic amplicons in esophageal adenocarcinoma

Esophageal adenocarcinoma is a prominent example of cancer characterized by frequent amplifications in oncogenes. However, the mechanisms leading to amplicons that involve breakage-fusion-bridge cycles and extrachromosomal DNA are poorly understood. Here, we use 710 esophageal adenocarcinoma cases with matched samples and patient-derived organoids to disentangle complex amplicons and their associated mechanisms. Short-read sequencing identifies ERBB2, MYC, MDM2, and HMGA2 as the most frequent oncogenes amplified in extrachromosomal DNAs. We resolve complex extrachromosomal DNA and breakage-fusion-bridge cycles amplicons by integrating of de-novo assemblies and DNA methylation in nine long-read sequenced cases. Complex amplicons shared between precancerous biopsy and late-stage tumor, an enrichment of putative enhancer elements and mobile element insertions are potential drivers of complex amplicons’ origin. We find that patient-derived organoids recapitulate extrachromosomal DNA observed in the primary tumors and single-cell DNA sequencing capture extrachromosomal DNA-driven clonal dynamics across passages. Prospectively, long-read and single-cell DNA sequencing technologies can lead to better prediction of clonal evolution in esophageal adenocarcinoma.